All this time I've thought Garland was the guy, but as stated above, it could certainly be Wray.
I just don't know how the power structure works if it's Wray. I can see Wray wanting to do it, but Garland had the power. I guess it's certainly possible Wray told Garland to stop the release of docs, but candidly, I'm not sure Garland needed a push from Wray.
I know this won't happen, but I'd LOVE to see Rosenstein get caught up in this. Nearly everyone else in the Russiagate fiasco is still pushing the conspiracy, but Rosenstein shut up about that a long time ago. Well, I'm not familiar with any of Rosenstein's testimony to congress, but that's damned sure over five years ago.
BTW, according to the docs released by Gabbard, the CIA guys specifically told Brennan NOT to include their names on the new ICA. I'm sure that happened, but is their a law for putting analysts names on docs that specifically said "NO", don't put mine on there?
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.