Bondi out (per FOX News)

23,401 Views | 291 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by jickyjack1
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Alex wants to break a story so bad.



Not seeing anything, at all, making me think this claim of his is true. I saw rumors/claims Tulsi is next but with all the crap about DHS right now I doubt it. As others no doubt have shared I see it is Blanche who will now serve as AG/pending a nomination-confirmation cycle of craziness.

If Bondi was 'pals' with Swalwell it absolutely reeks to high heaven. That would be the first 'real' scandal of a Trump administration, to me.
TommyBrady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Donald J. Trump is the most consequential President in the last 150 years. GOAT LEVEL.
Trajan88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

I've never heard of her being 'friends' with that piece of utter human garbage, but if she really did something like tip him off about FBI investigations/plans related to his sedition/man-whoring etc, I could see why Trump would need to immediately cut her loose.

Still, if this is true, she should never have been considered even as a nominee for this job. 'Have you ever been pals with any of the sham impeachment squad members in the past 20 years, and if so how/why?'



*****

Compensated with U.s. taxpayer monies? Monies and names that were hidden by House vote recently?

Edit: referring to the women that signed NDAs
nai06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SigAg6 said:

Now show Trump riding a bike

Hot take: I don't actually give a **** if the president can ride a bike, bench 200 pounds, or some other meaningless feat of strength. It doesn't make a bit of difference in terms of the job.


What I care more about is if they are mentally fit to do the job. The job takes it's toll on everyone let alone octogenarians. Both Biden and Trump are too old to be doing this.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Between the war speech thread and this one, the most deranged and vile of our resident leftists have shown their true colors. TDS truly does rot people from the inside.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some on that thread say he's a registered Democrat.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgDev01 said:

I never would have guessed that given how much y'all seem to reference him anytime someone points out the slightest fault related to Trump.

Trying to pretend like Trump is as bad or worse than Biden in his ability to be alert for the job isn't pointing out "the slightest fault" related to Trump. It's just ridiculous projection, and should be treated as such.

People point out Trump's faults on here every single day. None of us would have the time to "reference Biden" every single time in response like the fantasy you're asserting.

Again, projection noted.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't think DeSantis would take it but he would be on my short list.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Biz Ag said:



Old McDonald
How long do you want to ignore this user?
B-1 83 said:

Between the war speech thread and this one, the most deranged and vile of our resident leftists have shown their true colors. TDS truly does rot people from the inside.
comments like these should be considered trolling. this board is full of 3-time trump voters who have grown disappointed and disillusioned with how this term has panned out, and have changed their minds about him.

at this point the TDS label applies more to people who think every critic is a leftist than the critics.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

Don't think DeSantis would take it but he would be on my short list.

Lots of ultra-MAGAs on social media are already demanding it not be because they still see him as a "traitor" for running against Trump, and for not stopping the Mar-a-Lago raid by the FBI.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:



Two things.

Someone has to fill in right now so warming a chair for a short time means nada. It is virtually always the second in command who has to do it.

Very few former Biden people can be prosecuted because Biden pardoned almost everyone.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



Don't they do this when they have a specific mess to take care of, appoint an "acting" position, let them handle the mess and then eventually fill the position?
MROD92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Has Rick Barnes removed his name from consideration?
infinity ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91 said:

Don't think DeSantis would take it but he would be on my short list.


I agree.
DeSantis would never want to be in a situation where he could get fired by Trump. That would be damaging, so he won't accept even if offered.
torrid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
zb008 said:

Which Barbie will become Trump's new scapegoat?


Reportedly Karoline Leavitt.
swc93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So much for the DOW being over 50,000.

Another dull Trump tool put back into the shed.
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
torrid said:

zb008 said:

Which Barbie will become Trump's new scapegoat?


Reportedly Karoline Leavitt.


Surely not. She's the most competent in the entire admin by a mile.
Danimal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hahaha

Hahahahhahaha

MAGA supporters having to defend this **** show of leadership.

Haha. Oh man, I can't wait to see who the last bootlicker is. Good luck all. It's been entertaining to watch you all ride trump's stinky coattails up and down and down and down. Hopefully you don't go all the way down where he's headed.
BetterNotBeChipKelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MouthBQ98 said:

I'll take an ineffective Republican cabinet member over a corrupt And lawless Democrat one any day, but it would really help to quit picking based on image and popularity and start focusing on competency.


Do you really think people like Howard Lutnick, Pete Hegseth and Trump aren't corrupt and lawless? Yes the people in the last administration also sucked too, so don't feed me "well Hunter Biden".

I am so thankful I am not tied to a party and I'm skeptical of all of these politicians. Seems like every democrat and republican will just bury their head in the sand when it comes to their "people". All of these politicians are selfish and do not give a damn about normal Americans no matter what they tell you.
TommyBrady
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the firing was beneficial because it enforces accountability by removing an official viewed as underperforming, and allows Trump to get someone more aligned with his policy agenda. I also think it signals decisiveness in making tough personnel changes and creates a chance for new leadership and reforms. It serves as a political strategy to shore up support among key constituencies and respond to critics. GOAT MOVE.
Ridgeback85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
samurai_science said:

Garr3ttmj9 said:

Scapegoated for following his orders

Stop lying, she is just not a good AG. She was suspect at best anyway based on her previous stance towards the 2A, and many on here said as much.

I am definitely not shedding tears on her departure. I want someone to get rid of the idiotic suppressor and SBR stuff. Neither of those restrictions are legal and really don't make any sense anyway. What was anyone thinking on restricting putting a stock on a pistol? There is no logical reason to restrict that. And if uptight England prefers you use a suppressor, why is America restricting it?
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BetterNotBeChipKelly said:

MouthBQ98 said:

I'll take an ineffective Republican cabinet member over a corrupt And lawless Democrat one any day, but it would really help to quit picking based on image and popularity and start focusing on competency.


Do you really think people like Howard Lutnick, Pete Hegseth and Trump aren't corrupt and lawless? Yes the people in the last administration also sucked too, so don't feed me "well Hunter Biden".

I am so thankful I am not tied to a party and I'm skeptical of all of these politicians. Seems like every democrat and republican will just bury their head in the sand when it comes to their "people". All of these politicians are selfish and do not give a damn about normal Americans no matter what they tell you.


Great post.

Fear not, this is true MAGA and it is growing.
Sid Farkas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BetterNotBeChipKelly said:

MouthBQ98 said:

I'll take an ineffective Republican cabinet member over a corrupt And lawless Democrat one any day, but it would really help to quit picking based on image and popularity and start focusing on competency.


Do you really think people like Howard Lutnick, Pete Hegseth and Trump aren't corrupt and lawless? Yes the people in the last administration also sucked too, so don't feed me "well Hunter Biden".

I am so thankful I am not tied to a party and I'm skeptical of all of these politicians. Seems like every democrat and republican will just bury their head in the sand when it comes to their "people". All of these politicians are selfish and do not give a damn about normal Americans no matter what they tell you.


DEI is dead. Woke on the run. Censorship dying. corruption being exposed (MN and Calif to name a couple). Border: closed…

You're 100% right about their motives. But you're going to have to live with one or the other in power. Which one do you choose?
AxelFoley85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Both can be true.
BetterNotBeChipKelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sid Farkas said:

BetterNotBeChipKelly said:

MouthBQ98 said:

I'll take an ineffective Republican cabinet member over a corrupt And lawless Democrat one any day, but it would really help to quit picking based on image and popularity and start focusing on competency.


Do you really think people like Howard Lutnick, Pete Hegseth and Trump aren't corrupt and lawless? Yes the people in the last administration also sucked too, so don't feed me "well Hunter Biden".

I am so thankful I am not tied to a party and I'm skeptical of all of these politicians. Seems like every democrat and republican will just bury their head in the sand when it comes to their "people". All of these politicians are selfish and do not give a damn about normal Americans no matter what they tell you.


DEI is dead. Woke on the run. Censorship dying. corruption being exposed (MN and Calif to name a couple). Border: closed…

You're 100% right about their motives. But you're going to have to live with one or the other in power. Which one do you choose?


Border and DEI fading have been the two things this admin can hang its hat on. Hope those efforts continue.

However I disagree on the censorship and the corruption front, the only thing that has changed is who commits fraud and who's censored. This admin has literally blocked out journalists from "opposing" publications from the Pentagon and look at the stock and predictive markets during this war, lots of very convenient trades at convenient times.

Unfortunately I think this two party system is broken.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DESANTIS

would be the absolute best pick on so many levels!!
Geminiv
How long do you want to ignore this user?
samurai_science said:

Garr3ttmj9 said:

Scapegoated for following his orders

Stop lying, she is just not a good AG. She was suspect at best anyway based on her previous stance towards the 2A, and many on here said as much.


True because its never Trump. He just tends to find the most incompetent people to work in his administration.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigRobSA said:

flown-the-coop said:

BigRobSA said:

Ok

Cool

Does this make gas cheaper?
Groceries?
Other items?

Nobody gives a flying **** who is AG. It impacts daily life less than zero.

Good luck to her and whomever President Trump decides to appoint. But seriously....

If you were an antiabortion activist, catholic mom who speaks out at school board meetings, or if you were journalist exposing the twitter files, the Biden AG impacted your daily life quite extensively.

Should they impact your daily life? No. Can they? Better not take a Capitol tour when a Dem is about to be in charge.


I'm none of those things.

I'm someone, like 99.99% of America, that's just trying to make it in a ****ty economy (though less ****ty since President Houseplant Autopen).


Bruh-

to claim this is a sh@tty economy is just so out of the realm of reality.

were you alive in 2008-2009?

were you alive in 2020?

LITERALLY gasoline and unemployment were higher in 2022 than today!

2001?

1981?

1974?
zag213004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Geminiv said:

samurai_science said:

Garr3ttmj9 said:

Scapegoated for following his orders

Stop lying, she is just not a good AG. She was suspect at best anyway based on her previous stance towards the 2A, and many on here said as much.


True because its never Trump. He just tends to find the most incompetent people to work in his administration.


I hear it's only the best people
jickyjack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ducks4brkfast said:

Need some NIL money to convince Jim Jordan to take the job

They'll need someone who fits the job like a glove. If I'd studied and gone to class and gotten a degree and gone to law school and passed the bar, it could have been me. *Sigh* for opportunities missed.
jickyjack1
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
javajaws said:

Its always somebody else's fault...rinse and repeat.


Yeah it's too bad that Trump and his law degree couldn't do better as head of the DOJ
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Geminiv said:

samurai_science said:

Garr3ttmj9 said:

Scapegoated for following his orders

Stop lying, she is just not a good AG. She was suspect at best anyway based on her previous stance towards the 2A, and many on here said as much.


True because its never Trump. He just tends to find the most incompetent people to work in his administration.


This is such a stupid take.

The vast majority of the administration has been incredibly good at executing their responsibilities.

jickyjack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HTownAg98 said:

And who hired those incompetent government employees?


Dang right. And speaking of those guilty of tabbing the wrong people, who selected Judas?
jickyjack1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.