Bari Weiss reportedly 'stunned' '60 Minutes' crew

12,028 Views | 75 Replies | Last: 8 hrs ago by richardag
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bari Weiss reportedly 'stunned' '60 Minutes' crew by asking why the country thinks they're 'biased': report


Quote:

"Bari Weiss, the new editor-in-chief of CBS News, surprised senior staff at the venerable news program '60 Minutes' during a meeting on Tuesday when she asked a provocative question: Why does the country think you're biased?" the Times reported.


Quote:

Weiss reportedly has taken a more hands-on approach to leadership by helping to personally book network guests herself, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Middle East policy advisors Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.


It appears that steps are being taken to correct the mistakes made at CBS.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dont care.

Their game is to get big names. That means they will be nice to them. Those big names want to sell us some lies. It is all a waste.
Ferg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If they want to make a real change, put Sharl Attkisson in charge of 60 minutes and
make Michele Caruso Cabrera the evening news Anchor.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If they want anybody to take them seriously, they can dedicate a 60 minutes episode to apologizing to everyone for the lies and propaganda they pushed for years fire Leslie Stahl fire every one on the 60 Minutes anchors and start from scratch unless they do that screw them. Hire people like John Stossel Sharyl Attkisson Bill Moyers r Amy Goodman, until then they can pound sand.
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
rocky the dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Elections are when people find out what politicians stand for, and politicians find out what people will fall for.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

Dont care.

Their game is to get big names. That means they will be nice to them. Those big names want to sell us some lies. It is all a waste.

Let's take the wins where we can get them.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
TheEternalOptimist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fire Scott Pelley and Leslie Stahl for more legitimacy!
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rocky the dog said:




The best thing is she still loves to fall back on "This is 60 minutes" as if that makes anything she says into a paragon of truth and objectivity when the only people that might still buy that are liberal boomers that went to the "No Kings" rally last weekend.

The sad thing is there is a real need for investigative journalism that is objective and holds both sides accountable. The MSM simply has zero interest in that.
"The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help."

Ronald Reagan
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, sorry - not buying it. What was her follow up? For all we know the intent here could just be that she wants them more circumspect . Or she wants them to help persuade viewers to their point of view instead of being truly nonpartisan. Knowing liberals I wouldn't place any bets on anything substantially changing here. Maybe in a year or two I'll be pleasantly surprised but I'm not getting my hopes up.
Noctilucent
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rocky the dog said:




Great meme, and all true. I've been calling them "60 Liars" for a long time since they've lied about a ****load more than what's in the meme over the last few decades!
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is an especially deep irony when "journalists" forget the most basic concept in communications: The message you think you send means nothing in the face of how that message is received. You can think you're nonpartisan and unbiased all you want, but if a large chunk of your audience doesn't agree, it's time to question whether you actually are.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They were exposed way back in 01 and have only gotten worse since then.

The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

There is an especially deep irony when "journalists" forget the most basic concept in communications: The message you think you send means nothing in the face of how that message is received. You can think you're nonpartisan and unbiased all you want, but if a large chunk of your audience doesn't agree, it's time to question whether you actually are.


Agreed. Hopefully this is the start of a correction within main stream media.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

"Bari Weiss, the new editor-in-chief of CBS News, surprised senior staff at the venerable news program '60 Minutes' during a meeting on Tuesday when she asked a provocative question: Why does the country think you're biased?" the Times reported.

Brainstorming for ideas on how to better hide the bias would be my guess. They're not going to magically change their MOP with the staff already in place and they're most certainly not going to burn it all down and start over. Even if they did wipe the slate, where would they find enough unbiased staff to make it work? Would take a whole lot more than simply replacing the talking heads
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Imagine the temerity to question 60 minutes. The arrogance of the 4th estate is off the charts.
12th Man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they want to make it up to us, they can start by producing a 60 Minutes episode that uses its entire 60 minutes to expose the depth of their malicious bias; using the very aggression & gotcha techniques Morley Safer made famous.
Bob Knights Liver
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good book. Outlined it all for them but the left didn't want to listen.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
what is amazing is when you watch even CNBC news on the half hour

it is so amazingly biased to the left every single time.

just them reporting the "news" is inherently biased!
texagbeliever
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

texagbeliever said:

Dont care.

Their game is to get big names. That means they will be nice to them. Those big names want to sell us some lies. It is all a waste.

Let's take the wins where we can get them.


An institution with a history of lying releases a report that implies they wont lie anymore. Yeah im not stupid so I wont be falling for that.
Ferg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LMCane said:

what is amazing is when you watch even CNBC news on the half hour

it is so amazingly biased to the left every single time.

just them reporting the "news" is inherently biased!

Yup, that became very visible when they added Howard Dean as a contributor several decades back. The reasoning was he once worked as a stockbroker(for his dad for a couple of years right out of school). He'd come on and just recite democratic talking points.

Then it hit bottom when they held a Republican (primary candidates) economic debate, and when they got to Ted Cruz, he recited back the personal attack in the questions given to every other candidate, and absolutely left Becky Quick and Carl Quintanilla shell shocked the rest of the night,
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wonder what their response was?
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
can you ever trust media again even if they recognize their wrongs? just because they want to make more money and see that their overt bias is costing them money doesn't mean change. it means they want to make more money. there is no repentance
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

can you ever trust media again even if they recognize their wrongs? just because they want to make more money and see that their overt bias is costing them money doesn't mean change. it means they want to make more money. there is no repentance

Repentance makes you feel better. If they make a change, for whatever reason, that makes them more balanced, then we benefit as a nation.

Vengeance doesn't matter at all.
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
FobTies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No idea why people think 60 min is biased...

cavscout96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anyone commenting ever actually read or listen to anything Weiss has put out?
Jason C.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
texagbeliever said:

Dont care.

Their game is to get big names. That means they will be nice to them. Those big names want to sell us some lies. It is all a waste.


Exactly. More like 15 MINUTES OF COMMERCIALS. lol who tf even watches TV anymore.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Detmersdislocatedshoulder said:

can you ever trust media again even if they recognize their wrongs? just because they want to make more money and see that their overt bias is costing them money doesn't mean change. it means they want to make more money. there is no repentance

Repentance makes you feel better. If they make a change, for whatever reason, that makes them more balanced, then we benefit as a nation.

Vengeance doesn't matter at all.


I remember the NYT editorial board having a come to Jesus moment in 2016 and realizing that they had completely missed the mark on middle America because they were so infatuated with Hillary only to turn around and immediately start a section on racism under Trump that quickly filled up with hoaxes and minimal corrections.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
texagbeliever said:

Dont care.

Their game is to get big names. That means they will be nice to them. Those big names want to sell us some lies. It is all a waste.

I agree, just stop calling 60mins a news program and move it to daytime slot opposite "The View"
ExPeterKeating
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Twenty five years ago I would plan to sit and watch 60 Minutes. Haven't intentionally watched a show since then. CBS should move the show out of NY and get entirely new staff and anchors. I like the ones mentioned above. Stahl and Pelley need to be released. Anderson Cooper is a confirmed leftist. Why would we trust anything they say? And to be clear, I'm not looking for all conservatives. Atkinson and Stossel would be great. Just find anchors who WANT TO TELL THE TRUTH! Anchors who have a burning curiosity for the truth. Why is this so hard for some?
SuhrThang
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Libs ruin everthing they touch. Amirite right Barry?
“A drunkard’s dream if I ever did see one”
Ferg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ExPeterKeating said:

Twenty five years ago I would plan to sit and watch 60 Minutes. Haven't intentionally watched a show since then. CBS should move the show out of NY and get entirely new staff and anchors. I like the ones mentioned above. Stahl and Pelley need to be released. Anderson Cooper is a confirmed leftist. Why would we trust anything they say? And to be clear, I'm not looking for all conservatives. Atkinson and Stossel would be great. Just find anchors who WANT TO TELL THE TRUTH! Anchors who have a burning curiosity for the truth. Why is this so hard for some?


Agreed, Get Sharyl Attkisson! Either to run it or for a weekly segment, and bring her entire team from Full Measure.
Martin Cash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ExPeterKeating said:

Twenty five years ago I would plan to sit and watch 60 Minutes. Haven't intentionally watched a show since then. CBS should move the show out of NY and get entirely new staff and anchors. I like the ones mentioned above. Stahl and Pelley need to be released. Anderson Cooper is a confirmed leftist. Why would we trust anything they say? And to be clear, I'm not looking for all conservatives. Atkinson and Stossel would be great. Just find anchors who WANT TO TELL THE TRUTH! Anchors who have a burning curiosity for the truth. Why is this so hard for some?

She's 83 friggin' years old.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cavscout96 said:

Anyone commenting ever actually read or listen to anything Weiss has put out?


Sure some of us do, but I take it with a grain of salt because she's got a history of the same crap everyone is complaining about on 60 minutes. Has she ever apologized to Tulsi? Nope. Calling someone a toadie or a sycophant when you're a stone propagandist for the NYT and in fact a sycophant herself doesn't come of over time without a verbal apology to the people you slandered
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And does anyone still use an analog stopwatch? Come on CBS, step into the 21st century!
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bari apparently spiked a segment on 60 Minutes that was critical of the CECOT facility that housed illegal aliens we shipped to El Salvador. Lots of angry journalists.

If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.