Politics of the crash.

32,756 Views | 384 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by halfastros81
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

Trump being Trump today with his comments. This is the type of thing that has blowback and got him bogged down the first time. I am sure Susie Wiles is pulling her hair out.
Except it appears the pilot was a Trans and the ATC Tower was understaffed in part because they have been pushing for DEI hires. It appears Trump knew this before the PC but the trickle out of information so far looks like it's going to support his statements.

Trump is going to be Trump, the key for him this go round is to stay on offense and not worry about trying to curry favor with the press, that was his downfall last time. He just needs to keep moving and moving fast so they can't focus on a target.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.
You must be new here
Charpie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggie93 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Trump being Trump today with his comments. This is the type of thing that has blowback and got him bogged down the first time. I am sure Susie Wiles is pulling her hair out.
Except it appears the pilot was a Trans and the ATC Tower was understaffed in part because they have been pushing for DEI hires. It appears Trump knew this before the PC but the trickle out of information so far looks like it's going to support his statements.

Trump is going to be Trump, the key for him this go round is to stay on offense and not worry about trying to curry favor with the press, that was his downfall last time. He just needs to keep moving and moving fast so they can't focus on a target.
And the bolded part has already been debunked
HoustonAg9999
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you really want a trans person pilot? Seems like they might have mental issues
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


Probably because we saw two planes hit large buildings in NY and can't understand how the Blackhawk pilot didn't see it.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMU1990 said:

There were 3 pilots correct? All doing different roles?
Pilot, Co-Pilot and a crew chief.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


The chopper was going straight. The pilot had to be looking straight ahead. The plane it crashed into had lights flashing so it could be seen by others.

It's hard not to see the obvious.

Or, could the pilot of the helicopter been passed out and didn't see he was flying into a plane?
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Where else are you supposed to do it? Part of a checkride is to assess your ability to complete the mission. If your mission is VIP transport around DC, then that's what you have to do
Fully understand those necessities for training, Simulators or flying around less densely populated areas (not to mention all of the nearby restricted airspace will not be good replicators.

What is not absolutely necessary and can be controlled is the civilian commercial traffic volume at DCA. Need to adjust those runways as well. Shut down 33, for instance. Too short, approach angle after lining up for a straight shot coming down one side of the Potomac for runway 1 to then change to a different angle of approach crossing to the other side of the Potomac raises another question for me.

Outer markers for 33. Where are those located? I assume the CRJ went out to those before turning back in to line up? Or being a smaller fixed wing, shorter bank to turn inside the outer marker?
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ts5641 said:

No Spin Ag said:

Jbob04 said:

Tin foil hat [ON] OFF





Okay, it looks like that was intentional.

What do we know about the helicopter pilot?
I can't go down that path yet. Too many variables.


I get that, but just by the looks of it, it is a possibility and can't be taken off the table. IMO
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My brother flew military for 19 years before he retired. Now he flies GA aircraft for fun on weekends. Both he and I are shocked how hard it is to see other aircraft down low with all the ground clutter. I imagine it's even more difficult at night.
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hitting X this morning, lead pilot of Blackhawk was trans and wrote a letter about Trump and DEI a couple of days before incident.

Debunked. My bad.
OE_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here is the channel that is good at pulling all the at communications.

They seemed to handle it normally, helo reported the plane was in sight and requested to maintain visual separation. ATC got a tcas alert and radio the pilot who still asked for visual separation and could see. Not sure what all will be found but seems like with the dark distance or timing was miss juged possibly where he thought the plane would be past by the time they were there or they would be under.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTmAg said:

My brother flew military for 19 years before he retired. Now he flies GA aircraft for fun on weekends. Both he and I are shocked how hard it is to see other aircraft down low with all the ground clutter. I imagine it's even more difficult at night.
But this plane wasn't "down low" in relation to the helicopter.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


The chopper was going straight. The pilot had to be looking straight ahead. The plane it crashed into had lights flashing so it could be seen by others.

It's hard not to see the obvious.

Or, could the pilot of the helicopter been passed out and didn't see he was flying into a plane?

If they had night vision goggles on, your field of view is reduced by about 40%. Plus bright lights can wash out your view completely.

Not hard to make that jump on not seeing the plane if they were under NV conditions (or the pilot was looking at console, map/nav, or something else).
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Because they were focusing on a different, larger aircraft straight ahead. I guess you guys have never flown anything before.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WBAP is saying an ATC was allowed to leave his shift early not long before the crash. Really sounds like staffing is going to be a significant piece of this puzzle, at least on the ATC side.

As with most aviation crashes, Swiss Cheese is lining up.
Jeeper79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ts5641 said:

No Spin Ag said:

Jbob04 said:

Tin foil hat [ON] OFF





Okay, it looks like that was intentional.

What do we know about the helicopter pilot?
I can't go down that path yet. Too many variables.
World's best pilot if true.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would expect better situational awareness than that. Maybe my expectations of military pilots is too high. CRM training by ATC and the Blackhawk would have prevented this.
Jeeper79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.
Agreed. That wasn't a solo flight. One kamikazepilot would get taken out by the others.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


The chopper was going straight. The pilot had to be looking straight ahead. The plane it crashed into had lights flashing so it could be seen by others.

It's hard not to see the obvious.

Or, could the pilot of the helicopter been passed out and didn't see he was flying into a plane?
You guys are INSANE if you think this was intentional. Both pilots didn't see each other because it's HARD TO SEE. And the helicopter didn't have ADS-B. You guys think they were both in on the conspiracy? To the death? Really?
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTmAg said:

No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


The chopper was going straight. The pilot had to be looking straight ahead. The plane it crashed into had lights flashing so it could be seen by others.

It's hard not to see the obvious.

Or, could the pilot of the helicopter been passed out and didn't see he was flying into a plane?
You guys are INSANE if you think this was intentional. Both pilots didn't see each other because it's HARD TO SEE. And the helicopter didn't have ADS-B. You guys think they were both in on the conspiracy? To the death? Really?


No, just the helicopter. Or it could just be complete incompetence on the part of the helicopter pilot, but regardless, the helicopter has a lot of time to not keep going straight at the plane yet still does.

I'd imagine the Blackhawk pilots are trained to use evasive maneuvers to not hit other aircraft in the sky, no?
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
MaroonStain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reports this morning stating there was another incident same scenario earlier in the night week. Passenger flight changed course, circled twice and landed after other Blackhawk passed.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FTAG 2000 said:

No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


The chopper was going straight. The pilot had to be looking straight ahead. The plane it crashed into had lights flashing so it could be seen by others.

It's hard not to see the obvious.

Or, could the pilot of the helicopter been passed out and didn't see he was flying into a plane?

If they had night vision goggles on, your field of view is reduced by about 40%. Plus bright lights can wash out your view completely.

Not hard to make that jump on not seeing the plane if they were under NV conditions (or the pilot was looking at console, map/nav, or something else).


There's only one person in those helicopters? I ask because I don't know, so any info help.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aTmAg said:

My brother flew military for 19 years before he retired. Now he flies GA aircraft for fun on weekends. Both he and I are shocked how hard it is to see other aircraft down low with all the ground clutter. I imagine it's even more difficult at night.
I believe they were flying with NVG's, pretty standard night ops flight training.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FTAG 2000 said:

No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


The chopper was going straight. The pilot had to be looking straight ahead. The plane it crashed into had lights flashing so it could be seen by others.

It's hard not to see the obvious.

Or, could the pilot of the helicopter been passed out and didn't see he was flying into a plane?

If they had night vision goggles on, your field of view is reduced by about 40%. Plus bright lights can wash out your view completely.

Not hard to make that jump on not seeing the plane if they were under NV conditions (or the pilot was looking at console, map/nav, or something else).
^^^^^This.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


The chopper was going straight. The pilot had to be looking straight ahead. The plane it crashed into had lights flashing so it could be seen by others.

It's hard not to see the obvious.

Or, could the pilot of the helicopter been passed out and didn't see he was flying into a plane?
You guys are INSANE if you think this was intentional. Both pilots didn't see each other because it's HARD TO SEE. And the helicopter didn't have ADS-B. You guys think they were both in on the conspiracy? To the death? Really?


No, just the helicopter. Or it could just be complete incompetence on the part of the helicopter pilot, but regardless, the helicopter has a lot of time to not keep going straight at the plane yet still does.

I'd imagine the Blackhawk pilots are trained to use evasive maneuvers to not hit other aircraft in the sky, no?
If the airline pilot saw him, then he WOULD have turned to avoid him. He wouldn't have just flew into him because "he was supposed to move". That shows how hard it is to see and why ATC tells everybody about traffic. This pilot thought ATC was taking about another plane. Not the smaller closer one. Most military aircraft don't have ADS-B. That is much more to blame here than anything.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've read claims that the NVG's used by army aviators make vision akin to 'looking through toilet paper.'

This is still the Occam's razor simplest answer, imho. That neither the experienced pilot, nor co-pilot getting trained to use them, saw/recognized the plane they hit. The only real politics then would be why staffing was abnormal/reduced in the control tower, but that's really only a tangential impact to the pilot error.
Highway6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No Spin Ag said:

FTAG 2000 said:

No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


The chopper was going straight. The pilot had to be looking straight ahead. The plane it crashed into had lights flashing so it could be seen by others.

It's hard not to see the obvious.

Or, could the pilot of the helicopter been passed out and didn't see he was flying into a plane?

If they had night vision goggles on, your field of view is reduced by about 40%. Plus bright lights can wash out your view completely.

Not hard to make that jump on not seeing the plane if they were under NV conditions (or the pilot was looking at console, map/nav, or something else).


There's only one person in those helicopters? I ask because I don't know, so any info help.
A crew of 3 on this one
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aTmAg said:

No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

No Spin Ag said:

aTmAg said:

Why the hell do you guys think it was intentional? Looks to me like they didn't see it.


The chopper was going straight. The pilot had to be looking straight ahead. The plane it crashed into had lights flashing so it could be seen by others.

It's hard not to see the obvious.

Or, could the pilot of the helicopter been passed out and didn't see he was flying into a plane?
You guys are INSANE if you think this was intentional. Both pilots didn't see each other because it's HARD TO SEE. And the helicopter didn't have ADS-B. You guys think they were both in on the conspiracy? To the death? Really?


No, just the helicopter. Or it could just be complete incompetence on the part of the helicopter pilot, but regardless, the helicopter has a lot of time to not keep going straight at the plane yet still does.

I'd imagine the Blackhawk pilots are trained to use evasive maneuvers to not hit other aircraft in the sky, no?
If the airline pilot saw him, then he WOULD have turned to avoid him. He wouldn't have just flew into him because "he was supposed to move". That shows how hard it is to see and why ATC tells everybody about traffic. This pilot thought ATC was taking about another plane. Not the smaller closer one. Most military aircraft don't have ADS-B. That is much more to blame here than anything.

A former military and now private jet pilot for the past 20 years called into Clay & Buck yesterday. He said he has flown in and out of Reagan, Teterbero and other major airports up there "hundreds of times". According to him, all Helos in the DC area are required to have ADSB due to the high volume of air traffic. No idea if that is accurate or not but the guy came across as someone who knew what he was talking about. FWIW.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MaroonStain said:

Hitting X this morning, lead pilot of Blackhawk was trans and wrote a letter about Trump and DEI a couple of days before incident.
And like much of the time, "X" is wrong, especially when it is coming from people there with obvious political agendas.

The person accused of being the pilot has been confirmed alive by news outlets, and is still active on Facebook.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charpie said:

aggie93 said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Trump being Trump today with his comments. This is the type of thing that has blowback and got him bogged down the first time. I am sure Susie Wiles is pulling her hair out.
Except it appears the pilot was a Trans and the ATC Tower was understaffed in part because they have been pushing for DEI hires. It appears Trump knew this before the PC but the trickle out of information so far looks like it's going to support his statements.

Trump is going to be Trump, the key for him this go round is to stay on offense and not worry about trying to curry favor with the press, that was his downfall last time. He just needs to keep moving and moving fast so they can't focus on a target.
And the bolded part has already been debunked
A lot of things will continue to come out on this but that would still make it was a female pilot which would still be DEI.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Democrats continue to lie and politicize anything they can around the crash.


Politics:



More at the thread which is pretty long.

And it's ok after the woe's of the past 4 years which 2020 wrought to go down a thread online and be skeptical of a narrative, or storyline for a few hours to figure it out. The politics of these agencies and our government staffing have impacted our safety not just in air travel, but in many other regards.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.