Video from shooting officers cell phone - tells the whole story WOW!!

16,640 Views | 213 Replies | Last: 11 days ago by Casual Cynic
HumpitPuryear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.

This cop recently had 33 stitches after an "observer" ran over and dragged him with a vehicle. He probably hesitated to defend himself in that incident.

At least two verbal commands were issued to stop the car and get out. It's clear from the video that her window was down and she was speaking to the officer that made the commands, in English. Instead of stopping, she reversed then shifted into Drive and then floored it hitting the other officer. I would interpret that as an attempt to cause bodily harm and shooting in self defense is totally justified. It's not like she was worried she was getting car jacked or something. She and the goofy butch dike knew 110% that these were federal officers because they had been following them and interfering with them all morning. Add to that that her partner was verbally threatening them. When a pair of lunatics are threatening you and then take threatening action against you, I think you have to assume that the intend to do harm to you.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

akm91 said:

Why was the officer using a cell phone to video the encounter? Wouldn't you need both hands free?

Why do you need both hands? Haven't you ever used your phone to take a pic or video with one hand? It's not hard.

In a situation like this, I'd want to have both hands free to respond to unexpected actions.
Buttermaker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.


Bottom line, if she follows orders, she's alive today.
It’s better to be the hammer than the anvil.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Didn't know they didn't have body cams. Thanks!
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

Didn't know they didn't have body cams. Thanks!


Some do, not sure why the difference though.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.


Why not just follow the instructions and don't interfere? That's what most people do.

Thus why most people don't get shot.
One day at a time.
UnderoosAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

all protestors are terrible people


FIFY
HumpitPuryear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

Quote:

I don't see how that sticks. However, if they were being paid by someone to be there than the ones paying these useful idiots should be held accountable. There are bound to be charges that would stick for inciting and paying someone to commit unlawful acts that gets them killed.

When criminals are together and a capital murder is committed, they can all be charged with capital murder. This woman got her wife killed.

Cool they should pursue it then. If nothing else to force her to cooperate on why they were there and how they were paying their expenses. They need to get to the people that are funding and organizing.
aggie93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

HarryRocket said:

People need to go to prison for obstructing justice during things like this. If that happened you wouldn't have people doing **** like this thinking they would just get away with.

The audacity to think you can just **** with LEO is baffling to me.

Well if the local police in MN, L.A. , Seattle, and Portland would enforce the local law, this also would not happen. The mayor told them to STAND DOWN.

1) Blocking taffic
2) Speeding
3) Running lights and stop signs,

Just to name a few. This has been going on since April.

If they cared about actually protecting people and saving lives this is what they should do. When people know that if they cross the line they will pay a consequence they stop. When they think they can get away with it or they don't know what the lines are they will push the limits and bad things happen. It's basic logic.

It's essentially the "zero tolerance" and "broken window" theories that Rudy used to clean up NYC. First step is you come down hard on someone who is committing a small crime and it stops people from committing big crimes. You also clean up neighborhoods from graffiti and "broken windows" so that people have a perception that it is a nice area they can take pride in while knowing there is zero tolerance for destruction of property. It didn't take long to work, just have to make examples out of a few folks and the rest figured it out quickly or went straight to prison.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

When criminals are together and a capital murder is committed, they can all be charged with capital murder. This woman got her wife killed.

Be careful there. That would be while in the commission of a serious felony. We do not know what else those two were doing earlier in the day or in the days before. It does seem this particularly team of agents were familiar with these two but no proof of that...yet.
TheHulkster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guys, I'm not sure, but I'm thinking maybe the leftist paid protesters and anti-capitalist trantifa agitators on reddit and bluesky weren't being completely honest about this incident. IKR?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.


Why not just follow the instructions and don't interfere? That's what most people do.

Thus why most people don't get shot.

They are trained and funded to interfere with immigration enforcement, Democrats are okay with it.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ah, yes, I see your point now. Misinterpreted what you were asking.
justcallmeharry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Love hurts??
If you think I am a liberal, you are incorrect. Assume sarcasm on my part. Sorry if something I post has already been posted. Just the way it is!!
1981 Monte Carlo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.

I will just say this...I would be a horrible cop. Absolutely horrible. My desire to get home to my family in one piece FAR outweighs everything else, including the lives of slimeballs who hate me and want me dead. I have no negative emotions when someone like George Floyd dies...or even this woman. I just only have so much emotional bandwidth...mostly reserved for people I know who are suffering in various ways. Zero sympathy for someone trying to obstruct law enforcement and fighting them or gunning cars at them.

They already tried to kill this guy once and he got like 33 stitches. Imagine if he had been too slow and she plows straight through him and he breaks his neck or back or dies. His response time was perfect and his actions appropriate under the circumstances.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

Ah, yes, I see your point now. Misinterpreted what you were asking.

Yeah, looking back at my post and see it is ambiguous. Blame the 4 hours of sleep I had!
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure there could be a more stereotypical victim here.

Lesbian white woman
Works as a "poet"
3 children but only one that lives with her
Tons of stickers on the back of vehicle
Improperly maintained vehicle with fogged up headlights
Smug ass comments for LEOs

Only issue I see is a nice looking dog instead of 17 cats.

Otherwise this woman is the image of the enemy of red-blooded hard working Americans.
ChemAg15
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Which officer did the shooting? Was it the officer that got hit or was it the officer walking up? Either way the time between her hitting the gas and shots fired is super short. Draw to fire must have been quick.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.

...and too many cops die for not shooting quick enough. Justified in my opinion.
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I saw TMZ showing this video several times, and I noticed how one of the female staff members continues to insist that ICE agent Jonathan Ross murdered Renee Nicole Good. Several of my acquaintances claim her tires were turned, and she tried to leave. But this video from Ross' cell phone indicates that Renee Nicole Good hit Ross before he shot and killed her in self-defense.

Renee Nicole Good and her wife Rebecca should have been staying home and taking care of their 3 children instead of participating in this protest. Rebecca Good even admitted to making her wife go there. After an ICE agent asked Good to step out of her vehicle, she drove off, already disobeying a lawful order. Then, she drove directly into another ICE agent. Rebecca Good even tried to agitate the cops by telling him they will be coming for them later and said, "Drive Baby Drive" just before the ICE agents fired their shots.
Waffledynamics
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So is nobody going to mention the dinosaur in the background at 0:22?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waffledynamics said:

So is nobody going to mention the dinosaur in the background at 0:22?


It's been talked about by everyone since this started yesterday or whenever
Dr. Mephisto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Waffledynamics said:

So is nobody going to mention the dinosaur in the background at 0:22?

The "clever girl" was attempting a flanking move.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

Already openly hostile to law enforcement
0:37 - Get out of the ****ing car. Command from law enforcement.
0:39 - Get out of the car. Another command from law enforcement, and she's looking right at him. She knows he is there
0:42 - She hits him with the car. Even if you debate her intentions, the ICE officer has every reason to think she's trying to run him down.


Yeah, at first i thought maybe she didn't see him, but clearly she did.

Play stupid games, she won the prize.
And her ***** lesbian partner gets to play martyr over her dead body.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.


Why not just follow the instructions and don't interfere? That's what most people do.

Thus why most people don't get shot.


No argument. If she followed instructions she would be alive doesn't change my stance that going from park to 5mph is not a life threatening situation to pull your gun out and shoot.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teslag said:

Anyone that still thinks this is murder has an agenda and just hates cops. All cops.
This is true, but it's more about them hating Trump. It drives everything, and I mean everything, the left does.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.

At the very, very least, the woman recklessly put the officer's life in danger by running over him in her attempt to flee the scene of an attempted arrest. At worst, she is trying to kill the cop.

It's a tragedy that this woman thought that trying to flee an attempt at an arrest was a good idea, and she paid for it with her life.

That's the entire story. The end.

If I was trying to flee the scene of an arrest and ran over your child, would you be OK with a cop shooting me to try and keep me from doing that?
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

Already openly hostile to law enforcement
0:37 - Get out of the ****ing car. Command from law enforcement.
0:39 - Get out of the car. Another command from law enforcement, and she's looking right at him. She knows he is there
0:42 - She hits him with the car. Even if you debate her intentions, the ICE officer has every reason to think she's trying to run him down.


But... her tires were turned.
She was just trying to leave and they wouldn't let her.
She was an American Citizen.
</every lib moron in my FB feed>

Watching that video from the Officer, I can't believe he was able to respond and get shots off that quickly.

I did chuckle as it sounds like he said - "beeyotch" after he's laying on the ground.
SwigAg11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

aginlakeway said:

Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.


Why not just follow the instructions and don't interfere? That's what most people do.

Thus why most people don't get shot.


No argument. If she followed instructions she would be alive doesn't change my stance that going from park to 5mph is not a life threatening situation to pull your gun out and shoot.

I'm trying to find the video I saw earlier, but I cannot. It was from a BWC camera of a police officer who was run over by a vehicle when they were standing only a few feet behind a parked car. The driver kicked it into reverse, ran over the officer, which killed the officer.

So yes, a parked vehicle a few feet away from you can kill you even going slowly in the event you fall down and get run over.
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

akm91 said:

Why was the officer using a cell phone to video the encounter? Wouldn't you need both hands free?

Why do you need both hands? Haven't you ever used your phone to take a pic or video with one hand? It's not hard.

While also firing my weapon - No, can't say that I have.
Maybe I'll try that the next time I'm at the range.
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

I don't hear gunshots?

Is it the soft double-tap at the end? Only two shots?

I had to replay it a couple times to hear them.
It happened so fast.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Leftists crying about not being able to "Chauvin" this officer is pretty hilarious to me.

HTH: he was filming so if this did happen he wouldn't be tossed in prison for life by Ellison/Walz lies.
jeremy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HarryRocket said:

People need to go to prison for obstructing justice during things like this. If that happened you wouldn't have people doing **** like this thinking they would just get away with.

The audacity to think you can just **** with LEO is baffling to me.


The audacity to thi k you can just **** with anyone is baffling to me.

My dad used to say, "no matter how tough you think you are, someone is tougher".

I dont get in anyone's face and I don't start crap. Especially armed citizens or police. Common sense.
HollywoodBQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

aginlakeway said:

Philip J Fry said:

After seeing the video, I don't think my stance has changed. Cops are too quick to shoot in general.


Why not just follow the instructions and don't interfere? That's what most people do.

Thus why most people don't get shot.


No argument. If she followed instructions she would be alive doesn't change my stance that going from park to 5mph is not a life threatening situation to pull your gun out and shoot.

Are you seriously R-word?
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From the video it appears that the "wife" of Renee Nicole Good should be charged with attempted murder/assault. "Drive, baby drive"
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.