*** UAP THREAD ***

352,926 Views | 4278 Replies | Last: 7 min ago by TCTTS
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Personal attack? Seriously?

Is there any topic under the sun that can be discussed on this board without people suddenly turning into drama queens?

I posted an offhanded thought about disclosure, you stated an opinion in contrast to mine, then I merely replied.

It's a message board. We're going to disagree on things, and that doesn't mean it's "personal." In fact, I know nothing about you. Good lord.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My favorite part of it was when he flipped from "we have vehicles of non-human origin" to "yeah we've found dead aliens." I mean, are we taking about Roswell here?

Look, I am as skeptical of this as anyone, but I can't think of a motive for these kind of claims. The real "meat" of Grusch's complaint is an agency or program working outside of oversight. The alien side of it is just the icing. I am eager to learn more as this develops.

Entertainment Board is an excellent spot for this topic. Hell, maybe you can turn it into a solid screenplay.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This. The revelation that's going to cause the biggest stink among those who can actually affect some kind of change won't be that aliens exist and that we have in our possession some of their craft. Rather, it'll be that our representatives and defense personnel were left in the dark, that programs were illegally operating outside of their oversight, that laws were brazenly broken, etc. Ironically, that's likely also a reason none of this has been disclosed yet. It's not that society would freak out existentially, it's that the American people would freak out politically; that a select few in our government have been not only been lying to us for decades, but have been intimidating witnesses into submission, and may have even murdered certain individuals to keep it all secret. Basically, a version of the old adage, "It's not the crime, it's the cover-up."
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also, rest assured that the "solid screenplay" part is well on its way. I've been researching/outlining a Roswell movie for a while now, told on multiple timelines ('47, '78, and present day), with a grounded, human/emotional throughline (in other words, not some big sci-fi extravaganza). I've got it all figured out, and am finally about start writing, now that things have slowed down a bit due to the writer's strike.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also, as much as I enjoy poking fun at this subject, I do appreciate all the info you bring, cuz I don't actively go looking for it.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No problem. Ha, trust me, I could post A LOT more on the subject, but I'm already dangerously close to Spyderman territory here, so I try to hold back.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like the entire Grusch interview will finally air Sunday in prime time on News Nation. Again, Grusch was interviewed by Coulthard for close to seven hours, across two different sit-downs, and this obviously won't be all of that, but will cover the highlights in a one-hour special...

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Setting opinions of Seth Abramson aside (he's a leftist whom many on the right can't stand), I'm focused solely on the comments from Republican Representative Tim Burchett…

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That said, Abramson is keeping an incredible, constantly updated account of this story at the link below, with all kinds of links and helpful commentary, from an objective standpoint…

https://sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaking-news-pentagon-whistleblower
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This story really is starting blow up - I'm seeing it *everywhere* and all over social media, including from people who never, ever talk about this kind of stuff - to the point where, even though I'll almost assuredly end up eating my words, this feels like something that could very well keep snowballing into a truly massive ordeal. I'm of course leaving the door open for some kind of crazy psyop, or the possibility that Grusch ends up having a skeleton or two in his closet, but as of now, his credentials are impeccable, and the list of officials vouching for him is only becoming more impressive/convincing. We're getting into unprecedented territory here, and it's kind of mind blowing that it's already gotten this far, this fast. Even in just the reporting, I'm hearing phrasing and discussion I didn't expect to hear in national news media for years, if ever.
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I disagree. To me it's much different today. I started reading up on the topic in the mid to late 90s.

Today however is different because for the first time you have the Pentagon stating and even a recent former President stating publicly there are strange objects violating our airspace moving in ways we cannot explain and we don't know what they are.

It means:
1. They are all lying.
2. Someone on this planet has far advanced technology.
3. We are being visited by an advanced civilization.

We are beyond weather balloons, Venus or sensor malfunctions.
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What we really need is for them to talk about it on The Bachelor then people will take notice…
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seth Abramson's update page on this story is available at https://sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaking-news-pentagon-whistleblower. I think he does a good job of keeping the focus on the language of all the statements, which at this stage is important to parse so that we understand what is actually being claimed. It leads to some jaw dropping insights (emphasis mine):
Quote:

A pre-recorded add-on interview/documentary has been released showing behind-the-scenes images and video from the Ross CoulthartDavid Grusch interview. We learn from this hour-long video the following additional information about Grusch:

  • He was formerly co-responsible for putting together the Presidential Daily Brief
  • He has TS-SCI classified access to over 2,000 Pentagon "special access" programs
  • His public statements come under prior authorizations from the Defense Office Prepublication Security Review protocol (meaning his disclosures are not illegal)
  • He was the "lead investigator" on the Pentagon task force the Department of Defense set up explicitly at the request (up to the demand) of the U.S. Congress
  • He's vouched for, per Coulthart, by "so many people on the inside [of the USAF]"
  • He was interviewed by Coulthart for over seven hours, and not all of what he said was included in the first Debrief report by Kean and Blumenthal

Even more incredible is this revelation: Coulthart, an award-winning journalist, now says that he himself was directed, by a U.S. Navy intel officer named Nat Covitz [ph], to individuals who "were [then] working in what they purported was a secret [Pentagon] program involving the retrieval and attempted reverse-engineering of non-human technology." In other words, Grusch was not the original source for Coulthart's report, but rather a number of people inside the Pentagon who, unlike David Grusch, weren't willing to become named whistleblowers.

Coulthart says Grusch's "allegations" were "verified as both urgent and credible" by the ICIG, which seems to suggest (based on Coulthart's delivery of this information) that it was the UAP-retrieval program allegations that were found credible (see Update #8, above), meaning that no reason was found to discard the allegations as unreliable.

Coulthart implies that these allegations are so widely accepted as accurate inside the U.S. military that a shorthand has already been developed; specifically, "NHI" (for nonhuman intelligence)to discuss them and avoid the use of inexact terms like "alien."

If true, this could mean that NHI will soon be as discussed a term as "AI" already is.
Grusch is the public face of a wider effort to get this information out there. There are others within the Pentagon behind him.

ETA list codes and punctuation for readability.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, in Coulthart's latest podcast episode concerning all of this, he goes into more detail on these other sources - some of them actually involved in the programs themselves - and says they're basically waiting to see how Grusch is treated before potentially coming forward themselves. It almost sounds like Grusch essentially volunteered to be the canary in the coal mine. The episode is just under an hour, but provides a ton of context for this whole thing, so I highly recommend watching/listening for those interested…

Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looking at all of the info suddenly release very publicly over the last few years, the growing 'shamwow WTF' of Skinwalker Ranch*, this pending interview, etc...tin foil hat Garrelli can see a path that is a long-planned and controlled awareness campaign to the public.

*haven't pulled the trigger yet to pay for season 4 on AppleTV but who am I kidding - it'll happen this weekend.

Random edit: These books are right up this alley - Time Life: Mysteries of the Unknown When I was in my teens this bookset was advertised constantly. For my birthday one year my parents signed me up. I think it was something akin to 1 book would arrive per month. At some point during or soon after college they got tossed when my parents moved and were tired of having a lot of my crap in the house. I made the call to toss them - so stupid. I kept 1 or 2 but at some point I realized I accidentally didn't keep the most interesting to me (out of body experiences edition).

Staff - take out the trash.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are just so many questions and thoughts rolling around for me if this is all true. At the top is probably "why all the secrecy?"

Somewhere down the botom of the list is "Should we stop worrying about going to Mars?"
Fenrir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

No problem. Ha, trust me, I could post A LOT more on the subject, but I'm already dangerously close to Spyderman territory here, so I try to hold back.
You crossed the rubicon a long time ago.
JCRiley09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Shout out to all y'all who brought attention to the NatGeo series on UAPs. These weren't weirdos talking about this, it was a bipartisan group of congressional leaders, government officials, and military. I went from more than a skeptic to believer in one day.

Exciting stuff!
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No worse than being an F16 regular. Could you imagine?
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Yeah, in Coulthart's latest podcast episode concerning all of this, he goes into more detail on these other sources - some of them actually involved in the programs themselves - and says they're basically waiting to see how Grusch is treated before potentially coming forward themselves. It almost sounds like Grusch essentially volunteered to be the canary in the coal mine. The episode is just under an hour, but provides a ton of context for this whole thing, so I highly recommend watching/listening for those interested…


I agree, it sounds exactly like Grusch volunteered (or was elected?) to be the whistleblower for the whole group. And possibly because his reputation and credibility appears to be unassailable.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Easily the best docu-series I've seen on the subject. We've moved so far past the Ancient Aliens dude and tinfoil hat days.
Fenrir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

No worse than being an F16 regular. Could you imagine?
Oh noes. I post on a board some.

Back to relevancy though, you're just better at hiding your thoughts regarding alien conspiracy theories than spyderman, that's the only significant difference between the two of you on this subject. Hell I'll admit there is some chance that maybe you end up right but let's not pretend you two don't share the same sources and arguments.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I absolutely do not "share the same sources and arguments" as Spyderman. In fact, I've chastised that dude publicly more times than I can count for the sh*t "sources" he provides (often looney bin YouTube conspiracy junk), and have straight up told him how bad most of his arguments are. He gives this entire subject a bad name, in the most cliched ways possible, and I could not disagree with his approach more.

We both simply happen to be open to the idea that this phenomenon could be real, but that's where our similarities end.
oragator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would love for it to be real, it would be the biggest story in history by light years (pun!), and would redefine our place in the universe, bring us much closer to understanding it all, and a 100 other things. And some of the videos are interesting.
But how is it that a country with less than 2 percent of the earth's area seems to be the one with all the captured or crashed craft? And how would the biggest story in human history have stayed secret for decades? I mean, to the speculation above, Lockheed Martin would have just gotten alien technology that dozens of people would have needed to analyze, and it never got out?
But the real question I keep coming back to…aliens have the ability to travel speed of light probably or faster, technology that we can't fully comprehend or even remotely match based on the videos, and yet they seem to find a way to crash here, maybe a few times. They have an exponentially worse safety record than a discount airline, really? They could likely conquer us but don't, could communicate but don't, could make themselves easier seen but don't, it all stays just murky enough to maybe be real but not truly. Which is how every conspiracy theory has worked for forever.
So for me, gonna take a lot more than what's out there. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

This story really is starting blow up - I'm seeing it *everywhere* and all over social media, including from people who never, ever talk about this kind of stuff - to the point where, even though I'll almost assuredly end up eating my words, this feels like something that could very well keep snowballing into a truly massive ordeal. I'm of course leaving the door open for some kind of crazy psyop, or the possibility that Grusch ends up having a skeleton or two in his closet, but as of now, his credentials are impeccable, and the list of officials vouching for him is only becoming more impressive/convincing. We're getting into unprecedented territory here, and it's kind of mind blowing that it's already gotten this far, this fast. Even in just the reporting, I'm hearing phrasing and discussion I didn't expect to hear in national news media for years, if ever.


You've got a lot more faith in our government than I do.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/republicans-hunter-biden-laptop-former-intelligence-officials/
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oragator said:

But the real question I keep coming back to…aliens have the ability to travel speed of light probably or faster, technology that we can't fully comprehend or even remotely match based on the videos, and yet they seem to find a way to crash here, maybe a few times. They have an exponentially worse safety record than a discount airline, really? They could likely conquer us but don't, could communicate but don't, could mae themselves easier seen but don't, it all stays just murky enough to maybe be real but not truly.
So for me, gonna take a lot more than what's out there.


Navigating the cosmos is nothing compared to the New Mexican desert…it's a real doozy.
Post removed:
by user
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oragator said:

I would love for it to be real, it would be the biggest story in history by light years (pun!), and would redefine our place in the universe, bring us much closer to understanding it all, and a 100 other things. And some of the vie does are interesting.
But how is it that a country with less than 2 percent of the earth's land mass seems to be the one with all the captured or crashed craft? And how would the biggest story in human history have stayed secret for decades? I mean, to the speculation above, Lockheed Martin would have just gotten alien technology that dozens of people would have needed to analyze, and it never got out?
But the real question I keep coming back to…aliens have the ability to travel speed of light probably or faster, technology that we can't fully comprehend or even remotely match based on the videos, and yet they seem to find a way to crash here, maybe a few times. They have an exponentially worse safety record than a discount airline, really? They could likely conquer us but don't, could communicate but don't, could mae themselves easier seen but don't, it all stays just murky enough to maybe be real but not truly.
So for me, gonna take a lot more than what's out there.
All reasonable objections worth considering. I am also a skeptic on this topic, and I can offer some counterpoints.
  • It makes no sense to assume that UAP crashes only occur in the continental US. No one has claimed that. Rather, it seems logical to assume that UAP crashes can occur anywhere on the planet.
  • If Grusch's claim that US retrieval teams have been successfully operating in secret is true, then it seems logical that other countries have organized similar secret efforts.
  • As for FTL travel, I have a big problem with this purely on physics grounds. No counter there.
  • So why would pilots with such advanced technology crash at all? First, why not? Is there any technology that is 100% safe and effective? Second, **** happens, especially the more complicated the technology and/or operating limits becomes. Remember that our technology and planetary environment may be just as alien to them as their technology and planetary environment would certainly be to us.
Just some thoughts.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The hardest thing for me to come to terms with in regards to all this supposed retrieval is how are these secret groups the only ones to find them? If these craft are truly visiting all over the world where are the youtube/insta/twitter posts from some Australian farmer, or Mexican tequila maker, or whoever in BFE Africa, etc? Supposedly, we (the US military) don't know where they come from and don't know how to track them. Am I to assume once they crash anywhere in the world one of these secret groups knows about it and tracks them down before any Joe Schmoe with and iPhone finds it?
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Exactly. Main reason I buy none of this.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Easily the best docu-series I've seen on the subject. We've moved so far past the Ancient Aliens dude and tinfoil hat days.


G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

The hardest thing for me to come to terms with in regards to all this supposed retrieval is how are these secret groups the only ones to find them? If these craft are truly visiting all over the world where are the youtube/insta/twitter posts from some Australian farmer, or Mexican tequila maker, or whoever in BFE Africa, etc? Supposedly, we (the US military) don't know where they come from and don't know how to track them. Am I to assume once they crash anywhere in the world one of these secret groups knows about it and tracks them down before any Joe Schmoe with and iPhone finds it?
(A) Maybe there's nothing very interesting worth looking at in Australia, Mexico, or BFE Africa. And (B), a lot of Australia, Mexico, and BFE Africa is pretty barren, and UAPs seem to be pretty small. We're not talking about crashed Star Destroyers here. Finally, (C) a farmer has been the first to discover a crash site. Admittedly, iPhones didn't exist yet in 1948, but the crash still made nationwide news within a day. (And then the secret retrieval crew showed up, took the evidence, and convinced everyone it was a weather balloon.)
Mr President Elect
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

No problem. Ha, trust me, I could post A LOT more on the subject, but I'm already dangerously close to Spyderman territory here, so I try to hold back.
Haha, I don't think you are near that territory. Just don't start posting obscure youtube videos with only 7 views as if they hold credibility.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

oragator said:

I would love for it to be real, it would be the biggest story in history by light years (pun!), and would redefine our place in the universe, bring us much closer to understanding it all, and a 100 other things. And some of the vie does are interesting.
But how is it that a country with less than 2 percent of the earth's land mass seems to be the one with all the captured or crashed craft? And how would the biggest story in human history have stayed secret for decades? I mean, to the speculation above, Lockheed Martin would have just gotten alien technology that dozens of people would have needed to analyze, and it never got out?
But the real question I keep coming back to…aliens have the ability to travel speed of light probably or faster, technology that we can't fully comprehend or even remotely match based on the videos, and yet they seem to find a way to crash here, maybe a few times. They have an exponentially worse safety record than a discount airline, really? They could likely conquer us but don't, could communicate but don't, could mae themselves easier seen but don't, it all stays just murky enough to maybe be real but not truly.
So for me, gonna take a lot more than what's out there.
All reasonable objections worth considering. I am also a skeptic on this topic, and I can offer some counterpoints.
  • It makes no sense to assume that UAP crashes only occur in the continental US. No one has claimed that. Rather, it seems logical to assume that UAP crashes can occur anywhere on the planet.
  • If Grusch's claim that US retrieval teams have been successfully operating in secret is true, then it seems logical that other countries have organized similar secret efforts.
  • As for FTL travel, I have a big problem with this purely on physics grounds. No counter there.
  • So why would pilots with such advanced technology crash at all? First, why not? Is there any technology that is 100% safe and effective? Second, **** happens, especially the more complicated the technology and/or operating limits becomes. Remember that our technology and planetary environment may be just as alien to them as their technology and planetary environment would certainly be to us.
Just some thoughts.

All great answers. To try and fill in a few blanks…

Expanding on your first point, according to reports, of the craft we apparently have in our possession, at least two of them were either given to us by our allies, or we basically strong-armed them and said "Yeah, we'll take those." In particular, there are rumors of downed craft in Italy and in Brazil that we then brought back to the U.S. Grusch also mentions that we have "landed," intact craft as well, and the rumors there are that at least one if not more of these were found in excavations of ancient sites (obviously meaning these things have been here for thousands if not hundreds of thousands of years). Who knows if any of this is true - it's all admittedly pretty out there - but the point is that there are zero claims that these crashes are only happening in the U.S. In fact, in the Grusch interview excerpts we've seen so far, he specifically hints that Russia has exotic materials as well (hence the mention of a secret, "Cold War" race to try and reverse engineer this stuff before they do - and the "good" news there is, this tech is apparently so advanced that neither of us have been able to crack it yet, not even after all this time).

Quote:

But the real question I keep coming back to…aliens have the ability to travel speed of light probably or faster, technology that we can't fully comprehend or even remotely match based on the videos, and yet they seem to find a way to crash here, maybe a few times. They have an exponentially worse safety record than a discount airline, really?

First of all, echoing G Martin, the more complex a system is, the more opportunities there are for things to go wrong. These beings are obviously incredibly advanced, but they aren't infallible, and no system is perfect. For all we know, say they have some kind of tech or forcefield that shields their craft from lightning, but that forcefield has to drop out for a split second when the craft shifts gravity settings or whatever, and in that split second a bolt of lightning happens to strike the craft, and down it goes. There are myriad issues like that where the tech could be crazy advanced, yes, but not utterly perfect or infallible.

There's also another, more outside-the-box line of thinking, which is that some of these craft *might* have been crashed on purpose. In other words, for whatever reasons, these beings can't yet blatantly make themselves known to us, or have certain self-imposed restrictions in regards to contact, so one "loophole" would be simply crashing these things in remote areas of the world for us to find. One popular line of thought is that "the grays" - the small, gray aliens with big heads and big, black, almond-shaped eyes - are basically not only the "worker bees," but soulless, biological drones of sorts. Almost like controllable, biological, A.I. avatars. If so, they'd also be expendable pilots, and for, say, a sect of aliens who *do* want to make themselves known to us, but in less obvious ways, without technically breaking any potential "rules of engagement," simply having these biological drone beings crash a few craft over the course of 90 years would certainly do the trick. Or, maybe these crashes are "offered" in a way not unlike the monoliths from 2001: A Space Odyssey. As in, they've decided they're not going to straight up give us this tech, hold our hand, and tech us how to use it... but here's some debris/intact craft, and if and when you figure out how to replicate it on your own, you'll be "worthy" of using it.

Again, another crazy idea, but also another possible explanation.

Quote:

They could likely conquer us but don't, could communicate but don't, could mae themselves easier seen but don't, it all stays just murky enough to maybe be real but not truly.

I know this is way, way out there, but… if they had a hand in creating us, or even simply aiding in our evolution, why would they want to "conquer" us? It could very well be that we're part of an elaborate, multi-thousand-year experiment, and again, the entire point is to see how we develop on our own, without their immediate interference.

All I know is that the more I've studied this subject, the more I see how unintentionally bias and assumption-filled many of the simplest questions can be.

People instantly assume these beings come from other star systems/galaxies, and that they're bound by our human, 2023 knowledge of physics. But what if they come from other dimensions or planes of existence altogether (and thus don't have to traverse vast distances)? If not, though, what if our "laws" of physics are merely a result of our limited understanding of how the universe works, and interstellar travel is relatively "easy" once a species reaches a certain technological threshold? People also assume these beings would want to conquer us or destroy or us or at least make themselves known upon discovering us. But what if they had a hand in *making* us? And what if remaining in the shadows is the whole point?

Yes, again, I fully admit how batsh*t some of this sounds, and I'm not saying these questions shouldn't be asked, or that skepticism isn't essential. Because it absolutely is. Trust me, I get it, and I'm not at all giving my full-throated endorsement of any of these theories. I'm simply asking people to have a more open mind about some of this stuff, consider possible alternatives, and try and leave any preconceived notions at the door.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

TCTTS said:

Easily the best docu-series I've seen on the subject. We've moved so far past the Ancient Aliens dude and tinfoil hat days.





I'm not saying that the Ancient Aliens dude isn't still a thing, or that there aren't still plenty of lunatics in this field. My only point is that most of the prominent documentaries/docu-series we see today don't really feature those types anymore, and instead concentrate on the MANY credible government/military officials who are coming forward in the wake of 2017, which is something that didn't happen prior to 2017.
Last Page
Page 2 of 123
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.