BigRobSA said:WestTexasAg said:Ozzy Osbourne said:
The left is pressing HARD against Vance. That should tell you he's the best candidate BY FAR.
Nah. I think Rubio appears to a wider base of voters.
Well, he's on TV more, so....duh!
Ha! Corrected.
BigRobSA said:WestTexasAg said:Ozzy Osbourne said:
The left is pressing HARD against Vance. That should tell you he's the best candidate BY FAR.
Nah. I think Rubio appears to a wider base of voters.
Well, he's on TV more, so....duh!
Ag87H2O said:LMCane said:DX2011 said:
Give me Desantis, but depending on how the next couple of years go, Rubio would be a great choice as well. I'm not high on Vance as POTUS, though I think he's been a good VP.
Desantis will have the benefit of not being tied to Trump's negatives as much.
of course I would love DeSantis
I was in the original DeSantis Brigade here on F16 and took a lot of flak for that.
but I think electorally Marco is a better more natural politician and with his background and experience can win.
DeSantis should really be on the Supreme Court replacing Clarence Thomas
Maybe after he serves eight years in the White House. He's imminently qualified to be President. He's both strategic in his thinking and a fantastic tactician. He would slay the Democrats if given a chance, just like he has in Florida.
My fear is that the hard core Trump supporters will never forgive him for running against Trump in 2024. It would be about par for the course.
BigRobSA said:Buck Turgidson said:
My preference would be, in order DeSantis, Vance, Rubio.
It takes a different guy to be a leader as opposed to a smart and capable staff officer. Both are necessary for the success of the enterprise, but Rubio has never governed or led others. DeSantis might be the best governor of any state in US history.
Chuuuuch! </Snoop voice>
Quote:
His decision to run against Trump in 2024 shows such a lack of political instinct that it is disqualifying.
bonfarr said:
Vance scores low on the likability scale. Regardless of policy or performance I think people just don't like the guy. Plus it isn't 1862, he should lose the beard. When was the last time a bearded candidate won the presidency?
4 said:
I like all 3, but man, Rubio has REALLY been impressive as SecState. Great communicator, displays strength and leadership and the ability to successfully manage a lot of high stress, complicated issues simultaneously.
Will absolutely lock up the Hispanic vote.
I've always been a big fan of Desantis, but this last short-lived presidential campaign was less than impressive.
His ability to run a government as it's chief executive is unquestionable, but I'm not sure his personality comes across as something that would appeal to a large group of people on a national level. A bit Casper milk-toastish and somewhat low energy.
.Hardcore Greg said:bonfarr said:
Vance scores low on the likability scale. Regardless of policy or performance I think people just don't like the guy. Plus it isn't 1862, he should lose the beard. When was the last time a bearded candidate won the presidency?
I like Vance a lot, but I think the beard actually helps cover up his pudgy baby face. Some men ljust ook way better/more masculine with a beard.![]()
DonHenley said:
What is Trump doing exactly to put America first? War in Iran no one wants, inflation has gotten higher since he took office
Because he's the VP. You're reading way too far into it.Ozzy Osbourne said:
The left is pressing HARD against Vance. That should tell you he's the best candidate BY FAR.