I feel the same about people that voted for a candidate that promoted no more wars, Epstein disclosure and that he wasn't beholden to anyone, but then they defend his complete departure from such positions.

Massie, Tucker and MTG continue to push pro-America positions that were championed here by MAGA. Trump gets money/pressure from the elites, shifts positions entirely, and somehow Massie, Tucker and MTG are enemies of the republic.

BlackGold said:

---

Ulysses90 said:

---

You attack Visegrad and ascribe motivations and puppet strings to them to discredit a post in which they play an unedited video of Tucker speaking and summarize it in three statements.

Nothing in that post was slanted or a shaped as a statement of opinion. It's just reporting on what Tucker said and highlighting his claims. You are diverting from the subject, which is what Tucker has claimed, and attacking the sources that noticed what Tucker said (and failed to substantiate with any data sources or references.).

---

I'm not diverting from any subject. Simply stating that they are paid actors, acting on behalf of the IDF and I'm sure other parties that pay, not some news org doing real journalism. They post what they're told to post - that means the info they share is meant to distort, not to enlighten. Similar to when there is an "anonymous source" from the intel community as the primary source on some report. That report is either an outright lie or meant to distort the truth.

Google them past the first few pages of results. The internet also seems to agree with me that they are paid to push propaganda.

---

And in this case they posted Tucker's actual words. So what's your issue?

Quote:

---

promoted no more wars,

---

That's fair, but he also never swayed from his commitment that Iran can't get nuclear weapons. Until we have ground forces committed I think an honest person would admit he hasn't reality abandoned anything he promised on this. That would change.

Quote:

---

Epstein disclosure

---

Trump always said he believed there was fake stuff included and would not commit to wholesale disclosure. It's a complete fabrication to claim he was ever pushing for the release of all these documents.

I don't know his real reason for doing so maybe he's hiding something. Maybe he's protecting someone. Regardless, he was always very consistent on saying there would not be a full release.

Quote:

---

and that he wasn't beholden to anyone

---

This is nonsensical. Love him, hate him, whatever. He does what the hell he wants and is not beholden to anyone. Sometimes that's good, sometimes that's bad.

This idea Trump is just netanyahu's *****boy it's so ridiculously devoid of any factual basis I wonder if people pushing it are trolling or literally brain damaged.

How much money did Miriam Adelson give Trump?

Quote:

---

Tucker….continue to push pro-America positions that were championed here by MAGA.

---

This is a complete lie. I posted direct quotes from Tucker back on pages 12-13 the last time you lied about this. You ran away. Maybe you can explain it now.

Super weird and interesting how Tucker Carlson, his guest Professor Jiang, Alex Jones, Aleksandr Dugin, Tim Pool, et al., are currently saying almost exactly the same thing Klaus Schwab was saying back in 2017 at the World Economic Forum: the "multipolar world" garbage. pic.twitter.com/TCgAKr8cdE

— James Lindsay, anti-Communist (@ConceptualJames) March 22, 2026

Quote:

---

He's now parroting Klaus Schwab. He's left the reservation. At this point, I just think he's trolling to see how many morons he can get to follow him.

as i said previously:

Quote:

---

Carlson is, and always has been, the doughboy, mealy mouthed bow tie worm he was when he started as the "conservative" voice on crossfire.

---

---

Quote:

---

Parroting Klaus Schwab? Muh China? Do you understand the difference between stating that something is happening vs supporting it?

---

did you even listen to what he said?

after the ccp mouth piece gives his take (shared by klaus) about this new world order where US is no longer a hegemon, carlson says "that is the wisest advice and only path that preserves civilization"

yet you say he doesn't "support" it?

I don't necessarily oppose a multipolar world either. I'm not sure what the issue is with a peaceful multipolar world. Parties pushing their hegemonic agenda will lead to global war. I think it's a far more reasoned approach than us becoming an empire.

Do you realize how far off the reservation you sound? I don't mean "not a normie." I mean you're defending lunatics.

Case in point: MTG and Tucker have completely flipped. Their "opinions" now are in extreme contrast to their claimed opinions before.

And Massie is still the liberal he's always been. He's always working against the conservative position. He just tells you he isn't and you believe him. He's like Dustin Burrows and Brad Buckley.

Seamaster said:

---

BMX Bandit said:

---

Seamaster said:

---

Phatbob said:

---

The antisemitic crowd is having a hard time recognizing their media leaders are mostly comprised of nutjobs and hate mongers.

---

Resorting to name-calling is the surest signal that you've already lost the argument.

---

Your first post yesterday on this thread

Quote:

---

The normies won't even listen.

---

Great job taking a loss right from the jump. Impressive faceplant

---

Ha. Fair point.

However, I think there's a world of difference between calling people a "normie", which simply means that they haven't woken up yet, to an "antisemite."

I used to be a normie. So there at least hope for them.

---

"Normie" is just a word people who have very little discretion call people who can see through the scam.

Don't believe there is Jewish plot in everything? You're a "normie".

Don't believe there are secret meetings in every small town to sacrifice babies and drink their blood? You're a "normie".

Don't believe there are lizard people living under the Vatican? You're a "normie".

If being a "normie" means the capacity for critical thinking skills, count me in.

It is a diversion because you are making an appeal to authority a la the SPLC tacric to impeach the source while evading actual comment on the substance of the posted claim.

You are evading because the substance of the post is a true representationof what Tucker Carlson said and it is a fair characterizationof who Tucker is.

They provided factual information without spin. What is your comment on the information contained in the Videgrad post without commenting on the ascribed motivations of who posted it?

BTW, Tucker's "Egyptian planes tailing Erika" claim is fabricated bull***** Rebut that.