US Women's team ranting against Trump

10,070 Views | 129 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by Muy
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Me personally, I would go 100% of the time. I also wouldn't pull that stunt where I cross out Biden's name to have Trump sign some certificate or letter. I don't care who is in office. I'd be honored to be recognized by POTUS and would cherish that document for the remainder of my days.
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
safety guy said:

CharleyKerfeld said:

Forgive the devil's advocate-ism, but if any of you guys had some accomplishment that got you called by Joe Biden or Kamala Harris inviting you to the White House between 2020 and 2024, would you have gone?


Here's the deal. The White House is bigger than the person that occupies it. The historical nature of the building and what it has represented for the country overrides any thoughts of who occupies the building at any time.

President Taft excluded

HILLJE61
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The comments have captured all the facets very well. Outstanding job my friends. Would have been better and more decent to have the woemen stay home.
Law-Apt_3G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Put me in the stunt column, you in the cherish.
The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HILLJE61 said:

The comments have captured all the facets very well. Outstanding job my friends. Would have been better and more decent to have the woemen stay home.


I think they should compete. I also think it's fair to say there is little to no interest in this sport outside of the olympics and parents paying their kids through club sports until college.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HILLJE61 said:

The comments have captured all the facets very well. Outstanding job my friends. Would have been better and more decent to have the woemen stay home.


I think you misread the comments
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's as if Trump demanded the girls show up and make him and the boys some sammiches.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Collective said:

HILLJE61 said:

The comments have captured all the facets very well. Outstanding job my friends. Would have been better and more decent to have the woemen stay home.


I think they should compete. I also think it's fair to say there is little to no interest in this sport outside of the olympics and parents paying their kids through club sports until college.

pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
'The good news is that I don't have to think about women's hockey again until 2030'....

*boom*
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't see Trumps comment until I read this thread, and I did not know they had turned down his invitation.

FWIW, I would gladly eat a Quarter Pounder at the White House regardless who is President, but I don't expect an invitation anytime soon. Maybe it was to do with something I wrote on Usenet in 1997. I dunno.


One thing that disappoints me about America today is how many people are convinced they will be offended even before someone they don't like opens their mouth. There seems to be a lot of that from both sides. It seems to be a hindrance to having legit conversations, something we Americas used to be proud of
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am not surprised that the Gold Medal winning US Women's hockey team ranted about being very offended by President Trump's joke because liberal white women always play the victim. They claimed they declined the State they declined his invitation to the White House and the State of Union because of scheduling conflicts, but they were partying with Flavor Flav and doing several press conferences. They squandered a very rare opportunity to go to the White House and meet the President. Screw them!


CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Iraq2xVeteran said:

I am not surprised that the Gold Medal winning US Women's hockey team ranted about being very offended by President Trump's joke and showed why they declined his invitation to the White House and the State of Union. They can't even seem to relish the moment and allow fans to admire their accomplishments.


t_J_e_C_x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I doubt they're going to miss the glowing support of the MAGA crowd which is already so unlikely to support them regardless.
C/O 2013 - Company E2
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
New here?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I would be much more likely to support them if the professed any pride for the front of thr shirt.

*note- i dont know if the women's hockey team **** on the usa or not, but, as im not generally a hockey or women's hockey fan, I obviously have only relative associated support, in so much as I want every usa Olympic team or athlete to dominate. Its obviously much easier to root for the men's team which oozes American pride than other athletes who crap on it when given the opportunity

The only team I will not support and would be fine if they would entirely disassociate themsleves with the usa is the uswnt. Screw them.
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CharleyKerfeld said:

Iraq2xVeteran said:

I am not surprised that the Gold Medal winning US Women's hockey team ranted about being very offended by President Trump's joke and showed why they declined his invitation to the White House and the State of Union. They can't even seem to relish the moment and allow fans to admire their accomplishments.




Worst kept secret on Texags
pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Women's hockey....
CharleyKerfeld
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones! said:

New here?

Nope, but I had WInston open for something else and thought it was worth a test.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

One thing that disappoints me about America today is how many people are convinced they will be offended even before someone they don't like opens their mouth. There seems to be a lot of that from both sides. It seems to be a hindrance to having legit conversations, something we Americas used to be proud of

Charlie Kirk tried that and a lefty lunatic assassinated him for it but don't worry, legacy media tried to gaslight the public into believing it was a conservative who did it.

It's difficult to have any legit conversations when the other side believes conservatives are all neo-Nazi's going door-to-door "looking for brown people to deport." Thanks legacy media and irresponsible Democrat politicians.
Azeew
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Buncha gunts
Ag_SGT
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ABATTBQ11 said:

So you're offended that they were offended that Trump **** on their accomplishments?

How exactly did Trump ****on their accomplishments?
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." Ben Franklin
Backyard Gator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EclipseAg said:

And look who decided to throw her two cents into the discussion: The woman responsible for destroying two decades of goodwill built by the pioneers of US women's soccer.



That See You Next Tuesday's 15 minutes are up
AggieGunslinger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EclipseAg said:

And look who decided to throw her two cents into the discussion: The woman responsible for destroying two decades of goodwill built by the pioneers of US women's soccer.




She wouldn't have the team at a strip club singing the Star Spangled Banner after a big win either. She can **** right off.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapino is what young girls should not aspire to be or they will live a partial life, focusing more on pretending to be victims than anything else.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.