FBI Raiding Fulton County Election Office

32,529 Views | 373 Replies | Last: 25 days ago by will25u
An L of an Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Should this be on the mueller thread or here? I dunno.

Sorry for the 'breaking' but it is an interesting post by Trump.


I'd like to believe this, but by this point I don't think Bondi could dunk a donut into a coffee cup.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I know this was already posted about, but what happened to the 44+ missing boxes? Nothing fishy here at all.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GeorgiAg said:

UTExan said:

GeorgiaAg hasn't chimed in yet on this. I now reside in Georgia and Fulton County is a real "interesting" place.

I don't think what they are doing has anything to do with prior elections. Same with Trump talking about nationalizing elections in about 15 places. Guess what? They all vote heavily against him.

He wants to rig the elections, purge voters and have a heavy Gestapo presence for intimidation in urban centers that won't vote for him.

I'm also old enough to remember attorneys Lin Wood and Sidney Powell telling Georgia Republicans at a rally: "Do not vote in this rigged election... why would you go back and vote in another rigged election?"

This might be the most delusional thing I have ever read on TexAgs, and that is saying something.

What piece of information have you consumed that would suggest that this is even in the universe of possiblity?

Who would be the heavy Gestapo you talk about? Who would be the actual foot soldiers that would pull this off?

The US Military? Other Federal Employees? MAGA volunteers, who are going to take time away from running their small businesses or working at their jobs to stand in front of poll? The 75 year old retired grandmas that give you stickers as a thanks for voting? 10,000 clones of Oliver Anthony created in a Wuhan lab?
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

txwxman said:


If "off of the rails", you mean that he doesn't believe all the election conspiracy slop being fed to him by Daddy Trump, yes, he is off the rails.

Donald Trump isn't the one who has found all the huge irregularities and illegal activities. One doesn't need to "believe him" to look at the facts. One does need to be interested in facts. I am not aware of a single person on the left who is, though.


62 lawsuits later and not one bore fruit. Lol This along with Republicans, oh and only Republicans, nationalizing the election, sending in false electors, "STOP THE VOTE" nonsense is just another Donny attempt to thwart the electoral process. But now all of a sudden the evidence is "Clear as day!" how convenient for this administration

How many of those lawsuits were dismissed by cowardly judges for "lack of standing" before the election, and "latches" after the election?

If the evidence is complete junk, why are you worried? Just let it play out.

Trump is not going to get a third term. The only good thing that can come from this is the passing of better election integrity laws. Are you against better election integrity laws?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I know this was already posted about, but what happened to the 44+ missing boxes? Nothing fishy here at all.

I am more inclined to think that is just sloppy record keeping at this point. Now that too could be by design, however.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I know this was already posted about, but what happened to the 44+ missing boxes? Nothing fishy here at all.

I am more inclined to think that is just sloppy record keeping at this point. Now that too could be by design, however.


Incompetence is 100% by design in a lot of places. They make such a mess of things that it's impossible to get to the bottom of anything. Makes it easy to hide stuff.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I know this was already posted about, but what happened to the 44+ missing boxes? Nothing fishy here at all.

I am more inclined to think that is just sloppy record keeping at this point. Now that too could be by design, however.


Incompetence is 100% by design in a lot of places. They make such a mess of things that it's impossible to get to the bottom of anything. Makes it easy to hide stuff.

True. And Fulton County has such a history of playing whack-a-mole with records. Oh those are located here, at this address. Show up, people there (if any are) have no idea what they are talking about and sends them to the next location. On and On.
Hubert J. Farnsworth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I know this was already posted about, but what happened to the 44+ missing boxes? Nothing fishy here at all.

I am more inclined to think that is just sloppy record keeping at this point. Now that too could be by design, however.


Incompetence is 100% by design in a lot of places. They make such a mess of things that it's impossible to get to the bottom of anything. Makes it easy to hide stuff.

True. And Fulton County has such a history of playing whack-a-mole with records. Oh those are located here, at this address. Show up, people there (if any are) have no idea what they are talking about and sends them to the next location. On and On.


I see incompetence as a poor excuse. We've unknowingly been desensitized to that excuse.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:



I know this was already posted about, but what happened to the 44+ missing boxes? Nothing fishy here at all.


Is former head of Atlanta fbi going to face consequences?
Tony Franklins Other Shoe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

GeorgiAg said:

UTExan said:

GeorgiaAg hasn't chimed in yet on this. I now reside in Georgia and Fulton County is a real "interesting" place.

I don't think what they are doing has anything to do with prior elections. Same with Trump talking about nationalizing elections in about 15 places. Guess what? They all vote heavily against him.

He wants to rig the elections, purge voters and have a heavy Gestapo presence for intimidation in urban centers that won't vote for him.

I'm also old enough to remember attorneys Lin Wood and Sidney Powell telling Georgia Republicans at a rally: "Do not vote in this rigged election... why would you go back and vote in another rigged election?"

This might be the most delusional thing I have ever read on TexAgs, and that is saying something.

What piece of information have you consumed that would suggest that this is even in the universe of possiblity?

Who would be the heavy Gestapo you talk about? Who would be the actual foot soldiers that would pull this off?

The US Military? Other Federal Employees? MAGA volunteers, who are going to take time away from running their small businesses or working at their jobs to stand in front of poll? The 75 year old retired grandmas that give you stickers as a thanks for voting? 10,000 clones of Oliver Anthony created in a Wuhan lab?


Also, during 2020, 2022, 2024, where were all these Gestapo minions? When is Orange Man gonna release the hounds? I keep hearing about it but he never seems to pull it off, it's always one election cycle away.

Person Not Capable of Pregnancy
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Hubert J. Farnsworth said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

I know this was already posted about, but what happened to the 44+ missing boxes? Nothing fishy here at all.

I am more inclined to think that is just sloppy record keeping at this point. Now that too could be by design, however.


Incompetence is 100% by design in a lot of places. They make such a mess of things that it's impossible to get to the bottom of anything. Makes it easy to hide stuff.

True. And Fulton County has such a history of playing whack-a-mole with records. Oh those are located here, at this address. Show up, people there (if any are) have no idea what they are talking about and sends them to the next location. On and On.



Like trying to get a copy of Permit A38.
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BusterAg said:

GeorgiAg said:

UTExan said:

GeorgiaAg hasn't chimed in yet on this. I now reside in Georgia and Fulton County is a real "interesting" place.

I don't think what they are doing has anything to do with prior elections. Same with Trump talking about nationalizing elections in about 15 places. Guess what? They all vote heavily against him.

He wants to rig the elections, purge voters and have a heavy Gestapo presence for intimidation in urban centers that won't vote for him.

I'm also old enough to remember attorneys Lin Wood and Sidney Powell telling Georgia Republicans at a rally: "Do not vote in this rigged election... why would you go back and vote in another rigged election?"

This might be the most delusional thing I have ever read on TexAgs, and that is saying something.

What piece of information have you consumed that would suggest that this is even in the universe of possiblity?

Who would be the heavy Gestapo you talk about? Who would be the actual foot soldiers that would pull this off?

The US Military? Other Federal Employees? MAGA volunteers, who are going to take time away from running their small businesses or working at their jobs to stand in front of poll? The 75 year old retired grandmas that give you stickers as a thanks for voting? 10,000 clones of Oliver Anthony created in a Wuhan lab?


I would assume he is referring to ICE/DHS...which is still delusional.

The left really does love them some fear porn.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/breaking-judge-unseals-warrant-affidavit-probable-cause-fbi/

Judge unsealed warrant.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

2020 was a fraudulent election that was stolen from the American people by Democrats and Rino's like Raffensperger.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, and the elections have been rigged, that's the whole point.

Hopefully the broader public is actually made aware of this soon.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Somehow I missed Kurt Olsen becoming a special employee.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/panic-ensues-after-trump-orders-cia-give-2020-election-intel-stop-steal-lawyer

Now a second story about access to intel.
t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

t_J_e_C_x said:


62 lawsuits later and not one bore fruit. Lol This along with Republicans, oh and only Republicans, nationalizing the election, sending in false electors, "STOP THE VOTE" nonsense is just another Donny attempt to thwart the electoral process.
You can wave your hand, but your blanket statement is bull*****

As I said, I'm not aware of a single person on the left who is interested in facts. You're actively dismissing them.

The people who want to thwart the electoral process are the ones who illegally suspended election laws, who don't want to ensure only citizens are voting. And who refuse to allow full transparency in the voting process. The facists are on the left. But you know that.



The whole non-citizens voting is such a tired excuse that it was such a non starter that it never passed muster in dozens of court cases. All of this is simply another attempt by Republicans to make voting harder when more than half of Americans don't have passports and countless women don't have the same last name on their birth certificate since getting married.

Can't wait for it to get voted down in Senate and to hear ol Dummy Donny rattle on about rigged this and that while be continued to avoid taking ownership for everything Epstein.
C/O 2013 - Company E2
Jack Squat 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

t_J_e_C_x said:


62 lawsuits later and not one bore fruit. Lol This along with Republicans, oh and only Republicans, nationalizing the election, sending in false electors, "STOP THE VOTE" nonsense is just another Donny attempt to thwart the electoral process.
You can wave your hand, but your blanket statement is bull*****

As I said, I'm not aware of a single person on the left who is interested in facts. You're actively dismissing them.

The people who want to thwart the electoral process are the ones who illegally suspended election laws, who don't want to ensure only citizens are voting. And who refuse to allow full transparency in the voting process. The facists are on the left. But you know that.



The whole non-citizens voting is such a tired excuse that it was such a non starter that it never passed muster in dozens of court cases. All of this is simply another attempt by Republicans to make voting harder when more than half of Americans don't have passports and countless women don't have the same last name on their birth certificate since getting married.

Can't wait for it to get voted down in Senate and to hear ol Dummy Donny rattle on about rigged this and that while be continued to avoid taking ownership for everything Epstein.


You appear to be very useful.
I don't think you know me.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

t_J_e_C_x said:


62 lawsuits later and not one bore fruit. Lol This along with Republicans, oh and only Republicans, nationalizing the election, sending in false electors, "STOP THE VOTE" nonsense is just another Donny attempt to thwart the electoral process.
You can wave your hand, but your blanket statement is bull*****

As I said, I'm not aware of a single person on the left who is interested in facts. You're actively dismissing them.

The people who want to thwart the electoral process are the ones who illegally suspended election laws, who don't want to ensure only citizens are voting. And who refuse to allow full transparency in the voting process. The facists are on the left. But you know that.



The whole non-citizens voting is such a tired excuse that it was such a non starter that it never passed muster in dozens of court cases. All of this is simply another attempt by Republicans to make voting harder when more than half of Americans don't have passports and countless women don't have the same last name on their birth certificate since getting married.

Can't wait for it to get voted down in Senate and to hear ol Dummy Donny rattle on about rigged this and that while be continued to avoid taking ownership for everything Epstein.


If the name on their license is different than their birth certificate, then they can produce… a marriage license! Or even better, any one who has changed their name for any reason just needs the BC and the record of name change!

Oh, and they have ample notice to gather these documents if they are so motivated to vote.

Voting is important and should not be easy or an afterthought. If you require it to be such, please stop voting as you are hurting your country in doing so.
BCSWguru
How long do you want to ignore this user?
they've inadvertently told everyone how they commit fraud via mail and harvesting. ballots sent to women under their maiden name. and their married name. and both get submitted and counted.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

t_J_e_C_x said:


62 lawsuits later and not one bore fruit. Lol This along with Republicans, oh and only Republicans, nationalizing the election, sending in false electors, "STOP THE VOTE" nonsense is just another Donny attempt to thwart the electoral process.

You can wave your hand, but your blanket statement is bull*****

As I said, I'm not aware of a single person on the left who is interested in facts. You're actively dismissing them.

The people who want to thwart the electoral process are the ones who illegally suspended election laws, who don't want to ensure only citizens are voting. And who refuse to allow full transparency in the voting process. The facists are on the left. But you know that.



The whole non-citizens voting is such a tired excuse that it was such a non starter that it never passed muster in dozens of court cases. All of this is simply another attempt by Republicans to make voting harder when more than half of Americans don't have passports and countless women don't have the same last name on their birth certificate since getting married.

Can't wait for it to get voted down in Senate and to hear ol Dummy Donny rattle on about rigged this and that while be continued to avoid taking ownership for everything Epstein.

Will be interesting to see how those court cases fare without the cover of disparate impact, am I right?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Quote:


The people who want to thwart the electoral process are the ones who illegally suspended election laws, who don't want to ensure only citizens are voting. And who refuse to allow full transparency in the voting process. The facists are on the left. But you know that.



The whole non-citizens voting is such a tired excuse that it was such a non starter that it never passed muster in dozens of court cases.

Tell us about them.

Seems like there would be no objections to proof of citizenship and voter ID if that were the truth.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Holy hell that is weapons grade stupidity there.

It is amazing tens of millions of people are able to do all kinds of things daily that require an ID but it is just too oppressive to do so in order to vote.

Also love that 'non starter' about non-citizens voting but the left screams about validating voter data. Tell me again why all hell breaks loose when anyone wants to audit voter data, entitlement data, etc if there are no illegals on those lists?
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

t_J_e_C_x said:


62 lawsuits later and not one bore fruit. Lol This along with Republicans, oh and only Republicans, nationalizing the election, sending in false electors, "STOP THE VOTE" nonsense is just another Donny attempt to thwart the electoral process.
You can wave your hand, but your blanket statement is bull*****

As I said, I'm not aware of a single person on the left who is interested in facts. You're actively dismissing them.

The people who want to thwart the electoral process are the ones who illegally suspended election laws, who don't want to ensure only citizens are voting. And who refuse to allow full transparency in the voting process. The facists are on the left. But you know that.



The whole non-citizens voting is such a tired excuse that it was such a non starter that it never passed muster in dozens of court cases. All of this is simply another attempt by Republicans to make voting harder when more than half of Americans don't have passports and countless women don't have the same last name on their birth certificate since getting married.

Can't wait for it to get voted down in Senate and to hear ol Dummy Donny rattle on about rigged this and that while be continued to avoid taking ownership for everything Epstein.
If voting is important for you, then you can do anything to be lawfully compliant in order to vote.

Quit making excuses for lazy people. If they don't want to have the necessary documents ready in order to vote, then they probably don't have the brain capacity to make an informed decision to vote either.

My wife and I got married and postponed our honeymoon for 4 months since I was in the middle of baseball season. We also did this so that she would have enough time to update the documents she needed in order to leave and come back into the country.

It isn't hard to do. Everyone that is a legal US citizen can do it. Quit making excuses for lazy people and people that shouldn't be taking part in things citizens are lawfully allowed to do.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.
oh for sure, but they like to live in the .0005% of cases and speak as all cases are like these. Once those are gone and done, they are also.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.


Actually it is.
e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t_J_e_C_x said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

t_J_e_C_x said:


62 lawsuits later and not one bore fruit. Lol This along with Republicans, oh and only Republicans, nationalizing the election, sending in false electors, "STOP THE VOTE" nonsense is just another Donny attempt to thwart the electoral process.
You can wave your hand, but your blanket statement is bull*****

As I said, I'm not aware of a single person on the left who is interested in facts. You're actively dismissing them.

The people who want to thwart the electoral process are the ones who illegally suspended election laws, who don't want to ensure only citizens are voting. And who refuse to allow full transparency in the voting process. The facists are on the left. But you know that.



The whole non-citizens voting is such a tired excuse that it was such a non starter that it never passed muster in dozens of court cases. All of this is simply another attempt by Republicans to make voting harder when more than half of Americans don't have passports and countless women don't have the same last name on their birth certificate since getting married.

Can't wait for it to get voted down in Senate and to hear ol Dummy Donny rattle on about rigged this and that while be continued to avoid taking ownership for everything Epstein.


You seem upset that the fraud of the left is being exposed all over the country. It's almost like voter ID, which Texas has, will make it difficult for Democrats to win. That's the truth. Your rebuttal is just dumb. Just admit you're terrified.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.


Actually it is.

Well, then, are you saying that it is more important to let in tens or hundreds of thousands of illegitimate votes in order to placate the 1,000 votes nation wide where legitimate voters really are not able to get IDs?

Or are you saying that a whole lot of minorities are too stupid to get IDs if this is required?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusterAg said:

DeschutesAg said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.


Actually it is.

Well, then, are you saying that it is more important to let in tens or hundreds of thousands of illegitimate votes in order to placate the 1,000 votes nation wide where legitimate voters really are not able to get IDs?

Or are you saying that a whole lot of minorities are too stupid to get IDs if this is required?

Black participation in elections rose in states that implemented voter ID, so surely he's not sticking to the ID myth?
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.


Actually it is.

If it were, then they would be all for voter ID laws.
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

BusterAg said:

DeschutesAg said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.


Actually it is.

Well, then, are you saying that it is more important to let in tens or hundreds of thousands of illegitimate votes in order to placate the 1,000 votes nation wide where legitimate voters really are not able to get IDs?

Or are you saying that a whole lot of minorities are too stupid to get IDs if this is required?

Black participation in elections rose in states that implemented voter ID, so surely he's not sticking to the ID myth?

Oh, he's sticking to it.

I don't think he really believes it, it is almost impossible to defend, no one really believes it, but, he's sticking to it.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

DeschutesAg said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.


Actually it is.

If it were, then they would be all for voter ID laws.


If the DNC was data-oriented and logical, yes, they would support voter ID. But the Democratic Party has idiotic myths it believes in, just like the Republicans have many idiotic false myths they treat as dogma and believe in.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeschutesAg said:

akm91 said:

DeschutesAg said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.


Actually it is.

If it were, then they would be all for voter ID laws.


If the DNC was data-oriented and logical, yes, they would support voter ID. But the Democratic Party has idiotic myths it believes in, just like the Republicans have many idiotic false myths they treat as dogma and believe in.

They use it as figleaf to mask their naked power grab by flooding the elections with uninformed voters that are dependent on democratic policies and theft.
DeschutesAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

DeschutesAg said:

akm91 said:

DeschutesAg said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

And let's be honest, this isn't about legitimate voters for democrats.


Actually it is.

If it were, then they would be all for voter ID laws.


If the DNC was data-oriented and logical, yes, they would support voter ID. But the Democratic Party has idiotic myths it believes in, just like the Republicans have many idiotic false myths they treat as dogma and believe in.

They use it as figleaf to mask their naked power grab by flooding the elections with uninformed voters that are dependent on democratic policies and theft.


The Ds do try to get voters to vote for their party's candidates. The Rs do the exact same thing. I have never seen it described as a "naked power grab" since that is how democratic elections have been done in the U.S. for at least 225 years. Hamilton and Madison had some very spirited written discussions on that topic. Ben Franklin, John Adams and Jefferson had views on it, too. We Americans today still discuss and debate it.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.