Queso1 said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Have fun over there with tucker and fuentes

---

I don't know about Fuentes, but Tucker is about the only sane voice in media. Sorry it causes so much butt hurt here.

---

Tucker is complete and utter sell out. an absolute clown show.

OP I'm not sure what generation you were born in, but there is a giant population of people under 50 who agree with you. TexAgs is probably not where you're going to find a whole terrible lot of that mindset. Most here are either Big Government Republicans, or just rooting for Trump like he's the second coming.

The pending economic catastrophe will further accelerate the movement toward America First so keep your chin up things are changing.

FWTXAg said:

---

OP I'm not sure what generation you were born in, but there is a giant population of people under 50 who agree with you. TexAgs is probably not where you're going to find a whole terrible lot of that mindset. Most here are either Big Government Republicans, or just rooting for Trump like he's the second coming.

The pending economic catastrophe will further accelerate the movement toward America First so keep your chin up things are changing.

---

I rarely posted on politics, if ever, before all this Iran ***** But it really does seem like an echo chamber in here. I appreciate your comment, and it makes me optimistic that we'll actually get a real America first movement in the future.

Furlock Bones said:

---

Queso1 said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Have fun over there with tucker and fuentes

---

I don't know about Fuentes, but Tucker is about the only sane voice in media. Sorry it causes so much butt hurt here.

---

Tucker is complete and utter sell out. an absolute clown show.

---

And Tucker's virulent antisemitism infects other clowns.

aggies101 said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

OP I'm not sure what generation you were born in, but there is a giant population of people under 50 who agree with you. TexAgs is probably not where you're going to find a whole terrible lot of that mindset. Most here are either Big Government Republicans, or just rooting for Trump like he's the second coming.

The pending economic catastrophe will further accelerate the movement toward America First so keep your chin up things are changing.

---

I rarely posted on politics, if ever, before all this Iran ***** But it really does seem like an echo chamber in here. I appreciate your comment, and it makes me optimistic that we'll actually get a real America first movement in the future.

---

If your America First movement allows Iran nukes and the missiles to deliver bombs worldwide, same as the Obama and Libertarian doctrine, you are a danger to America.

Excellent summary thank you

It'll be really funny when, in 10+ years time, the justification for US involvement turns out to be a big lie and that this administration executed this war on the behalf of special domestic/foreign interests. At least people like Walsh are being ideologically consistent in their position (i.e. Constitutional Conservatism/Originalist intent + Founding Father's position on foreign entanglements). Given the recent history of US Foreign Affairs, cynicism IMO is a prudent approach.

Kvetch said:

---

FobTies said:

---

If this military campaign goes longer than a couple months, it will destroy Trumps legacy and midterms. Trump needs to find an off ramp in next few weeks, chalk it up as a win, and blame any fallout in Ben Net. That's the most likely outcome.

F16 has a very short memory.

Donald Trump has spent ten years promising not to start new wars.

A short compilation 🤡💀 pic.twitter.com/tOxr6MszWV

— Parody Jeff (@BackupJeffx) March 3, 2026

---

Now do the videos of him talking about Iran over the last decade. Sometimes peace takes strength.

---

Yeah. Let's hope this time is different. If any POTUS has broken the mold, its Trump.

But still, there is a military industrial complex in DC and Israel's influence is very strong. So the probability is against Trump being able to end US involvement/funding quick. Thats were the skepticism comes from. Its a healthy concern and doesn't make you Jane Fonda.

Putting aside your personal beliefs, this level of isolationism isn't a winner. Voters don't want troops on the ground with no end in sight, massive expenditures and significant losses. Assuming Trump doesn't plan any level of occupation (as he has stated but we shall see) then this is exactly how we should be exercising our foreign influence. Impair threats but don't occupy. If the next guy wants to FA then he will also FO. The lesson that should have been learned from the Bush era is there's no point in trying to install a regime through military force. It will never hold up. The calculus is simply how bad is the current regime and how likely is the next one to be worse? In this case, let's say the current (past?) regime was a 93 out of 100 on the bad guy scale. How likely are you to wind up with a 94+ with the next hombres?

IcaX91 said:

---

It'll be really funny when, in 10+ years time, the justification for US involvement turns out to be a big lie and that this administration executed this war on the behalf of special domestic/foreign interests. At least people like Walsh are being ideologically consistent in their position (i.e. Constitutional Conservatism/Originalist intent + Founding Father's position on foreign entanglements). Given the recent history of US Foreign Affairs, cynicism IMO is a prudent approach.

---

bobbranco said:

---

aggies101 said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

OP I'm not sure what generation you were born in, but there is a giant population of people under 50 who agree with you. TexAgs is probably not where you're going to find a whole terrible lot of that mindset. Most here are either Big Government Republicans, or just rooting for Trump like he's the second coming.

The pending economic catastrophe will further accelerate the movement toward America First so keep your chin up things are changing.

---

I rarely posted on politics, if ever, before all this Iran ***** But it really does seem like an echo chamber in here. I appreciate your comment, and it makes me optimistic that we'll actually get a real America first movement in the future.

---

If your America First movement allows Iran nukes and the missiles to deliver bombs worldwide, same as the Obama and Libertarian doctrine, you are a danger to America.

---

I'm gonna guess you're probably 65 or older.

WestAustinAg said:

---

The Iran and Venezuela operations are proxy wars with China. The quest for energy. Regional control of the amerias and Middle East. We are also attempting to hem China in near their coast. Building up Japan with offensive fire power for first time since WW2.

Nothing more and nothing less. It is in our interests. China has been dominating in the American hemisphere. And was getting Iran to build their missiles in hopes we would allow them to build Iran up uncontested.

Trump's brilliant. Hopefully it works. Hopefully conservatives figure this **** out.

---

Precisely this.

aggies101 said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

aggies101 said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

OP I'm not sure what generation you were born in, but there is a giant population of people under 50 who agree with you. TexAgs is probably not where you're going to find a whole terrible lot of that mindset. Most here are either Big Government Republicans, or just rooting for Trump like he's the second coming.

The pending economic catastrophe will further accelerate the movement toward America First so keep your chin up things are changing.

---

I rarely posted on politics, if ever, before all this Iran ***** But it really does seem like an echo chamber in here. I appreciate your comment, and it makes me optimistic that we'll actually get a real America first movement in the future.

---

If your America First movement allows Iran nukes and the missiles to deliver bombs worldwide, same as the Obama and Libertarian doctrine, you are a danger to America.

---

I'm gonna guess you're probably 65 or older.

---

I am 48 and he is spot on. This new ultra-right, *******ized libertarian some seem to be recently caught up on is just... bizarre. Maybe its some younger folks just realizing how the big boy game works, but you learn to play in it not blow it up and hope what comes back is rainbows and unicorns.

aggies101 said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

aggies101 said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

OP I'm not sure what generation you were born in, but there is a giant population of people under 50 who agree with you. TexAgs is probably not where you're going to find a whole terrible lot of that mindset. Most here are either Big Government Republicans, or just rooting for Trump like he's the second coming.

The pending economic catastrophe will further accelerate the movement toward America First so keep your chin up things are changing.

---

I rarely posted on politics, if ever, before all this Iran ***** But it really does seem like an echo chamber in here. I appreciate your comment, and it makes me optimistic that we'll actually get a real America first movement in the future.

---

If your America First movement allows Iran nukes and the missiles to deliver bombs worldwide, same as the Obama and Libertarian doctrine, you are a danger to America.

---

I'm gonna guess you're probably 65 or older.

---

I've heard the same lame Libertarian / Leftist talking points for a long time.

Give Iran the bomb, return the land to the the American Indians and pay reparations. LOL. Lame.

These viewpoints and derangement are not new.

It's a worldview that says don't intervene, because it gives them an excuse to attack Americans. Let them attack Americans without an excuse so we can be morally superior.

There's a balance between restraint and deranged that can occur on either side of the Neo Con warmongering and the peacenik libertarian. Dave Smith and the like are on the deranged end of non-intervention.

The Hidden War: Why Iran Is Actually China’s Strategic Asset. China’s Secret Middle East Strategy Is Collapsing.

Iran is not just a rogue state. It is a core pillar of China’s Middle East strategy.

Beijing buys nearly 90% of Iran’s oil exports, builds the digital… pic.twitter.com/GATWlRrHdp

— Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle (@Ken_LoveTW) March 4, 2026

IcaX91 said:

---

It'll be really funny when, in 10+ years time, the justification for US involvement turns out to be a big lie and that this administration executed this war on the behalf of special domestic/foreign interests. At least people like Walsh are being ideologically consistent in their position (i.e. Constitutional Conservatism/Originalist intent + Founding Father's position on foreign entanglements). Given the recent history of US Foreign Affairs, cynicism IMO is a prudent approach.

---

Meh, not much of a war with no boots on the ground. I suspect Iran will soon cry uncle and that'll be the end of it.

It seems to me that Trump has done the same thing he crucified Bush for doing after 9/11 with WMDs in Iraq.

(Which trump probably would have never said about Bush in the first place if Bush had only endorsed him.)

Madagascar said:

---

Lol I thought this was about to be Make America Fat Again.

---

Every single time I have seen someone write MAFA in the last few days I always immediately think the same exact thing.

FWTXAg said:

---

OP I'm not sure what generation you were born in, but there is a giant population of people under 50 who agree with you. TexAgs is probably not where you're going to find a whole terrible lot of that mindset. Most here are either Big Government Republicans, or just rooting for Trump like he's the second coming.

The pending economic catastrophe will further accelerate the movement toward America First so keep your chin up things are changing.

---

Most here above the age of 50 were educated in a school system that still prioritized education over indoctrination.

flown-the-coop said:

---

aggies101 said:

---

bobbranco said:

---

aggies101 said:

---

FWTXAg said:

---

OP I'm not sure what generation you were born in, but there is a giant population of people under 50 who agree with you. TexAgs is probably not where you're going to find a whole terrible lot of that mindset. Most here are either Big Government Republicans, or just rooting for Trump like he's the second coming.

The pending economic catastrophe will further accelerate the movement toward America First so keep your chin up things are changing.

---

I rarely posted on politics, if ever, before all this Iran ***** But it really does seem like an echo chamber in here. I appreciate your comment, and it makes me optimistic that we'll actually get a real America first movement in the future.

---

If your America First movement allows Iran nukes and the missiles to deliver bombs worldwide, same as the Obama and Libertarian doctrine, you are a danger to America.

---

I'm gonna guess you're probably 65 or older.

---

I am 48 and he is spot on. This new ultra-right, *******ized libertarian some seem to be recently caught up on is just... bizarre. Maybe its some younger folks just realizing how the big boy game works, but you learn to play in it not blow it up and hope what comes back is rainbows and unicorns.

---

Its the "we held our nose and voted for Trump" crowd. But they don't say that out loud for the most part. Low-key TDS folks. They start alot of conversations with, "look, I voted for Trump 3 times.....BUT I don't like xyz he's doing". And they don't like much of anything he's doing. Its the Doomer class. They generally don't acknowledge all the W's the administration has had, only L's. And if they disagree with something, it's goes in the Loss column.

I am also 48.

Old Gorm said:

---

NPH- said:

---

America is great again; we are out of the confines of the demmy's ungodly movement.

But now Im team MAFA; Make America First Again. Why is this a bad thing? Since when do we put American citizen's freedoms, safety and tax dollars at risk because of someone else's agenda?

I was clearly born in the wrong generation. If we have excess and can help other people in a godly way, sure, let's help them. But we've clearly got things here on the home front that need correcting, and people here on our shores that can use our benefits. Why are we fighting the world's wars?

---

It is in the best interests of the United States to end the Iranian government.

We tried negotiating. It did not work.

We tried releasing money to them. That only gave them the opportunity to undermine their neighbors in building their proxy thug networks throughout the Middle East.

We tried allowing them nuclear capacity. They had no intention of using it for anything but bringing about the 12th Caliphate.

We have tried diplomacy. We've tried bribery. We've tried total appeasement.

The one thing we didn't try? Kicking their ass Jacksonian style.

We should have done it in 1979. We should have done it in OIF when the Quds forces were caught red-handed assisting the insurgents in the placement of plasma IEDs in the way of our forces.

Thank God we have a POTUS who understands that killing your enemy is a perfectly legitimate option when all other methods have proven ineffective.

---

And to add to this. Trump is looking 20 to 30 years down the road. He is making not just America but the entire world safer for the long haul.

fixer said:

---

WestAustinAg said:

---

The Iran and Venezuela operations are proxy wars with China. The quest for energy. Regional control of the amerias and Middle East. We are also attempting to hem China in near their coast. Building up Japan with offensive fire power for first time since WW2.

Nothing more and nothing less. It is in our interests. China has been dominating in the American hemisphere. And was getting Iran to build their missiles in hopes we would allow them to build Iran up uncontested.

Trump's brilliant. Hopefully it works. Hopefully conservatives figure this **** out.

---

Precisely this.

---

Yep 100%. Most people are not seeing the forest for the trees. I do think there is some valid fear that Iran was building up to launch a massive attack on Israel that would overload their defenses but that probably only served to get Israel on board. From our perspective this was about China primarily and Russia secondly.

Embarrassed for this shrew

Ex-beauty queen and longtime Trump ally Carrie Prejean turns on President Trump, declares “MAGA is dead.”

“Let me tell you right now, MAGA is dead.”

“It is deader than dead.”

“We do not recognize President Donald J. Trump anymore.”

“I’ve been a loyal supporter... for almost… pic.twitter.com/umI1g2sKUu

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 17, 2026

BMX Bandit said:

---

Embarrassed for this shrew

Ex-beauty queen and longtime Trump ally Carrie Prejean turns on President Trump, declares “MAGA is dead.”

“Let me tell you right now, MAGA is dead.”

“It is deader than dead.”

“We do not recognize President Donald J. Trump anymore.”

“I’ve been a loyal supporter... for almost… pic.twitter.com/umI1g2sKUu

— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) March 17, 2026

---

You can't come to America and hide from the rest of world. They will come looking for you and seek to destroy you. Have you ever heard the term, misery loves company? Well, misery is knocking at the door. At some point you have to draw a line in the sand and put a stop to it. Think of it as an infestation of fire ants. You can't live with them at your front door, so you have to use whatever means necessary get them well off your property.

There is something chemically wrong with these people.

I wholeheartedly support Megyn Kelly telling the world that Mark Levin has a micropenis.
It’s the most deserved insult and I don’t care if it’s vulgar.
And Trump’s gigantic defense of Levin only enraged the base more.
People are DONE.
MAGA destroyed by micropenis Mark Levin. https://t.co/FZCqlKlRxw

— Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸 (@mtgreenee) March 16, 2026

ruhtard right is an apt name for this new group

Zachary Klement said:

---

Help me understand.

The White House said we obliterated their nuclear facilities last summer, but now we are concerned with them having nukes that can hit the United States?

I'm also curious, if they're close to having weapons that can strike the U.S. from Iran, do we not have weapons that can strike Iran from the U.S.? Why did we need to move so much of our resources to the Middle East? Why can't we remotely strike them like they're supposedly going to be able to do to us? Are they on the verge of having more advanced tech than we have? Or what's the deal there?

---

Radioactive materials can also be used for dirty bombs. The radioactive bombs should scare you more then the nuclear bomb. One old cargo ship loaded with say U238 or God forbid Plutonium, could conceivably devastate NYC, LA, Miami, Houston or any port city in the U.S.. We must strike at the source. When the delivery system can be any vehicle, we must plan for the worse.