***Iran [Military Action Thread]***[See Staff Note in OP]

401,134 Views | 2325 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by LMCane
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Quote:

He's really not wrong though.


He really is though.


Trump is not backed into any corner. This post is just more blaming the Jews for everything.


I'm not focused on the corner remark. That doesn't matter and I don't care about that. Look at the meat of his post. Realistically, there just isn't many choices available left. At all. So it is probably more likely than not, that we will be in a war with Iran in the very near future IMO.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4 said:

"Negotiations are going nowhere right now"

Lol, well no s***.

What really is the point of negotiating with Iran, ever? Well, this iteration of it anyway for the last 50 years?

Negotiations have worked out real well in the past. They're a wonderful, trustworthy negotiating partner. They always live up to their end of the bargain.


Gotta go through the motions at the very least and to be honest, talking should always be tried first before people start dying. You don't just give up or not attempt because they were mean or liars in the past. That's not how actual global politics work. Maybe neighborhood but not at this level for new hotspots.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
War generally requires both sides to fight.

Iran will be incapacitated completely within 48 hours.

This won't be a war.
Pichael Thompson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'll be absolutely shocked if the goat sends Troops in for prolonged fighting


He's already shown us what he's about multiple times...



When the terrorist leaders **** around they find out what death is like


Precision strikes that delete the main belligerent



Ayatollah get ready
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I'm not focused on the corner remark.


Glad you aren't, but the fake historian is!


I'm Gipper
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4 said:

War generally requires both sides to fight.

Iran will be incapacitated completely within 48 hours.

This won't be a war.

Perhaps. That phrase has been said more than once though in history, to the attackers chagrin later. Gotta love the assurance of F16 about unknown future events though.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I could be wrong.

But based on their response last Summer, and their history of blabbermouth, if you made me bet everything I'm worth one way or the other, I'm going to bet on a one-sided ass kicking.

Remember, Iraq was supposed to be the "mother of all wars."

I just hope mossad has their direct action operatives well placed and ready to go.

A knife is going to turn out to be the most consequential weapon in this fight.

If the Mullahs are not taken out, it will all be for nothing.
Eliminatus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4 said:

I could be wrong.

But based on their response last Summer, and their history of blabbermouth, if you made me bet everything I'm worth one way or the other, I'm going to bet on a one-sided ass kicking.

Remember, Iraq was supposed to be the "mother of all wars."

I just hope mossad has their direct action operatives well placed and ready to go.

A knife is going to turn out to be the most consequential weapon in this fight.

If the Mullahs are not taken out, it will all be for nothing.

Our government doesn't know how to "win" wars anymore. Even if our military does. We smashed Iraq in '03. So why did I go there in '06 and '07 fighting my ass off? We beat Afghaniland even before '03. So why was I there in '08 fighting my ass off?

I HOPE the elimination of some Mullahs would be enough if it comes to that. I would never, ever count on it though. That is sheer folly. I mean... *waves vaguely at our past 50 years of wars*

Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm shocked chuck who says it's racist for America to have a border wall but spends American tax payer money on Israel's border wall isn't opposed to war with Iran. Shocked.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

I guess they figured out how to fix the ****ters, for now. Way to go Navy.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Commercial Chicom outfit MizarVision has been providing visual updates as to where our gear is going.


I guess that's not necessarily a 'good thing' but no sense in denying it, imho.
agent-maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I guess that's not necessarily a 'good thing' but no sense in denying it, imho.

True, but anybody that matters already knew this long before it was in the public domain anyways.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:


I guess they figured out how to fix the ****ters, for now. Way to go Navy.

What mountains around Crete are snow covered right now?
bonfarr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Someone needs to make a video of the USS Ford sailing into the Mediterranean with Cousin Eddie in his bath robe smoking a cigar while dumping the sewage. "****ters Full"
Disclaimer: Views expressed in this post reflect the opinions of Texags user bonfarr and are not to be accepted as facts or to be taken at face value.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
[No need for the repetitive personal attacks. Take a break -- Staff]
Yellerjacket
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eliminatus said:

4 said:

War generally requires both sides to fight.

Iran will be incapacitated completely within 48 hours.

This won't be a war.


Yep. I'm sure nobody thought Iraq would last long. And Afghanistan. The initial push won't take long, but what happens after that? 10-20 years of s***. That's what.
Perhaps. That phrase has been said more than once though in history, to the attackers chagrin later. Gotta love the assurance of F16 about unknown future events though.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Non-essential US staff leave Israel:
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Eliminatus said:

Im Gipper said:

Quote:

He's really not wrong though.


He really is though.


Trump is not backed into any corner. This post is just more blaming the Jews for everything.


I'm not focused on the corner remark. That doesn't matter and I don't care about that. Look at the meat of his post. Realistically, there just isn't many choices available left. At all. So it is probably more likely than not, that we will be in a war with Iran in the very near future IMO.


were we in a "war" with Iran during June of 2025?

because I remember all the idiots blaming the Jews that there would be World War Three and "THOUSANDS" of American dead if Israel and the USA attacked Iran.

Oh, you mean none of those dire results actually came to pass?!?!
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Deputy Mayor of the City of Beer Sheva (Negev Desert) now opening public bomb shelters. Beer Sheva has like 500,000 residents



Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[If you think omitting a few characters in a post that is obviously obscene somehow absolves you from accountability for obscenity, you are incorrect -- Staff]

AlaskanAg99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the reason Chuck is worries is all the sleeper cells and "students" will go full jihad here in the US.

That and a very real possibility of cyber attacks on our energy and water infrastructure. So much of this should be air gapped now and removed from being connected to the internet.
aTm '99
Serious Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whats ya'lls take on this analysis? TLDR: China built the chessboard, armed both players, and positioned itself to learn from whoever loses.

Quote:

The Pentagon's own wargames show China can sink the USS Gerald R. Ford. And China just handed Iran the tools to prove it.

The leaked 2025 Overmatch Brief, the most classified US naval simulation conducted last year, concluded that in a Taiwan conflict, Chinese hypersonic anti-ship missiles overwhelm carrier strike group defenses and send the Ford to the bottom. The $13.3 billion crown jewel of American naval power, destroyed in a simulation by the same country that is now selling CM-302 supersonic anti-ship missiles to Iran and delivering electronic warfare systems capable of jamming F-35s operating from carrier decks.

The Ford departed Souda Bay, Greece yesterday. She is heading directly toward the theater where those weapons are being transferred.

China is running the most elegant strategic operation of the 21st century and doing it in plain sight. Step one: prove in your own wargames that you can kill the carrier. Step two: sell the missile technology to the country the carrier is being sent against. Step three: deliver electronic warfare packages that degrade the carrier's air wing. Step four: photograph every asset in the strike architecture and publish it so the target knows exactly what is coming and from where. Step five: sit back and watch whether America sails its most valuable warship into the kill zone anyway.

If the Ford survives, China learns how American carrier defenses actually perform against the weapon systems China designed. If the Ford is hit, China has achieved the single most consequential military intelligence victory since Enigma: real-world combat data on how to sink an American supercarrier without firing a shot themselves.

Iran is not the opponent. Iran is the laboratory.

MizarVision has photographed the F-22s at Ovda, the empty berths at Bahrain, the tankers at Diego Garcia, and now the Ford's departure from Greece. Beijing has constructed a real-time intelligence mosaic of the entire American order of battle and distributed it freely. Every satellite pass is a page in the targeting manual China is writing through Iranian hands.

Pentagon insiders told Politico they have 7 to 10 days of munitions. Trump decides tomorrow at 3 PM. Task Force Scorpion's kamikaze drones stand ready to extend the campaign with $35,000 Shahed clones when the Tomahawks run dry. Geneva produced "progress" without agreement. The demands remain unbridgeable. And the Ford sails toward missiles that were designed in Chinese laboratories, tested in Chinese simulations, and sold to the country America says it will strike by March.

China did not pick a side. China built the chessboard, armed both players, and positioned itself to learn from whoever loses.

The Ford is not sailing toward Iran. The Ford is sailing into a Chinese experiment. And the results will determine who controls the Pacific for the next fifty years.

Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?
BQ_90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yukon Cornelius said:

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country
AustinCountyAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ_90 said:

Yukon Cornelius said:

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country

we all saw how that worked out in the ME before. We don't need to capture any country over there. The only way to ever eliminate the threat from the ME for the rest of mankind is to kill/destroy EVERYTHING. Which, will never happen. We are simply kicking the can down the road. One should just hope we kick the can far enough that we wont have to kick it again in our lifetime.
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
US evacuating Israel, Egypt and other places. China evacuating Iran.


This is going to happen
God loves you so much He'll meet you where you are. He also loves you too much to allow to stay where you are.

We sing Hallelujah! The Lamb has overcome!
Fitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AlaskanAg99 said:

I think the reason Chuck is worries is all the sleeper cells and "students" will go full jihad here in the US.

That and a very real possibility of cyber attacks on our energy and water infrastructure. So much of this should be air gapped now and removed from being connected to the internet.

Well, if they are here, you might as well turn the lights on and let these cockroaches show themselves. Better than having them breed in the dark.
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
TacosaurusRex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
American Hardwood said:

AlaskanAg99 said:

I think the reason Chuck is worries is all the sleeper cells and "students" will go full jihad here in the US.

That and a very real possibility of cyber attacks on our energy and water infrastructure. So much of this should be air gapped now and removed from being connected to the internet.

Well, if they are here, you might as well turn the lights on and let these cockroaches show themselves. Better than having them breed in the dark.

I wish I could find the article again, but it was talking about how slow playing the talks was not just to move assets into the area. Iran's leadership has been moving anything of value out of the country. They were pillaging every state resource that they could move. The thought was why slow them down? Let them rip apart their country and then chop it's head off.

With this line of thinking, who would be left to pay these people in America? If the leadership that told you to do something was no longer around, would they keep going? Who is going to pay them now? If you had a kush student life in America, why pop your head up for a regime that doesn't exists anymore?
"If you are reading this, I have passed on from this world — not as big a deal for you as it was for me."
T. Boone Pickens
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh?

FBI releases video of the Islamic Republic trying to assassinate POTUS Trump.

but someone just yesterday informed me that THERE IS NO NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT FROM IRAN.

and the IAEA states Iran is engaged in more lying about their nuclear program.

but it's not a problem at all- because the Islamic Republic poses no threat to America.

LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ_90 said:

Yukon Cornelius said:

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country


no one is talking about capturing a country

did we "capture" Venezuela?

and last I looked, Venezuela now does everything we tell them to do.
American Hardwood
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TacosaurusRex said:

American Hardwood said:

AlaskanAg99 said:

I think the reason Chuck is worries is all the sleeper cells and "students" will go full jihad here in the US.

That and a very real possibility of cyber attacks on our energy and water infrastructure. So much of this should be air gapped now and removed from being connected to the internet.

Well, if they are here, you might as well turn the lights on and let these cockroaches show themselves. Better than having them breed in the dark.

I wish I could find the article again, but it was talking about how slow playing the talks was not just to move assets into the area. Iran's leadership has been moving anything of value out of the country. They were pillaging every state resource that they could move. The thought was why slow them down? Let them rip apart their country and then chop it's head off.

With this line of thinking, who would be left to pay these people in America? If the leadership that told you to do something was no longer around, would they keep going? Who is going to pay them now? If you had a kush student life in America, why pop your head up for a regime that doesn't exists anymore?

I would agree with this line of thinking if you could expect radical Islamists to behave rationally like normal human beings. But being a radical Islamist by definition means that their motivations are likely entirely different than you would expect. Dying in jihad for the glory of Allah for instance may outweigh a cushy American lifestyle.
The best way to keep evil men from wielding great power is to not create great power in the first place.
BQ_90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

BQ_90 said:

Yukon Cornelius said:

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country


no one is talking about capturing a country

did we "capture" Venezuela?

and last I looked, Venezuela now does everything we tell them to do.

yea cause this is this is the same exact thing as Venezuela. I mean why are we sending that huge part of our AF and Naval planes to the area if we just gonna pop in with some SF guys and take out the 1 leader of Iran, oh wait, there isn't just one leader
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BQ_90 said:

LMCane said:

BQ_90 said:

Yukon Cornelius said:

So anyone able to answer why the US needs to involved and not just let Israel bomb Iran if that's what they think they need to do?

Doubt it. I mean bombing didn't work twice against Iraq. Didn't work in Afghanistan didn't work last year with Iran. At some point boots have to go on the ground if you're talking about capturing a country


no one is talking about capturing a country

did we "capture" Venezuela?

and last I looked, Venezuela now does everything we tell them to do.

yea cause this is this is the same exact thing as Venezuela. I mean why are we sending that huge part of our AF and Navel planes to the area if we just gonna pop in with some SF guys and take out the 1 leader of Iran, oh wait, there isn't just one leader


aside from our "navel" planes (sic)

what is your point?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.