Mike Lindell hoisted by his own petard

20,847 Views | 154 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by J. Walter Weatherman
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Anonymous Source • 4:20p, 6/3/25
Because they threw the evidence away.

Reply Quote
4
Anonymous Source
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 4:27p, 6/3/25
S
Im Gipper said:
Because they threw the evidence away.

Who knew that Satan had a janitorial gig?
Gig 'Em
Reply Quote
3
Butcher of Bakersfield
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:39p, 6/3/25
Even worse (FAR WORSE) than what Mike Lindell and others hitched their wagon to, is the IRREFUTABLE FACT that the FBI and American intelligence community directly and openly interfered in the 2020 election, in favor of their preferred braindead/puppet democrat candidate.

The founders would have been going to war over that type of sh**.

It's probably the most egregious thing to happen in any of our lifetimes if you stop and think about it...and this was just a few years after Spygate, the OMG RUSSSIANCOLLUUUUSION hoax and various other coup and sabotage attempts. Trump's first term was pretty much a cold civil war.

All of those things make Watergate look like youth group shenanigans...especially the 2020 election tampering/interference by our government.

Jan 6th would have been more than justified if it was in response to this particular cheating imo.
Reply Quote
12
2 edits
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:20p, 6/13/25



I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
1 edit
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:58p, 6/16/25


This sounds like a "win" for Lindell.

Not the victory he wanted, but probably a safe guess that the defense lawyers, not the plaintiffs, are celebrating tonight!

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
2
ts5641
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 7:01a, 6/17/25
Im Gipper said:


This sounds like a "win" for Lindell.

Not the victory he wanted, but probably a safe guess that the defense lawyers, not the plaintiffs, are celebrating tonight!
How does Dominion keep escaping scrutiny? They're must be a lot of swamp creatures getting kickbacks.
Reply Quote
7
Queso1
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ts5641 • 7:03a, 6/17/25
AG
I still remember when F16 wanted these suits because "the discovery was gonna be great."
Reply Quote
10
BMX Bandit
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to ts5641 • 7:04a, 6/17/25
in this case, the "Experts" did not come to trial to support the theories Lindell was espousing. wonder why?


2.3mm ain't nothing, but it sure is far, far less than they were hoping for and expecting. I agree that this is a defense "win"
Reply Quote
5
HTownAg98
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 7:52a, 6/17/25
They were never going to get $40MM.

Looks like the "Mike Lindell is too stupid for people to take him seriously" play worked. Or Coomer couldn't prove all of his claimed damages.
Reply Quote
1
Aggie1205
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 9:23p, 7/2/25
AG
BMX Bandit said:
in this case, the "Experts" did not come to trial to support the theories Lindell was espousing. wonder why?


2.3mm ain't nothing, but it sure is far, far less than they were hoping for and expecting. I agree that this is a defense "win"
Lindell was in front of a judge saying he was unable to pay a 50K fine. If he can't pay that, not sure how he pays 2.3 million.

Why isn't Trump coming to his defense the way that he came to bat for Trump? Seems like Trump should at least tell his followers to buy more pillows to help this guy out.
Reply Quote
HTownAg98
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggie1205 • 4:54a, 7/3/25
Because they realized that Mike is pants on fire crazy and distanced themselves from him.
Reply Quote
2
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:15p, 7/23/25
UNHOISTED!!


I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
4
HTownAg98
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 4:44p, 7/23/25
Is this the one where he promised $5MM to someone if they could prove his lines of code or whatever he was using was bullhockey, and someone did?
Reply Quote
1
Ag with kids
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to HTownAg98 • 6:05p, 7/23/25
AG
HTownAg98 said:
Is this the one where he promised $5MM to someone if they could prove his lines of code or whatever he was using was bullhockey, and someone did?

Well, apparently the Appeals Court disagrees with you...
Reply Quote
J. Walter Weatherman
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 6:15p, 7/23/25
The grift never stops.

Quote:
The fight isn't over - support for his ongoing legal fees for election security is more critical than ever.
Donate Now: GiveSendGo.com/MikeLindell
Reply Quote
1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.