Emblems from the American Civil War that relate to the Southern Cause continue to be under seige from elements of the left/progressive culture in the US. Statues of Civil War heroes on both the tu and TAMU campuses are drawing fire from those who want them removed. Images of the Confederate battle flag draw particularly vicious howls of outrage from a vocal few who cannot differentiate history from contemporary political drama. Most folks today cannot understand what all the fuss is about ... so in most cases local powers that be yield to the protesters ... to the disappointed annoyance of the "silent majority."
A former president of Texas A&M, Frank E. Vandiver, PhD, addressed this situation April 28, 2001 in a speech at Andersen at the dedication of a statue and plaza commemorating the Grimes County Greys, a volunteer group who fought for the Confederacy more than 140 years ago. This group was a source of historic family and community pride for Grimes County.
For those of you who never had the pleasure of meeting Frank Vandiver allow me to introduce this gentleman.
Vandiver was President at TAMU from 1981 to 1988. Before that, he was President at the University of North Texas from 1979-1981. Before that he was on the faculty at Rice University 1955-1979 and served as President there 1968-1970. Vandiver retired from TAMU in 1988 to head the Mosher Institute at A&M and to devote full time to writing Civil War and military histories.
Vandiver was a Civil War historian of the first order and published 20 books on the subjects. Before his teaching at Rice, Vandiver was on the faculty at Oxford University and the US Military Academy. His favorite characters were "Mighty Stonewall Jackson" and John J. Pershing. He was not locked into the Civil War but in later writings blended lessons from that war into contemporary wars, WWI, WWII, Vietnam, etc.
Frank Vandiver was a good and gentle man ... and his delivery of anecdotes from the Civil War could mesmerize an audience ... He was the pure academic historian, the type who footnotes every utterance. And his voice was on par with Shelby Foote (a popular historian) who wrote the History of the Civil War and narrated the Ken Burns epic of that book.
Frank Vandiver found a home at Texas A&M and loved every part of it, from the Dixie Chicken to Kyle Field. He passed away at his home in College Station in 2005.
This was Frank Vandiver's speech for dedication of the Grimes County Greys memorial in April 2001.
Edit: As one might expect, a member of the TAMU Touchstone group attacked Vandiver's speech with viciousness and hatred. That attack on an even-handed address by a learned and compassionate person stands in itself as a symbol of the blind hatred the left/progressives have for speech they do not agree with ... speech is only free if it reflects their narrow views.
[This message has been edited by fossil_ag (edited 1/20/2007 1:04p).]
A former president of Texas A&M, Frank E. Vandiver, PhD, addressed this situation April 28, 2001 in a speech at Andersen at the dedication of a statue and plaza commemorating the Grimes County Greys, a volunteer group who fought for the Confederacy more than 140 years ago. This group was a source of historic family and community pride for Grimes County.
For those of you who never had the pleasure of meeting Frank Vandiver allow me to introduce this gentleman.
Vandiver was President at TAMU from 1981 to 1988. Before that, he was President at the University of North Texas from 1979-1981. Before that he was on the faculty at Rice University 1955-1979 and served as President there 1968-1970. Vandiver retired from TAMU in 1988 to head the Mosher Institute at A&M and to devote full time to writing Civil War and military histories.
Vandiver was a Civil War historian of the first order and published 20 books on the subjects. Before his teaching at Rice, Vandiver was on the faculty at Oxford University and the US Military Academy. His favorite characters were "Mighty Stonewall Jackson" and John J. Pershing. He was not locked into the Civil War but in later writings blended lessons from that war into contemporary wars, WWI, WWII, Vietnam, etc.
Frank Vandiver was a good and gentle man ... and his delivery of anecdotes from the Civil War could mesmerize an audience ... He was the pure academic historian, the type who footnotes every utterance. And his voice was on par with Shelby Foote (a popular historian) who wrote the History of the Civil War and narrated the Ken Burns epic of that book.
Frank Vandiver found a home at Texas A&M and loved every part of it, from the Dixie Chicken to Kyle Field. He passed away at his home in College Station in 2005.
This was Frank Vandiver's speech for dedication of the Grimes County Greys memorial in April 2001.
quote:
Ladies and gentlemen, please accept my warm thanks for your invitation to participate in the unveiling of a new monument to Confederate soldiers. It is fitting and proper that we should do this for these men fought for what they believed in and wanted their descendants to have. It is fashionable now in some parts of the nation to stereotype Rebels as fighting for slavery. This certainly was one of the reasons, but the many, many non-slave holders in arms indicate other causes among which were independence and the defense of a life tempo comfortable in an agrarian nation. Rebels gave their lives for what they believed in -- many, many lives.
It may be that some of the men we commemorate here today were among those to whom General Lee referred in his tribute until recently displayed on the State Supreme Court building in Austin: I rate my Texans as storm troops and regret only that I must call on them too often. (As an aside, I wonder why that quotation was quietly removed by the then Governor. Was it because Lee said it, or because it praised Texas Confederates? See how easily meanings are confused?) I suspect that some of the men here memorialized were among Lee's favorites. Texas troops have usually done well. On that surreptitious moment that Lee's quote was taken from us, so was a bas relief of the Confederate Battle Flag.
It's about the current flag issue that I'd like to talk for a moment, with your kind indulgence. This issue is, to borrow a Jefferson phrase, "like a fire bell in the night." It is a far more serious matter than most people think. It is not "much ado about nothing," nor is it likely simply to go away. Part of the problem is that flags mean different things to different people at different times. Our American flag has suffered burnings, cursings and has, now and then, represented things not entirely agreeable to all Americans. So, too, the Lone Star. If you read the growing news about the Battle Flag you'll see that opinions are beginning to firm up on both sides of the issue. Many blacks have a legitimate aversion to a banner seeming to them a cloak for racism, a banner spuriously embraced by racist groups such as the KKK. Many Southerners sustain a deep, personal devotion to ancestors who died for that same banner in an American quest for independence -- and they see the controversy as an example of reverse racism.
What alarms me is that neither side, I think, quite appreciates the power of symbolism in this situation. The direct black approach of economic threats to sections of the south retaining the flag have scored early and big victories. But a counter-resentment is growing among defenders of their heritages and they just scored in Mississippi. The quick assertion that the election did not settle the issue and that the Mississippi campaign to change the flag would continue clearly underscores the deep divisions this issue is causing.
Where will all this end? If both sides continue digging in, riveting their positions, I foresee great trouble ahead for the country, a country re-divided in ways tragically hurtful to the vital progress of Civil Rights for both sides.
I do not think this is an issue of political correctness (surely an oxymoron!); it is an issue of deep-struck anguish. Both sides have legitimate points. In the normal American process these would be compromised. But compromise has failed because a few extremists on both sides will not have it so.
Let me suggest that all of us here, Americans everywhere, government officials especially, take this symbolic conflict as the warning that it is. I suggest that those on both sides of the flag issue try to see beyond their angers into the hearts of their supposed opponents. The battle flag seems to demean black successes in their fight against a background of American shame. The battle flag also has deep meaning in the southern psyche because it honors courage and assuages, still, the heartbreak of losing. In a new bestseller about the end of the war the point is made that had not Grant, Sherman, Lincoln and other Northern leaders been the men they were, the results of the war could well have been years of savage guerrilla battles and the kind of butchery that followed many European wars. One of the wise things to come from Lincoln's attitude of "letting 'em up easy," was that the South was left its history, could cherish men who fought gallantly in adversity and so could reenter a Union with honor and old enemies could become comrades once again.
If the flag issue, and it is only one of several attacks on Confederate history, escalates, banked anguish may become overt hostility with dismal portents. Americans must not let this happen. Edicts, proclamations, shouts, week-kneed truckling, none will derail this different train.
Americans all need to retreat from extremism. We need to work our way back to democracy's surest foundation -- reason. Reason nourishes understanding, understanding cools hatred so that the old trait of compromise can work its preserving magic. Americans can avoid racism and honor bravery at the same time.
May I suggest that defenders of both sides recall and affirm some words of Voltaire, which I will paraphrase here to reflect differing views: "I disagree with everything you say about the Battle Flag, but will defend to the death your right to say it." "I disagree with your displaying the Battle Flag, but will defend to the death your right to display it." Here is empathy coming from compassionate reason, the thing most needed in our country today.
I congratulate all of you who have produced this splendid memorial and deeply hope that it will be among the first received with the respect of compassionate reason.
Thank you
Edit: As one might expect, a member of the TAMU Touchstone group attacked Vandiver's speech with viciousness and hatred. That attack on an even-handed address by a learned and compassionate person stands in itself as a symbol of the blind hatred the left/progressives have for speech they do not agree with ... speech is only free if it reflects their narrow views.
[This message has been edited by fossil_ag (edited 1/20/2007 1:04p).]