Ag with kids said:

---

MouthBQ98 said:

---

shiftyandquick said:

---

The problem with Bondi is that she works for Trump, instead of working for the American people. She will go down as the worst, most corrupt AG in modern history.

---

Were you around for the Obama presidency?

---

As opposed to Rahm Emanuel? Who was Obama's WINGMAN?

Yeah....

---

Rahm was Obama's Chief of Staff. Literally his WINGMAN.



You mean Eric Holder. A top 5 historical US AG in terms of "working for the president's personal desires, not the people or justice"

I've wondered why no one has asked about the evidence from his island. FBI was there a few years ago pulling boxes upon boxes out. Someone flew a drone over to capture some of it I think

You realize the official line would be there are no Epstein files without Massie?

True but also Obama used the irs to audit donors to opposition political parties. Thats a really big deal. He weaponized a federal agency against political donors because he could. Zero accountability.

Apache said:

---

Quote:

---

Again, why don't any of the dozens of victims publicly name their abusers? That for sure would put on the pressure.

---

Many of them received millions of dollars in compensation from previous lawsuits and signed NDAs.
Also victims start naming names & they get the living hell sued out of them by people with very deep pockets.

They are probably trying to put the trauma behind them & get on with their lives. Getting drug through the mud and hounded by reporters may not be something they are willing to do. Nor do these people want to become a name on the Clinton Body Count list, offed by Mossad, The Crown, or some 3 letter Deep State entity.

---

None of that is in jeopardy if crimes are involved. You can't NDA a crime and enforce the NDA. You can't NDA on behalf of a third party. Are you saying that all the perpetrators made and paid for individual NDA with each one of those victims? That doesn't hold water.

The victims will HAVE to name names if they ever want justice in a criminal court. There is no getting around that. If there is legitimacy to their implied claims that other conspirators committed sex crimes, let's have it.


Yes, some of them prefer to remain anonymous and move on with their lives, but a few groups of them keep holding public events or issuing statements that imply there are perpetrators that have gone unaddressed but they never ever drop even one name.

theJonatron said:

---

Mr.Milkshake said:

---

1. Anytime you see something claiming sex crimes against children, high likelihood it's fake. 'They' have been using this for ages bc it's the one thing that's indefensible.
2. Bondi et al loud noises. Same for thereatrded Democrats. Ok? Do something.

---

If it's fake then why don't they release 3million other files? Why has our federal government, under both parties, taken steps and precautions to cover this up on multiple levels? Why is Ghilane in prison?

If it's fake, why not release everything? If this was just one big conspiracy theory, why not haven't all the accused prove how they were not involved?

The accused have been silent, they have distanced themselves, and some have been shunned from their positions.

Wake. Up.

---

Mmhmm. Far more likely there are a bunch of state secrets, financial, and drug crimes than some giant pedo ring, but whatever you want to believe bud

I agree, Epstein was deep in insider trading and information peddling and I think there's much more hard evidence of that that can be uncovered and prosecuted. Hell, they have a couple of his associates dead to rights insider trading on secret government information. One of them is a current high ranking Brit politician. If anything, that is why there is not more made public.

A few scattershot thoughts on this:

• Bondi is a twit. She may have done some good things but she comes across very fake and has her lips constantly on Trumps balls and doesn't seem to carry an independent thought. A number of the questions asked could have been easily answered.
• That said I'm OK with her and any of Trump's cabinet giving it back to the Dems and being hostile to them in these settings. They are nothing more than a circus anyway and there's a high level of hypocrisy coming from Dems constantly looking for soundbites.
• I'm for full transparency on this: release all files unredacted, victims need to name names, etc. Personally I think the bigger story is Epstein's financial dealings and possible entanglements with the CIA/Mossad, etc, although I'd love to see a ton of people taken down for diddling underage girls.
• I think many many Dems are only pushing for this because they think Trump participated. They don't care about victims or pedophilia, they just want to get Trump. The media as well. Almost all their stories on this have had a Trump angle rather than Clinton or other players. Its disingenuous because none of these people were screeching about it during Biden's term.
• Trump and his team, including Bondi, Patel, Bongino all completely botched the handling of this. First promoting it, then claiming there were no files, a hoax etc.

Quote:

---

None of that is in jeopardy if crimes are involved. You can't NDA a crime and enforce the NDA. You can't NDA on behalf of a third party. Are you saying that all the perpetrators made and paid for individual NDA with each one of those victims? That doesn't hold water.

---

No, I specifically said "Many" of the victims received NDAs. I understand that you can't NDA a crime, but it creates a level of deterrence.

Quote:

---

The victims will HAVE to name names if they ever want justice in a criminal court. There is no getting around that. If there is legitimacy to their implied claims that other conspirators committed sex crimes, let's have it.

---

Again I think many of the victims simply want to move on from the trauma and upending their current lives.. It's that simple. Obviously not all of them. Many received a ton of money to keep quiet, who knows how many victims are STILL receiving large sums of money to keep quiet.

Quote:

---

Yes, some of them prefer to remain anonymous and move on with their lives, but a few groups of them keep holding public events or issuing statements that imply there are perpetrators that have gone unaddressed but they never ever drop even one name.

---

Why do you think this is? Fear? Lack of evidence? They are lying? All of the above? Genuinely curious.

The Democrats do not care about transparency. They only care for finding anything that can be used to politically damage Trump, even if it means pretending disclosure is concealment. With that said, President Trump, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino completely mishandled the process of releasing the Epstein files. Trump needs to replace Bondi and Patel because there have been zero arrets from the Epstein case.

By far the most true, rational, intelligent post I have seen on this site.

Danimal said:

---

To OP.... Hahaha hahaha haha hahaha.

She wrecked her career yesterday in front of the world. Can't believe you said that.

---

How many people do you think are going to watch any of that at all?

Here is what the BBC says about the testimony. The BBC is biased, but not as biased as the MSM:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq6ql2n917zo

The people on the left will think she acted stupid. The people on the right will love her few zingers. Everyone will consume the story that plays into their confirmation bias. Nothing of note will change regarding Bondi's career.

4stringAg said:

---

Trump and his team, including Bondi, Patel, Bongino all completely botched the handling of this. First promoting it, then claiming there were no files, a hoax etc.

---

This, I think, is the real problem. When they uncovered the truth about this, it was one of:

1) a situation so incredibly slimy and all-encompassing that opening pandora's box would cause massive damage to the entire federal government;
2) very tightly tied to our CIA / NSA / FBI activities, and Trump agreed to squash it because of that; or
3) so much false information in the files that it is impossible to tell fact from fiction. Releasing the files would be too damaging because a lot of it contains stuff that is made up and easily verified as being made up, so it brings into question pretty much the entire file.

I think that the truth is a mix between all three.

But, promoting this as something they are going to deliver on, and then punting without telling us why, is just not OK.

Anonymous Source said:

---

If Pam Bondi was a waitress: pic.twitter.com/Qky4a1lLXT

— April Ajoy (@aprilajoyr) February 12, 2026

---

Sounds like a wife.

infinity ag said:

---

Bondi is a disaster.

Time for a new AG. A man who kicks ass.

---

Need one of our heroic American CEOs to take up the mantle. There are thousands to choose from.

**** like this is a big reason for our CPI ranking dropping to its lowest levels ever. When fear of the system collapsing is the reason for not prosecuting crimes, the system is broken.

This was obviously an important hearing for almost all Dems.

Jerry Nadler cares so much about his constituents that he fell asleep during another hearing today….

Perhaps there should be age limits for serving in Congress…
pic.twitter.com/JoSTeytH4M

— Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) February 11, 2026

BusterAg said:

---

Danimal said:

---

To OP.... Hahaha hahaha haha hahaha.

She wrecked her career yesterday in front of the world. Can't believe you said that.

---

How many people do you think are going to watch any of that at all?

Here is what the BBC says about the testimony. The BBC is biased, but not as biased as the MSM:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq6ql2n917zo

The people on the left will think she acted stupid. The people on the right will love her few zingers. Everyone will consume the story that plays into their confirmation bias. Nothing of note will change regarding Bondi's career.

---

You apparently believe that the confirmation bias of a very large number of posters here is of an anti-MAGA persuasion.

rswayshion

Old McDonald said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Less Evil Hank Scorpio said:

---

Iraq2xVeteran said:

---

The Democrats do not care about transparency. They only care for finding anything that can be used to politically damage Trump, even if it means pretending disclosure is concealment. With that said, President Trump, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino completely mishandled the process of releasing the Epstein files. Trump needs to replace Bondi and Patel because there have been zero arrets from the Epstein case.

---

Even if it were true that the Democrats don't actually care about transparency, what about Republicans? The party that has been beating the "release the files" drum for years, the party that had a photo op with a bunch of influencers with a binder, aren't Republicans supposed to want transparency?? The war between the parties is so exhausting. No one has any actual principles, it's all about owning the other side and it's pathetic.

---

Everyone needs to stop battling over Republican vs Democrat. These people have no principles. These people do not care about you. If it suddenly benefited the Republicans to be indifferent on abortion, they would flip. If it suddenly benefited Democrats to oppose gay marriage, they would flip.

At the end of the day, the Republican at the top of the ticket has more in common with the Democrat they are running against than they do with you or me and they would happily sell us out to enrich themselves or protect the money of their benefactors.

The people need to be united in choosing our own side and protecting our interest the same way these people in power are.

---

well said. i'm pretty sick of being constantly distracted with "look at us own the libs/chuds! you love when we own the libs/chuds!" as if the elites aren't richer than ever from circlejerk deals with this government while my neighbors struggle to afford housing, groceries, and healthcare.

---

Well, obviously the solution is to make housing, groceries, and healthcare less affordable!

Good thing you got yours, though, regardless of your neighbor's plight.

Thoughts and prayers.

DeschutesAg said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

4stringAg said:

---

Trump and his team, including Bondi, Patel, Bongino all completely botched the handling of this. First promoting it, then claiming there were no files, a hoax etc.

---

This, I think, is the real problem. When they uncovered the truth about this, it was one of:

1) a situation so incredibly slimy and all-encompassing that opening pandora's box would cause massive damage to the entire federal government;
2) very tightly tied to our CIA / NSA / FBI activities, and Trump agreed to squash it because of that; or
3) so much false information in the files that it is impossible to tell fact from fiction. Releasing the files would be too damaging because a lot of it contains stuff that is made up and easily verified as being made up, so it brings into question pretty much the entire file.

I think that the truth is a mix between all three.

But, promoting this as something they are going to deliver on, and then punting without telling us why, is just not OK.

---

Agreed. But I'd add:

4) Trump is implicated. How deeply implicated is the $64T question.

---

He called the cops on Epstein.

I have my doubts that he is in trouble directly.

Why would he be friends at all with Epstein when he gets whatever he wants without him?

I have no doubt that many of his very good friends are directly implicated, maybe even some of his family members.

Watermelon Man said:

---

BusterAg said:

---

Danimal said:

---

To OP.... Hahaha hahaha haha hahaha.

She wrecked her career yesterday in front of the world. Can't believe you said that.

---

How many people do you think are going to watch any of that at all?

Here is what the BBC says about the testimony. The BBC is biased, but not as biased as the MSM:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cq6ql2n917zo

The people on the left will think she acted stupid. The people on the right will love her few zingers. Everyone will consume the story that plays into their confirmation bias. Nothing of note will change regarding Bondi's career.

---

You apparently believe that the confirmation bias of a very large number of posters posts from a minority of very vocal posters here is of an anti-MAGA persuasion.

rswayshion

---

a mix of:
Anti-Maga
Pro-Maga but anti Bondi (which is possible)
Pro-Maga but upset specifically about Epstein

Oh, and FIFY

ETFan said:

---

Old McDonald said:

---

bondi really tried to pull the "sure epstein raped kids, but have you seen the stock market lately?" defense

---

She's playing for an audience of one.

---

And received rave reviews from that audience

There's plenty to criticize Massie over, but it certainly wasn't the questions he asked yesterday

Old McDonald said:

---

Zachary Klement said:

---

Less Evil Hank Scorpio said:

---

Iraq2xVeteran said:

---

The Democrats do not care about transparency. They only care for finding anything that can be used to politically damage Trump, even if it means pretending disclosure is concealment. With that said, President Trump, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, and Dan Bongino completely mishandled the process of releasing the Epstein files. Trump needs to replace Bondi and Patel because there have been zero arrets from the Epstein case.

---

Even if it were true that the Democrats don't actually care about transparency, what about Republicans? The party that has been beating the "release the files" drum for years, the party that had a photo op with a bunch of influencers with a binder, aren't Republicans supposed to want transparency?? The war between the parties is so exhausting. No one has any actual principles, it's all about owning the other side and it's pathetic.

---

Everyone needs to stop battling over Republican vs Democrat. These people have no principles. These people do not care about you. If it suddenly benefited the Republicans to be indifferent on abortion, they would flip. If it suddenly benefited Democrats to oppose gay marriage, they would flip.

At the end of the day, the Republican at the top of the ticket has more in common with the Democrat they are running against than they do with you or me and they would happily sell us out to enrich themselves or protect the money of their benefactors.

The people need to be united in choosing our own side and protecting our interest the same way these people in power are.

---

well said. i'm pretty sick of being constantly distracted with "look at us own the libs/chuds! you love when we own the libs/chuds!" as if the elites aren't richer than ever from circlejerk deals with this government while my neighbors struggle to afford housing, groceries, and healthcare.

---

And yet you'll rush here every day to troll conservatives and defend every liberal and policy position without fail.