🚨 FRISCO, TEXAS 🚨An Indian resident says the U.S. is “stolen land” and defends the influx of Hindu Indians through the H-1B visa program. She also argues that America is an economic zone. Why is a Republican county allowing this demographic collapse? pic.twitter.com/KX8W3JN5Gk

— Carlos Turcios (@Carlos__Turcios) April 8, 2026

This video is ridiculous

My mom and dad immigrated from Taiwan to the United States in 1975 and 1979 respectively. I am for legal immigration, but not the current massive immigration levels. For several reasons, the US needs to tame down the current immigration levels. Massive immigration causes traffic congestion, which would cause the quality of roads to decline faster. Also, the rapid increase has strained America's beleaguered schools, which literally don't have room for all these students. In addition, massive immigration would further tighten the supply of affordable housing for purchase or rent. Furthermore, there would be an increased demand for water, electricity, and other public services. Most importantly, there would be increased competition for jobs. Scaling back legal migration and cracking down on illegal immigration would ensure an improved quality of life for current US citizens.

SteveA said:

---

Quote:

---

I look foawrd to southlake carrolls demise in athleticism and prowess in band and debate club. The eroding of American culture for an infestation of H1B1.

---

America can use more band

---

The rate limiting factor is the number of lockers available to shove them into.

Just some general observations from an old fart...

It's definitely not okay when Indians are brought in to take U.S.-based jobs as long as there are U.S. citizens capable of doing the same jobs at least as well. The H-1B program should not have anything to do with companies being allowed to pay less for talent. Regulating what our corporate overlords are allowed to do in the name of stockholder value isn't always a bad idea.

Most of the Indians who moved here won't assimilate much, and I don't think it's realistic to expect this process to happen quickly. It will take many years for most of those that choose to do so. If they're smart, they'll at least compromise and encourage their kids and grandkids to assimilate while still retaining the qualities of their culture/home life that contribute to their overall scholastic excellence.

Their kids and grandkids will be able to speak English clearly without an accent, and this should help reduce the barriers to assimilation. Personally, I work in the tech industry, and I'm always pleasantly surprised to meet an Indian whose accent doesn't make my eyes roll back in my head. I've noticed that as I get older, my tolerance for and ability to understand heavily accented English seems to be decreasing, and the Indian accent is one of the worst. Every time I hear "development" pronounced as "double-up-ment", a tiny part of my brain asks for permission to retire earlier than planned. Conversely, when I end up working with an Indian who speaks English clearly, it's such a pleasant surprise that I'm more engaged than usual in the conversation.

My FISD teacher wife thinks many "heritage citizens" in Frisco are simply failing their kids compared to the Indian parents. Generally speaking, it seems their priorities are out of whack. These parents value extracurricular activities and are highly involved in making sure their kids have everything they need to do their best when it comes to sports, etc., but they don't bring down the hammer like we did back in the day to ensure their kids are putting in the work to do their best scholastically. There are a lot of "cool moms" who no doubt love their kids, but good, well-rounded parenting has become less common. Sadly, our schools have lowered the bar due to lower expectations, which I consider ridiculous. Public education in Texas seems to be a slowly sinking ship, but what our government should do about it is another hot topic for debate.

Semper Fi and Gig 'em

Yesterday said:

---

I want immigrants who love America. Not India. There's a reason India is a giant **** hole and it's not because it's run by Americans.

---

We all (except Dems) agree that illegal immigration is bad, wrong and should be stopped.

But why are so many people forced to say that they want legal immigrants?
I see this issue with our Republican politicians too. I suspect it is because they don't want to be seen as racists or xenophobes. We don't need to open our country for anyone. That is also okay. We can be full, which we currently are. There is a time and place for legal immigration and it is our option to open or close.

People should be bold to openly say that they are not for any kind of immigration. Legal immigration actually means nothing. Dems can open it up to 1000000000000000 visas a year, entire India would be in the US and should we welcome them?

I'm good greatly curtailing legal immigration, but the trade off of that is that we have to be ok with a managed decline of the country as we de-populate.

Which I'm totally fine with, if done correctly. It's what Japan has opted to do under their current PM.

Granted, as soon as we get a Dem back in office we will be back to open borders and unfettered immigration so everyone should prepare themselves for that.

Quote:

---

The rate limiting factor is the number of lockers available to shove them into.

---

I'm in Allen, so no lockers. Some kid tried with my band son, and he did a double leg take down, mount and one-shotted him with an elbow. BJJ and band are a good combo.

My mom taught AP calculus in a north Texas high school that slowly got swallowed up by H1-B kids. The absurd amount of grade grubbing and willingness to do anything to get an advantage (up to an including cheating) was so rampant that she finally just said, "eff these idiots" and retired.

SteveA said:

---

Quote:

---

The rate limiting factor is the number of lockers available to shove them into.

---

I'm in Allen, so no lockers. Some kid tried with my band son, and he did a double leg take down, mount and one-shotted him with an elbow. BJJ and band are a good combo.

---

Band on band violence is a hell of a thing

Yesterday said:

---

I want immigrants who love America. Not India. There's a reason India is a giant **** hole and it's not because it's run by Americans.

---

India is a giant s**hole because it was invaded and ruled for foreign powers like Muslims and European powers for 1000 years. Until 1700 AD, India was the world's largest GDP and the richest country.
History goes far beyond 1776.

And let's be careful before we laugh at others. Muslim immigrants have turned beautiful Europe into a sheethole in the last 25 years. Muslims, H1Bs and others are going to to the same to the US also.

More apt for Plano that Frisco but still on point.

Please allow me to introduce myself - I'm Lila Starling here to tell you about the threat of #ShariaLaw to our Texas way of life see https://t.co/poJ60OMxew for more pic.twitter.com/fpPpZMSLdN

— TXGirlsFightSharia (@TxFightSharia) January 27, 2026

infinity ag said:

---

Yesterday said:

---

I want immigrants who love America. Not India. There's a reason India is a giant **** hole and it's not because it's run by Americans.

---

India is a giant s**hole because it was invaded and ruled for foreign powers like Muslims and European powers for 1000 years. Until 1700 AD, India was the world's largest GDP and the richest country.
History goes far beyond 1776.

And let's be careful before we laugh at others. Muslim immigrants have turned beautiful Europe into a sheethole in the last 25 years. Muslims, H1Bs and others are going to to the same to the US also.

---

This is one of those stats that gets thrown around and is absolutely meaningless when you look into it. India wasn't India in 1700, it was the Mughal Empire which didn't include much of now southern India and did include modern Bangladesh, Pakistan, and part of Nepal and Afghanistan. There was no cohesive culture or language and nobody could communicate with each other as almost nobody could read/write and very few could speak a second language. Moreover, GDP prior to the Industrial Revolution was almost entirely driven by a combination of natural resources and population. India was rich in both. The GDP PER CAPITA in 1700 of the Mughal Empire was less than a third to a fourth of the European powers. And the wealth that did exist was concentrated within the upper hierarchy of the empire. 99% of Indians were a kind of poor that doesn't even exist in much of the world today, and a kind of poor that even most modern poor Indians don't experienced.

The only reason India is a semi functional, unified nation today is because of the language and systems of education/government brought by the British. Literally EVERYTHING useful and functional about their nation today operates under rules and decorum introduced by the British. Similar to the European slave trade, while it was awful at the time their descendants are much better off than they would have been had it never happened. These people couldn't even speak to one another until the British empire forced them all to learn English.

Infection_Ag11 said:

---

infinity ag said:

---

Yesterday said:

---

I want immigrants who love America. Not India. There's a reason India is a giant **** hole and it's not because it's run by Americans.

---

India is a giant s**hole because it was invaded and ruled for foreign powers like Muslims and European powers for 1000 years. Until 1700 AD, India was the world's largest GDP and the richest country.
History goes far beyond 1776.

And let's be careful before we laugh at others. Muslim immigrants have turned beautiful Europe into a sheethole in the last 25 years. Muslims, H1Bs and others are going to to the same to the US also.

---

This is one of those stats that gets thrown around and is absolutely meaningless when you look into it. India wasn't India in 1700, it was the Mughal Empire which didn't include much of now southern India and did include modern Bangladesh, Pakistan, and part of Nepal and Afghanistan. There was no cohesive culture or language and nobody could communicate with each other as almost nobody could read/write and very few could speak a second language. Moreover, GDP prior to the Industrial Revolution was almost entirely driven by a combination of natural resources and population. India was rich in both. The GDP PER CAPITA in 1700 of the Mughal Empire was less than a third to a fourth of the European powers. And the wealth that did exist was concentrated within the upper hierarchy of the empire. 99% of Indians were a kind of poor that doesn't even exist in much of the world today, and a kind of poor that even most modern poor Indians don't experienced.

The only reason India is a semi functional, unified nation today is because of the language and systems of education/government brought by the British. Literally EVERYTHING useful and functional about their nation today operates under rules and decorum introduced by the British. Similar to the European slave trade, while it was awful at the time their descendants are much better off than they would have been had it never happened. These people couldn't even speak to one another until the British empire forced them all to learn English.

---

You are just coping with that argument. India of 1900 is not the India of 2026. Same with the US which has changed. We are talking about civilizations here, not political countries which is a newer construct.

If you go back to 300BC, then India was among the most advanced civilizations on earth. The downfall happened after the Muslims invaded in 700AD.

Tell me, why would people invaded one after the other if a country was not rich? Would you invade Somalia? Ethiopia?

Don't give me the arguments of the evangelists. Their end goal is always "so we need to covert your ass so we can tell you what to do".

The British did nothing. They just looted the place and took out the wealth back England. They built the tains do help them do that. Take away 1000 years of Muslims and all the Europeans and India would have been on a different trajectory today. But then no one can say for sure other than go by what existed then. The Brits cannot even protect their own country today.

infinity ag said:

---

Infection_Ag11 said:

---

infinity ag said:

---

Yesterday said:

---

I want immigrants who love America. Not India. There's a reason India is a giant **** hole and it's not because it's run by Americans.

---

India is a giant s**hole because it was invaded and ruled for foreign powers like Muslims and European powers for 1000 years. Until 1700 AD, India was the world's largest GDP and the richest country.
History goes far beyond 1776.

And let's be careful before we laugh at others. Muslim immigrants have turned beautiful Europe into a sheethole in the last 25 years. Muslims, H1Bs and others are going to to the same to the US also.

---

This is one of those stats that gets thrown around and is absolutely meaningless when you look into it. India wasn't India in 1700, it was the Mughal Empire which didn't include much of now southern India and did include modern Bangladesh, Pakistan, and part of Nepal and Afghanistan. There was no cohesive culture or language and nobody could communicate with each other as almost nobody could read/write and very few could speak a second language. Moreover, GDP prior to the Industrial Revolution was almost entirely driven by a combination of natural resources and population. India was rich in both. The GDP PER CAPITA in 1700 of the Mughal Empire was less than a third to a fourth of the European powers. And the wealth that did exist was concentrated within the upper hierarchy of the empire. 99% of Indians were a kind of poor that doesn't even exist in much of the world today, and a kind of poor that even most modern poor Indians don't experienced.

The only reason India is a semi functional, unified nation today is because of the language and systems of education/government brought by the British. Literally EVERYTHING useful and functional about their nation today operates under rules and decorum introduced by the British. Similar to the European slave trade, while it was awful at the time their descendants are much better off than they would have been had it never happened. These people couldn't even speak to one another until the British empire forced them all to learn English.

---

You are just coping with that argument. India of 1900 is not the India of 2026. Same with the US which has changed. We are talking about civilizations here, not political countries which is a newer construct.

If you go back to 300BC, then India was among the most advanced civilizations on earth. The downfall happened after the Muslims invaded in 700AD.

Tell me, why would people invaded one after the other if a country was not rich? Would you invade Somalia? Ethiopia?

Don't give me the arguments of the evangelists. Their end goal is always "so we need to covert your ass so we can tell you what to do".

The British did nothing. They just looted the place and took out the wealth back England. They built the tains do help them do that. Take away 1000 years of Muslims and all the Europeans and India would have been on a different trajectory today. But then no one can say for sure other than go by what existed then. The Brits cannot even protect their own country today.

---

The people of India today and the people living in what is now India in 300 BC are completely different ethnicities. It's akin to comparing the people of what is now Turkey in 1000 AD to the people living in Turkey today.

Literally EVERYTHING about India's system of government today was taken from the British system in one way or another. Without exception.

And being resource rich is not even remotely the same thing as a population being rich on the whole. Moreover, Europeans DID invade Somalia and Ethiopia. Multiple times.

"Read a history book" is admittedly pretty trite and dismissive, but please do so.

TAMU1990 said:

---

🚨 FRISCO, TEXAS 🚨An Indian resident says the U.S. is “stolen land” and defends the influx of Hindu Indians through the H-1B visa program. She also argues that America is an economic zone. Why is a Republican county allowing this demographic collapse? pic.twitter.com/KX8W3JN5Gk

— Carlos Turcios (@Carlos__Turcios) April 8, 2026

This video is ridiculous

---

How ironic. The lady comes from scammerland. A country where a solid 45% of the workforce is engaged in societal wide theft from everyother country in the world. While the other 55% of the workforce is engaged in litter maintenance programs, ensuring that litter levels never drop below 3 feet of height on any street in the country. Also what is SUPER SCUMMY is they go after senior citizens stealing their life's savings. How many people have deleted themselves because of HER country and HER culture ??? On the other hand, those Indians are experts in stealing from other people, so maybe we should attentively listen to everything she says?