I think a multitude of things can be true. Iran can be the bad guy everyone says it is. It's also true we and England played a pivotal role in that being the case in 1953. I also think Islam immigration is one of the most significant threats to the west at large today and it's not being addressed. It's clear the regional countries are the most endangered by Iranian aggression and nuclear proliferation yet those neighboring countries aren't removing the problem. It some how always requires Americans to be on the chopping block.

GeorgiAg said:

---

Ag87H2O said:

---

GeorgiAg said:

---

I feel this is my duty to get the thread going. (I dint give a crap about Iran)

Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 11, 2013

---

So Trump was wrong in 2013.

He got it right today.

---

I am posting these things as talking points. Iran is a horrible regime. I just hate that we are having to put our soldiers and service men at risk and spend our money.

---

I hate half the country pays no income tax and I hate our giveaway programs, two things where we spend our money but are within our control to stop with paper and a pen. Iran is not within that degree of control.

one safe place said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

I'm sick of the wars. I'm sick of the corruption. I voted Trump every time to clean this stuff. But I'm more confident than ever that they're all compromised.

I'm sick of our leaders being elected on a position and then completely deviating. The whole thing makes me sick as ****.

---

You had two choices, Harris or Trump. Neither were perfect. One was a do nothing idiot, the other was Trump.

As to being sick as ****, I think you are exaggerating.

---

I don't really care if you think I'm exaggerating or not. I still have my beliefs and you can't change them, and that infuriates you.

An excellent statement from Mark Carney.

“Canada stands with the Iranian people in their long and courageous struggle against Iran's oppressive regime. Canada has listed the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist entity, and has sanctioned 256 Iranian entities and 222… https://t.co/SCW6RqI1Mf

— Billboard Chris 🌎 (@BillboardChris) February 28, 2026

Yukon Cornelius said:

---

I think a multitude of things can be true. Iran can be the bad guy everyone says it is. It's also true we and England played a pivotal role in that being the case in 1953. I also think Islam immigration is one of the most significant threats to the west at large today and it's not being addressed. It's clear the regional countries are the most endangered by Iranian aggression and nuclear proliferation yet those neighboring countries aren't removing the problem. It some how always requires Americans to be on the chopping block.

---

Iran is part of that problem. The Iranian Imams have been encouraging Islamic immigration to western countries for years as one of the tactics. Honestly it's the only one that's actually got a chance to work

Not sure why I wouldn't…we've been in the sand for quarter century.

And 42 stars show I'm not the only person who agrees. Don't let that anger you.

Waste of time and resources in that region. The regime change will flop like every one tried.

AxelFoley85 said:

---

Waste of time and resources in that region. The regime change will flop like every one tried.

---

And lead to further migration to the west. All part of the plan.

Quote:

---

I think a multitude of things can be true. Iran can be the bad guy everyone says it is. It's also true we and England played a pivotal role in that being the case in 1953.

---

Are you referring to the Suez Canal?

Yep, dumb dumb dumb.

Who?mikejones! said:

---

An excellent statement from Mark Carney.

“Canada stands with the Iranian people in their long and courageous struggle against Iran's oppressive regime. Canada has listed the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist entity, and has sanctioned 256 Iranian entities and 222… https://t.co/SCW6RqI1Mf

— Billboard Chris 🌎 (@BillboardChris) February 28, 2026

---

He smells oil!

I hope you're right.

Phatbob said:

---

Old McDonald said:

---

so tldr:

trump 2024: no new wars
republicans: hell yeah
trump 2025: just gonna bomb Iran's nuke sites real quick
republicans: hell yeah
trump 2026: we're doing a regime change war in iran, some of you may die but that's a risk I'm willing to take
republicans: hell yeah
everyone else: hey we don't want another forever war in the middle east
republicans: cry more libs

---

This was always a fantasy by some MAGA. Trump was never as dovish as they projected him to be. He is, however, way more hesitant and better at it than his most recent predecessors

---

So true. The difference here is surgical strikes, assisting other allies (israel) doing the heavy lifting, empowering the local population to create their own government instead of decades long war feeding our bloodthirsty dirty grifting warmongers in congress.

To achieve peace means being willing to fight. Fighting wisely is the difference.

Ag87H2O said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

PaulsBunions said:

---

I am opposed to this War.

This is not “America First.”

When Congress reconvenes, I will work with @RepRoKhanna to force a Congressional vote on war with Iran.

The Constitution requires a vote, and your Representative needs to be on record as opposing or supporting this war.

— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) February 28, 2026

---

Look it's the Quisling commiserating with the Marxists.

---

"The War Powers Resolution requires the president to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30-day withdrawal period, without congressional authorization for use of military force (AUMF) or a declaration of war by the United States."

Congress was notifiied. This thing may be over before any congressional authorization is required. Massie is a drama queen looking for headlines.

---

Senator Fetterman is a better conservative, common sense, congressman than Massie. Thomas Massie is a naive joke, at best. His every action is designed to attract attention to himself not aid in governing.

So long as its not albertan hes for it

Ro Khanna is endorsed by NIAC, which is a front for Islamic Regime in Iran's interests. The Islamic Regime in Iran is an entity currently engaged in open hostilities with the United States. This POS is opining for his dagg partner Massie. COmpletely clueless to Article 2 Sec 8. Rubio briefed the Gang of EIght, this clown and his buddy Massie can EAD

Trump has launched an illegal regime change war in Iran with American lives at risk. Congress must convene on Monday to vote on @RepThomasMassie & my WPR to stop this. Every member of Congress should go on record this weekend on how they will vote. pic.twitter.com/tlRi3Vz849

— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) February 28, 2026

There are few neutral people, especially in congress

Queso1 said:

---

one safe place said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

I'm sick of the wars. I'm sick of the corruption. I voted Trump every time to clean this stuff. But I'm more confident than ever that they're all compromised.

I'm sick of our leaders being elected on a position and then completely deviating. The whole thing makes me sick as ****.

---

You had two choices, Harris or Trump. Neither were perfect. One was a do nothing idiot, the other was Trump.

As to being sick as ****, I think you are exaggerating.

---

I don't really care if you think I'm exaggerating or not. I still have my beliefs and you can't change them, and that infuriates you.

---

Oops! Again, I believe you have exaggerated. Are you clairvoyant?

Do you have any substance to add or are we all out of material and limited to ad hominem attacks?

Sorry you interpreted my comment as an ad hominem attack, but yours struck me exactly that way. Very emotional response.

Ag87H2O said:

---

Committed Democrat here.

I’m a hard no.

My vote is Operation Epic Fury. 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/VTiFcWbzqG

— U.S. Senator John Fetterman (@SenFettermanPA) February 28, 2026

Fetterman on national security is a better Republican than a lot of Republicans.

---

True but he still sat on his ass at the SOU when Trump asked who would stand for the American people.

Who?mikejones! said:

---

An excellent statement from Mark Carney.

“Canada stands with the Iranian people in their long and courageous struggle against Iran's oppressive regime. Canada has listed the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist entity, and has sanctioned 256 Iranian entities and 222… https://t.co/SCW6RqI1Mf

— Billboard Chris 🌎 (@BillboardChris) February 28, 2026

---

Carney is 0 for 2 this week. Poor Canada.

flyrancher said:

---

Sorry you interpreted my comment as an ad hominem attack, but yours struck me exactly that way. Very emotional response.

---

Are we supposed to divorce emotion from this? Are we supposed to ignore that our government is compromised? I guess we just get in line again, subject ourselves to the propaganda and suffer the consequences. I'm not willing to do that again. I've seen my country destroyed and it upsets me.

Prosperdick said:

---

Ag87H2O said:

---

Committed Democrat here.

I’m a hard no.

My vote is Operation Epic Fury. 🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/VTiFcWbzqG

— U.S. Senator John Fetterman (@SenFettermanPA) February 28, 2026

Fetterman on national security is a better Republican than a lot of Republicans.

---

True but he still sat on his ass at the SOU when Trump asked who would stand for the American people.

---

Incorrect he stood, it's on video and in the interview with Shannon Bream he said so as well

Does the US have boots on the ground in Iran this very minute?

Because the bleeding tweets on page 1 makes me think the US has completely invaded and occupied Tehran.

Quote:

---

Carney is 0 for 2 this week.

---

Hockey and what?

BTKAG97 said:

---

Does the US have boots on the ground in Iran this very minute?

Because the bleeding tweets on page 1 makes me think the US has completely invaded and occupied Tehran.

---

None whatsoever

Who?mikejones! said:

---

I think many are misremembering what trump said.

He never promised no new wars. He said no endless, stupid wars. So, as weve seen, he doesn't considered short, singular action as "war," nor has anything he's done proven to become endless.

So, it is some fantasy on the maga right, along with normal tds people coming together to hate trumps fp.

---

this is naive. we have 40 years of experience telling us regime change wars in the middle east are never singular decisive actions, but instead endless quagmires that give rise to and endless stream of new problems down the road. yet this time it's differen(T) because… why exactly?

also, very convenient that trump can never betray the "no new wars" promise until they become forever wars once he's out of office