Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

The problem is Texas A&M

25,465 Views | 193 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by SBDavis87
geoag58
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SBDavis87 said:

Nibblerweather said:

I honestly have zero line of sight as to what goes on behind the scenes. A lot of fair criticisms about some of our culture and some of our traditions. But I don't see the link between not booing and losing. A lot of teams boo, have female cheerleaders and lose just fine.


Allow me to demonstrate the link.

When you are watching the Donghorns beat your Aggies and whomever is deciding how a play at the goal line which is the same one that didn't work previously (ever) should be chosen/executed - and this idjit makes the absolutely brain-dead decision to pull a guard leaving a direct path for Donghorn players who are the strength of their program this year, to the Aggie backfield and also ensures that there is no possible way a yard can be obtained by having the quarterback go under center yet hands the ball to a small halfback five yards deep in the backfield (negating the under center advantage) then you would as a Donghorn if the role was reversed BOO quite a lot showing your displeasure and hopefully the embarrassment would lead to correction by the Hawthorne Effect next time. If many share this view and Boo loudly, the coaching staff usually realizes they screwed up and need to fix this because there is immediate verbal communication that the fan base is angry.

However, as an Aggie you cannot boo, and have to keep your mouth shut and hope that perhaps someone would post something on social media or texags that would somehow reach the staff personnel responsible and the correction would happen through osmosis and/or diffusion. This is absolute fantasy and will never correct the issue so this is why there is a link between immediate and proper communication that does not reward bad behavior, and the probability of winning the game so in essence - winning.
Fight against the dictatorship of the federal bureaucracy!
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SBDavis87 said:

Nibblerweather said:

I honestly have zero line of sight as to what goes on behind the scenes. A lot of fair criticisms about some of our culture and some of our traditions. But I don't see the link between not booing and losing. A lot of teams boo, have female cheerleaders and lose just fine.


Allow me to demonstrate the link.

When you are watching the Donghorns beat your Aggies and whomever is deciding how a play at the goal line which is the same one that didn't work previously (ever) should be chosen/executed - and this idjit makes the absolutely brain-dead decision to pull a guard leaving a direct path for Donghorn players who are the strength of their program this year, to the Aggie backfield and also ensures that there is no possible way a yard can be obtained by having the quarterback go under center yet hands the ball to a small halfback five yards deep in the backfield (negating the under center advantage) then you would as a Donghorn if the role was reversed BOO quite a lot showing your displeasure and hopefully the embarrassment would lead to correction by the Hawthorne Effect next time. If many share this view and Boo loudly, the coaching staff usually realizes they screwed up and need to fix this because there is immediate verbal communication that the fan base is angry.

However, as an Aggie you cannot boo, and have to keep your mouth shut and hope that perhaps someone would post something on social media or texags that would somehow reach the staff personnel responsible and the correction would happen through osmosis and/or diffusion. This is absolute fantasy and will never correct the issue so this is why there is a link between immediate and proper communication that does not reward bad behavior, and the probability of winning the game so in essence - winning.


This.

Well stated.
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Since joining the Big 12 in 1996, we have lost 4+ games in 26 of 29 years. The only 3 exceptions were when we finished 11-3 (7-1 Big 12) and won the Big 12 in 1998, 11-2 (6-2 SEC) in 2012 and 9-1 (8-1 SEC) in 2020. We finished with a 9-2 (6-2 Big 12) regular season record to win the Big 12 South Division in 1997 before getting trounced 54-15 by eventual national champion Nebraska in the Big 12 Championship Game and losing 29-23 to UCLA in the Cotton Bowl to finish 9-4. We finished with 9-3 regular season records in 2006 and 2010, but both seasons ended with 17+ point bowl losses to drop us to 9-4. We finished with 8-4 regular season records in 2013 and 2018, and both seasons ended with bowl wins to finish 9-4.

We usually win 7 or 8 games per year and finish in the middle of the Big 12 or SEC with several 9+ win seasons and a few losing seasons mixed in. We have won 9+ games just 8 times in the last 29 years: 1997, 1998, 2006, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2018, and 2020. During that span, we had missed bowl eligibility just 4 times: 2003, 2005, 2008, and 2022. Also, we finished 6-6 (4-4 Big 12) in 1996, 6-6 (3-5 Big 12) in 2002, and 6-7 (3-5 Big 12) in 2009.
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Iraq2xVeteran said:

Since joining the Big 12 in 1996, we have lost 4+ games in 26 of 29 years. The only 3 exceptions were when we finished 11-3 (7-1 Big 12) and won the Big 12 in 1998, 11-2 (6-2 SEC) in 2012 and 9-1 (8-1 SEC) in 2020. We finished with a 9-2 (6-2 Big 12) regular season record to win the Big 12 South Division in 1997 before getting trounced 54-15 by eventual national champion Nebraska in the Big 12 Championship Game and losing 29-23 to UCLA in the Cotton Bowl to finish 9-4. We finished with 9-3 regular season records in 2006 and 2010 but both seasons ended with 17+ point bowl losses to drop us to 9-4. We finished with 8-4 regular season records in 2013 and 2018 and both seasons ended with bowl wins to finish 9-4.

We have consistently lost 4+ games and finished in the middle of the Big 12 or SEC with a few good or great seasons and a few losing seasons mixed in. We have won 9+ games just 8 times in the last 29 years: 1997, 1998, 2006, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2018, and 2020. During that span, we had 5 losing seasons in 2003, 2005, 2008, 2009 and 2022.


Great info but damn that's just sad.
fightinag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So So So damn tired of "WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR" a year that never ever comes
Class of 65
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Spoken like a true sip
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Class of 65 said:

Spoken like a true sip


Spoken like that which he criticized…. someone lost in the past. Thankfully that mindset is going the way of the T-Rex. You've had your day in the sun, now make way for the change we need. Bye.
BiochemAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some of these comments are concerning.. if all an Aggie was how good our football team was I would've gone elsewhere. And tbh to hell with our football team because it makes yall forget who and why we came here. I came here (and still go there) for a good education (a top 50 university btw) and an alumni base that helps other Aggies. If kids find the traditions here cringe then they don't have to go. I certainly haven't done everything tradition has to offer. And the traditions I do find a little cringe I simply do not do.

I read someone say something about being "too nice" and we have a loser mentality on campus. Of the three major sports we have two elite teams, we won multiple championships in women's sports in the past year. But we're losers and everything needs to change because the football team sucks. It's year one under a new head coach. We're supposed to suck. I was at a majority of the home games this year. I saw the flaws but it certainly looked a lot better than the previous years product. Elko came in with pieces from a dozen puzzles and was expected to recreate the Mona Lisa.

Give them time and stop trying to uproot what A&M is for a couple extra wins each year.
Done7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OP is right. I bet Saban would have failed at A&M.
Nelson Wilbury
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Banned said:

Frok said:

It's definitely the coaching, we hire one bad one after another


Coaching is bad for sure… but why do we hire only bad ones and non good ones?
The last football coach that left without being fired was in 1958. Think about it - A&M keeps firing coaches, then complains that we never hire any good coaches.

Give existing coaches an opportunity to show their competencies, deficiencies, and improve. Coaches aren't different from players - good ones learn and develop when exposed to different situations.

Would you want to take a job where people had only been fired for the last 66 years?
Farmer_J
How long do you want to ignore this user?

How many went on to have success after coaching at A&M?

What does that tell you?
Bill Superman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nelson Wilbury said:

The Banned said:

Frok said:

It's definitely the coaching, we hire one bad one after another


Coaching is bad for sure… but why do we hire only bad ones and non good ones?
The last football coach that left without being fired was in 1958. Think about it - A&M keeps firing coaches, then complains that we never hire any good coaches.

Give existing coaches an opportunity to show their competencies, deficiencies, and improve. Coaches aren't different from players - good ones learn and develop when exposed to different situations.

Would you want to take a job where people had only been fired for the last 66 years?
How long would you want to give them? They all have had ample amounts of time outside of maybe Sherman.

Jimbo was never going to work with that guaranteed contract. A different type of contract may have told a different story.
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PanzerAggie06 said:

SBDavis87 said:

Nibblerweather said:

I honestly have zero line of sight as to what goes on behind the scenes. A lot of fair criticisms about some of our culture and some of our traditions. But I don't see the link between not booing and losing. A lot of teams boo, have female cheerleaders and lose just fine.


Allow me to demonstrate the link.

When you are watching the Donghorns beat your Aggies and whomever is deciding how a play at the goal line which is the same one that didn't work previously (ever) should be chosen/executed - and this idjit makes the absolutely brain-dead decision to pull a guard leaving a direct path for Donghorn players who are the strength of their program this year, to the Aggie backfield and also ensures that there is no possible way a yard can be obtained by having the quarterback go under center yet hands the ball to a small halfback five yards deep in the backfield (negating the under center advantage) then you would as a Donghorn if the role was reversed BOO quite a lot showing your displeasure and hopefully the embarrassment would lead to correction by the Hawthorne Effect next time. If many share this view and Boo loudly, the coaching staff usually realizes they screwed up and need to fix this because there is immediate verbal communication that the fan base is angry.

However, as an Aggie you cannot boo, and have to keep your mouth shut and hope that perhaps someone would post something on social media or texags that would somehow reach the staff personnel responsible and the correction would happen through osmosis and/or diffusion. This is absolute fantasy and will never correct the issue so this is why there is a link between immediate and proper communication that does not reward bad behavior, and the probability of winning the game so in essence - winning.


This.

Well stated.
No, it is'nt... You think professional coaches who are good enough to coach at the D1 level need their fanbase to notify them when something needs adjusting? This is SILLY!

If you hiss, boo, chant "you suck", or whatever action your fanbase decides to use a) they (coaches) get the point, b) the coaches do not make decisions based on the decible level of said fan angst. C-MON man...
Nelson Wilbury
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How long is a good question. Have you ever had employees reporting to you that were underperforming? In my mind, they need to have an opportunity to learn and change at least once. If they keep making the same mistakes then it's time to go.

And to the earlier question of how A&M's former coaches did after being fired - my answer would be that none of them needed to work.
NewArmy12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We won a basketball natty in 2011
MosesHallDeadPot94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nelson Wilbury said:

How long is a good question. Have you ever had employees reporting to you that were underperforming? In my mind, they need to have an opportunity to learn and change at least once. If they keep making the same mistakes then it's time to go.

And to the earlier question of how A&M's former coaches did after being fired - my answer would be that none of them needed to work.
There's a difference between underperforming employees and an underperforming supervisor. You would think the supervisor would have enough work experience to not make fundamentally dumb decisions. Hate to say this but I saw plenty of dumb decisions by Elko the past season...
MosesHallDeadPot94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On a side note - what the hell happened to our Track and Field teams. We were dominant for a few years when we joined the SEC - and now not so much of a peep (outside of Men's 4x100). Threw all that money at new facilities...
SteveA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Yep. The school is just collectively ****ing losers at everything. Will never win anything of meaning ever. Same old crap year after year after year.
I mean, the sports teams do not equate to the school. You just want to be able to talk **** to your friends about how good your football team is.
SBDavis87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgFan1974 said:

PanzerAggie06 said:

SBDavis87 said:

Nibblerweather said:

I honestly have zero line of sight as to what goes on behind the scenes. A lot of fair criticisms about some of our culture and some of our traditions. But I don't see the link between not booing and losing. A lot of teams boo, have female cheerleaders and lose just fine.


Allow me to demonstrate the link.

When you are watching the Donghorns beat your Aggies and whomever is deciding how a play at the goal line which is the same one that didn't work previously (ever) should be chosen/executed - and this idjit makes the absolutely brain-dead decision to pull a guard leaving a direct path for Donghorn players who are the strength of their program this year, to the Aggie backfield and also ensures that there is no possible way a yard can be obtained by having the quarterback go under center yet hands the ball to a small halfback five yards deep in the backfield (negating the under center advantage) then you would as a Donghorn if the role was reversed BOO quite a lot showing your displeasure and hopefully the embarrassment would lead to correction by the Hawthorne Effect next time. If many share this view and Boo loudly, the coaching staff usually realizes they screwed up and need to fix this because there is immediate verbal communication that the fan base is angry.

However, as an Aggie you cannot boo, and have to keep your mouth shut and hope that perhaps someone would post something on social media or texags that would somehow reach the staff personnel responsible and the correction would happen through osmosis and/or diffusion. This is absolute fantasy and will never correct the issue so this is why there is a link between immediate and proper communication that does not reward bad behavior, and the probability of winning the game so in essence - winning.


This.

Well stated.
No, it is'nt... You think professional coaches who are good enough to coach at the D1 level need their fanbase to notify them when something needs adjusting? This is SILLY!

If you hiss, boo, chant "you suck", or whatever action your fanbase decides to use a) they (coaches) get the point, b) the coaches do not make decisions based on the decible level of said fan angst. C-MON man...
Oh ok.
The "professional coaches who are good enough to coach at the D1 level" (whatever that means - like coaching is complicated rocket science or as if they have a PhD program for coaching) were able to solve the 4th and 1 problems and defeated the univer****ty of texass? Wow, I must have missed that.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.