I'll be absolutely shocked if the goat sends Troops in for prolonged fighting


He's already shown us what he's about multiple times...



When the terrorist leaders **** around they find out what death is like


Precision strikes that delete the main belligerent



Ayatollah get ready

Quote:

---

I'm not focused on the corner remark.

---

Glad you aren't, but the fake historian is!

4 said:

---

War generally requires both sides to fight.

Iran will be incapacitated completely within 48 hours.

This won't be a war.

---

Perhaps. That phrase has been said more than once though in history, to the attackers chagrin later. Gotta love the assurance of F16 about unknown future events though.

I could be wrong.

But based on their response last Summer, and their history of blabbermouth, if you made me bet everything I'm worth one way or the other, I'm going to bet on a one-sided ass kicking.

Remember, Iraq was supposed to be the "mother of all wars."

I just hope mossad has their direct action operatives well placed and ready to go.

A knife is going to turn out to be the most consequential weapon in this fight.

If the Mullahs are not taken out, it will all be for nothing.

4 said:

---

I could be wrong.

But based on their response last Summer, and their history of blabbermouth, if you made me bet everything I'm worth one way or the other, I'm going to bet on a one-sided ass kicking.

Remember, Iraq was supposed to be the "mother of all wars."

I just hope mossad has their direct action operatives well placed and ready to go.

A knife is going to turn out to be the most consequential weapon in this fight.

If the Mullahs are not taken out, it will all be for nothing.

---

Our government doesn't know how to "win" wars anymore. Even if our military does. We smashed Iraq in '03. So why did I go there in '06 and '07 fighting my ass off? We beat Afghaniland even before '03. So why was I there in '08 fighting my ass off?

I HOPE the elimination of some Mullahs would be enough if it comes to that. I would never, ever count on it though. That is sheer folly. I mean... *waves vaguely at our past 50 years of wars*

I'm shocked chuck who says it's racist for America to have a border wall but spends American tax payer money on Israel's border wall isn't opposed to war with Iran. Shocked.

USS aircraft carrier Gerald Ford has left Crete heading towards eastern Mediterranean and will arrive Israel in 24hrs time. pic.twitter.com/Il28XhKnBu

— Polymarket Intel (@PolymarketIntel) February 26, 2026

I guess they figured out how to fix the ****ters, for now. Way to go Navy.

Commercial Chicom outfit MizarVision has been providing visual updates as to where our gear is going.

READ MORE👇https://t.co/MAL5How5U8

— Clash Report (@clashreport) February 26, 2026

📍🛰 Diego Garcia, Feb 25th, 2026, Mizarvision.

6 x F-16E
3 x C-17A
3 x KC-135R
1 x C-5M
2 x P-8A Poseidon
2 x MC-130J https://t.co/9RcqIxTR3e pic.twitter.com/Ab9YO8ILK3

— MenchOsint (@MenchOsint) February 26, 2026

I guess that's not necessarily a 'good thing' but no sense in denying it, imho.

Quote:

---

I guess that's not necessarily a 'good thing' but no sense in denying it, imho.

---

True, but anybody that matters already knew this long before it was in the public domain anyways.

nortex97 said:

---

USS aircraft carrier Gerald Ford has left Crete heading towards eastern Mediterranean and will arrive Israel in 24hrs time. pic.twitter.com/Il28XhKnBu

— Polymarket Intel (@PolymarketIntel) February 26, 2026

I guess they figured out how to fix the ****ters, for now. Way to go Navy.

---

What mountains around Crete are snow covered right now?

[No need for the repetitive personal attacks. Take a break -- Staff]

Eliminatus said:

---

4 said:

---

War generally requires both sides to fight.

Iran will be incapacitated completely within 48 hours.

This won't be a war.

---

Yep. I'm sure nobody thought Iraq would last long. And Afghanistan. The initial push won't take long, but what happens after that? 10-20 years of s***. That's what.
Perhaps. That phrase has been said more than once though in history, to the attackers chagrin later. Gotta love the assurance of F16 about unknown future events though.

---

Shalom and Welcome (Bruchim Ha-ba’im) to the sailors of the USS Gerald R. Ford who arrived today in Haifa, Israel.

pic.twitter.com/ipPk9jmGl9

— Marc Zell (@GOPIsrael) February 27, 2026

Non-essential US staff leave Israel:

🚨🇺🇸🇮🇷U.S. evacuates Israel embassy amid growing signs of imminent war with Iran. My report on @axios https://t.co/8BKfEIVz2B

— Barak Ravid (@BarakRavid) February 27, 2026

Eliminatus said:

---

Im Gipper said:

---

Quote:

---

He's really not wrong though.

---

He really is though.


Trump is not backed into any corner. This post is just more blaming the Jews for everything.

---

I'm not focused on the corner remark. That doesn't matter and I don't care about that. Look at the meat of his post. Realistically, there just isn't many choices available left. At all. So it is probably more likely than not, that we will be in a war with Iran in the very near future IMO.

---

were we in a "war" with Iran during June of 2025?

because I remember all the idiots blaming the Jews that there would be World War Three and "THOUSANDS" of American dead if Israel and the USA attacked Iran.

Oh, you mean none of those dire results actually came to pass?!?!

Deputy Mayor of the City of Beer Sheva (Negev Desert) now opening public bomb shelters. Beer Sheva has like 500,000 residents

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has sent an email to staff saying that those who wanted to leave “should do so TODAY.”

Huckabee told employees they should find a flight out of Tel Aviv’s Ben-Gurion Airport to any city outside of Israel which could eventually take them to… https://t.co/aKH7CJw5uR

— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) February 27, 2026

[If you think omitting a few characters in a post that is obviously obscene somehow absolves you from accountability for obscenity, you are incorrect -- Staff]

I think the reason Chuck is worries is all the sleeper cells and "students" will go full jihad here in the US.

That and a very real possibility of cyber attacks on our energy and water infrastructure. So much of this should be air gapped now and removed from being connected to the internet.

whats ya'lls take on this analysis? TLDR: China built the chessboard, armed both players, and positioned itself to learn from whoever loses.

Quote:

---

The Pentagon's own wargames show China can sink the USS Gerald R. Ford. And China just handed Iran the tools to prove it.

The leaked 2025 Overmatch Brief, the most classified US naval simulation conducted last year, concluded that in a Taiwan conflict, Chinese hypersonic anti-ship missiles overwhelm carrier strike group defenses and send the Ford to the bottom. The $13.3 billion crown jewel of American naval power, destroyed in a simulation by the same country that is now selling CM-302 supersonic anti-ship missiles to Iran and delivering electronic warfare systems capable of jamming F-35s operating from carrier decks.

The Ford departed Souda Bay, Greece yesterday. She is heading directly toward the theater where those weapons are being transferred.

China is running the most elegant strategic operation of the 21st century and doing it in plain sight. Step one: prove in your own wargames that you can kill the carrier. Step two: sell the missile technology to the country the carrier is being sent against. Step three: deliver electronic warfare packages that degrade the carrier's air wing. Step four: photograph every asset in the strike architecture and publish it so the target knows exactly what is coming and from where. Step five: sit back and watch whether America sails its most valuable warship into the kill zone anyway.

If the Ford survives, China learns how American carrier defenses actually perform against the weapon systems China designed. If the Ford is hit, China has achieved the single most consequential military intelligence victory since Enigma: real-world combat data on how to sink an American supercarrier without firing a shot themselves.

Iran is not the opponent. Iran is the laboratory.

MizarVision has photographed the F-22s at Ovda, the empty berths at Bahrain, the tankers at Diego Garcia, and now the Ford's departure from Greece. Beijing has constructed a real-time intelligence mosaic of the entire American order of battle and distributed it freely. Every satellite pass is a page in the targeting manual China is writing through Iranian hands.

Pentagon insiders told Politico they have 7 to 10 days of munitions. Trump decides tomorrow at 3 PM. Task Force Scorpion's kamikaze drones stand ready to extend the campaign with $35,000 Shahed clones when the Tomahawks run dry. Geneva produced "progress" without agreement. The demands remain unbridgeable. And the Ford sails toward missiles that were designed in Chinese laboratories, tested in Chinese simulations, and sold to the country America says it will strike by March.

China did not pick a side. China built the chessboard, armed both players, and positioned itself to learn from whoever loses.

The Ford is not sailing toward Iran. The Ford is sailing into a Chinese experiment. And the results will determine who controls the Pacific for the next fifty years.

---

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

---

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country

BQ_90 said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

---

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country

---

we all saw how that worked out in the ME before. We don't need to capture any country over there. The only way to ever eliminate the threat from the ME for the rest of mankind is to kill/destroy EVERYTHING. Which, will never happen. We are simply kicking the can down the road. One should just hope we kick the can far enough that we wont have to kick it again in our lifetime.

US evacuating Israel, Egypt and other places. China evacuating Iran.


This is going to happen

I don’t think that people understand how unusual this picture is #Iran https://t.co/72itsQunEn

— Nadav Pollak (@NadavPollak) February 27, 2026

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

I think the reason Chuck is worries is all the sleeper cells and "students" will go full jihad here in the US.

That and a very real possibility of cyber attacks on our energy and water infrastructure. So much of this should be air gapped now and removed from being connected to the internet.

---

Well, if they are here, you might as well turn the lights on and let these cockroaches show themselves. Better than having them breed in the dark.

American Hardwood said:

---

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

I think the reason Chuck is worries is all the sleeper cells and "students" will go full jihad here in the US.

That and a very real possibility of cyber attacks on our energy and water infrastructure. So much of this should be air gapped now and removed from being connected to the internet.

---

Well, if they are here, you might as well turn the lights on and let these cockroaches show themselves. Better than having them breed in the dark.

---

I wish I could find the article again, but it was talking about how slow playing the talks was not just to move assets into the area. Iran's leadership has been moving anything of value out of the country. They were pillaging every state resource that they could move. The thought was why slow them down? Let them rip apart their country and then chop it's head off.

With this line of thinking, who would be left to pay these people in America? If the leadership that told you to do something was no longer around, would they keep going? Who is going to pay them now? If you had a kush student life in America, why pop your head up for a regime that doesn't exists anymore?

Oh?

FBI releases video of the Islamic Republic trying to assassinate POTUS Trump.

but someone just yesterday informed me that THERE IS NO NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT FROM IRAN.

and the IAEA states Iran is engaged in more lying about their nuclear program.

but it's not a problem at all- because the Islamic Republic poses no threat to America.

امروز آژانس انرژی اتمی، خبر از یک تاسیسات هسته جدید در ایران و ادامه غنی سازی بمب اتم خبر داده؛ و اف بی ای هم یک ویدیو منتشر کرده از اقدام به یک حمله تروریستی توسط ایران برای کشتن ترامپ.

همزمانی این دو اتفاق در یک روز، و اون هم الان:
یعنی “روایت سازی” قبل از آغاز “جنگ”…

— Marzia Hussaini (@marziahussaini0) February 27, 2026

BQ_90 said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

---

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country

---

no one is talking about capturing a country

did we "capture" Venezuela?

and last I looked, Venezuela now does everything we tell them to do.

TacosaurusRex said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

I think the reason Chuck is worries is all the sleeper cells and "students" will go full jihad here in the US.

That and a very real possibility of cyber attacks on our energy and water infrastructure. So much of this should be air gapped now and removed from being connected to the internet.

---

Well, if they are here, you might as well turn the lights on and let these cockroaches show themselves. Better than having them breed in the dark.

---

I wish I could find the article again, but it was talking about how slow playing the talks was not just to move assets into the area. Iran's leadership has been moving anything of value out of the country. They were pillaging every state resource that they could move. The thought was why slow them down? Let them rip apart their country and then chop it's head off.

With this line of thinking, who would be left to pay these people in America? If the leadership that told you to do something was no longer around, would they keep going? Who is going to pay them now? If you had a kush student life in America, why pop your head up for a regime that doesn't exists anymore?

---

I would agree with this line of thinking if you could expect radical Islamists to behave rationally like normal human beings. But being a radical Islamist by definition means that their motivations are likely entirely different than you would expect. Dying in jihad for the glory of Allah for instance may outweigh a cushy American lifestyle.

LMCane said:

---

BQ_90 said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

---

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country

---

no one is talking about capturing a country

did we "capture" Venezuela?

and last I looked, Venezuela now does everything we tell them to do.

---

yea cause this is this is the same exact thing as Venezuela. I mean why are we sending that huge part of our AF and Naval planes to the area if we just gonna pop in with some SF guys and take out the 1 leader of Iran, oh wait, there isn't just one leader

BQ_90 said:

---

LMCane said:

---

BQ_90 said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

---

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country

---

no one is talking about capturing a country

did we "capture" Venezuela?

and last I looked, Venezuela now does everything we tell them to do.

---

yea cause this is this is the same exact thing as Venezuela. I mean why are we sending that huge part of our AF and Navel planes to the area if we just gonna pop in with some SF guys and take out the 1 leader of Iran, oh wait, there isn't just one leader

---

aside from our "navel" planes (sic)

what is your point?

American Hardwood said:

---

TacosaurusRex said:

---

American Hardwood said:

---

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

I think the reason Chuck is worries is all the sleeper cells and "students" will go full jihad here in the US.

That and a very real possibility of cyber attacks on our energy and water infrastructure. So much of this should be air gapped now and removed from being connected to the internet.

---

Well, if they are here, you might as well turn the lights on and let these cockroaches show themselves. Better than having them breed in the dark.

---

I wish I could find the article again, but it was talking about how slow playing the talks was not just to move assets into the area. Iran's leadership has been moving anything of value out of the country. They were pillaging every state resource that they could move. The thought was why slow them down? Let them rip apart their country and then chop it's head off.

With this line of thinking, who would be left to pay these people in America? If the leadership that told you to do something was no longer around, would they keep going? Who is going to pay them now? If you had a kush student life in America, why pop your head up for a regime that doesn't exists anymore?

---

I would agree with this line of thinking if you could expect radical Islamists to behave rationally like normal human beings. But being a radical Islamist by definition means that their motivations are likely entirely different than you would expect. Dying in jihad for the glory of Allah for instance may outweigh a cushy American lifestyle.

---

I agree with everything you said, and it was a thought of mine as well. Human behavior was a specialty of mine before career changes, so it will be incredibly fascinating to see unfold. I just hope we are able to study it without the blood stains.

LMCane said:

---

BQ_90 said:

---

LMCane said:

---

BQ_90 said:

---

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

---

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country

---

no one is talking about capturing a country

did we "capture" Venezuela?

and last I looked, Venezuela now does everything we tell them to do.

---

yea cause this is this is the same exact thing as Venezuela. I mean why are we sending that huge part of our AF and Navel planes to the area if we just gonna pop in with some SF guys and take out the 1 leader of Iran, oh wait, there isn't just one leader

---

aside from our "navel" planes (sic)

what is your point?

---

I fixed my typo for you. But do you really think this operation is the same as Venezuela? Have you even bothered to look at a map of Iran. I get you call of duty guys think this all a video game.

Do you really think Iran doesn't have far better capabilities as Venezuela