Apache said:
Quote:
But as far as belts go, it's really hard to measure skill by the color of their belt.
Do you think there should be belt testing to establish a base level of techniques that a person at a certain belt level should know?
IMO, you can't base belt on who beats who rolling or in a match. Teach a collegiate wrestler 5 basic moves & he'll smoke most BJJ guys up to purple/brown belt. (I know from experience lol)
Judo is a sister sport to BJJ so many of those moves directly translate. Same with Sambo and catch wrestling.
Do you think it would be bad if a guy with 8 years Sambo experience went into a gym, smoked all the whites/blues & beat some purples was awarded a purple belt on the spot? Would he need to "pay his dues" at BJJ, even when he clearly paid them elsewhere?
Curious what y'all think.
Agreed. Its difficult to nail this down.
There are days when I can maintain/hold my own with a purple belt, then the next day I'm having issues with a white belt. There are people all up and down the scale & you are right, a wrestler is a lot to deal with for anyone.
But, I don't think there should be "standardized" testing at this point in time. That may change sometime in the future, because I've heard more than one person say that BJJ is getting "watered down".
Edit: I am joining IBJJF because I'm doing the tournament in Round Rock in July & its required, I'm in the Masters 5 division & should be weighing in the low 190s at that point.
One of my issues is relevant to this because I know & have seen schools keep a guy at a lower belt level for longer than they should be so they can compete at that level. I'm not AS concerned about it because of the age thing & I'm not doing Nogi....but it does happen.