Agree with this. I told my wife I need to watch it again in a few months before I decide how much I like it.
PDWT_12 said:
Regardless of how you feel about his movies (I personally really like them), WA is pretty well liked and well respected by the actors that he typically works with. Which is why so many of them come back and take roles for a lot less money than they may typically go for.
I totally agree with this take. After a while, I thought that all the actors must have loved doing this quirky and esoteric stuff. But, it wasn't a great movie for the audience. It's not one I'll ever watch again.TexAgs91 said:
This is because movies like these are made more for Hollywood and film school types than the general public.
I saw the movie. There were certain scenes and visuals I thought were really funny but the story wasn't there.
YankeeAg05 said:
I saw it earlier this week and mostly enjoyed it but didn't think it was great. There wasn't really any emotional storyline like in my favorite WA movies. The plot just kind of moves along with the odd story within a story within a story framing. There were a lot of funny lines but I can't say I really cared about any of the characters or their arcs like in Rushmore or Tennebaums or Grand Budapest. About halfway through the movie it started to bother me that all the characters were speaking with a very short, monotone delivery. I know he's had some of that in previous movies so I can't say why it bothered me so much but I also don't recall a movie that every single character spoke with the same pattern.
The day after “Asteroid City” wrapped, Wes Anderson and Bill Murray, who couldn’t be in the film because he contracted COVID, had an idea: Murray would play a character who was cut from the film, in a fake trailer. Watch it here. https://t.co/uk3fV87LA6
— The New Yorker (@NewYorker) July 8, 2023