Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

8,684,991 Views | 50509 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by flown-the-coop
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just a Smartmatic update

Quote:

https://thefederalist.com/2025/05/22/filing-smartmatic-executives-deleted-data-messages-related-to-lawsuit-over-election-reporting/
Darn the luck!
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How would a charge of conspiracy help with this SOL problem? Does the SOL reset when proof of the lie was uncovered? Is the crime's completion when proof is uncovered?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:

How would a charge of conspiracy help with this SOL problem? Does the SOL reset when proof of the lie was uncovered? Is the crime's completion when proof is uncovered?
Limitations begins to run after the LAST overt act of the conspiracy.

I'm Gipper
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:

bobbranco said:

How would a charge of conspiracy help with this SOL problem? Does the SOL reset when proof of the lie was uncovered? Is the crime's completion when proof is uncovered?
Limitations begins to run after the LAST overt act of the conspiracy.
I guess deleting evidence counts. Not that there was any conspiracy. That's just ludicrious. /sarcasm

People should be even more suspicious now.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Blatantly allowing rabid leftists to trample all over the Constitution. The DC Circuit is criminal.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting how the DC circuit never had anything to say about this.

They talk about other stuff that is irrelevant but the bits about Flynn/Comey etc. are very pertinent here.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/bongino-announces-reviews-3-unsolved-mysteries-wh-cocaine-scotus-leak-roe-jan-6-pipe

This seems to be likely to cause some cockraoches to scatter.

Do the D.C. lawfare firms that made deals with the Trump White House to provide many millions of dollars of of legal work for the executive branch now have a conflict of interest that would prevent them from representing individuals that may be targeted by these investigations? Were those deals perhaps made in part to dry-up the supply of lawyers in D.C. a Democrat law firms that would be the attorneys of first result for targets of the DoJ investigations of corruption?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Amazing to view these McCabe/CBS 2020 lies in retrospect.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ulysses90 said:

nortex97 said:

Joffe was knee deep in this going back to Sussman in 2016 and the origin of the 'pee tape' lies ostensibly dug up by fellow ham radio hobbyist Nellie Ohr; claiming they (Fusion GPS atty's) didn't know he was involved/no idea is just…another bold face lie.

Quote:

The origin of the Michael Cohen in Prague is even more convoluted. However, that story connects to the recently highlighted connection between Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann and Rodney Joffe. While working for Perkins Coie, Sussmann also represented Rodney Joffe, a cybersecurity expert referred to in Durham's indictment as "Tech Executive-1." In 2016, Joffe, who has not been previously identified, worked with researchers to collect internet data about the Trump Organization that Sussmann took to the FBI. {Go Deep} You'll see where Joffe surfaces toward the end.
Quote:

In October of 2018 Mrs. Nellie Ohr was questioned by a House committee about her involvement with Fusion-GPS while working as a paid contract agent for the firm. Additionally, she was questioned on: her relationship with the dossier origination; her contacts with Christopher Steele; her role and responsibility within Fusion as it related to the Trump project; and the nature of the communication between herself and the participating players inside and outside of government.

Mrs Ohr invoked spousal privilege
to protect any communication between herself and her husband.
We now know that in 2016 a cybersecurity expert named Rodney Joffe was under contract with Perkins Coie and collaborating with researchers to collect internet data about the Trump Organization that Clinton Lawyer Michael Sussmann took to the FBI.

So we know the FBI was getting research information from Nellie Ohr via Chris Steele, and from Rodney Joffe via Michael Sussmann.

What do Nellie and Rodney have in common? They are both HAM Radio operators. What a coincidence.
Quote:

There is every indication the Michael Cohen visiting Prague story originated from Nellie's research and was passed along to Chris Steele becoming a point in his dossier. An unfortunately named art dealer from New York was likely mistaken for President Trump's lawyer.

Former Senate Intelligence Committee lead staffer Dan Jones was working with Glenn Simpson at Fusion-GPS. Fusion-GPS contracted with Nellie Ohr in "late 2015". This is the exact same time when thousands of unauthorized "contractor searches" were taking place within the NSA/FBI database. This is where the Ham radio comes in handy to receive, share and discuss information from database extraction.

Nellie Ohr then sends research outcomes to Chris Steele for the dossier assembly; and the dossier is then laundered back to Bruce Ohr and FBI for use in their operation against the Trump campaign. Meanwhile, Simpson and Jones are leaking to the media who are writing articles. Nellie then captures those articles to validate material in the dossier; puts the citations on a thumb-drive and gives it to Bruce. Again, it's the same damn origin.

Chris Steele is not defending his lies, he is defending the mistaken research of Nellie Ohr.

For obvious reasons, Chris Steele cannot reveal where he got both points of erroneous information without exposing himself to the legal ramifications that accompany a group of political operatives successfully weaponizing the FBI against a U.S. presidential candidate. This is not conspiracy theory, this is a factual conspiracy.




Of course, it's all just a coincidence she/Joffe developed a mid-life sharp interest in shortwave radio transmissions, and oh by the way is a Stalin apologist;


Quote:

That brings us to Nellie Ohr, holder of amateur radio call sign KM4UDZ. Ohr graduated from Harvard University in 1983 with a degree in history and Russian literature. She studied in the Soviet Union in 1989 and obtained a PhD in Russian history in 1990.

For those of you who may be tempted to read her 400-plus page PhD thesis, here's a spoiler alert: in murdering untold millions, Joseph Stalin may have engaged in some "excesses" which, in her words, "sometimes represented desperate measures taken by a government that had little real control over the country." Translated into simple English, she meant, "Hey, cut the guy some slack. Creating a proletarian paradise can be tough and anybody can get carried away."

She is said to be fluent in the Russian language and an expert on cybersecurity. Her husband is Bruce Ohr, the former number four official in President Obama's Justice Department.

According to a sworn court filing by Fusion GPS co-founder Glenn Simpson, she was hired by that firm to conduct opposition research on behalf of the Clinton campaign against candidate Donald Trump. In his statement, Simpson acknowledged bank records reflect that Fusion GPS contracted with her "to help our company with its research and analysis of Mr. Trump."

At the same time, Fusion GPS retained the services of former British spy and FBI informant Christopher Steele to obtain derogatory information from his Russian sources about Trump. The final Fusion GPS product became the now-discredited eponymous Steele dossier, which James Comey's FBI and Obama's DOJ used to obtain Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to spy on a Trump campaign member.
Who Are Nellie and Bruce Ohr?

The so-called Nunes memorandum by the Republican majority on the House Intelligence Committee states Nellie Ohr was "employed by Fusion GPS to assist in the cultivation of opposition research on Trump" and added that her husband "later provided the FBI with all of his wife's opposition research." Sen. Lindsey Graham has stated publicly that she "did the research for Mr. Steele."

We now know that, before the House Intelligence Committee, Simpson disclosed that he met personally with Bruce Ohr "at his request, after the November 2016 election to discuss our findings regarding Russia and the election." That committee also learned that during the election campaign, Bruce Ohr met with Steele, the dossier's author.

It has also come out that Bruce Ohr failed to report the source of his wife's income from Fusion GPS on his DOJ ethics disclosure forms. Such disclosure is mandatory, and Ohr's omission raises many questions.

For example, under the law, such an omission could be considered evidence tending to prove his consciousness of guilt. Why would he, in effect, conceal by omission his wife's employment by the firm that produced the meretricious Steele dossier that his own employer, the Obama DOJ, submitted under oath to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) for authorization to spy on the Trump campaign and presidency? Was he trying to hide his connections with Fusion GPS? If so, why? And what inference should a jury draw from such concealment?

He is not alone in this regard. What about Nellie Ohr's ham radio license?

Why Did Nellie Ohr Suddenly Become a Ham in 2016?

Ohr is a member of Women in International Security, which describes itself as supporting "research projects and policy engagement initiatives on critical international security issues, including the nexus between gender and security." She has done cybersecurity consulting for Accenture, a politically connected firm, for which she gave a presentation on "Ties Between Government Intelligence Services and Cyber Criminals Closer Than You Think?"

Did she develop an overwhelming middle-aged desire to talk to geeks over the radio?

It is apparent that, between her own professional experience and her marriage to a top DOJ official, she was well aware of the ability of the National Security Agency to intercept and store every communication on the Internet. Did this knowledge have anything to do with her mid-life decision to become a ham radio operator and communicate outside cyberspace?

What Was Happening When Nellie Ohr Got Her License

On May 23, 2016, she received a technician-level amateur radio license. The timing is significant. The presidential campaign was underway and she and her employer, Fusion GPS, were digging for dirt in Russia to use against Trump. Given her cybersecurity knowledge, was Nellie Ohr hoping to use non-cyber short wave communications to hide her participation in that nefarious effort from the NSA?

Recall that, in early 2016, NSA head Admiral Mike Rogers became aware of "ongoing" and "intentional" violations and abuse of FISA surveillance, which he subsequently exposed in testimony before Congress. Thereafter, pressure mounted within the Obama administration to fire him.
If I, a pedestrian frustrated citizen tracking a few blogs/amateur media sites, could put all of this together a few years ago, I'd like to think our geniuses running the Durham investigation etc. might have figured it all out by now, but I hold out no hope they want to/would admit to it if they did.

The theory that Nellie Ohr' FCC license was an indicator that she used amateur radio equipment to communicate information she was afraid to send over the internet never made sense to me as someone who had a technician class license since the early 1990s.

Why bother to get a license from the FCC? Nellie could buy the radio gear and use a spoofed callsign when communicating? There is effectively zero enforcement of FCC regulations requiring one to possess a license except for other Hams reporting rogue operators to the FCC and helping to locate and identify them.

The technician class license only grants privilege to use VHF and UHF frequencies. The 2M (144MHz) and 70cm (440MHz) bands are effectively line of sight communications i.e within a few miles of where she was transmiting. World band HF bands are not included in Technician class license privileges. If you want to communicate more than a few miles you need to use a repeater which means that every operator who monitors that repeater is going to hear you when you key the mic. LoS radio communication makes sense only if you are talking so frequently that it's impractical to drive to the recipient and hand them documents or a flash drive. A burner phone is a better alternative in almost every scenario. If you are worried about the cell tower logs for calls then that same concern would apply to the recorded logs of amateur repeater stations.

Of course, it would not make any sense for Ohr to use voice communication on amateur bands unless she was speaking in code to another callsign. In all likelihood she would have used packet radio which is not a high bandwidth capability in the VHF and UHF bands. Packet transmissions in the 2M and 70cm bands is similar to the baud rate of telephone modems in the 1990s. It is 8-bit message packets which mean that it's nearly useless for transmitting anything but text. Large fles such as images or PDFs would take a longoing and conspicuous time to transmit. Encrypted or coded language communication on amateur radio is a violation of the law and one of the quickest ways to get the Hams that respect the rules to record and inform the FCC is to use encrypted communications.

My point is this, if Nellie Ohr wanted to use radio burst transmission to evade surveillance on the internet or being logged, she would not have bothered to get a license an instead would have used packet radio to send short burst text messages to someone that she communicated frequently in short text messages.
Nellie Ohr lied in testimony about her Ham radio courses/license/dates of classes, among other matters, including her fabricated FSB report, Ukrainian political party, travels to Czech Republic with dear hubby, efforts to get her 'research' to FBI, etc.


Oh btw, she studied Russian history/literature at Harvard. She was not 'under employed' in the spring of 2016 when she studied how to use a ham radio nor is the timing of her acquisition of such a radio/how to use it and testimonial lies about this topic (among other lies) to me still indicate it was used as part of the plot to frame Trump as a Russian collaborator, and later Gen. Flynn in crossfire hurricane.

Her deletion of emails/files as well suggest an intent to hide/mask her communications/role/deceptions that are also amplified by her false testimony.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bqce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Admiral Rogers is definitely one of the good guys.
Larry S Ross
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bqce said:

Admiral Rogers is definitely one of the good guys.



I want to agree, but can someone tell us where has been since his retirement? He is bound to know much more about all that went down. I would think he could shed so much light on so much more of what went down to get Trump.
Zapata23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bqce said:

Admiral Rogers is definitely one of the good guys.


No

This wasn't just some rogue Booz Allen contractor spying on a few people, this was a full blown all hands on deck spy mission on the President Elect and eventually the President, that was initiated in the Oval Office by Barry and company and the head of the NSA let it happen. Rogers and Flynn go back years and he let it happen.

Sorry no
It’s never too late
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've read many times that it was Rogers that ratted out the operation to 'tap my wires' to Trump. He may have been in on some of it to be sure, but I don't know that there's a credible theory he didn't share info with Trump the coup plotters did not want to share.

Trump just, at that time, through mid 2017 at least, had no idea of the volume of folks plotting his impeachment/coup, including of course all the regular names of folks who worked for him (including Rod Rosenstein), and the various corrupt judges on the other side (not limited of course to FISC judges like the lovebird's pal, but also Flynn's inquisitor from the bench, Boasberg etc).

Mark Halperin had a podcast I listened to today, fwiw, that is sort of on point with respect to Trump's intelligence/background. It was with Newt Gingrich, of all people, who pointed out that Trump learned when moving from Queens to Manhattan, early on, that all publicity/media is good, and that he would never be accepted as 'someone on the in crowd.' I think a similar process happened in DC with him after winning the presidency the first time. He's certainly not as dumb as his many detractors/TDS sufferers would like to believe.
Zapata23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97 said:

I've read many times that it was Rogers that ratted out the operation to 'tap my wires' to Trump. He may have been in on some of it to be sure, but I don't know that there's a credible theory he didn't share info with Trump the coup plotters did not want to share.

Trump just, at that time, through mid 2017 at least, had no idea of the volume of folks plotting his impeachment/coup, including of course all the regular names of folks who worked for him (including Rod Rosenstein), and the various corrupt judges on the other side (not limited of course to FISC judges like the lovebird's pal, but also Flynn's inquisitor from the bench, Boasberg etc).

Mark Halperin had a podcast I listened to today, fwiw, that is sort of on point with respect to Trump's intelligence/background. It was with Newt Gingrich, of all people, who pointed out that Trump learned when moving from Queens to Manhattan, early on, that all publicity/media is good, and that he would never be accepted as 'someone on the in crowd.' I think a similar process happened in DC with him after winning the presidency the first time. He's certainly not as dumb as his many detractors/TDS sufferers would like to believe.



That story of his trip to Trump Tower was not what was initially reported. Flynn was in the room and it wasn't what was reported, Roger's was there wanting to be the replacement for Clapper, he didn't tip off anything. According to Flynn it was one of his cronies from the DIA side that let it be known and also dropped a dime on Michigan Mike Rogers who was immediately booted off the transition team.


The NSA had been full blown spying on Trump for over a year before the so called meeting with Adm Rogers, and it was only after Trump won. Like I said it wasn't some rogue Booz Allen guy doing this it was a full blown operation. Those FISA warrants at that level go across the NSA chief's desk. Crossfire Hurricane was an op not some side deal.
It’s never too late
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The question becomes not whether these agencies were spying g on Trump, but instead on who ordered it to happen, and who received the intel.

Truly becoming a moment in history that at nearly 250 years decides what's next.

Why do people, very powerful and influential people, fear Trump so much?!
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

According to Flynn it was one of his cronies from the DIA side that let it be known and also dropped a dime on Michigan Mike Rogers who was immediately booted off the transition team.


I am curious to know where Flynn made these comments. Who would it have been attempting DIA that tipped him off? Surely not the Commanding general?
Zapata23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ulysses90 said:

Quote:

According to Flynn it was one of his cronies from the DIA side that let it be known and also dropped a dime on Michigan Mike Rogers who was immediately booted off the transition team.


I am curious to know where Flynn made these comments. Who would it have been attempting DIA that tipped him off? Surely not the Commanding general?



Flynn has stated as much in multiple interviews, he never mentions by name who it was that tipped him off, but given Flynn ran the arm of military intelligence for years I'm sure he had many loyalists still in place. Steve Cortes corroborated Flynn's claim.
It’s never too late
Zapata23
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It’s never too late
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
flown-the-coop said:

The question becomes not whether these agencies were spying g on Trump, but instead on who ordered it to happen, and who received the intel.

Truly becoming a moment in history that at nearly 250 years decides what's next.

Why do people, very powerful and influential people, fear Trump so much?!
Why? He is a direct threat to their racket.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
whatthehey78 said:

flown-the-coop said:

The question becomes not whether these agencies were spying g on Trump, but instead on who ordered it to happen, and who received the intel.

Truly becoming a moment in history that at nearly 250 years decides what's next.

Why do people, very powerful and influential people, fear Trump so much?!
Why? He is a direct threat to their racket.
One of the few men in our history who defied being bought, bribed, bullied, besmirched and even bloodshed.

The folks against Trump are indeed the real threat to democracy, to the future of our Nation.
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/02/senior-doj-officials-didnt-know-database-allowed-fbi-to-bury-existence-of-russiagate-documents/

Quote:

On Monday, a former political appointee at the DOJ expressed surprise that no one from Special Counsel Mueller's team mentioned the "Prohibited Access" functionality of Sentinel to senior officials.


Drip……drip……drip

All still through alt media. Arguably the biggest political, law enforcement, counter-intelligence, AND MEDIA scandal in U.S. history.

The first and only time MSM will report on this will be if indictments begin, even then, the headlines will be about "Trump's Enemies List" .

Death of a Republic and its Constitution level stuff going on since Obama administration and the Federal Bureaucracy started dealing with reality of the first outsider President in US history in 2016.

Crazy how good this thread was at revealing the malfeasance of the Get Trump government/media operators so soon after it all cranked up.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So, why exactly were the so afraid of Trump? Because he was an outsider, brash, unpredictable? Scared of all the BS that Trump could find out?

They went through all sorts of corrupt actions to get Trump and staff. Would they have done this with any other Republican if they were elected?

I mean really, Trump more closely aligns with their ideology than a lot of Republicans. It's just completely odd to me the hate and corruptness they displayed towards Trump.









Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People really should hang.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BTW, it was Sidney Powell who kept yelling about the misuse of the Sentinel system in the Mike Flynn case. That had to do with Brady and Giglio material. She knew it should have been there despite the FBI saying they didn't have that information.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
policywonk98 said:

Drip……drip……drip

All still through alt media. Arguably the biggest political, law enforcement, counter-intelligence, AND MEDIA scandal in U.S. history.

The first and only time MSM will report on this will be if indictments begin, even then, the headlines will be about "Trump's Enemies List" .

Death of a Republic and its Constitution level stuff going on since Obama administration and the Federal Bureaucracy started dealing with reality of the first outsider President in US history in 2016.

Crazy how good this thread was at revealing the malfeasance of the Get Trump government/media operators so soon after it all cranked up.
They gave a Pulitzer Prize to the reporters pushing the fraud, and ignored the accurate reporting on what happened.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Only 8 people in the US government knew there was a politicalized investigation into Trump. And they made sure it stayed that way.

One of, if not the biggest scandal in US history. And no MSM will do any truthful reporting on it. Sickening.

Quote:

If you want to understand how tempting it was in the early days of CH to use "Prohibited Access" coding to kept the existence of the investigation - and the targets -- hidden, you need to think back to how it was conducted the first six months.

McCabe authorized it and put Strzok in charge, even though Strzok was a HQ Division supervisor and didn't have a squad who worked under him to do the work. McCabe gave him the freedom to handpick the team. Lisa Page was McCabe's "Legal Counsel".

Strzok picked Joe Pientka, an SSA he had known and worked with to supervise the investigation with 4 targets: Manafort, Page, Papadopolous, and 2 week after the others, Flynn.

The two of them picked three Case Agents -- from three different Field Offices. One for Page, one for Manafort, and one for Papadopolos. When Flynn was added the Case Agent for Manafort took on Flynn too since both were in the D.C. area where the Agent was assigned.

So you had Case Agents in Chicago, New York and DC, along with the Supervisor in DC, Strzok in DC, Page and McCabe in DC. Brian Auten was the analyst assigned to work with them - also in DC.

That was it. That was pretty much the entire world of the FBI involved in CH from July 2016 to Jan. 2017.

Using "Prohibited Access" meant that only those 8 people would know what was being memorialized in serialized records in the case file. Anyone else who went looking would not get any indication that any investigation actually existed and was ongoing.


fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/02/senior-doj-officials-didnt-know-database-allowed-fbi-to-bury-existence-of-russiagate-documents/

Quote:

https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/02/latest-fbi-revelations-show-the-mueller-special-counsel-was-a-cover-up-and-much-more/

Quote:

https://thefederalist.com/2025/06/03/u-s-attorney-vetting-evidence-of-biden-corruption-did-not-know-of-fbis-ability-to-hide-documents/

FWIW, The Federalist has these three really excellent articles about this whole thing. I wasn't going to put anything here until it got to three different explanations.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We don't have many pictures or any testimony still from Pientka, whom I believe even today works for the lovely FBI. He's the one on the left in swat gear here;
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If he is still in the FBI that is more beneficial for getting good testimony out of him since he could still see classified info.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Drip... New name to add to corrupt government CH.

TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025-02-25-CEG-RHJ-to-DOJ-FBI-Violations.pdf
Quote:

Although Special Agent Giardina was assigned to the Mueller investigation's "Team R,"
he would've most likely had access to or been made aware of information from "Team 10," the
reported investigation that formed the basis of the Washington Post reporting. We asked the
Justice Department and FBI whether they had opened a media leak investigation into personnel
assigned to the Mueller team. We never received a response from the Biden administration.

First Page Last Page
Page 1418 of 1444
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.