CSISD Board Elections

15,793 Views | 89 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by BCSWguru
Bob is your uncle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe I'm late to the party, but what is happening with this year's CSISD Board Elections?
2025 Election Information - College Station Independent School District

Specifically, the former Superintendent is running against the Board President. That seems really odd to me. Why did he retire if he still has unfinished business?

I don't know much about the Place 3 candidates other than that Fields raises money for children in Africa.

Also interesting to see a former principal running against McAdams.
KaneIsAble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The guy running against Fields dropped out but will still be on the ballot. Will be interesting to see how that vote goes.

Quality first post, should get a lot of comments. The Pro-Martindale group vs Anti-Martindale group is very defined.
HWY6_RunsBothWays
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's my understanding that Martindale isn't happy with the new Super and wants to bring in one of his former lieutenants as the new Super. As the previous poster said, there are some pro- and anti-groups for Martindale, which probably means Purple vs Marron, given his past.
SoTheySay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
I do find it odd, though, that Hadnot is running against the one person who wasnt eager to renew the superintendents contract.
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
HWY6_RunsBothWays said:

It's my understanding that Martindale isn't happy with the new Super and wants to bring in one of his former lieutenants as the new Super. As the previous poster said, there are some pro- and anti-groups for Martindale, which probably means Purple vs Marron, given his past.

Which is silly because he's never shown favoritism.

Some people got mad and created a Facebook page because he's posted pictures in Cougar shirts. The audacity of a Dad wearing a school shirt to his kid's event is horrible, I guess.

There is or was a thread on here that was about Martindale "saying the quiet part out loud" because of it.
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
I wish Madsen hadn't dropped out. From everything that I've heard, he's conservative and that would be good to have on the board.
KaneIsAble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was he President of the Cougar Club while the daughter was in school or after graduation; I can't remember.
Bob is your uncle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoTheySay said:

I do find it odd, though, that Hadnot is running against the one person who wasnt eager to renew the superintendents contract.

I'm sorry, don't understand. Can you please explain?
brownandred
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can anyone share the reason the former superintendent abruptly retired instead of admitting to his mistakes?

Either we want a united College Station or more of the past CSHS favoritism with Martindale!
AllTheFishes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It will be more interesting to watch all the teachers show up and vote against their former superintendent. I don't know a single teacher who likes him or thought he did good things for the district.
NativeBCS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some...interesting...takes on this thread spoken as fact.

Martindale has no desire to take out the current super, nor could he has one of seven board members even if elected. His kids are now out of high school and in college, and he said he wants to give back to the district that did so much for him and his family.

He retired on his own accord to spend more time with his kids before they were graduated/playing college sports that he wanted to go watch. If there was something nefarious it's not been released to my knowledge but by all means bring it forth if you have it.

I know far more teachers who like Martindale than the current super. Harkrider has done some really good things, but he's not someone known to listen to his teachers or seem like he cares how his decisions affect their day to day in the classroom. That has not gone over well with current teachers.

I encourage anyone reading this thread to talk to teachers you know directly to see what they think about the Martindale/Horak race. You might be surprised by how strongly they feel.


George Costanza
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SoTheySay said:

I do find it odd, though, that Hadnot is running against the one person who wasnt eager to renew the superintendents contract.


Supposedly she supported an extension, just not as long of one as some of the other board members.
KaneIsAble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NativeBCS said:

Some...interesting...takes on this thread spoken as fact.

Martindale has no desire to take out the current super, nor could he has one of seven board members even if elected. His kids are now out of high school and in college, and he said he wants to give back to the district that did so much for him and his family.

He retired on his own accord to spend more time with his kids before they were graduated/playing college sports that he wanted to go watch. If there was something nefarious it's not been released to my knowledge but by all means bring it forth if you have it.

I know far more teachers who like Martindale than the current super. Harkrider has done some really good things, but he's not someone known to listen to his teachers or seem like he cares how his decisions affect their day to day in the classroom. That has not gone over well with current teachers.

I encourage anyone reading this thread to talk to teachers you know directly to see what they think about the Martindale/Horak race. You might be surprised by how strongly they feel.






The counter to this would be I know a dozen teachers and admin that would overwhelmingly disagree with your post. It's interesting to see Martindale signs predominantly (possibly exclusively) in Cougar family yards. It's not an accident.
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
brownandred said:

Can anyone share the reason the former superintendent abruptly retired instead of admitting to his mistakes?

Either we want a united College Station or more of the past CSHS favoritism with Martindale!


List examples of this. You must have a bunch of them since you used an exclamation.
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Quote:

The counter to this would be I know a dozen teachers and admin that would overwhelmingly disagree with your post. It's interesting to see Martindale signs predominantly (possibly exclusively) in Cougar family yards. It's not an accident.

And just ignore the fact that he was outspoken about the improvements needed to Consol and how much he pushed the bonds. There were a bunch signs up for it in "Cougar family yards". There were signs all over those neighborhoods and he was handing them out.

I don't know Martindale personally, but it's hilarious how people that talk about his bias don't provide examples.
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Quote:

The counter to this would be I know a dozen teachers and admin that would overwhelmingly disagree with your post. It's interesting to see Martindale signs predominantly (possibly exclusively) in Cougar family yards. It's not an accident.

The counter to your counter is that we also know a bunch of teachers through church, 4H, and FFA that would disagree with your disagreement. 4H and FFA aren't school specific and have kids from every school in the county.

I've already addressed the signs.
HWY6_RunsBothWays
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NativeBCS said:

Some...interesting...takes on this thread spoken as fact.

Martindale has no desire to take out the current super, nor could he has one of seven board members even if elected. His kids are now out of high school and in college, and he said he wants to give back to the district that did so much for him and his family.

He retired on his own accord to spend more time with his kids before they were graduated/playing college sports that he wanted to go watch. If there was something nefarious it's not been released to my knowledge but by all means bring it forth if you have it.

I know far more teachers who like Martindale than the current super. Harkrider has done some really good things, but he's not someone known to listen to his teachers or seem like he cares how his decisions affect their day to day in the classroom. That has not gone over well with current teachers.

I encourage anyone reading this thread to talk to teachers you know directly to see what they think about the Martindale/Horak race. You might be surprised by how strongly they feel.




Interesting. You speak of this as fact as well.

True, it takes at least four board members to make a change; but Martidale, Fields, and McAdams make three...and they only need one more to agree with them.

I commend anyone who seeks to serve their community and ISD, but the optics of this don't point to selfless service--it points to an agenda. Place 3 had no incumbent, yet Martindale chose to run against Horak. And while Martindale was Super, Horak and he seemed to be very close. I also understand that Martindale has basically cut off all communication with Horak since he filed against him.

I have talked with teachers and principals, and they agree that this is an extremely bad look for the district. Even if they may be having growing pains adjusting to the new Superintendent, they don't want the possible drama that will come with the retired Superintendent being on the Board.
TAMU1990
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NativeBCS said:

Some...interesting...takes on this thread spoken as fact.

Martindale has no desire to take out the current super, nor could he has one of seven board members even if elected. His kids are now out of high school and in college, and he said he wants to give back to the district that did so much for him and his family.

He retired on his own accord to spend more time with his kids before they were graduated/playing college sports that he wanted to go watch. If there was something nefarious it's not been released to my knowledge but by all means bring it forth if you have it.

I know far more teachers who like Martindale than the current super. Harkrider has done some really good things, but he's not someone known to listen to his teachers or seem like he cares how his decisions affect their day to day in the classroom. That has not gone over well with current teachers.

I encourage anyone reading this thread to talk to teachers you know directly to see what they think about the Martindale/Horak race. You might be surprised by how strongly they feel.





On the day to day - I've heard Harkrider is using a program that Martindale bought to deal with day to day tasks that they don't like. The district bought it and didn't use it under Martindale's tenure. Supposedly, Harkrider is not buying a new one to be budget conscious.

Martindale became the Cougar Club president within 10 days of "retiring". I thought it was 2 weeks but it was 10 days. (correction)

The admin employees are happy the purple hue is gone and now a neutral one. As it should be.
jac4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Speaking of signs, which candidates correlate with the Beto signs from 2018?
Hair God
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm pretty sure McAdams does. She and Nolan (got voted out last cycle) were pro masking due to covid after we had clear evidence that most of our students would be okay.

I hope Hadnot wins that race easily. He is a great family man and leader who always has put teachers first in his 20+ years of leadership in CSISD.
letterman72
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


…?? Ignore the fact that he was outspoken about the improvements needed to Consol and pushed the bonds???

In fact, it was quite the opposite. Martindale abruptly resigned on March 23 and never once lifted a finger in support of the bonds. After his resignation, he was truly just a citizen/former parent of CSISD and he had every opportunity to be engaged with the promotion of the bond, but he did zero. There were kids and parents from all over this district walking streets, knocking on doors, and posting up at polling places to promote the bonds. Martindale did not one thing.

It's funny because you mention in your post that people say things but don't provide examples….so I'm asking you - please provide examples to all of us to back up your statement that he was outspoken about the improvements needed at Consol and that he pushed the bonds.

We'll be waiting, because I think you're going to find that the exact opposite of your statement is what actually happened.


If he truly cared about this district and the kids of CSISD, he would have been vocal and been on the streets with these kids and parents - but he couldn't stand to see the unification that took place after he left - purple and maroon working TOGETHER - something he never promoted or fostered during his time as the superintendent.
doubledog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The incombants are

Jeff Horak
Kimberly McAdams

For those who remember our last bond, bond, bond until it passes board.

Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
He was vocal to people about the bonds. Just because he didn't walk door-to-door to push it, that doesn't mean that he wasn't vocal. He also gave signs to people and encouraged people to put them in their yards.

You didn't provide a "fact". Your entire post is long way of saying "I don't think he did enough to satisfy me".
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Quote:

but he couldn't stand to see the unification that took place after he left - purple and maroon working TOGETHER

What, exactly, are you basing that on? Hearsay?

As I said, I don't know him personally. I've spoken to him at events and heard him speak at events and that is the opposite of everything that I've heard him say.
brownandred
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stupe said:

He was vocal to people about the bonds. Just because he didn't walk door-to-door to push it, that doesn't mean that he wasn't vocal. He also gave signs to people and encouraged people to put them in their yards.

You didn't provide a "fact". Your entire post is long way of saying "I don't think he did enough"


He sure did a lot to make sure Cougar High was a Taj Mahal while
Consol was left to rot.
Did nothing to curtail realtors from telling people how awful Consol was…. how did that work out? East side is thriving now inspite of his realtor buddies.

Vote HORAK to keep their little 3 member voting block scheme a pipe dream. The fact that there are 3 people
aligned to remove the current superintendent is EXACTLY the type of games Martindale played while he was super.

Kinda strange you are unwavering in your support for someone you don't even know.




Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
I'm not "supporting" anyone. I just find it interesting when people say things as fact...without providing fact.

What, exactly, did he do to make a building a "Taj Mahal" when he was Superintendent? A school that opened the doors in 2012?
CSHS seems like a "Taj Mahal" because it's a newer school. All new schools seem like that compared to older schools in a school district. Everywhere.

"Did nothing to curtail". Another statement based on "Didn't do enough to satisfy me".
ElephantRider
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
KaneIsAble said:

NativeBCS said:

Some...interesting...takes on this thread spoken as fact.

Martindale has no desire to take out the current super, nor could he has one of seven board members even if elected. His kids are now out of high school and in college, and he said he wants to give back to the district that did so much for him and his family.

He retired on his own accord to spend more time with his kids before they were graduated/playing college sports that he wanted to go watch. If there was something nefarious it's not been released to my knowledge but by all means bring it forth if you have it.

I know far more teachers who like Martindale than the current super. Harkrider has done some really good things, but he's not someone known to listen to his teachers or seem like he cares how his decisions affect their day to day in the classroom. That has not gone over well with current teachers.

I encourage anyone reading this thread to talk to teachers you know directly to see what they think about the Martindale/Horak race. You might be surprised by how strongly they feel.






The counter to this would be I know a dozen teachers and admin that would overwhelmingly disagree with your post. It's interesting to see Martindale signs predominantly (possibly exclusively) in Cougar family yards. It's not an accident.

I see plenty in my neighborhood and we're zoned to Consol
EFR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How is the superintendent of a school district supposed to stop realtors from giving an opinion on schools? If this is one of your complaints against the guy you are really reaching.
Creekisrising
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a good way to look at it.

The two for sure are McAdams and Field. Both seem to have the unwavering support of leaders in the Democratic Party. If the opponent to Field really dropped out that is an automatic move in board direction to the left with Benn leaving.
I have no idea on Martindale but he seems to be aligned with the two I have mentioned in this post already.

If those three all win I am thinking it is as split of a board as we have seen in a long time politically speaking.

coconuthead
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Candidate questionnaires can be viewed by clicking each person's name here: Election Information
KaneIsAble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Creekisrising said:

This is a good way to look at it.

The two for sure are McAdams and Field. Both seem to have the unwavering support of leaders in the Democratic Party. If the opponent to Field really dropped out that is an automatic move in board direction to the left with Benn leaving.
I have no idea on Martindale but he seems to be aligned with the two I have mentioned in this post already.

If those three all win I am thinking it is as split of a board as we have seen in a long time politically speaking.




You can still vote for the person opposing Fields, or at least that's my understanding they will still be on the ballot. The board would then schedule a special election to re-seat the spot.

Someone correct me on the ballot part if I'm wrong.
91_Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Creekisrising said:

This is a good way to look at it.

The two for sure are McAdams and Field. Both seem to have the unwavering support of leaders in the Democratic Party. If the opponent to Field really dropped out that is an automatic move in board direction to the left with Benn leaving.
I have no idea on Martindale but he seems to be aligned with the two I have mentioned in this post already.

If those three all win I am thinking it is as split of a board as we have seen in a long time politically speaking.




This election for school board is not about Democrat vs Republican... dont bring that in here.
jac4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
91_Aggie said:

Creekisrising said:

This is a good way to look at it.

The two for sure are McAdams and Field. Both seem to have the unwavering support of leaders in the Democratic Party. If the opponent to Field really dropped out that is an automatic move in board direction to the left with Benn leaving.
I have no idea on Martindale but he seems to be aligned with the two I have mentioned in this post already.

If those three all win I am thinking it is as split of a board as we have seen in a long time politically speaking.




This election for school board is not about Democrat vs Republican... dont bring that in here.


Regardless of party affiliation, if a candidate advocated for masks in schools in 2022 it is my opinion that he or she should never hold public office. That is as good of a bell weather issue as you are going to have in local politics.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How about we all hold off on the speculation and find out what the candidates actually have to say.

Quote:

College Station ISD will hold a Board of Trustees candidate forum for the upcoming 2025 election on Wednesday, Oct. 15 at 6 p.m. in the CSISD Boardroom (1812 Welsh Ave).

The forum will feature candidates seated at a table in front of a live audience, while the event is streamed on the CSISD YouTube channel. The forum will be moderated by Robert Long III, division director for TASB's Board Development Services, alongside subject-matter expert Jason Burdine, who has served on the Board of Directors for the Texas State School Safety Center and the Fort Bend ISD Board of Trustees.
SCHTICK00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stupe said:

I'm not "supporting" anyone. I just find it interesting when people say things as fact...without providing fact.

What, exactly, did he do to make a building a "Taj Mahal" when he was Superintendent? A school that opened the doors in 2012?
CSHS seems like a "Taj Mahal" because it's a newer school. All new schools seem like that compared to older schools in a school district. Everywhere.

"Did nothing to curtail". Another statement based on "Didn't do enough to satisfy me".


Consol had mold growing in the walls while funds were diverted to CS for a new indoor batting cage. Any chance his kids played baseball at CS?
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.