EO signed to ban ICE in areas of Chicago

20,940 Views | 203 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by will25u
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

Not a lie. Just because the entire cities are not in chaos does not mean there is not serious violence problems right now. They have been out to go unfetter and it's time to stop it. I'm not sure why you can't understand that.
“Some people bring joy wherever they go, and some people bring joy whenever they go.” ~ Mark Twain
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag98and03 said:

Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

When the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are repeatedly telling you that they have things under control and DO NOT NEED NATIONAL GUARD, that is it. Leave them alone.

State's rights include calling up the NG. The local people know best whether they need NG or not.

Why is this so hard to understand?

They are lying and the VOTERS voted for it.
jrdaustin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag98and03 said:

Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

When the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are repeatedly telling you that they have things under control and DO NOT NEED NATIONAL GUARD, that is it. Leave them alone.

State's rights include calling up the NG. The local people know best whether they need NG or not.

Why is this so hard to understand?
Why should the city officials be taken 100% at their word and everything Trump says and does be scrutinized and assumed is with nefarious intent?

Especially when we are inundated with video in both Chicago and Portland of mobs opposing ICE while throwing things at vehicles and assaulting federal officers?

Your logic is horribly flawed.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jrdaustin said:

Ag98and03 said:

Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

When the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are repeatedly telling you that they have things under control and DO NOT NEED NATIONAL GUARD, that is it. Leave them alone.

State's rights include calling up the NG. The local people know best whether they need NG or not.

Why is this so hard to understand?
Why should the city officials be taken 100% at their word and everything Trump says and does be scrutinized and assumed is with nefarious intent?

Especially when we are inundated with video in both Chicago and Portland of mobs opposing ICE while throwing things at vehicles and assaulting federal officers?

Your logic is horribly flawed.


It isn't logic.

It is will.

They desire for there to not be law and order because they succeed as politicians pretending to control the chaos.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Only a county sheriff has the authority to ban federal agents.
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag98and03 said:

Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

When the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are repeatedly telling you that they have things under control and DO NOT NEED NATIONAL GUARD, that is it. Leave them alone.

State's rights include calling up the NG. The local people know best whether they need NG or not.

Why is this so hard to understand?


Immigration is a federal issue and there is a coordinated domestic terror campaign against ICE and DHS. Some of the people claiming they don't want the national guard are helping or ignoring the progressive terror groups attacking federal agents. End of story

You being uninformed on this issue is noted
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science said:

Ag98and03 said:

Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

When the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are repeatedly telling you that they have things under control and DO NOT NEED NATIONAL GUARD, that is it. Leave them alone.

State's rights include calling up the NG. The local people know best whether they need NG or not.

Why is this so hard to understand?


Immigration is a federal issue and there is a coordinated domestic terror campaign against ICE and DHS. Some of the people claiming they don't want the national guard are helping or ignoring the progressive terror groups attacking federal agents. End of story

You being uninformed on this issue is noted

Liberal trolls are just mad that the supremacy clause allows ICE to do their job and remove future Democrat voters who are not citizens yet and came here illegally. It also WRECKS them on the Census and reapportionment. Combine this with low left wing birthrates, and the Dems are screwed long term. They MUST have mass migration to survive.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag98and03 said:

You can't shut off money to states that you disagree with. That's not how this works. Power of the purse belongs to Congress.

Again, another check and balance that for some reason you guys want to destroy.

What happens if a Democrat is in office and decides to cut off Texas funding for whatever reason?

Our Constitution has to hold. Our government laws have to hold. If they don't, we literally can lose our country.

Maybe you can try murdering some more republicans to get them on your side
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

Ag98and03 said:

Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

When the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are repeatedly telling you that they have things under control and DO NOT NEED NATIONAL GUARD, that is it. Leave them alone.

State's rights include calling up the NG. The local people know best whether they need NG or not.

Why is this so hard to understand?


Immigration is a federal issue and there is a coordinated domestic terror campaign against ICE and DHS. Some of the people claiming they don't want the national guard are helping or ignoring the progressive terror groups attacking federal agents. End of story

You being uninformed on this issue is noted

The lies are out of control though.

Isn't saying that over and over a compelling argument?
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MAGA rallies aren't unconstitutional. MAGA rallies don't fall under the very narrow scope of law enforcement the federal government actually has.

It is the duty of the federal government to enforce immigration law PASSED BY CONGRESS, and no city, municipality or state can obstruct the federal government from enforcing those laws.

However as we learned under the traitorous Biden, if the federal government does abdicate those peers, states are well within their rights to move to enforce the federal immigration laws themselves.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jarrin Jay said:

MAGA rallies aren't unconstitutional. MAGA rallies don't fall under the very narrow scope of law enforcement the federal government actually has.

It is the duty of the federal government to enforce immigration law PASSED BY CONGRESS, and no city, municipality or state can obstruct the federal government from enforcing those laws.

However as we learned under the traitorous Biden, if the federal government does abdicate those peers, states are well within their rights to move to enforce the federal immigration laws themselves.



That last paragraph is wrong. States cannot enforce immigration law. Unfortunately.

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
ShaggySLC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ag98and03 said:

ShaggySLC said:

Democrats want a confrontation where the feds are pushed into shooting

No they do not. This is why they keep repeatedly saying "no National Guard". The presence of NG does nothing but ramp up high emotions.

I think Trump, Hegseth, and especially Stephen Miller are hoping for a reason to deploy the actual military against US citizens. They are wanting this to blow up tensions.

Yes they do, its ICE agents conducting legal business. States don't get to ignore federal immigration laws.
BkYdPitmaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How about Trump give them what they want? Remove all federal help and let chi town sanctuary city degrade at a rapid pace. These Chicago fools voted for these morons so I say let them get what they voted for. Absolute idiocy. Close all of the federal facilities there out of an abundance of caution because of the threats. Watch the fallout.
Backyard Pitmaster
ShaggySLC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BkYdPitmaster said:

How about Trump give them what they want? Remove all federal help and let chi town sanctuary city degrade at a rapid pace. These Chicago fools voted for these morons so I say let them get what they voted for. Absolute idiocy. Close all of the federal facilities there out of an abundance of caution because of the threats. Watch the fallout.

Until a random judge over steps their power and the supreme court refuses to do their job.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag98and03 said:

Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

When the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are repeatedly telling you that they have things under control and DO NOT NEED NATIONAL GUARD, that is it. Leave them alone.

State's rights include calling up the NG. The local people know best whether they need NG or not.

Why is this so hard to understand?

You go to those cities and walk the streets at night. Be sure and video it for us and show us how "in control" those cities are. We'll be waiting for your videos, if you survive. If dems couldn't lie, they couldn't talk.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chicago mayor Johnson says MAGA wants a rematch of the Civil War. Why do we need a rematch? Does he know who Lincoln was? We won the Civil War against the party of slavery and the KKK.
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag98and03 said:

You guys are fully authoritarian. You want the federal government to shove whatever they want down state's throats.

The president makes up a stupid lie. You guys believe it.

And then you send in NG against the city and state's protests.

This is authoritarianism.

You are ripping state's rights away based on the premise of a lie. This helps no one. You are giving far too much power to the federal government

What happens if a Democrat gets into office and decided MAGA rallies are terrorist activities and sends in the NG against the state's repeated declarations that all criminal activity is under control by the local police?

Do you want a future president to have that power? Are you really thinking this through? I don't think you are.





And you've gone full ________. I don't want the feds anywhere near where they don't belong. But the FACT is, during the Obama "admin," the state of Arizona tried to do something the feds at the time wouldn't do -- enforce the border requirements -- and the feds SUED them. The USSC said, wrongly in my view, that this was EXCLUSIVELY Federal jurisdiction and the states couldn't do anything about it. The left cheered.

Now, when the Feds ARE doing something about -- and have the law on their side, even the one the left "signed off on," the left doesn't want them doing it.

The fact is, the lunatics and authoritarians, like you, are on the left. They don't want these laws enforced because that diminishes their power. That's NOT a constitutional reason.

Your MAGA rally comparison is not only off by a factor of a million, its stupid. There's no protected free speech in refusing to allow the Feds to enforce Federal law.

titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
91AggieLawyer said:

Ag98and03 said:

You guys are fully authoritarian. You want the federal government to shove whatever they want down state's throats.

The president makes up a stupid lie. You guys believe it.

And then you send in NG against the city and state's protests.

This is authoritarianism.

You are ripping state's rights away based on the premise of a lie. This helps no one. You are giving far too much power to the federal government

What happens if a Democrat gets into office and decided MAGA rallies are terrorist activities and sends in the NG against the state's repeated declarations that all criminal activity is under control by the local police?

Do you want a future president to have that power? Are you really thinking this through? I don't think you are.





And you've gone full ________. I don't want the feds anywhere near where they don't belong. But the FACT is, during the Obama "admin," the state of Arizona tried to do something the feds at the time wouldn't do -- enforce the border requirements -- and the feds SUED them. The USSC said, wrongly in my view, that this was EXCLUSIVELY Federal jurisdiction and the states couldn't do anything about it. The left cheered.

Now, when the Feds ARE doing something about -- and have the law on their side, even the one the left "signed off on," the left doesn't want them doing it.

The fact is, the lunatics and authoritarians, like you, are on the left. They don't want these laws enforced because that diminishes their power. That's NOT a constitutional reason.

Your MAGA rally comparison is not only off by a factor of a million, its stupid. There's no protected free speech in refusing to allow the Feds to enforce Federal law.



That bold is actually a reason to supporting laying off Portland and Chicago. Let the new precedent the Dems are setting stand. Arizona, Texas, any other states that need to will be able to secure their own borders next time you have a globalist President trying to open borders again.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

ShaggySLC said:

Democrats want a confrontation where the feds are pushed into shooting

Yep, or for just one MAGA identifying person to commit an act of violence like the trans loving freak did with Charlie Kirk.


100% this. Jan 6th was their wet dream after 4.5 years of taunts. They had to cook the books to make it legit.

There's a liberal figurehead assassin out there laying the online trail of being conservative.
Staff - take out the trash.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag98and03 said:

You guys are fully authoritarian. You want the federal government to shove whatever they want down state's throats.

The president makes up a stupid lie. You guys believe it.

And then you send in NG against the city and state's protests.

This is authoritarianism.

You are ripping state's rights away based on the premise of a lie. This helps no one. You are giving far too much power to the federal government

What happens if a Democrat gets into office and decided MAGA rallies are terrorist activities and sends in the NG against the state's repeated declarations that all criminal activity is under control by the local police?

Do you want a future president to have that power? Are you really thinking this through? I don't think you are.




What lie are you talking about?
Bucketrunner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"There's a liberal figurehead assassin out there laying the online trail of being conservative. "

100% this.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag98and03 said:

Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

When the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are repeatedly telling you that they have things under control and DO NOT NEED NATIONAL GUARD, that is it. Leave them alone.

State's rights include calling up the NG. The local people know best whether they need NG or not.

Why is this so hard to understand?


You think Chicago, one of the highest cities for murder in our country is under control? Bless your heart buddy
Jugstore Cowboy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BkYdPitmaster said:

How about Trump give them what they want? Remove all federal help and let chi town sanctuary city degrade at a rapid pace. These Chicago fools voted for these morons so I say let them get what they voted for. Absolute idiocy. Close all of the federal facilities there out of an abundance of caution because of the threats. Watch the fallout.

The problem is the cartels and their street soldiers don't stay in Blue Cities, they use them as central hubs to spread out from. So do the illegal immigrants who are being trafficked here.
sharpdressedman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Homan has been talking tough for months about jailing anyone who actively obstructs ICE doing its job.

Let's see if Noem and Bondie back him or not.
Scruffy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When i lived in Chicago from 2018-2021 there were nights i prayed for nuke... while I would probably die, it would be a cleansing fire of the dumbassery.

Let then all rot.
That was the first time I ever had Jews, to my face, want me and others thrown in concentration camps and killed.
I have no remorse for anyone in that racist hellhole
They voted for this, let them suffer for it.
TXAGBQ76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe it's time to just let them do their thing. Cut off any federal funding for police activities and let nature take its course.
InfantryAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag98and03 said:

You guys are fully authoritarian. You want the federal government to shove whatever they want down state's throats.

The president makes up a stupid lie. You guys believe it.

And then you send in NG against the city and state's protests.

This is authoritarianism.

You are ripping state's rights away based on the premise of a lie. This helps no one. You are giving far too much power to the federal government

What happens if a Democrat gets into office and decided MAGA rallies are terrorist activities and sends in the NG against the state's repeated declarations that all criminal activity is under control by the local police?

Do you want a future president to have that power? Are you really thinking this through? I don't think you are.

Alright, George Wallace. Complaint noted.
AgDad121619
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Queso1 said:

The thing on the left is what we are fighting against.
truly a human pig
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ShaggySLC said:

Democrats want a confrontation where the feds are pushed into shooting

They just got one...

But, ramming an ICE vehicle isn't exactly the victim that will play with the independents...
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag98and03 said:

You guys are fully authoritarian. You want the federal government to shove whatever they want down state's throats.

The president makes up a stupid lie. You guys believe it.

And then you send in NG against the city and state's protests.

This is authoritarianism.

You are ripping state's rights away based on the premise of a lie. This helps no one. You are giving far too much power to the federal government

What happens if a Democrat gets into office and decided MAGA rallies are terrorist activities and sends in the NG against the state's repeated declarations that all criminal activity is under control by the local police?

Do you want a future president to have that power? Are you really thinking this through? I don't think you are.




What happens if a Republican gets elected and the Democrat that is IN office spies on them and then tries to completely tank his entire term in office? What happens if Democrats try to put large numbers of Republicans and conservatives in jail because they don't like them?


Oh....

Wait....

We know what happens, because Democrats have already done that.

So don't bring your "well we have to stop this NOW before something bad happens" bull**** here. Because the SOMETHING BAD HAS ALREADY HAPPENED and your side did it.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chicago mayor is a black lives matter marxist.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag98and03 said:

Trump's repeated lie is that these cities are out of control.

When the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are repeatedly telling you that they have things under control and DO NOT NEED NATIONAL GUARD, that is it. Leave them alone.

State's rights include calling up the NG. The local people know best whether they need NG or not.

Why is this so hard to understand?

So, when students needed to be integrated into schools in the south during the 50s and 60s and the "city leadership, their local police, and state governors (WERE) repeatedly telling (the federal government) that they have things under control", then the national guard (and 101st) should not have been deployed to ensure that the schools were integrated?

Maybe...when the city leadership, their local police, and state governors are lying and full of ****, they should be overruled.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.