Let's talk war crimes and the 25th amendment

31,288 Views | 523 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Logos Stick
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

bobbranco said:

Keyno said:

Rapier108 said:

"Bombing civilian infrastructure" is not a war crime.

And no matter what you want, other than ordering the release of nuclear weapons, Trump is not going to be removed from office by the 25th Amendment.

"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again..."

This is a genocide threat. Is that a war crime still or not anymore?


It is not a genocide threat.

The "Iranian terrorist culture" will die tonight is probably more accurate. That is the goal, kill the Iranian terrorist culture (civilization) that exists today in Iran.

Destroying that culture and bringing Iran into the 21st century will eliminate the terrorist threat.

Yeah I mean if you want to change Trump's words to say what you want them to say, then obviously it changes things.


This is exactly what you're doing when you say Iran's leadership constantly pushing "Death to America" doesn't actually mean they want America to be dead. Except that most people are aware Trump, for better or worse, constantly exaggerates and says things he's not planning on following through with.

I told posters to look into the meaning of the phrase (which of course you did not). The Iranians literally define it and tell you what it means

Y'all really need to quit listening to Supreme Leader as though he was a DNC spokesperson.

He made that **** up a little over a decade ago. Just whipped it out of thin air. Hell, even CNN called out their goat**** on this.

https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/04/middleeast/ayatollah-death-to-america

You are choosing to believe the word of a tyrant who killed thousands of his own people, thousands more across the globe and hundreds of Americans.

You take him at his word in order to hate on Trump?

Really?


J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

bobbranco said:

Keyno said:

Rapier108 said:

"Bombing civilian infrastructure" is not a war crime.

And no matter what you want, other than ordering the release of nuclear weapons, Trump is not going to be removed from office by the 25th Amendment.

"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again..."

This is a genocide threat. Is that a war crime still or not anymore?


It is not a genocide threat.

The "Iranian terrorist culture" will die tonight is probably more accurate. That is the goal, kill the Iranian terrorist culture (civilization) that exists today in Iran.

Destroying that culture and bringing Iran into the 21st century will eliminate the terrorist threat.

Yeah I mean if you want to change Trump's words to say what you want them to say, then obviously it changes things.


This is exactly what you're doing when you say Iran's leadership constantly pushing "Death to America" doesn't actually mean they want America to be dead. Except that most people are aware Trump, for better or worse, constantly exaggerates and says things he's not planning on following through with.

I told posters to look into the meaning of the phrase (which of course you did not). The Iranians literally define it and tell you what it means


How about you enlighten us what they really mean since you're the one making the claim.

Making what claim? I am not saying someone mean's something else. Some other poster is trying to explain Trump really means something else.


You've claimed Iran saying "Death to America" doesn't actually mean they want America and its people dead. If you don't want to back up that claim that's fine, we can just chalk it up to you reflexively giving the benefit of the doubt to Israel's enemies.
tycolab1@yahoo.com
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The saddest part of this is, if the tables were reversed and those wonderful people dropped a nuclear weapon on our country, would that be a war crime? Would the extinction of thousands of lives be a war crime? To your kind, you would some sick way to justify it in your mind.
BHAg10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"destroying civilization" by destroying power plants in a desert country is tantamount to killing thousands of civilians at the absolute minimum. You're killing babies in NICU incubators, sick patients who need Oxygen or dialysis, and those dependent of supply chains for medication. That's not to mention lack of access to water or food in urban areas.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

Keyno said:

bobbranco said:

Keyno said:

Rapier108 said:

"Bombing civilian infrastructure" is not a war crime.

And no matter what you want, other than ordering the release of nuclear weapons, Trump is not going to be removed from office by the 25th Amendment.

"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again..."

This is a genocide threat. Is that a war crime still or not anymore?


It is not a genocide threat.

The "Iranian terrorist culture" will die tonight is probably more accurate. That is the goal, kill the Iranian terrorist culture (civilization) that exists today in Iran.

Destroying that culture and bringing Iran into the 21st century will eliminate the terrorist threat.

Yeah I mean if you want to change Trump's words to say what you want them to say, then obviously it changes things.


This is exactly what you're doing when you say Iran's leadership constantly pushing "Death to America" doesn't actually mean they want America to be dead. Except that most people are aware Trump, for better or worse, constantly exaggerates and says things he's not planning on following through with.

I told posters to look into the meaning of the phrase (which of course you did not). The Iranians literally define it and tell you what it means


How about you enlighten us what they really mean since you're the one making the claim.

Making what claim? I am not saying someone mean's something else. Some other poster is trying to explain Trump really means something else.


Trump never said he was going to wipe out the Iranian population, nor used the term genocide.

It's safe to assume you consider the Israeli / Gaza war genocide. It was not.
Hogties
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
2000AgPhD said:

My prediction is that if some 11th hour deal is struck, the people calling to invoke the 25th Amendment will immediately pivot to TACO.


So let it be written
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
See my post above. The ol Ayatollah gave a speech in 2015 where he rambled on Trump style and created a new definition. Like Trumps 1000% price decreases.

It was so bad CNN called it out, back before Trump went down the escalator and the ceased to report the news.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
But but but orange man is bad and he said mean things! Impossible!

So yall that said you voted for him before and wouldn't anymore, does he now have your vote?
twelve12twelve
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

But but but orange man is bad and he said mean things! Impossible!

So yall that said you voted for him before and wouldn't anymore, does he now have your vote?

So the war is over?
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agador Spartacus said:

It's pretty clear at this point that Trump isn't worried about threatening / committing international war crimes.

Simply bombing civilian infrastructure is a clear and obvious war crime, and this morning he went a step further and threatened genocide against the entire Iranian civilization. ("A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again...")

Taking away the emotion of this, which is admittedly high, how far would this need to go before the 25th could potentially be invoked?

Dude... this was staged and gave Iran an off ramp to save face with their people. War crimes??? Dems never ask that question about their own. And 25th amendment? After ****ing Biden???
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
twelve12twelve said:

TAMUallen said:

But but but orange man is bad and he said mean things! Impossible!

So yall that said you voted for him before and wouldn't anymore, does he now have your vote?

So the war is over?


As of now, if the Iranians behave and are honest. That's not how we got here though so let them be stupid to show the world they cant sit at a negotiation table, ever. Plus, it's times for the Persians and Kurds to start working on the Islamic Republic
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BHAg10 said:

"destroying civilization" by destroying power plants in a desert country is tantamount to killing thousands of civilians at the absolute minimum. You're killing babies in NICU incubators, sick patients who need Oxygen or dialysis, and those dependent of supply chains for medication. That's not to mention lack of access to water or food in urban areas.


If only hospitals in a perpetual war zone had spoken with a Generac door to door rep when they came knocking.
B-1 83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

BusterAg said:

Keyno said:

bobbranco said:

Keyno said:

Rapier108 said:

"Bombing civilian infrastructure" is not a war crime.

And no matter what you want, other than ordering the release of nuclear weapons, Trump is not going to be removed from office by the 25th Amendment.

"A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again..."

This is a genocide threat. Is that a war crime still or not anymore?


It is not a genocide threat.

The "Iranian terrorist culture" will die tonight is probably more accurate. That is the goal, kill the Iranian terrorist culture (civilization) that exists today in Iran.

Destroying that culture and bringing Iran into the 21st century will eliminate the terrorist threat.

Yeah I mean if you want to change Trump's words to say what you want them to say, then obviously it changes things.

Well, you still haven't told us how Trump is going to eradicate the Iranians so that the Iranians can be led by less radicalized leaders. Who are the leaders going to lead if all of the Iranians are dead?

When I asked you to tie those ends together you threw up your hands as it being indecipherable.

It actually isn't that hard to understand unless you are trying very, very hard not to understand it.

If you knew anything about the definition of genocide, you would know that it does not necessarily mean literally every member of that race or ethnicity is killed

Or it does now…..

Sounds like a former poster (now sock) who defined "homophobia". Even staff chastised him on that one, and I have screen shots.
Being in TexAgs jail changes a man……..no, not really
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Quote:

Fine what is your question? "Why won't you give a direct answer as to why Iran saying their end game is to destroy the United States a war crime?"

I have not seen Iran ever say their "end game" is to destroy the United States. I also have not seen that written anywhere in their government policy. I know Mark Levin and Sean Hannity like to make this claim, but it's called propaganda. If you are talking about the phrase "Death to America", then yeah I addressed that and no that is not some stated Iranian "end game"

Furthermore, something you would know if you read the thread, I never said the threat itself was a war crime. I said I was not sure, another poster said it was and cited it, it was debated a little bit, and I ended up agreeing that no incitement took place from Trump's post.

Your argument is that a radical Islamic regime saying "Death to America" for almost five decades isn't a threat because they DON'T REALLY MEAN what they are saying and that taking it literally is "right wing propaganda"?

That's your answer: They don't mean it so it's ok for them to say it.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
can't wait to hear idiotic leftists explain how it's a war crime to accept a two week ceasefire!
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

can't wait to hear idiotic leftists explain how it's a war crime to accept a two week ceasefire!


He talked about it in a manner they did not like, therefore WAR CRIME
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Quote:

Furthermore, something you would know if you read the thread, I never said the threat itself was a war crime. I said I was not sure, another poster said it was and cited it, it was debated a little bit, and I ended up agreeing that no incitement took place from Trump's post.

I never said anything about Trump's statement.

If you had read my posts, you would know that.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stupe said:

Quote:

Fine what is your question? "Why won't you give a direct answer as to why Iran saying their end game is to destroy the United States a war crime?"

I have not seen Iran ever say their "end game" is to destroy the United States. I also have not seen that written anywhere in their government policy. I know Mark Levin and Sean Hannity like to make this claim, but it's called propaganda. If you are talking about the phrase "Death to America", then yeah I addressed that and no that is not some stated Iranian "end game"

Furthermore, something you would know if you read the thread, I never said the threat itself was a war crime. I said I was not sure, another poster said it was and cited it, it was debated a little bit, and I ended up agreeing that no incitement took place from Trump's post.

Your argument is that a radical Islamic regime saying "Death to America" for almost five decades isn't a threat because they DON'T REALLY MEAN what they are saying and that taking it literally is "right wing propaganda"?

That's your answer: They don't mean it so it's ok for them to say it.

No I told you to look into the meaning and background of what that phrase means. Literally just google it. It does not mean genocide and Iranian leaders explain it. Of course you did not do that.

Edit: Sorry, I never told you specifically to look into it. I told other posters who pressed this. Which you would know if you read the thread like you claimed
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iran was very clear that if they developed a functional nuclear weapon on Monday they would have used it against Israel on Tuesday, and if they could hit NYC or DC via a ICBM they would have.
One Eyed Reveille
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Guess who started civilian "war crimes" Grant and Sherman. After Shiloh, Grant knew he had to do it. Stop making crap up libs.
Pizza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One Eyed Reveille said:

Guess who started civilian "war crimes" Grant and Sherman. After Shiloh, Grant knew he had to do it. Stop making crap up libs.


In war there are no crimes. IDC what Canada says.

China, Russia, Iran, etc. will use whatever means necessary to win if they believe they can.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pizza said:

One Eyed Reveille said:

Guess who started civilian "war crimes" Grant and Sherman. After Shiloh, Grant knew he had to do it. Stop making crap up libs.


In war there are no crimes. IDC what Canada says.

China, Russia, Iran, etc. will use whatever means necessary to win if they believe they can.


You don't hear pot banging about Russia's extensive and years upon years of war crimes in Ukraine. Geee, that sure is strange.
BartInLA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump has just agreed on giving Iran 2 more weeks. Says 10 point plan proposal from Iran may be workable.
David_Puddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Big L for all of the crazy liberals rooting against America and hoping we were about to kill a bunch of civilians
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
David_Puddy said:

Big L for all of the crazy liberals rooting against America and hoping we were about to kill a bunch of civilians


Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Quote:

No I told you to look into the meaning and background of what that phrase means. Literally just google it. It does not mean genocide and Iranian leaders explain it. Of course you did not do that.


I will give you credit. You've finally answered a very simple and direct question instead of just saying "read the thread".

Your basis is that Iran saying "We don't really mean what we say" when they chant "Death to America" ...in Parliament and public speeches...doesn't really qualify as a genocidal threat.
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
David_Puddy said:

Big L for all of the crazy liberals rooting against America and hoping we were about to kill a bunch of civilians

Yep.

I can't imagine having a brain that would that would be that confused right now.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The entire concept of international law and war crimes is made up. And not merely in the sense that "all laws are made up"; but in the sense that they are objectively arbitrary, inherently unenforceable and intrinsically violated by the nature of warfare.

They are concepts created to make the allies feel better about themselves after the two world wars. Full stop. That's all they are.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stupe said:

Quote:

No I told you to look into the meaning and background of what that phrase means. Literally just google it. It does not mean genocide and Iranian leaders explain it. Of course you did not do that.


I will give you credit. You've finally answered a very simple and direct question instead of just saying "read the thread".

Your basis is that Iran saying "We don't really mean what we say" when they chant "Death to America" ...in Parliament and public speeches...doesn't really qualify as a genocidal threat.

Correct. If you read what the phrase means, and what the Iranians tell you it means, it is not referring to genocide. Furthermore, as I have said previously and you would know if you read the thread like you claimed, Iran does not have the ability to genocide America. They literally do not have any weapon capable of even hitting the US homeland, much less a nuke.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tycolab1@yahoo.com said:

The saddest part of this is, if the tables were reversed and those wonderful people dropped a nuclear weapon on our country, would that be a war crime? Would the extinction of thousands of lives be a war crime? To your kind, you would some sick way to justify it in your mind.


Iranian War Crimes:

unprovoked ballistic missiles fired at Bahrain, Kuwait, UAE, Saudi Arabia

usage of cluster munitions on Israeli cities

firing ballistic missiles at civilian cities

hiding military forces in civilian areas

massacring their own citizens

blocking international waterways
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Team Iran working overtime on this topic!

I'm Gipper
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Im Gipper said:

Team Iran working overtime on this topic!


Might not get paid either since ActBlue is in hot water
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

Im Gipper said:

Team Iran working overtime on this topic!


Might not get paid either since ActBlue is in hot water


Nah. These guys are on the Qatar payroll.

I'm Gipper
twelve12twelve
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

twelve12twelve said:

TAMUallen said:

But but but orange man is bad and he said mean things! Impossible!

So yall that said you voted for him before and wouldn't anymore, does he now have your vote?

So the war is over?


As of now, if the Iranians behave and are honest. That's not how we got here though so let them be stupid to show the world they cant sit at a negotiation table, ever. Plus, it's times for the Persians and Kurds to start working on the Islamic Republic

Sounds like boomer cope.
TxAg82
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keyno said:

Stupe said:

Quote:

No I told you to look into the meaning and background of what that phrase means. Literally just google it. It does not mean genocide and Iranian leaders explain it. Of course you did not do that.


I will give you credit. You've finally answered a very simple and direct question instead of just saying "read the thread".

Your basis is that Iran saying "We don't really mean what we say" when they chant "Death to America" ...in Parliament and public speeches...doesn't really qualify as a genocidal threat.

Correct. If you read what the phrase means, and what the Iranians tell you it means, it is not referring to genocide. Furthermore, as I have said previously and you would know if you read the thread like you claimed, Iran does not have the ability to genocide America. They literally do not have any weapon capable of even hitting the US homeland, much less a nuke.


Maybe we have already gone over this, but what exactly is the Islamic Republics definition of "death to America?"
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.