Southern poverty law center charged by DOJ with fraud

26,685 Views | 275 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by Ulysses90
techno-ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to VP at Pierce and Pierce • 10:21p, 4/21/26
AG
VP at Pierce and Pierce said:
What are the leftists saying to defend this? and the media?




They're being excoriated in the comments for the bit about "paid informants."
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Reply Quote
11
Silent For Too Long
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:00p, 4/21/26
If anyone was wondering the real reason behind the Kash Patel hit piece in The Atlantic last week...


...well. Here you go.
Reply Quote
43
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:15a, 4/22/26
title does not do justice to the insanity and immorality being perpetrated by the left

for DECADES conservatives have known the 'race hustlers' as Rush Limbaugh classified them were deliberately stoking the exact racism that they claimed to be fighting, all to grift and raise money for their own lavish lifestyles

now we see the left doing the exact same thing but taking it even a step farther-

paying directly the Klan to then raise more money to fight the Klan.

Reply Quote
6
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 45-70Ag • 12:17a, 4/22/26
now imagine how many literally rich Americans there are because they have fraudulently stolen government money for NGOs

stolen fraudulent money for 'civil rights organizations'

stolen fraudulent money from taxpayers for different grants and Section 8 and welfare and covid and autism...
Reply Quote
8
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 45-70Ag • 12:21a, 4/22/26
100% guarantee that in a few years we will find out that the left and the Islamists around the world

have paid Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens and Theo Von money to foment discord among the "conservative influencers"
Reply Quote
15
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Whoop Delecto • 12:23a, 4/22/26
how are they charging a non-profit without naming the actual human beings who were committing the crimes?

this is a criminal case correct?
Reply Quote
1
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Old Gorm • 12:26a, 4/22/26
Old Gorm said:
No doubt Bialistock and Bloom could have sold the SPLC a 300 percent share in "Springtime for Hitler."

If society has truly moved beyond racism, then much of the American left's argument and funding is null and void.

Can't have that. So we find out the anti-racists are funding as many racist groups as they can find.


isn't this the OPPOSITE of "Springtime for Hitler"

which was designed by Bloom to LOSE MONEY and be a complete failure for a tax writeoff

of course that was also fiction
Reply Quote
3
Trajan88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:52a, 4/22/26
AG
SPLC is a bunch of goons, thugs with a tax exemption.

Here's one of many examples of why they should be smashed, dismantled...

"SPLC Labels Catholic Organizations as Hate Groups"

https://coalition4america.com/splc-labels-catholic-organizations-as-hate-groups/

Heck, the DoJ should RICO their asses out of existence... go after them like they went after the mafia.
Reply Quote
11
Trajan88
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:01a, 4/22/26
AG
Another example... "Biden admin plotted with SPLC at White House, refuses to tell public if Moms was mentioned"

https://api.afn.net/legal-courts/2023/10/02/biden-admin-plotted-with-splc-at-white-house-refuses-to-tell-public-if-moms-was-mentioned/
Reply Quote
8
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:35a, 4/22/26
AG
What time do the talking points come out? Guessing about 10am
Reply Quote
7
BMX Bandit
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to backintexas2013 • 4:37a, 4/22/26
backintexas2013 said:
What time do the talking points come out? Guessing about 10am


They came out yesterday

Reply Quote
4
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 4:40a, 4/22/26
AG
Damn that was quick.
Reply Quote
8
45-70Ag
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:51a, 4/22/26
AG
Reply Quote
13
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:09a, 4/22/26
AG
I genuinely thought everyone knew this was the case when they had their props out their marching with tiki torches in khaki pants chanting 'Jews will not replace us!' Like there is/was some invasive army of very fertile jews descending upon rural Virginia that had the common bigots all upset for the cameras.

Between SPLC and ActBlue getting legal colonoscopies this year/last, I am curious where the Soros guys shift their cash next.
Reply Quote
17
LOYAL AG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:53a, 4/22/26
AG
Anyone remember an article that came out a few years ago talking about the dramatic increase in the use of the phrase "white nationalism" in the corporate media? It was one of the first signs that the intelligence apparatus built to prosecute the War on Terror was being turned on the American people. This is an extension of that story. Our tax dollars were being used to create the bogeyman kd white nationalism so that our tax dollars could be grifted by orgs to fight that bogeyman. Oldest play in the book. Keep the people fighting against each other so they don't realize they're being fleeced.

It's all political theatre to hide the fleecing of the American taxpayer.
Reply Quote
18
1 edit
Who?mikejones!
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LOYAL AG • 6:25a, 4/22/26
I remember it. I think it coincidence with the election of obama.
Reply Quote
11
fc2112
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to LMCane • 6:29a, 4/22/26
LMCane said:
how are they charging a non-profit without naming the actual human beings who were committing the crimes?

this is a criminal case correct?

the charges are not necessarily for the payments - it's for violating the 501(c)3 statute.


Quote:
Political Restrictions: 501(c)(3) organizations cannot participate in political campaigns for or against candidates and may only engage in limited lobbying activities.

Private Benefit Prohibition: No part of the organization's net earnings may benefit private individuals or shareholders. Excess benefit transactions can trigger excise taxes on involved parties.

Unrelated Business Income Tax: Income from activities unrelated to the organization's exempt purpose is taxable.

Transparency Requirements: 501(c)(3) organizations must file annual IRS reports (Form 990) and make financial information publicly available, ensuring accountability.


The PR hit is the worst part for them. These organizations live off their donors. This whole "we're paying infiltrators" BS won't carry water.
Reply Quote
6
nortex97
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fc2112 • 7:03a, 4/22/26
AG
Yes, one would have to be a 'The View' news consumer to buy that line.

Always a Soros/Eisen 'rule of law' and 'open society' connection.

Oh, and they've been moving assets to the Caymans.
Reply Quote
13
LOYAL AG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 7:05a, 4/22/26
AG
Who?mikejones! said:
I remember it. I think it coincidence with the election of obama.


It started later than that. Obama signed a law removing restrictions on the CIA targeting Americans with propaganda and the race was on to convince us that white nationalists were the biggest threat to mankind in the known universe. That was passed on 2012 or 2014 I believe. From that year forward the article said use of that phrase in corporate "news" was up something like 2300% in a 3-4 year period.

Then we got Ferguson, MO and Charlotte and all the other racist incidents that turned out to largely be lies. It almost felt coordinated. Almost. Obviously our government would never do that to us because government can be trusted to do the right thing, always.
Reply Quote
19
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fc2112 • 7:06a, 4/22/26
Quote:
the charges are not necessarily for the payments - it's for violating the 501(c)3 statut

LOL! What are you talking about????


Counts 1-6: Wire Fraud. 18 USC 1343.

"The objective of the scheme and artifice was to obtain money via donations through materially false representations and omissions about what the donated funds would be used for."


Counts 7-10: False Statements to a Federally Insured Bank.

"The purpose of opening these bank accounts for the fictitious entities was to be able to conduct financial transactions that made it appear as if the Fs were receiving money from the fictitious entities rather than receiving donated funds from the SPLC."

Count 11: Conspiracy to Commit Concealment Money Laundering. 18 USC 1956(a)(1)(B)(i)

It was the objective oft his conspiracy to conduct financial transactions designed to conceal the true nature, source, ownership, and control of fraudulently obtained donated money the SPLC paid to Fs.

This case is directly about the payments (and also the solicitation of money). Wire Fraud, False Statements, Money Laundering!

It is not for violating the 501(c)(3) statute!

https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1437146/dl

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
12
1 edit
LOYAL AG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fc2112 • 7:10a, 4/22/26
AG
fc2112 said:
LMCane said:
how are they charging a non-profit without naming the actual human beings who were committing the crimes?

this is a criminal case correct?

the charges are not necessarily for the payments - it's for violating the 501(c)3 statute.


Quote:
Political Restrictions: 501(c)(3) organizations cannot participate in political campaigns for or against candidates and may only engage in limited lobbying activities.

Private Benefit Prohibition: No part of the organization's net earnings may benefit private individuals or shareholders. Excess benefit transactions can trigger excise taxes on involved parties.

Unrelated Business Income Tax: Income from activities unrelated to the organization's exempt purpose is taxable.

Transparency Requirements: 501(c)(3) organizations must file annual IRS reports (Form 990) and make financial information publicly available, ensuring accountability.


The PR hit is the worst part for them. These organizations live off their donors. This whole "we're paying infiltrators" BS won't carry water.


I just realized you were serious with this post. No, the PR hit isn't the worst part. It's the crimes they committed. They're being indicted for wire fraud. And since they're moving funds overseas I'm guessing they know that.

Dear God you're naive. Or dishonest. I'll leave that to you.
Reply Quote
12
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Im Gipper • 7:17a, 4/22/26
AG
Well that's going to leave a mark.
Reply Quote
10
doubledog
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Who?mikejones! • 7:37a, 4/22/26
Who?mikejones! said:


Silly liberals, you thought it was about justice and it turned out to be about the money.
Reply Quote
15
Logos Stick
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:44a, 4/22/26
good vid:

Reply Quote
13
reineraggie09
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to fc2112 • 7:48a, 4/22/26
AG
Disagree. I bet their donations go up this quarter. Orange man bad
Reply Quote
7
LMCane
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Logos Stick • 8:20a, 4/22/26
the best part is this is in a district in Alabama

hopefully we can find 12 honest jurors
Reply Quote
10
VP at Pierce and Pierce
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to reineraggie09 • 8:25a, 4/22/26
reineraggie09 said:
Disagree. I bet their donations go up this quarter. Orange man bad


This!! The democrats rally around each other in moments like this. They will donate more, change leadership to even more aggressive and slimy people, then up the ante on anti white anti Christian rhetoric.
Reply Quote
5
Sid Farkas
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:25a, 4/22/26
AG
Not even one mention of this story on NYT front page today.
Reply Quote
11
YouBet
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:28a, 4/22/26
AG
SPLC is a domestic terror front and everyone involved should be treated as terrorists.
Reply Quote
19
FTAG 2000
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to reineraggie09 • 8:32a, 4/22/26
AG
reineraggie09 said:
Disagree. I bet their donations go up this quarter. Orange man bad


No one with any sense will attach themselves to a party under indictment by the Feds and putting themselves at risk of discovery and financial investigation.
Reply Quote
7
Im Gipper
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FTAG 2000 • 8:33a, 4/22/26
FTAG 2000 said:
reineraggie09 said:
Disagree. I bet their donations go up this quarter. Orange man bad


No one with any sense will attach themselves to a party under indictment by the Feds and putting themselves at risk of discovery and financial investigation.

He didn't say anything about people "with any sense" now did he?

I'm Gipper
Reply Quote
5
YouBet
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FTAG 2000 • 8:34a, 4/22/26
AG
FTAG 2000 said:
reineraggie09 said:
Disagree. I bet their donations go up this quarter. Orange man bad


No one with any sense will attach themselves to a party under indictment by the Feds and putting themselves at risk of discovery and financial investigation.


So a ton of Democrats will still contribute then.
Reply Quote
7
solishu
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:40a, 4/22/26
AG
So, I would expect that this court case will hinge on whether these are "paid informants" or "paid agitators." I'm glad to see that nobody here has prejudged the case prior to the investigation and legal process playing out.
Reply Quote
Prosperdick
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BMX Bandit • 8:43a, 4/22/26
AG
BMX Bandit said:
backintexas2013 said:
What time do the talking points come out? Guessing about 10am


They came out yesterday


Yes, paid informants like the ones that planned to kidnap Whitmir except it was all paid informants and a couple of homeless mentally ill dudes. Great job, you really infiltrated that hate group!
Reply Quote
8
Secolobo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:50a, 4/22/26
AG
Don't know how this shows up but it's from data republican's site.
When it opens look in the upper right.

SPLC under Charity funding.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.