Ellis Wyatt said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

I think the trolling is nearly off the charts.

---

is kinda goofy and risky in this case.

---

I was talking about the OP.

---

I know, I was having a laugh at the lefts expense your post was fine.

Every president tries their best to "rule" as much as a dictator as possible. Trump isn't the first and he won't be the last.

Every president sees what the previous ones did and says, "Hold my beer," because they now have a new playbook to work from. The next dem president with have Trump's playbook and they'll do even more and the next and the next.

Honestly, IMO Trump was been less trolling than his first term, so he media is really going to have to work extra hard to make a mountain out of a molehill when he's not giving them stuff to use a few times every hour like before.

Anonymous Source said:

---

But I think the real question is, this is related to state of New York policies. Why is the "party of smaller government" effing around with state politics?

---

Because the party of big government, your party, was involved. We are getting back to smaller government and rolling it back. Those toll roads in NY were built with federal funds.

Surely eliminating taxes on the people is smaller government.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Every president tries their best to "rule" as much as a dictator as possible. Trump isn't the first and he won't be the last.

---

What has Trump done that isn't within his constitutional authority?

Epic troll. The left has no sense of humor.

Logos Stick said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

But I think the real question is, this is related to state of New York policies. Why is the "party of smaller government" effing around with state politics?

---

Because the party of big government, your party, was involved. We are getting back to smaller government and rolling it back. Those toll roads in NY were built with federal funds.

Surely eliminating taxes on the people is smaller government.

---

Yes, and federal law allowed for an exemption in this case

Quote:

---

Congress allowed limited exceptions including one specifically permitting pilot projects that test congestion reducing techniques.

---

BTW, this law was passed in 1958 under the presidency of raging lib Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Francis Macomber said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.

---

I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

---

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

---

Interesting hyptheticals.

I think the first one could actually happen, as for the first time we're seeing off-the-rails partisan District judges making court orders attempting to usurp Executive Authority and separation of powers to such an extent that they're trying to tell the administrative branch what should be on government websites. Such orders are doomed to fail and should be pushed hard against. Lawfare at the district level continues with hand-picked, partisan judges who are not following the law.

These orders will be slapped down at the appellate level. But if such an order somehow made it through SCOTUS, I would expect Trump to follow it, and then I would lament the loss of the country. But I also believe that will never happen.

Excellent move. Instead of dems getting riled about the fact that he killed off congestion pricing, they are talking about innocuous words in a tweet

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

The real "patriots" around here have the Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.

---

It's all trolling until finally it's not. Conservatives have lost their ****ing minds.


Guys, no one is keeping tally of your opinions, you are awarded no points. You don't have to tote water for these bat**** "lol just trollin bro" posts. Your team isn't about to lose the game if you don't get one more PWN on a lib. This isn't A&M football is what I'm trying to say...

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

The real "patriots" around here have the Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.

---

I passed over this gem the first time.

It shows your ignorance and disdain for anyone who doesn't agree with you. Your use of "almost" isn't a get-out-of-jail-free card for a malicious ad-hom against over half the country.

Flagged.

Don't care. Too busy winning.

Logos Stick said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.

---

I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

---

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

---

what did you do when Biden defied the SCOTUS order?

Biden: A couple weeks ago, the Supreme Court made a decision that was a setback. They said nono to debt relief that would've helped more folks than any plan in historyup to 40 million working people who need the help the mostmiddle-class folks, a lot of whom got Pell Grants. That didn't stop us.

---

Biden didn't defy the Order. They reworked the plan so that it wasn't in defiance of the SCOTUS. That's how it normally works, and I have no problem if Trump does the same. That's not what I'm asking you and this is just a weak attempt to deflect and not answer the question. What if Trump says the SCOTUS cannot make me do anything, which is what JD Vance hinted at.

BTW, can any of you actually address Trump's actions without "but whadda bout Biden?"

jrdaustin said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.

---

I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

---

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

---

Interesting hyptheticals.

I think the first one could actually happen, as for the first time we're seeing off-the-rails partisan District judges making court orders attempting to usurp Executive Authority and separation of powers to such an extent that they're trying to tell the administrative branch what should be on government websites. Such orders are doomed to fail and should be pushed hard against. Lawfare at the district level continues with hand-picked, partisan judges who are not following the law.

These orders will be slapped down at the appellate level. But if such an order somehow made it through SCOTUS, I would expect Trump to follow it, and then I would lament the loss of the country. But I also believe that will never happen.

---

The question isn't what you expect him to do, it's what you will do if he doesn't follow it.

jrdaustin said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

The real "patriots" around here have the Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.

---

I passed over this gem the first time.

It shows your ignorance and disdain for anyone who doesn't agree with you. Your use of "almost" isn't a get-out-of-jail-free card for a malicious ad-hom against over half the country.

Flagged.

---

I don't see you saying you don't want him as king. In fact, I specifically asked a question about what you would do if he didn't follow the SCOTUS and you deflected and didn't answer it, leading me to believe that you would still support him if he did that.

I guess I want to know what the breaking point will be for some of you, or if there is one? So far, the feeling I get is as long as "We're pwning libs!" then he can do whatever he wants and you and your like will be on board.

Mr. Fingerbottom said:

---

No not at all


Obvious joke that only idiots are upset about



Trump killing it as usual

---

Well, there are a lot of idiots. Can't wait for CNN and MSNBC to attack this one.

Francis Macomber said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

---

I really couldn't care less about the statement. But I imagine that some of you who are saying it's nothing would have lost your ****ing mind if Obama had said the same thing after passing AHA.

---

I'll wait until Trump violates the Constitution to be bothered by it. Hussein showed early and often that he would wipe his ass with it.

---

What will you do if Trump and his administration defy Court Orders?

What if they defy an order from the Supreme Court?

---

what did you do when Biden defied the SCOTUS order?

Biden: A couple weeks ago, the Supreme Court made a decision that was a setback. They said nono to debt relief that would've helped more folks than any plan in historyup to 40 million working people who need the help the mostmiddle-class folks, a lot of whom got Pell Grants. That didn't stop us.

---

Biden didn't defy the Order. They reworked the plan so that it wasn't in defiance of the SCOTUS. That's how it normally works, and I have no problem if Trump does the same. That's not what I'm asking you and this is just a weak attempt to deflect and not answer the question. What if Trump says the SCOTUS cannot make me do anything, which is what JD Vance hinted at.

BTW, can any of you actually address Trump's actions without "but whadda bout Biden?"

---

what actions? you posted hypotheticals.

Francis Macomber said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

The real "patriots" around here have the Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.

---

I passed over this gem the first time.

It shows your ignorance and disdain for anyone who doesn't agree with you. Your use of "almost" isn't a get-out-of-jail-free card for a malicious ad-hom against over half the country.

Flagged.

---

I don't see you saying you don't want him as king. In fact, I specifically asked a question about what you would do if he didn't follow the SCOTUS and you deflected and didn't answer it, leading me to believe that you would still support him if he did that.

I guess I want to know what the breaking point will be for some of you, or if there is one? So far, the feeling I get is as long as "We're pwning libs!" then he can do whatever he wants and you and your like will be on board.

---

Liberals were ok with court packing and other crazy stuff Biden and company were proposing.

Anonymous Source said:

---

Logos Stick said:

---

Anonymous Source said:

---

But I think the real question is, this is related to state of New York policies. Why is the "party of smaller government" effing around with state politics?

---

Because the party of big government, your party, was involved. We are getting back to smaller government and rolling it back. Those toll roads in NY were built with federal funds.

Surely eliminating taxes on the people is smaller government.

---

Yes, and federal law allowed for an exemption in this case

---

That has to be approved by the executive branch. Trump is simply unapproving it. He is lowering the tax burden which is smaller government imo.

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

The real "patriots" around here have the Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.

---

this is what is so disturbing about the MAGA cult. Conservatives used to be the safe haven for constitutionalists and limited government. Its so far from that now. It is in a lot of ways an understandable reaction to the craziness of the left but it is disturbing nonetheless.

Francis Macomber said:

---

jrdaustin said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

The real "patriots" around here have the Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.

---

I passed over this gem the first time.

It shows your ignorance and disdain for anyone who doesn't agree with you. Your use of "almost" isn't a get-out-of-jail-free card for a malicious ad-hom against over half the country.

Flagged.

---

I don't see you saying you don't want him as king. In fact, I specifically asked a question about what you would do if he didn't follow the SCOTUS and you deflected and didn't answer it, leading me to believe that you would still support him if he did that.

I guess I want to know what the breaking point will be for some of you, or if there is one? So far, the feeling I get is as long as "We're pwning libs!" then he can do whatever he wants and you and your like will be on board.

---

I dunno, but all the right pigs are squealing.

ttu_85 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

ttu_85 said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

I think the trolling is nearly off the charts.

---

is kinda goofy and risky in this case.

---

I was talking about the OP.

---

I know, I was having a laugh at the lefts expense your post was fine.

---

Agree about kind of risky. Not even sure quite following but its not especially helpful to play into the
MSM' narrative about seeking kingship or any such pretensions. Fans can claim it for you, but this seems just a bit overdone.

When someone controls your emotional state, they control you. YOU empower them.

TDS is one of the most effective non-pharmaceutical mind controlling drugs every created, and Trump has learned to dominate the market through mean-tweets originally, and now via a more refined process of epic trolling.

If anyone thinks this is just a random happenstance derived from Trumps egoistic lack of scruples, you are mistaken. Look at the results. It was mentioned before, 'the clouded minds'. HIs opposition is so off balance, so un-cohesive, that they have no real campaign to stop him or anything that even looks like a schematic to do so.

The only real response is from random partisan judges making obvious breeches of constitutional authority with their dazed leftist onlookers gazing in in disbelief as their delusional world construct is being demolished purposefully around them. And all they can do while this systematic planned disassembly occurs is REEEE about troll jobs designed entirely to elicit this exact response.

OP, you got played and don't even know it.

pollo hermanos said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

The real "patriots" around here have the Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.

---

this is what is so disturbing about the MAGA cult. Conservatives used to be the safe haven for constitutionalists and limited government. Its so far from that now. It is in a lot of ways an understandable reaction to the craziness of the left but it is disturbing nonetheless.

---

Seriously? Why do think Biden opened the border? He and the party wanted votes, votes to stay in power for a very long time. You think he wanted them to come and get educated so they could better themselves?

Trump is so pro big government he's slashing spending and rooting out corruption and waste.

Geez TDS is a serious mental disorder

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

No Spin Ag said:

---

Every president tries their best to "rule" as much as a dictator as possible. Trump isn't the first and he won't be the last.

---

What has Trump done that isn't within his constitutional authority?

---

Nothing. Which is why I said "as possible."

I said in another post last week that I'm finding it interesting just how Trump is pushing what power the presidency actually has.

It's obviously able to do so much more than previous president's have, which to me, a lover of history, is a good thing. The last thing a country needs is a stagnant government. That's how we get "The Swamp" and "The Establishment."

Looking ahead a few decades and the presidents then should really be able to move things for the better.

nu awlins ag said:

---

pollo hermanos said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

The real "patriots" around here have the Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.

---

this is what is so disturbing about the MAGA cult. Conservatives used to be the safe haven for constitutionalists and limited government. Its so far from that now. It is in a lot of ways an understandable reaction to the craziness of the left but it is disturbing nonetheless.

---

Seriously? Why do think Biden opened the border? He and the party wanted votes, votes to stay in power for a very long time. You think he wanted them to come and get educated so they could better themselves?

---

I have no clue what your comment has to do with my statement.

Agree, but I'm still in favor of term limits. The is a "public service" job not a career. Two terms for a senator and 3 for a congress person. Need to rotate the "soil" so to speak.

Ok...read harder.

nu awlins ag said:

---

Agree, but I'm still in favor of term limits. The is a "public service" job not a career. Two terms for a senator and 3 for a congress person. Need to rotate the "soil" so to speak.

---

For sure. No one should get to make a career out of serving he public.

pollo hermanos said:

---

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

The real "patriots" around here have the Founding Fathers rolling in their graves.

---

this is what is so disturbing about the MAGA cult. Conservatives used to be the safe haven for constitutionalists and limited government. Its so far from that now.

---

Not actually. Your ad hominems aren't facts.

Francis Macomber said:

---

It's become very clear that the "conservative" party would almost universally accept a monarchy if it was their guy in charge.

---

Does that account for the "conservatives" on this board who rage against the authoritarian members of the Republican party?