Bari Weiss reportedly 'stunned' '60 Minutes' crew

11,979 Views | 75 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by richardag
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burdizzo said:

And does anyone still use an analog stopwatch? Come on CBS, step into the 21st century!

"Siri/Google/Alexa, time me while I do this."
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
javajaws said:

Yeah, sorry - not buying it. What was her follow up? For all we know the intent here could just be that she wants them more circumspect . Or she wants them to help persuade viewers to their point of view instead of being truly nonpartisan. Knowing liberals I wouldn't place any bets on anything substantially changing here. Maybe in a year or two I'll be pleasantly surprised but I'm not getting my hopes up.

Bari Weiss is NOT a liberal

that's why the leftists are freaking out
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Bari apparently spiked a segment on 60 Minutes that was critical of the CECOT facility that housed illegal aliens we shipped to El Salvador. Lots of angry journalists.





This Sharyn person is a political hack. Sorry, she is not someone with any credibility.




I'm Gipper
AJ02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wish for every left leaning editorial put out, the same outfit is forced to put out a counterpart right leaning editorial.

I took journalism classes. It was drilled into us about making sure to use terms that were completely neutral to avoid adding any sort of bias to what we were saying.

1. Start the story with current events, not what happened in the past.
2. Make sure your word choices are completely neutral and convey no bias.
3. Keep your headline short, limited to x number of characters max.

Granted, it's been 25+ years since I've take journalism, but I do remember those key points. And 99% of all stories put out today by BOTH sides may be "true", but word choice is intentionally chosen in a biased manner.

For example, saw a headline recently that was something to the effect of "Man Dies from Material Found in 95% of all Home Kitchens".

Then you read the article....it was a lifelong quarry worker who inhaled mining dust over several decades and eventually developed a lung disease. So while headline isn't technically "false", it was obviously framed in a way to get people to freak out about something in their kitchen that's slowly killing them and their family.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Weiss…strikes back.
Quote:

She also provided more information in a call with the staff.
Quote:

Weiss addressed the backlash during a network-wide editorial call, saying she held the segment because "we simply need to do more," according to a recording reviewed by the Wall Street Journal. [....]

She said the only newsroom she wants to run is one where editors can have "contentious disagreements" while assuming "the best intent" of colleagues an implicit criticism of "60 Minutes" correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi.

"The only newsroom that I'm interested in running is one where we are able to have contentious disagreements about the thorniest editorial matters and do so with respect and crucially where we assume the best intent of our colleagues," Weiss said on the editorial call on Monday.

She didn't like that they hadn't gotten a comment from the Trump administration, although Alfonsi said they had reached out.
Quote:

The Times reported that Weiss first reviewed the segment Thursday and requested numerous changes over the following days, including asking producers to seek a fresh interview with White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller or another senior Trump administration official.

Weiss also raised concerns about referring to the deported Venezuelans as "migrants," noting they were in the US illegally, people familiar with the discussions told the Times.

Ooh, that last part is really going to make the left nuts. But I love it. It's about time someone went after liberal media for this effort to change the language to support their narrative. They aren't "migrants," and they aren't "undocumented," and much of the liberal media wants to hide the illegality behind these terms. Could there be a reset to reality coming?

Weiss said there had already been reporting on CECOT by the New York Times, and it was critical to do more to get the principals on the record.
Quote:

"To me, our viewers come first, not a listing schedule or anything else," Weiss said on Monday.
"That is my North Star and I hope it's the North Star of every person in this newsroom."

Oh my gosh, journalism, and what more are you adding to the question, rather than just pushing the Democratic narrative?

More at the link (Redstate).
KerrAg76
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Liars kicking and screaming as they get called out
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Oops.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I bet some activist staffer did that on purpose. I'd find out who did it and fire their ass in front of everyone to set an example.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you're curious:



Well ****, that didn't last long. Let's see how long this one lasts.

https://archive.org/details/60-minutes-inside-cecot
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABATTBQ11 said:

I bet some activist staffer did that on purpose. I'd find out who did it and fire their ass in front of everyone to set an example.


Almost guaranteed.
Gordo14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

I bet some activist staffer did that on purpose. I'd find out who did it and fire their ass in front of everyone to set an example.


Free speech
Artimus Gordon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Put the sniveling old Ass diaper dumping 60 minutes crew on a one way carnival cruise line with stops in Cuba and Venezuela.
BQ78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NPR is not CBS fake news, but it is a long-time bastion of communist lies really, so in many ways similar to 60-minutes. They have now banned going to their favorite law prof for quotes on any/everything, after noticing he'd been used as an expert at least 77 times for their propaganda.

Now he laughs about it and plans to focus on his TDS for 2026.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He certainly seems to get around, NPR to the Federalist Society.

https://fedsoc.org/bio/carl-tobias
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gordo14 said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

I bet some activist staffer did that on purpose. I'd find out who did it and fire their ass in front of everyone to set an example.


Free speech

^^^

doesn't understand "free speech"
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's not free speech, it's defying your employer. Thats a fireable offense.
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So we are lead to believe that the reporter reached out to the Trump administration and no one got back to them? Yeah, I have some really great ocean front property in SW Kansas that is ripe for development. Steven MIller, Homan, Noem, any number of interested parties are all over the media.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No kidding. Steven Miller would jump at this chance.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
torrid said:

If you're curious:



Well ****, that didn't last long. Let's see how long this one lasts.

https://archive.org/details/60-minutes-inside-cecot

It's already all over the internet and probably saved on servers for future reference by every major and minor outlet.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

So we are lead to believe that the reporter reached out to the Trump administration and no one got back to them? Yeah, I have some really great ocean front property in SW Kansas that is ripe for development. Steven MIller, Homan, Noem, any number of interested parties are all over the media.
it's strategic silence from the white house. weiss says the story can't run unless the white house comments on it. the white house doesn't respond so cbs won't run it.

now that cbs has management friendly to trump, this sets the precedent that they can quash negative coverage regardless of veracity by simply declining to comment on it and making a phone call to Weiss's boss.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

So we are lead to believe that the reporter reached out to the Trump administration and no one got back to them? Yeah, I have some really great ocean front property in SW Kansas that is ripe for development. Steven MIller, Homan, Noem, any number of interested parties are all over the media.
it's strategic silence from the white house. weiss says the story can't run unless the white house comments on it. the white house doesn't respond so cbs won't run it.

now that cbs has management friendly to trump, this sets the precedent that they can quash negative coverage regardless of veracity by simply declining to comment on it and making a phone call to Weiss's boss.


Welcome to the last 40 years in favor of Dems
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old McDonald said:

Tony Franklins Other Shoe said:

So we are lead to believe that the reporter reached out to the Trump administration and no one got back to them? Yeah, I have some really great ocean front property in SW Kansas that is ripe for development. Steven MIller, Homan, Noem, any number of interested parties are all over the media.
it's strategic silence from the white house. weiss says the story can't run unless the white house comments on it. the white house doesn't respond so cbs won't run it.

now that cbs has management friendly to trump, this sets the precedent that they can quash negative coverage regardless of veracity by simply declining to comment on it and making a phone call to Weiss's boss.


Laughably absurd. She was hired with the stated intent to try and bring some semblance of balance back to a long running left wing biased show.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gordo14 said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

I bet some activist staffer did that on purpose. I'd find out who did it and fire their ass in front of everyone to set an example.


Free speech


... doesn't extend to leaking things your employer said are not ready for release because you want to push your agenda.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TRM said:




Whoopsie. Old Mickey D wrong again
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

He certainly seems to get around, NPR to the Federalist Society.

https://fedsoc.org/bio/carl-tobias


Important distinction, but yeah. He seems like he likes to hear himself talk.

Quote:

A person listed on this page has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society. In most cases, the biographical information on a person's bio page is provided directly by the person, and the Federalist Society does not edit or otherwise endorse that information. The Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues. All expressions of opinion by a speaker or author are those of the individual.
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm shocked!
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

60 minutes has long been a total joke.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Bari Weiss reportedly 'stunned' '60 Minutes' crew by asking why the country thinks they're 'biased': report


Quote:

"Bari Weiss, the new editor-in-chief of CBS News, surprised senior staff at the venerable news program '60 Minutes' during a meeting on Tuesday when she asked a provocative question: Why does the country think you're biased?" the Times reported.


Quote:

Weiss reportedly has taken a more hands-on approach to leadership by helping to personally book network guests herself, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Middle East policy advisors Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.


It appears that steps are being taken to correct the mistakes made at CBS.

Good Bari.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CBS News is still really just a parody of an actual news organization. That this woman (and Scott Pelley) still works there just proves the point.

A.G.S.94
How long do you want to ignore this user?

ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Bari Weiss reportedly 'stunned' '60 Minutes' crew by asking why the country thinks they're 'biased': report


Quote:

"Bari Weiss, the new editor-in-chief of CBS News, surprised senior staff at the venerable news program '60 Minutes' during a meeting on Tuesday when she asked a provocative question: Why does the country think you're biased?" the Times reported.


Quote:

Weiss reportedly has taken a more hands-on approach to leadership by helping to personally book network guests herself, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Middle East policy advisors Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.


It appears that steps are being taken to correct the mistakes made at CBS.

Good Bari.

Exactly! I love how the reporter is worried about 60 Minutes reputation. Yeah, that went out the window about 25 years ago. Nothing but shills for the left.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WSJ report mirroring Axios's reporting
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She's a liar, clearly.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.