Tucker Carlson has lost his way, something is seriously wrong.

59,959 Views | 639 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Ulysses90
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When the Big Choc 18er has been lubed in bacon fat…

Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:





Tucker Carlson had one of those in his pocket when he interviewed Putin? Really? Wow. I was right all along!
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
School pride. Nothing new for that school in Austin.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:

School pride. Nothing new for that school in Austin.

Tucker Carlson didn't go to the University of Texas. I just assumed he's always been fond of, you know…those. I mean, he wore a bow tie for years. How could you not know?
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bobbranco said:



How is the joke on me? I'm the one saying that Tucker Carlson playing with, you know…those…is completely logical. I've suspected it for 30 years. Are you saying you're surprised?
ShaggySLC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad Sip said:

bobbranco said:



How is the joke on me? I'm the one saying that Tucker Carlson playing with, you know…those…is completely logical. I've suspected it for 30 years. Are you saying you're surprised?

He's saying the joke went over your head ol boy
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ShaggySLC said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

bobbranco said:



How is the joke on me? I'm the one saying that Tucker Carlson playing with, you know…those…is completely logical. I've suspected it for 30 years. Are you saying you're surprised?

He's saying the joke went over your head ol boy

Yeah, but how? Here's how it all went down:

1. Ellis made a joke about something in Tucker's pants.
2. I asked what it was.
3. Someone said it was a tu protest toy.
4. I asked what that meant.
5. Someone posted photos of, you know…those.
6. I immediately agreed that it made perfect sense.
7. I got accused of missing the joke that was originally made which I totally agreed with.

So how's the joke on me?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Trump can put spells on people, why is he under the control of Netanyahu?

Jewish magic stronger than Trump's antichrist sorcery?

I'm Gipper
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

bobbranco said:





Tucker Carlson had one of those in his pocket when he interviewed Putin? Really? Wow. I was right all along!

Was it on his pocket or "concealed"?

Though watching the Dark Wizard about Dean Potter I learned the term "butt weed".

Never ever accept anything termed butt weed. Let's say it relates to concealment in an orifice.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

bobbranco said:





Tucker Carlson had one of those in his pocket when he interviewed Putin? Really? Wow. I was right all along!

Was it on his pocket or "concealed"?

Though watching the Dark Wizard about Dean Potter I learned the term "butt weed".

Never ever accept anything termed butt weed. Let's say it relates to concealment in an orifice.

Good to know.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you want any further evidence that Tucker is a ***** for the highest bidder, he is now a paid endorser of the new Animal Farm, a movie that defecates all over the source material and has replaced Communism with Capatalism as the source of its polemic.

George would rolling over in his grave
ShaggySLC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad Sip said:

ShaggySLC said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

bobbranco said:



How is the joke on me? I'm the one saying that Tucker Carlson playing with, you know…those…is completely logical. I've suspected it for 30 years. Are you saying you're surprised?

He's saying the joke went over your head ol boy

Yeah, but how? Here's how it all went down:

1. Ellis made a joke about something in Tucker's pants.
2. I asked what it was.
3. Someone said it was a tu protest toy.
4. I asked what that meant.
5. Someone posted photos of, you know…those.
6. I immediately agreed that it made perfect sense.
7. I got accused of missing the joke that was originally made which I totally agreed with.

So how's the joke on me?

I didn't look that deep into it, was just letting you know what the picture meant. Clearly you didn't
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ShaggySLC said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

bobbranco said:



How is the joke on me? I'm the one saying that Tucker Carlson playing with, you know…those…is completely logical. I've suspected it for 30 years. Are you saying you're surprised?

He's saying the joke went over your head ol boy


I will chalk it up to naivete. Had a teasip lose his mind when the term teasip was explained. Not clear if the silver spooned doofus was more offended about the city boy comment or the Liberace comment.
Phatbob
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

If Trump can put spells on people, why is he under the control of Netanyahu?

Jewish magic stronger than Trump's antichrist sorcery?

Dude, what do you think? They have space lasers.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bulldog73 said:



I thought this was a joke. This loon/click ho having a 7% (or anything greater than .0000000001%) chance of being the GOP nominee in 2028?

This was once said about Donald Trump
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
love how Nazi Tucker agrees to be interviewed by a friendly NY Times

only to be schooled with his own lies.

he literally lies about everything.

and his weird cackle for things that are not remotely funny just adds to his mental illness
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html
Seamaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?

bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?



Why do we need to listen to Tucker and Massie?
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?




Tucker lies constantly so it's probably hard to pick one. But here's an easy one from the interview.


Seamaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?




Tucker lies constantly so it's probably hard to pick one. But here's an easy one from the interview.





Maybe I am dense but where does that guy disprove what they're talking about?

I just asked Grok about this and gee whiz, it certainly looks like at one time the data showed that the DHS Twitter account was originally set up in Israel.

Do you have proof that the claim was false?!?
Seamaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco said:

Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?



Why do we need to listen to Tucker and Massie?


Well, if you're going to accuse them of being big fat liars, you might want to be able to point out the big fat lies….?
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seamaster said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?




Tucker lies constantly so it's probably hard to pick one. But here's an easy one from the interview.





Maybe I am dense but where does that guy disprove what they're talking about?

I just asked Grok about this and gee whiz, it certainly looks like at one time the data showed that the DHS Twitter account was originally set up in Israel.

Do you have proof that the claim was false?!?


Did you not read the actual tweet in the quote? X's Head of Product said it was fake and the person who did it apparently also admitted it. It was easily debunked months ago, yet Massie is still parroting it for attention from the woke right. I wouldn't be surprised if he's planning on losing the primary and joining the anti-Israel grifting train like Kent did.

As for Tucker, you only have to go down to the first comment:


bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seamaster said:

bobbranco said:

Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?



Why do we need to listen to Tucker and Massie?


Well, if you're going to accuse them of being big fat liars, you might want to be able to point out the big fat lies….?


Have not accused them of anything today. But based on their past statements, why do I need to listen to Tucker and Massie conduct another Iran appeasement hour?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Maybe I am dense


"Maybe"

I'm Gipper
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't listen to shills for foreign governments
Seamaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?




Tucker lies constantly so it's probably hard to pick one. But here's an easy one from the interview.





Maybe I am dense but where does that guy disprove what they're talking about?

I just asked Grok about this and gee whiz, it certainly looks like at one time the data showed that the DHS Twitter account was originally set up in Israel.

Do you have proof that the claim was false?!?


Did you not read the actual tweet in the quote? X's Head of Product said it was fake and the person who did it apparently also admitted it. It was easily debunked months ago, yet Massie is still parroting it for attention from the woke right. I wouldn't be surprised if he's planning on losing the primary and joining the anti-Israel grifting train like Kent did.

As for Tucker, you only have to go down to the first comment:





According to Grok, the experts claim it was a "data glitch" not that it didn't happen.

Big difference.

But that's small potatoes. That's like a minute talking point on a much bigger narrative.

J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seamaster said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?




Tucker lies constantly so it's probably hard to pick one. But here's an easy one from the interview.





Maybe I am dense but where does that guy disprove what they're talking about?

I just asked Grok about this and gee whiz, it certainly looks like at one time the data showed that the DHS Twitter account was originally set up in Israel.

Do you have proof that the claim was false?!?


Did you not read the actual tweet in the quote? X's Head of Product said it was fake and the person who did it apparently also admitted it. It was easily debunked months ago, yet Massie is still parroting it for attention from the woke right. I wouldn't be surprised if he's planning on losing the primary and joining the anti-Israel grifting train like Kent did.

As for Tucker, you only have to go down to the first comment:





According to Grok, the experts claim it was a "data glitch" not that it didn't happen.

Big difference.

But that's small potatoes. That's like a minute talking point on a much bigger narrative.




Who are these "experts"? More of an expert than you a literal X senior employee who said it was fake and added that DHS didn't have their locations shared for security purposes?

Also - do you think Tucker is lying or just wrong about Iran?
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?




Tucker lies constantly so it's probably hard to pick one. But here's an easy one from the interview.





Maybe I am dense but where does that guy disprove what they're talking about?

I just asked Grok about this and gee whiz, it certainly looks like at one time the data showed that the DHS Twitter account was originally set up in Israel.

Do you have proof that the claim was false?!?


Did you not read the actual tweet in the quote? X's Head of Product said it was fake and the person who did it apparently also admitted it. It was easily debunked months ago, yet Massie is still parroting it for attention from the woke right. I wouldn't be surprised if he's planning on losing the primary and joining the anti-Israel grifting train like Kent did.

As for Tucker, you only have to go down to the first comment:





According to Grok, the experts claim it was a "data glitch" not that it didn't happen.

Big difference.

But that's small potatoes. That's like a minute talking point on a much bigger narrative.




Who are these "experts"? More of an expert than you a literal X senior employee who said it was fake and added that DHS didn't have their locations shared for security purposes?

Also - do you think Tucker is lying or just wrong about Iran?


I think Iran murdering 1000's of their citizens because of protests throws the, "Iran is the most liberal country" out of the window.
Seamaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Seamaster said:

Queso1 said:

Just started the Massie interview. Opening monologue is pretty good so far. Pointing out that Trump admin taking the position that consumer credit card spending is a good thing and that it is actually a very bad sign and not something to be bragging about.

https://finance.yahoo.com/economy/articles/trump-official-boasts-americans-credit-201026439.html


The normies won't even listen.

If they did, I'd be curious if they could point out the lies for us.

What does Tucker or Massie say that's not true? Can somebody please listen and be specific?




Tucker lies constantly so it's probably hard to pick one. But here's an easy one from the interview.





Maybe I am dense but where does that guy disprove what they're talking about?

I just asked Grok about this and gee whiz, it certainly looks like at one time the data showed that the DHS Twitter account was originally set up in Israel.

Do you have proof that the claim was false?!?


Did you not read the actual tweet in the quote? X's Head of Product said it was fake and the person who did it apparently also admitted it. It was easily debunked months ago, yet Massie is still parroting it for attention from the woke right. I wouldn't be surprised if he's planning on losing the primary and joining the anti-Israel grifting train like Kent did.

As for Tucker, you only have to go down to the first comment:





According to Grok, the experts claim it was a "data glitch" not that it didn't happen.

Big difference.

But that's small potatoes. That's like a minute talking point on a much bigger narrative.




Who are these "experts"? More of an expert than you a literal X senior employee who said it was fake and added that DHS didn't have their locations shared for security purposes?

Also - do you think Tucker is lying or just wrong about Iran?


I think, based on your question, that you're wrong about Iran.

Iran is a giant mess. An unforced error that is going to cost the America First/MAGA movement any momentum it had, which is a shame.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Those aligned with Stormfront need to calm down. And avoid falling prey to the leftist rabblerousers.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lol - so you think Tucker is somehow correct about Iran being some regional liberal freedom stronghold? Because he's not.

The only options are 1. He actually thinks that, which makes him a moron. Or 2. He knows it's ridiculously false and is lying for attention/money or both.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Carlson wants USA to be weakened. He wants our hegemony gone and China to be equal to us.

"America first" my ass. He's a lying terrorist supporting POS

I'm Gipper
Seamaster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Carlson wants USA to be weakened. He wants our hegemony gone and China to be equal to us.

"America first" my ass. He's a lying terrorist supporting POS


As if our "hegemony" has made America any better for Americans.

Wake up.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.