***** Official Trump 47 Admin Court Battles *****

523,111 Views | 3719 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by will25u
AgEngineer72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We fixed the keg said:

Quote:

major in Law, Jurisprudence, and Social Thought.




AND…"in political thought and intellectual history"

A squad of social warriors for sure.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
  • Quote:

    Social Thought: How law intersects with issues like race, gender, class, and cultural history.

    So much for Justice is Blind.
  • will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    techno-ag
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Cut their federal funding then.
    The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
    Im Gipper
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    nortex97 said:

    DoJ probe launched finally into the contemptible E Jean Carroll:

    Reminder her crusade was funded by Reid Hoffman, a close epstein associate no less, which she lied about in her deposition:

    His Hopewell Fund is a dark money juggernaut that was managed by Arabella Advisors.


    Not so fast my friend



    I'm Gipper
    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?

    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?

    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    techno-ag
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Dear Hawaiian Judge,

    Are you Texan? No? Then get out.
    The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
    dvldog
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Trump says that he will now transfer ownership of the Kennedy Center to Congress for them to take care of.

    nortex97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Dhillon wants Fani 'gorilla grip' Willis-backer judge off of election integrity case. Duh.

    By the way, Obama-Judge Roy Cooper in Kennedy Center decision is married to Peepaw's personal attorney.

    DC is the absolute epicenter of nepotism in the entire galaxy.
    Rocky Rider
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    DC = cesspool
    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    ...


    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    nortex97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    LOL @ DC Circuit. That's not gonna hold water.

    Also, not '47 administration related really but pretty good take re: Hoffman-funded lawfare vs. Trump for defamation/rape claims etc:

    Quote:

    The Carroll case rested on a sequence of legal maneuvers with no precedent in American civil litigation. Democratic legislators passed a retroactive temporary law eliminating the statute of limitations for decades-old accusations that could not be dated, located, or defended with alibis. The day the temporary law took effect, Carroll filed her pre-prepared lawsuit, the first in the state to do so.

    A Democratic mega-donor secretly funded the plaintiff's legal costs through a nonprofit. The arrangement stayed hidden until one of Trump's lawyers discovered it. A Clinton-appointed judge then sealed all records so the jury never learned the billionaire backer had publicly committed to Trump's political destruction. Every participant in the legislative, funding, and judicial steps operated inside the same political network, and each decision produced the same cumulative result.

    The jury explicitly checked "no" on the verdict form's specific rape question. The judge ruled rape proven anyway, claiming the jury had used a common rather than statutory definition… an impossibility, since their rejection under the common definition precludes rape by any standard. Trump's team was barred from arguing innocence before a second jury, which awarded $83.3 million ($65 million punitive) on the rape finding the first jury had rejected.

    A defendant was sued for defamation over denying an accusation, prevented from asserting that denial as a defense, tried before a judge who concealed the plaintiff's political funding, and hit with a nine-figure verdict built on facts the jury itself refused to find.

    No comparable sequence exists in recorded U.S. civil litigation history.

    Once again; never, ever vote for a Democrat.
    Ag with kids
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    will25u said:



    "randomly"
    You can turn off signatures, btw
    Deerdude
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    We should replace the random appointer.
    nortex97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Alabama gets to use their legislature's map, despite district/appellate court judges not liking it.

    It was really quite a saga that played out over years since 2023:
    Quote:

    Just over two weeks later, on May 26, the lower court which included one Clinton appointee and two Trump appointees again barred Alabama from using the 2023 map, directing it to use the map created by the special master instead. The court emphasized that "we cannot see our way clear to requiring Alabamians to cast their votes in the 2026 elections under a districting plan tainted by intentional race-based discrimination."

    On May 27, Alabama came back to the Supreme Court, asking the justices to pause the lower court's ruling and allow it to use the 2023 map in the 2026 elections. Alabama Solicitor General A. Barrett Bowdre argued that the court's decision in "Callais vindicates Alabama's position on the lawfulness of the 2023 Plan, yet the district court decided in one week that Callais changed nothing." The district court, Bowdre stressed, did not require the challengers to offer alternative maps that would achieve Alabama's goals while still maintaining two majority-Black districts, as the Supreme Court suggested it should have, and "t did not matter to the district court that drawing an additional race-based district came at the cost of sacrificing communities of interest" specifically, predominantly white communities along the state's Gulf Coast "and pairing incumbents."

    The challengers countered that it was too late for the Supreme Court to intervene. They pointed to testimony by a senior election official indicating that if the state wanted to implement the 2023 map, it would have to finish reassigning voters in its voter registration database by June 2. Indeed, they emphasized, "the evidence in the record shows that Alabama cannot administer" a special primary election in August, under a law passed by the state's legislature in May to account for the possibility that the Supreme Court's decision in Callais would allow Alabama to use its 2023 map, even if the Supreme Court had granted Alabama's request on June 1. Moreover, they added, the Supreme Court's decision in Callaisshould make no difference to the lower court's ruling in their case, because of the lower court's conclusion that Alabama violated the Constitution by intentionally discriminating against Black voters.

    On Tuesday, the Supreme Court stated that the district court "failed to follow our instruction in Callais that the mere fact that voters of different races vote for different parties is not relevant to proving racially polarized voting patterns." It further held that the district court's decision, not Alabama's request for relief, had come too late. "We have repeatedly cautioned that lower federal courts should not 'alter the election rules on the eve of an election,'" the court said. "Here, the District Court interposed itself into Alabama's ongoing efforts to conduct its imminent 2026 congressional elections under maps that its elected representatives selected. Its view that conducting the elections under court-imposed maps would be more convenient for the State was not a valid justification for that intervention."

    In her 17-page dissent, Sotomayor asserted that Alabama "has no legitimate interest in enforcing an unconstitutional map, while vast harms will likely arise from upending the status quo, sowing chaos in Alabama, and rewarding Alabama's gamesmanship." "Because I choose to defend the rule of law and the right of all Alabamians to participate equally in democracy," Sotomayor concluded, "I respectfully dissent."

    Aside, Chemerinsky has a fairly hilarious hit piece on Justice Thomas melting down about his being a 'radical.' I laughed several times, anyway.
    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?


    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    BusterAg
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Can the state of Florida sue in Federal court in Florida now to try and block the rulings of the federal court in Chicago?

    This is stupid.
    nortex97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Florida sued in state court, a removal to federal court for a diversity of jurisdiction case such as this was inevitable imho. Caveat; I didn't read the full Illinois opinion.
    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    Rapier108
    How long do you want to ignore this user?


    Another Obama appointed "judge" who's previous job was as a long time Democrat party activist and employee.

    Not the first time he's tried to run the country himself. He want Trump to begin importing Afghans and people from mostly ****hole Muslim countries.
    "If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
    nortex97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    His order won't stand either.

    BTW, another Obama judge (Trump agreed to renominate her as part of a package of judges in year 1 of his first presidency) has made yet another outlandish ruling too.

    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    nortex97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Only Murk, Collins, and Miss Lindsey voted for that clown. Even Cornyn and Tillis voted against.
    Ellis Wyatt
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    But Tillis is a true conservative. Right?!
    nortex97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG

    Solid smack down came quickly over TDS-judge litigating Delaney Hall conditions.
    ETA: This is also a Biden mohammedan judge.

    32 GOP Senators voted to confirm him, including of course John Cornyn, who will never have the opportunity to vote for any more Democrat judges.
    nortex97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    This one's really just hilarious to me, legally speaking, though in NoVa I guess she has at least a 30 percent chance at winning an injunction.

    Quote:

    You thought you hated liberal boomers? You don't hate them nearly enough.

    A 69-year-old retired bureaucrat from Alexandria, Virginia, Susan F. Douglas, is suing to stop the planned UFC Freedom 250 event at the White House as part of America's 250th birthday celebration.

    Her argument? The event would cause her "aesthetic injury," meaning she doesn't like looking at it. She also claims watching it would worsen the physical pain from her osteoarthritis.

    A patriotic celebration featuring Americans enjoying themselves would allegedly cause Susan both emotional distress and physical pain. Think about that.

    After spending more than 50 years working in DC, Susan shares that she now devotes her retirement to protesting the White House ballroom and construction of the triumphant arch, opposing renovations like those of reflection pool, and serving as a "safety marshal" at No Kings protests.

    Susan is also a prolific donor to the James Talarico for Senate campaign, according to FEC records. Make of that what you will.

    Liberal boomers spent decades running the country into the ground, shipping jobs overseas, and opening the floodgates to third worlders. Now that they're retired, they dedicate themselves to draining the joy out of life for all other Americans.

    C'mon man...
    BusterAg
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    nortex97 said:




    If speaker Johnson actually had one of any merit he would bring impeachment articles on this A-hole.
    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?

    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    will25u
    How long do you want to ignore this user?



    "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

    - Abraham Lincoln
    AgBQ-00
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    The judiciary needs to be reined in. They are unilaterally thwarting the will of the people.
    God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

    We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
    HTownAg98
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    When you **** up so bad the judge grants habeas.
    nortex97
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Judge Dudek has no jurisdiction, as an article 3 judge in immigration matters is the issue.


    Good, outlandish that criminal background checks were forbidden by Biden DoJ.
    First Page Last Page
    Page 104 of 107
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.