*******The Official Houston Texans 2022: AW Thread************

366,885 Views | 3999 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by IrishAg
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cap-n-jack said:

If we get a qb at 2 we are just going to David Carr him. There are so many hole in this roster, fill it out then go find the guy.


Such a wet blanket post…do you sleep with the light on at night?
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Robert Woods...

um, he's kind of broken down isn't he?

2023 will be his 11th year in the league
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He wasn't brought in to be our #1. He was brought in to be a veteran presence for Metchie, Nico, and whichever WR we draft early this year… and catch a few balls a game out of the slot while he's at it.

Cooks is going to be gone so you need somebody unselfish in that role for a change.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
W said:

Robert Woods...

um, he's kind of broken down isn't he?

2023 will be his 11th year in the league


Headline could have been "Texans sign player you have heard of"
LincolnBorglum79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Bears traded way too early and many of their fans are not happy with the relatively weak return for the top pick. If they pick well, they are still better off than had they taken Anderson or Carter at 1. Anderson may be the next Von Miller but his production vs the best teams this year should be a warning sign. 7 total tackles in 3 games vs Texas Ags, Tennessee and LSU. Von Miller had some of his best games vs the toughest opponents.

Next up, the Raiders who will trade pick 7, their second rounder this year plus a 1 and 2 next year for pick 2. Then the Texans start talking about taking tu RB Robinson at 7. Would the Eagles or Tampa give us a first rounder next year to move up to 7 to take him?

These 2 trades would give the Texans 4 first round picks next year when the QB class may be better. Sign JImmy G, draft best available primarily defense and this team could challenge Jax for the division this year. The tank is over. Time to compete with a weak division and easy schedule.
TyHolden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Raiders are happy taking Richardson where they are. He may end up the best of them all. No risk taking the 4th qb in the draft when you have a ton of holes elsewhere. No reason to trade up.
Ryan34
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TyHolden said:

Raiders are happy taking Richardson where they are. He may end up the best of them all. No risk taking the 4th qb in the draft when you have a ton of holes elsewhere. No reason to trade up.

I don't think Richardson makes it past Indy. Levis seems to have settled into the consensus #4 QB.
IrishAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LincolnBorglum79 said:

The Bears traded way too early and many of their fans are not happy with the relatively weak return for the top pick. If they pick well, they are still better off than had they taken Anderson or Carter at 1. Anderson may be the next Von Miller but his production vs the best teams this year should be a warning sign. 7 total tackles in 3 games vs Texas Ags, Tennessee and LSU. Von Miller had some of his best games vs the toughest opponents.

Next up, the Raiders who will trade pick 7, their second rounder this year plus a 1 and 2 next year for pick 2. Then the Texans start talking about taking tu RB Robinson at 7. Would the Eagles or Tampa give us a first rounder next year to move up to 7 to take him?

These 2 trades would give the Texans 4 first round picks next year when the QB class may be better. Sign JImmy G, draft best available primarily defense and this team could challenge Jax for the division this year. The tank is over. Time to compete with a weak division and easy schedule.


Any we rumors that involve Bijan in the top 10 aren't going to happen at all. I can't see any team taking a RB in the top 10 for the foreseeable future. I will be irate if the Texans take a RB in the top 15
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hard to believe the Bears gave up the #1 pick to fall down to the #9 pick.

should have found a way to at least stay in the top 5.

D.J. Moore is a nice player but he's a short term asset
Snake Jazz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not happy if I'm a Bears fan. Underwhelming return. Feels like they just wanted to be done with it.

So happy it isn't Indy. Not getting your first choice for QB is bad, but having to then face that QB twice a year for the next decade would have been brutal.

Stroud seems like a better fit with Frank Reich, but who knows? Texans will take either Anderson or Stroud, whichever one is there.
IrishAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Snake Jazz said:

I'm not happy if I'm a Bears fan. Underwhelming return. Feels like they just wanted to be done with it.

So happy it isn't Indy. Not getting your first choice for QB is bad, but having to then face that QB twice a year for the next decade would have been brutal.

Stroud seems like a better fit with Frank Reich, but who knows? Texans will take either Anderson or Stroud, whichever one is there.


It looks like Carolina is going Stroud, so it'll probably be Young or Anderson
chjoak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Soooo... Lets assume Stroud is off the board. We are down to Young or Anderson and when our pick is up Indy calls. They are getting very nervous because one QB is off the board and Young is the only top guy left that they really like. Are you willing to drop back to #4 and if so, what does it take considering they are a division rival and there is a chance you lose out on Anderson as well?
mAgnoliAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
chjoak said:

Soooo... Lets assume Stroud is off the board. We are down to Young or Anderson and when our pick is up Indy calls. They are getting very nervous because one QB is off the board and Young is the only top guy left that they really like. Are you willing to drop back to #4 and if so, what does it take considering they are a division rival and there is a chance you lose out on Anderson as well?

This would be trading Bryce young for Anthony Richardson plus a few picks. If the Texans don't take will Anderson the cardinals will. The cardinals are the big winner in this Chicago Carolina trade because they are rewarded will Anderson in all likelihood.
Ryan34
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I wouldn't rule out Arizona trading down to someone looking to jump Indy, or Indy moving up one spot to make sure they don't get jumped. Arizona seems like the biggest winners of the Carolina-Chicago trade.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You'd better be damn confident Young is not going to be a star if you let division team swap spots to take him
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm assuming it's a typo when you included a&m among the best teams.
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
IrishAg said:

Snake Jazz said:

I'm not happy if I'm a Bears fan. Underwhelming return. Feels like they just wanted to be done with it.

So happy it isn't Indy. Not getting your first choice for QB is bad, but having to then face that QB twice a year for the next decade would have been brutal.

Stroud seems like a better fit with Frank Reich, but who knows? Texans will take either Anderson or Stroud, whichever one is there.


It looks like Carolina is going Stroud, so it'll probably be Young or Anderson


Good news, there is no difference between 1 and 2
scd88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I feel HOU is going to take Young at this point. Team needs a QB and you can't let Indy have him. I'm luke warm on Young because he's small QB. He will break, but you have to take that chance.
redag06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Buck Compton said:

He wasn't brought in to be our #1. He was brought in to be a veteran presence for Metchie, Nico, and whichever WR we draft early this year… and catch a few balls a game out of the slot while he's at it.

Cooks is going to be gone so you need somebody unselfish in that role for a change.


He was never a number 1, and never will be. But he's always been #2 to a real number 1 the Texans don't have a true number 1.
Harry Dunne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Plenty of small QBs have made it. I think the size component is a bit overvalued.

I'm more worried about durability & Young played in the toughest conference in college and has been extremely durable.
LincolnBorglum79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Porkchop Express said:

I'm assuming it's a typo when you included a&m among the best teams.


We lost to Bama by 1 play at Bama and should have won. Tennessee and LSU beat Bama. So their 3 biggest games were not good performances by Will Anderson. I agree we weren't good many other saturdays but that day we were and Will had no impact in a close game.
Buck Compton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redag06 said:

Buck Compton said:

He wasn't brought in to be our #1. He was brought in to be a veteran presence for Metchie, Nico, and whichever WR we draft early this year… and catch a few balls a game out of the slot while he's at it.

Cooks is going to be gone so you need somebody unselfish in that role for a change.


He was never a number 1, and never will be. But he's always been #2 to a real number 1 the Texans don't have a true number 1.
Right. So might as well not sign anybody, right?
Harry Dunne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Buck Compton said:

redag06 said:

Buck Compton said:

He wasn't brought in to be our #1. He was brought in to be a veteran presence for Metchie, Nico, and whichever WR we draft early this year… and catch a few balls a game out of the slot while he's at it.

Cooks is going to be gone so you need somebody unselfish in that role for a change.


He was never a number 1, and never will be. But he's always been #2 to a real number 1 the Texans don't have a true number 1.
Right. So might as well not sign anybody, right?


The Texans have a lot of #2 on the roster. He'll be a good fit.
. . .
How long do you want to ignore this user?
redag06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Buck Compton said:

redag06 said:

Buck Compton said:

He wasn't brought in to be our #1. He was brought in to be a veteran presence for Metchie, Nico, and whichever WR we draft early this year… and catch a few balls a game out of the slot while he's at it.

Cooks is going to be gone so you need somebody unselfish in that role for a change.


He was never a number 1, and never will be. But he's always been #2 to a real number 1 the Texans don't have a true number 1.
Right. So might as well not sign anybody, right?
When you already have a roster full of #2 receivers, why would you bring in yet another #2? Maybe you draft a true #1.But if you are going with Jimmy G as your qb, a true #1 isn't necessary.
Ryan34
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redag06 said:

Buck Compton said:

redag06 said:

Buck Compton said:

He wasn't brought in to be our #1. He was brought in to be a veteran presence for Metchie, Nico, and whichever WR we draft early this year… and catch a few balls a game out of the slot while he's at it.

Cooks is going to be gone so you need somebody unselfish in that role for a change.


He was never a number 1, and never will be. But he's always been #2 to a real number 1 the Texans don't have a true number 1.
Right. So might as well not sign anybody, right?
When you already have a roster full of #2 receivers, why would you bring in yet another #2? Maybe you draft a true #1.

There might not be any true #1s in this draft.
Max Power
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ryan34 said:

redag06 said:

Buck Compton said:

redag06 said:

Buck Compton said:

He wasn't brought in to be our #1. He was brought in to be a veteran presence for Metchie, Nico, and whichever WR we draft early this year… and catch a few balls a game out of the slot while he's at it.

Cooks is going to be gone so you need somebody unselfish in that role for a change.


He was never a number 1, and never will be. But he's always been #2 to a real number 1 the Texans don't have a true number 1.
Right. So might as well not sign anybody, right?
When you already have a roster full of #2 receivers, why would you bring in yet another #2? Maybe you draft a true #1.

There might not be any true #1s in this draft.
I think Quentin Johnston has the potential to be a true no 1. He's big, athletic, and has good hands. I like JSN but the issue with him is that he's been on teams at Ohio State that have so much WR talent it's hard to know how good each individual is. Last year he was with Wilson and Olave, this year he was with Marvin Harrison Jr who is a likely top 5 pick in next year's draft, and JSN had an injury this year. Personally I think Johnston is the only WR worth taking at 12. If he's gone I say o-line or pass rusher.

I will say I'm not normally one who puts much stock in the combine but I'm really fascinated with Nolan Smith. I liked him before, but a guy that size and athletic could be a problem for years to come.
IrishAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Max Power said:

Ryan34 said:

redag06 said:

Buck Compton said:

redag06 said:

Buck Compton said:

He wasn't brought in to be our #1. He was brought in to be a veteran presence for Metchie, Nico, and whichever WR we draft early this year… and catch a few balls a game out of the slot while he's at it.

Cooks is going to be gone so you need somebody unselfish in that role for a change.


He was never a number 1, and never will be. But he's always been #2 to a real number 1 the Texans don't have a true number 1.
Right. So might as well not sign anybody, right?
When you already have a roster full of #2 receivers, why would you bring in yet another #2? Maybe you draft a true #1.

There might not be any true #1s in this draft.
I think Quentin Johnston has the potential to be a true no 1. He's big, athletic, and has good hands. I like JSN but the issue with him is that he's been on teams at Ohio State that have so much WR talent it's hard to know how good each individual is. Last year he was with Wilson and Olave, this year he was with Marvin Harrison Jr who is a likely top 5 pick in next year's draft, and JSN had an injury this year. Personally I think Johnston is the only WR worth taking at 12. If he's gone I say o-line or pass rusher.

I will say I'm not normally one who puts much stock in the combine but I'm really fascinated with Nolan Smith. I liked him before, but a guy that size and athletic could be a problem for years to come.
I agree Johnston has the potential, but he's still coming from an offense with limited routes, aka the Briles offense. WRs have been notoriously a flop coming out of that offense, no matter how big and fast they are. That's why JSN and Addison are getting so much play, getting guys early that know how to run proper routes has become big for NFL offenses lately. It's the Cooper Cupp scenario.

I'm really thinking Nolan Smith at 12 would be nice.
Ryan34
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There are so many pass rushers and DL that I think the best value at #12. Nothing against Johnston.
. . .
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He gets a 2-year, $6.75M deal with $4M guaranteed - @RapSheet
IrishAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
. . . said:

He gets a 2-year, $6.75M deal with $4M guaranteed - @RapSheet

I wonder if this means we won't attempt to resign Adkins or Howard, or if we're looking at Beck being a FB role player....or both
IrishAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Hopefully McCalin reporting on this doesn't somehow keep him from signing with us
IrishAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?


So, I think this cements what most thought, Young or Stroud at #2


Raiders are looking at 3 years at 67.5M for Jimmy G
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
yes, it's difficult to forget the previous highly touted 1st round TCU WR...Jalen Reagor.

who was notoriously drafted 1 spot ahead of Justin Jefferson in the 2020 draft...whoops
. . .
How long do you want to ignore this user?


First Page Last Page
Page 99 of 115
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.