College Station Midtown Neglect

19,692 Views | 116 Replies | Last: 7 mo ago by MsDoubleD81
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Eagle's Stephen Whittaker has a pretty good article on Midtown this morning. Here's a link for those with a subscription.

https://theeagle.com/news/local/business/article_3723b79a-2ebf-43d7-90aa-7aa2d039c4df.html#tracking-source=home-top-story

Respectfully

Bob Y '95
jello123
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Alg said:

Bob Yancy said:

A lot of people don't even know where Midtown College Station is.
It was named "Midtown" and it is on the edge of town. There is no getting around this problem near-ish term without a rebrand.

I propose one of those cutesy acronyms like OPSaW (out past Scott and White).
A name change would indeed be a PLUS! First of all there is Midtown in Bryan being developed AND CS Midtown choose this name why??? Maybe due to middle of nowhere????? Confusing to the public and so many more appropriate names. Have a naming contest. LOL
MyNameIsJeff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is my first thought every time someone refers to CS Midtown. It's very confusing. Not sure if CS or Bryan had a Midtown first, but the two areas being developed in roughly the same time frame and College Station's being nowhere near "mid" town is definitely confusing.
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Name it Uptown. Up from what? Who knows, doesn't matter.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Captn_Ag05 said:

Name it Uptown. Up from what? Who knows, doesn't matter.
The city considers it part of the medical district. Why not call it all the Medical District?
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
AggiePhil
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Because there's really not all that much medical, save for SJCSH and BSW. Usually a hospital district will have a large concentration of hospitals, doctor's offices, surgical centers, etc. Closest thing we have to that is around E. 29th and Villa Maria in Bryan. If CS wants its own (which I don't disagree with), it's going to have to somehow incentivize and prioritize medical tenants.

I'm also confused as to why SJ Express/Pediatrics is not included in the Medical District. Prior to the purchase of CSMC, that was planned to be a rather large SJ medical development. I realize that's changed, but there are still a few doctor's offices and an imaging center there.
BCS-Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jeez, if only there were a big box anchor in the development that would have paid for the rock prairie overpass and spured this whole concept on...oh wait.

Seriously though, a little look further back in history will inform the LONGSTANDING boondoggle this part of town has been.

For those that have a subscription: http://theeagle.com/news/local/weingarten-cs-close-to-a-deal/article_64e02ef4-a8e0-5462-b7be-d894eea4e97d.html

For those that don't here is the AI summary.

Weingarten vs. College Station Walmart Development Dispute: History & Outcome

Background
In the early 2000s, Weingarten Realty Investors purchased land at Highway 6 and Rock Prairie Road. The property was designated in the City of College Station's Comprehensive Plan for big box retail, aligning with Weingarten's intent to build a Walmart Supercenter. The company offered to pay for a traffic impact study and fund key infrastructure, including the Rock Prairie Road overpass.

Zoning Conflict
Despite the zoning compatibility, City Council denied Weingarten's rezoning request in 2006 due to public opposition to Walmart. A subsequent approval added restrictive conditions that Weingarten claimed made the development financially unworkable.

Lawsuit & Legal Actions
Weingarten filed a federal lawsuit in 2008, alleging the City acted arbitrarily and damaged the property's value. A U.S. District Court allowed the case to move forward, but in 2010 the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed it, ruling that City Council members had legislative immunity in zoning decisions.

Settlement & Land Transfer
In 2011, the City settled with Weingarten for $1.6 million, down from the original $10 million claim. Both parties had spent roughly $2 million in legal fees.

Weingarten subsequently sold approximately 98 acres to Scott & White Healthcare, a tax-exempt entity, which built a hospital and clinic. The City was involved in brokering this sale, which removed the land from the commercial tax rolls. Unlike the original proposal, Scott & White was not required to fund the traffic improvementsmeaning the cost of infrastructure upgrades was ultimately passed along to the general taxpayer, rather than borne by a developer.

Outcome & Legacy
- The City avoided a large damages award but incurred significant legal costs.
- The loss of taxable retail land and public burden of infrastructure costs drew long-term criticism.
- Planned retail and transportation enhancements were abandoned, despite initial private funding offers.
- The case is often cited as a cautionary tale in planning, politics, and unintended consequences.

Flatlander
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Name it Uptown. Up from what? Who knows, doesn't matter.
The city considers it part of the medical district. Why not call it all the Medical District?
So... Medtown?
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Flatlander said:

techno-ag said:

Captn_Ag05 said:

Name it Uptown. Up from what? Who knows, doesn't matter.
The city considers it part of the medical district. Why not call it all the Medical District?
So... Medtown?

Oh you are good.

The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggiePhil said:

Because there's really not all that much medical, save for SJCSH and BSW.

That's ok it's not really in the middle of town either.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BCS-Ag said:

Jeez, if only there were a big box anchor in the development that would have paid for the rock prairie overpass and spured this whole concept on...oh wait.

Seriously though, a little look further back in history will inform the LONGSTANDING boondoggle this part of town has been.

For those that have a subscription: http://theeagle.com/news/local/weingarten-cs-close-to-a-deal/article_64e02ef4-a8e0-5462-b7be-d894eea4e97d.html

For those that don't here is the AI summary.

Weingarten vs. College Station Walmart Development Dispute: History & Outcome

Background
In the early 2000s, Weingarten Realty Investors purchased land at Highway 6 and Rock Prairie Road. The property was designated in the City of College Station's Comprehensive Plan for big box retail, aligning with Weingarten's intent to build a Walmart Supercenter. The company offered to pay for a traffic impact study and fund key infrastructure, including the Rock Prairie Road overpass.

Zoning Conflict
Despite the zoning compatibility, City Council denied Weingarten's rezoning request in 2006 due to public opposition to Walmart. A subsequent approval added restrictive conditions that Weingarten claimed made the development financially unworkable.

Lawsuit & Legal Actions
Weingarten filed a federal lawsuit in 2008, alleging the City acted arbitrarily and damaged the property's value. A U.S. District Court allowed the case to move forward, but in 2010 the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed it, ruling that City Council members had legislative immunity in zoning decisions.

Settlement & Land Transfer
In 2011, the City settled with Weingarten for $1.6 million, down from the original $10 million claim. Both parties had spent roughly $2 million in legal fees.

Weingarten subsequently sold approximately 98 acres to Scott & White Healthcare, a tax-exempt entity, which built a hospital and clinic. The City was involved in brokering this sale, which removed the land from the commercial tax rolls. Unlike the original proposal, Scott & White was not required to fund the traffic improvementsmeaning the cost of infrastructure upgrades was ultimately passed along to the general taxpayer, rather than borne by a developer.

Outcome & Legacy
- The City avoided a large damages award but incurred significant legal costs.
- The loss of taxable retail land and public burden of infrastructure costs drew long-term criticism.
- Planned retail and transportation enhancements were abandoned, despite initial private funding offers.
- The case is often cited as a cautionary tale in planning, politics, and unintended consequences.




I remember it well. There was also the incident with the bulldozing of all trees, which riled folks up, as I recall. I would later be approached by Scott & White to be the first chairman of the hospital's governance board- an honor and a duty I will forever hold in my memory.

People were saying "this town doesn't need another hospital." Now it's one of the busiest and high performing in the state. So, in the end, I think that land is the highest and best use from a community benefit perspective.

The Midtown District has good bones, immediate access to medical care and a Costco on the other end. The 28 acres just north of Costco is about to develop into mixed use, restaurant and retail, etc.

Midtown truly has the potential to be a great district, despite the bumpy start. We need forward thinking and leaning leadership to get there. My $.02

Respectfully

Yancy '95
My opinions are mine and should not be construed as those of city council or staff. I welcome robust debate but will cease communication on any thread in which colleagues or staff are personally criticized. I must refrain from comment on posted agenda items until after meetings are concluded. Bob Yancy 95
UhOhNoAgTag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good bones enough for the homeowners to be paying $2,000 in RPMD2 taxes? And I'm afraid the property at Hwy 6 and Corporate is just going to do more harm.
EBrazosAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed. At least if you are paying MUD taxes you can run the water or flush your toilet and feel like you are getting something for you $$$
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
hydes11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's not a MUD, it's a MMD.
EBrazosAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was highlighting the difference between the two. I know Midtown is a MMD. Others have MUDs. At least they get a tangible benefit (supposedly).
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
91_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BCS-Ag said:

Jeez, if only there were a big box anchor in the development that would have paid for the rock prairie overpass and spured this whole concept on...oh wait.

Seriously though, a little look further back in history will inform the LONGSTANDING boondoggle this part of town has been.

For those that have a subscription: http://theeagle.com/news/local/weingarten-cs-close-to-a-deal/article_64e02ef4-a8e0-5462-b7be-d894eea4e97d.html

For those that don't here is the AI summary.

Weingarten vs. College Station Walmart Development Dispute: History & Outcome

Background
In the early 2000s, Weingarten Realty Investors purchased land at Highway 6 and Rock Prairie Road. The property was designated in the City of College Station's Comprehensive Plan for big box retail, aligning with Weingarten's intent to build a Walmart Supercenter. The company offered to pay for a traffic impact study and fund key infrastructure, including the Rock Prairie Road overpass.

Zoning Conflict
Despite the zoning compatibility, City Council denied Weingarten's rezoning request in 2006 due to public opposition to Walmart. A subsequent approval added restrictive conditions that Weingarten claimed made the development financially unworkable.

Lawsuit & Legal Actions
Weingarten filed a federal lawsuit in 2008, alleging the City acted arbitrarily and damaged the property's value. A U.S. District Court allowed the case to move forward, but in 2010 the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed it, ruling that City Council members had legislative immunity in zoning decisions.

Settlement & Land Transfer
In 2011, the City settled with Weingarten for $1.6 million, down from the original $10 million claim. Both parties had spent roughly $2 million in legal fees.

Weingarten subsequently sold approximately 98 acres to Scott & White Healthcare, a tax-exempt entity, which built a hospital and clinic. The City was involved in brokering this sale, which removed the land from the commercial tax rolls. Unlike the original proposal, Scott & White was not required to fund the traffic improvementsmeaning the cost of infrastructure upgrades was ultimately passed along to the general taxpayer, rather than borne by a developer.

Outcome & Legacy
- The City avoided a large damages award but incurred significant legal costs.
- The loss of taxable retail land and public burden of infrastructure costs drew long-term criticism.
- Planned retail and transportation enhancements were abandoned, despite initial private funding offers.
- The case is often cited as a cautionary tale in planning, politics, and unintended consequences.


This was just another case where East side residents had huge sway with city council because they didn't want "those people" any where near their neighborhood. they also stopped a big box development where BMW and Mercedes Benz are now
-------------------------------------------------------
"91_Aggie is right again." -YankeeAg00
"91a: You are so classy." -abl
"and i find myself agreeing with 91 yet again..." -Gramercy Riffs
Captn_Ag05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggiePhil said:

I spent a few hours last night watching the May 8 council meeting. Very interesting and informative. I suggest that anyone with the time watch it.

https://www.cstx.gov/departments___city_hall/pubcomm/channel_19
Thanks for sharing. I was able to watch most of it. It seems like the former Mayor caused quite a bit of the distrust for the citizens in Midtown.
woodiewood1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bob Yancy said:

BCS-Ag said:

Jeez, if only there were a big box anchor in the development that would have paid for the rock prairie overpass and spured this whole concept on...oh wait.

Seriously though, a little look further back in history will inform the LONGSTANDING boondoggle this part of town has been.

For those that have a subscription: http://theeagle.com/news/local/weingarten-cs-close-to-a-deal/article_64e02ef4-a8e0-5462-b7be-d894eea4e97d.html

For those that don't here is the AI summary.

Weingarten vs. College Station Walmart Development Dispute: History & Outcome

Background
In the early 2000s, Weingarten Realty Investors purchased land at Highway 6 and Rock Prairie Road. The property was designated in the City of College Station's Comprehensive Plan for big box retail, aligning with Weingarten's intent to build a Walmart Supercenter. The company offered to pay for a traffic impact study and fund key infrastructure, including the Rock Prairie Road overpass.

Zoning Conflict
Despite the zoning compatibility, City Council denied Weingarten's rezoning request in 2006 due to public opposition to Walmart. A subsequent approval added restrictive conditions that Weingarten claimed made the development financially unworkable.

Lawsuit & Legal Actions
Weingarten filed a federal lawsuit in 2008, alleging the City acted arbitrarily and damaged the property's value. A U.S. District Court allowed the case to move forward, but in 2010 the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed it, ruling that City Council members had legislative immunity in zoning decisions.

Settlement & Land Transfer
In 2011, the City settled with Weingarten for $1.6 million, down from the original $10 million claim. Both parties had spent roughly $2 million in legal fees.

Weingarten subsequently sold approximately 98 acres to Scott & White Healthcare, a tax-exempt entity, which built a hospital and clinic. The City was involved in brokering this sale, which removed the land from the commercial tax rolls. Unlike the original proposal, Scott & White was not required to fund the traffic improvementsmeaning the cost of infrastructure upgrades was ultimately passed along to the general taxpayer, rather than borne by a developer.

Outcome & Legacy
- The City avoided a large damages award but incurred significant legal costs.
- The loss of taxable retail land and public burden of infrastructure costs drew long-term criticism.
- Planned retail and transportation enhancements were abandoned, despite initial private funding offers.
- The case is often cited as a cautionary tale in planning, politics, and unintended consequences.




I remember it well. There was also the incident with the bulldozing of all trees, which riled folks up, as I recall. I would later be approached by Scott & White to be the first chairman of the hospital's governance board- an honor and a duty I will forever hold in my memory.

People were saying "this town doesn't need another hospital." Now it's one of the busiest and high performing in the state. So, in the end, I think that land is the highest and best use from a community benefit perspective.

The Midtown District has good bones, immediate access to medical care and a Costco on the other end. The 28 acres just north of Costco is about to develop into mixed use, restaurant and retail, etc.

Midtown truly has the potential to be a great district, despite the bumpy start. We need forward thinking and leaning leadership to get there. My $.02

Respectfully

Yancy '95


"The 28 acres just north of Costco is about to develop into mixed use, restaurant and retail, etc."

You are giving a great example of why the city doesn't need to involve itself in any development of the Midtown area. It will develop by itself over the next decade or so as the city expands southward without any input by the taxpayers' taxes.

Other examples of development due to consumer demand would be the whole Tower Point area and the development at Jones Crossing.

The collected taxes for Midtown development should be returned to the owners and the city should go back to supplying services to the citizens as a whole rather than involving itself in the development of a private company's property. It should never have occurred from the get-go.




happyinBCS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
as a note on all of this and will hopefully not point to my age

maybe 30 or 40 years ago I was honored to get in Edsel Jones pickup, and we drove around all of what is Jones crossing now and he said don't ever sell land if it is in the right location, you can lease it.

I think that is the first location HEB ever agreed to a 99-year ground lease they always own the land, correct me if I am wrong

My point has always been consistent, Government (CS) should never be in the real estate world because it is not their money it is ours, and Mr. Jones knew how to use his family's money, and a huge company and development agreed.

rest my case
Mas89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
UhOhNoAgTag said:

doubledog said:

happyinBCS said:

Those folks pay an additional property tax to the city and have been since day one. They need to get their money back because it is obvious the city screwed this up as they always do when they touch anything that has to do with development
Sorry, I have never heard this before. Is it a tax or a fee? For example an HOA fee is not a tax. Perhaps you can provide us a link to a news article or government document that confirms the "additional" tax.




They pay an additional Rock Prairie Management District 2 tax of 65 cents. This had been 50 cents until last year. This tax does not take into consideration homestead exemption, so it is on the full appraised amount. This accounts for 35% of total taxes.
I bet there are some fat cats managing that district. Let's see the salaries. All of them. Those tax districts are easy to set up and almost impossible to get rid of.
dubi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I bet there are some fat cats managing that district. Let's see the salaries. All of them. Those tax districts are easy to set up and almost impossible to get rid of.
I assume the tax district is subject to FOIA?
91_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
techno-ag said:

AggiePhil said:

Because there's really not all that much medical, save for SJCSH and BSW.

That's ok it's not really in the middle of town either.
It's naming was definitely chosen like the way Greenland was named. A lie to try to make it more attractive
-------------------------------------------------------
"91_Aggie is right again." -YankeeAg00
"91a: You are so classy." -abl
"and i find myself agreeing with 91 yet again..." -Gramercy Riffs
atm86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
91_Aggie said:

BCS-Ag said:

Jeez, if only there were a big box anchor in the development that would have paid for the rock prairie overpass and spured this whole concept on...oh wait.

Seriously though, a little look further back in history will inform the LONGSTANDING boondoggle this part of town has been.

For those that have a subscription: http://theeagle.com/news/local/weingarten-cs-close-to-a-deal/article_64e02ef4-a8e0-5462-b7be-d894eea4e97d.html

For those that don't here is the AI summary.

Weingarten vs. College Station Walmart Development Dispute: History & Outcome

Background
In the early 2000s, Weingarten Realty Investors purchased land at Highway 6 and Rock Prairie Road. The property was designated in the City of College Station's Comprehensive Plan for big box retail, aligning with Weingarten's intent to build a Walmart Supercenter. The company offered to pay for a traffic impact study and fund key infrastructure, including the Rock Prairie Road overpass.

Zoning Conflict
Despite the zoning compatibility, City Council denied Weingarten's rezoning request in 2006 due to public opposition to Walmart. A subsequent approval added restrictive conditions that Weingarten claimed made the development financially unworkable.

Lawsuit & Legal Actions
Weingarten filed a federal lawsuit in 2008, alleging the City acted arbitrarily and damaged the property's value. A U.S. District Court allowed the case to move forward, but in 2010 the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed it, ruling that City Council members had legislative immunity in zoning decisions.

Settlement & Land Transfer
In 2011, the City settled with Weingarten for $1.6 million, down from the original $10 million claim. Both parties had spent roughly $2 million in legal fees.

Weingarten subsequently sold approximately 98 acres to Scott & White Healthcare, a tax-exempt entity, which built a hospital and clinic. The City was involved in brokering this sale, which removed the land from the commercial tax rolls. Unlike the original proposal, Scott & White was not required to fund the traffic improvementsmeaning the cost of infrastructure upgrades was ultimately passed along to the general taxpayer, rather than borne by a developer.

Outcome & Legacy
- The City avoided a large damages award but incurred significant legal costs.
- The loss of taxable retail land and public burden of infrastructure costs drew long-term criticism.
- Planned retail and transportation enhancements were abandoned, despite initial private funding offers.
- The case is often cited as a cautionary tale in planning, politics, and unintended consequences.


This was just another case where East side residents had huge sway with city council because they didn't want "those people" any where near their neighborhood. they also stopped a big box development where BMW and Mercedes Benz are now



DING DING DING!

And why would anyone purchase anything right next to an old dump? And pay outrageous extra taxes on it?

Where is the real access to the area as well? Are we still waiting for Barron Road to magically extend? Right now, access to MidMedTown is eastsider only.

Too many questions remain. Where is the leadership?
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
91_Aggie said:

techno-ag said:

AggiePhil said:

Because there's really not all that much medical, save for SJCSH and BSW.

That's ok it's not really in the middle of town either.
It's naming was definitely chosen like the way Greenland was named. A lie to try to make it more attractive


"That turd next to the old dump" just doesn't roll off the tongue the same.

I just can't feature paying those taxes. What extra services / benefits are they getting for those?

I'm sure the city will do the right thing and give that money back. /s
The Brazos Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Haven't read the whole thread but it was named "Midtown" because even though feels south of town, it's geographically in the middle of the CS city limits.

The ownership group pushed hard for Top Golf to move in behind Harley Davidson (I assembled/edited the pitch video) but nothing came of it and soon after the Bryan Midtown landed Top Shots or whatever it was called.

I live across 6 from Midtown and hope some cool retail makes its way there in the coming years.
UhOhNoAgTag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dubi said:

Quote:

I bet there are some fat cats managing that district. Let's see the salaries. All of them. Those tax districts are easy to set up and almost impossible to get rid of.
I assume the tax district is subject to FOIA?

Here is the board. There is also a tax assessor, attorney, engineer and I'm not sure what else. The board has little pieces of property in Midtown that the district pays the taxes on.

Uri Geva, President
Hays Glover, Vice President
Logan Lee, Assistant VIce President
Mark Lindemulder, Secretary
Samuel "Kit" Kerbel, Assistant Secretary
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So, the guy that owns the Bombers and a former Aggie Basketball player….
UhOhNoAgTag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hornbeck said:

So, the guy that owns the Bombers and a former Aggie Basketball player….


Yes, and the owner of Sveciks, Mark Lindemulder.
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
UhOhNoAgTag said:

Hornbeck said:

So, the guy that owns the Bombers and a former Aggie Basketball player….


Yes, and the owner of Sveciks, Mark Lindemulder.


More evidence that around here, it's not "what you know", it's "who you know"…

This is my shocked face.
UhOhNoAgTag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The City Council approves them. They had Kerbel and Logan Lee on the agenda on Thursday night but it was way down on the agenda. As far as you could get it from the Midtown agenda.
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
.
MsDoubleD81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I asked this question on the Bombers thread, so not to derail there. What is the status of the TIP @ Midtown? There is only the restroom out there. It's been almost a year. Nothing else.

And as another poster says, the property at Hwy 6 and Corporate is just going to "neglect" Midtown even more.
Bob Yancy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MsDoubleD81 said:

I asked this question on the Bombers thread, so not to derail there. What is the status of the TIP @ Midtown? There is only the restroom out there. It's been almost a year. Nothing else.

And as another poster says, the property at Hwy 6 and Corporate is just going to "neglect" Midtown even more.


Construction will begin this fall. We were waiting on final design and a grant from the state, which we received. The contract has been awarded. Here's a detailed update…

https://blog.cstx.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/5-Texas-Independence-Park-Update.pdf

Respectfully

Yancy '95
My opinions are mine and should not be construed as those of city council or staff. I welcome robust debate but will cease communication on any thread in which colleagues or staff are personally criticized. I must refrain from comment on posted agenda items until after meetings are concluded. Bob Yancy 95
Hornbeck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hornbeck said:

UhOhNoAgTag said:

Hornbeck said:

So, the guy that owns the Bombers and a former Aggie Basketball player….


Yes, and the owner of Sveciks, Mark Lindemulder.


More evidence that around here, it's not "what you know", it's "who you know"…

This is my shocked face.



Aaaaannnnnnddddd just like that, the Bombers are moving to CS.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where exactly is TIP going to be located?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.