ShouldastayedataTm said:
No I don't the new will be better, but I have no say in the decisions Glock makes. I think this is more in line with record companies pushing DVDs after cassettes took over for vinyl records. Folls will run out and buy the latest version of the guns they already have. In reality this is just Gen 6 but with actual significant changes versus just removing finger grooves.
I think you meant CDs but even with that, I'm not sure this is a good analogy. For one, music CD sales didn't start taking off until the mid-80s at the earliest (actually, it was more like the late '80s) even though the format arrived in '82 and two, when people switched over, they first bought the new CDs and only gradually replaced their tape/vinyl collection over time. Besides, replacing a tape costs $13 and even someone who only made $5 an hour full time in '86 or '87 could still afford a couple of CDs a month. 6 a year at the absolute minimum. This was not only my experience (I think I bought my first CD in '85) but also that of just about everyone I knew. Some didn't start buying CDs until the '90s. Remember, we all had tape decks in our cars. Car CD players were luxury items, mostly, and until the mid/late '90s weren't seen in a lot of cars. Thus, tapes still had their use.
Few buy anywhere near 6 guns a year (or even a decade for that matter -- I don't, and I have shot a lot over the years and have owned many guns), even for replacement purposes. I had my USP for almost 20 years even though I didn't like the DA/SA on it. I did replace the original LCP with the LCP Custom, but that was like 2-3 years later. Still have the Custom along with a G42.
I do, however, agree that that this is essentially a Gen6, but like already posted, how long is it going to take to develop the same device to go on these new guns? Not long, I'd say, unless the engineering of the gun makes it impossible. We'll see.