GAC06 said:
WestTexAg12 said:
GAC06 said:
Marksmanship isn't very important for any officer, and utterly meaningless for a general
You must be a POG. It's highly important for a grunt.
I'm someone that realizes that a Marine officer's utility is not tied to his rifle marksmanship, and it's utterly irrelevant for a freaking four star general.
Maybe I was a crappy harrier pilot and couldn't put bombs on target but hey at least I could shoot expert right? So dumb. If a couple LCpl's want to puff their chests out and make fun of each other over a shooting badge they're welcome to do so.
No offense, but I've been around plenty of Marine pilots that couldn't care less about marksmanship, among other fundamentals that make the Marine Corps what it is. I've seen pilots piss and moan because they had to go to the range for their annual quals. I've even seen pilots show up at the range in their flight suits.
We get it. You don't typically handle weapons, much less rifles. However, when it comes time when you become career designated and subsequently command slated, your official portrait says a lot about you. We enlisted tend to view "lead by example" as being pretty important. CO's set the standard. If you can't shoot for crap as a Marine, what are your expectations for the LCpl's in your command?
With this general being in the combat arms, there's no excuse for him to not have several expert quals - especially since his days of shooting were much earlier in his career.