**Tottenham Hotspur 2021-2022 Thread**

42,554 Views | 553 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by DeangeloVickers
t - cam
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have no clue why anyone would ever want to sell Lucas. The guy is an absolute pro. He's pretty much always the hardest worker on the team and is shockingly good in the air for his size.
Then throw in him being responsible for our best moment in the last 20 years and he's a legend.

Bryan98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I didn't notice until I saw a highlight today that, on Lucas's goal, his shirt was grabbed and the referee correctly played advantage. Well done!
Bachelor99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
another big game tomorrow....it will be interesting to see what lineup conte goes with considering we just played on sunday....do we rest kane and/or son? maybe bring them on in the 2nd half if things aren't going our way?
Bryan98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope we start both Son and Kane, since Conte took them off early on Sunday. Then they have until Saturday to rest.
DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Socrates05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
After a slow start, the persistent fouling caught up to Southampton. Penalty leaves it at 1 at half with the saints a man down.
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

BS offsides call. At worst case Kane was dead even with the guy. Maybe his shoulder was slightly ahead of another guys shoulder 30 yards across the field.... come on seriously. Ridiculous.
t - cam
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zombie Jon Snow said:


BS offsides call. At worst case Kane was dead even with the guy. Maybe his shoulder was slightly ahead of another guys shoulder 30 yards across the field.... come on seriously. Ridiculous.


That was terrible.

Fairview20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
3 goals disallowed so farโ€ฆ. Wow
DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brutal game
Socrates05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Should absolutely be 3-1 now if not for awful decisions from ref/VAR but the play against 10 men has just not been good enough. No answer for the deep defense.
t - cam
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was bull*****

DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TulaneAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't understand the wussification of the goalkeepers. I thought the Schmeichel call was bs a few weeks ago...and this one was total bs as well. The assumption that the goalkeeper has first rights to every ball in the air and on the ground is weird to me.
B$Weigem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's funny how a player with clear advantage (ability to use their hands) gets the calls over players who cannot. It's a 50/50 ball and he did not have possession at all.
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Socrates05 said:

Should absolutely be 3-1 now if not for awful decisions from ref/VAR but the play against 10 men has just not been good enough. No answer for the deep defense.

I mean it was good enough for 2 more goals at least.

Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TulaneAg said:

I don't understand the wussification of the goalkeepers. I thought the Schmeichel call was bs a few weeks ago...and this one was total bs as well. The assumption that the goalkeeper has first rights to every ball in the air and on the ground is weird to me.

Worse than the offsides. Touching the ball with one finger does not constitute control.
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There is absolutely no way to determine exactly when the ball was touched. None. These lines to the millimeter are ridiculous because of that fact.
t - cam
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zombie Jon Snow said:

Socrates05 said:

Should absolutely be 3-1 now if not for awful decisions from ref/VAR but the play against 10 men has just not been good enough. No answer for the deep defense.

I mean it was good enough for 2 more goals at least.




Exactly, it was plenty good and proved to be on the pitch.

Bachelor99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WTF VAR?
Socrates05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is true. Plenty good enough for the win today, just confirmation of what we already knew needed to be addressed moving forward. This team is built to break but doesn't have another option when the defense is compact.

Completely different from we didn't deserve anything today. They played well enough for the win regardless of how pretty it was. We can't expect pretty game in game out. To gut out a win on the road on two days rest is more than enough and the players did enough for that.
t - cam
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Socrates05 said:

This is true. Plenty good enough for the win today, just confirmation of what we already knew needed to be addressed moving forward. This team is built to break but doesn't have another option when the defense is compact.

Completely different from we didn't deserve anything today. They played well enough for the win regardless of how pretty it was. We can't expect pretty game in game out. To gut out a win on the road on two days rest is more than enough and the players did enough for that.


They scored 3 goals today. What are you talking about?

Socrates05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
t - cam said:

Socrates05 said:

This is true. Plenty good enough for the win today, just confirmation of what we already knew needed to be addressed moving forward. This team is built to break but doesn't have another option when the defense is compact.

Completely different from we didn't deserve anything today. They played well enough for the win regardless of how pretty it was. We can't expect pretty game in game out. To gut out a win on the road on two days rest is more than enough and the players did enough for that.


They scored 3 goals today. What are you talking about?
They scored from running onto balls over the top and a terrible keeper error. Enough to win today, sure. Not a plan B going forward.
DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How is Fodens goal onside today and Kane's offside.
Craziness
DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DeangeloVickers said:




Coupled with the fact there's no way of knowing the exact frame the ball is kicked, the attacking player is almost always running and while his feet are well behind, they're using the shoulder to judge.

It ridiculous. If you can't tell from a still image, it's not offside.
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aye Davanita said:

DeangeloVickers said:




Coupled with the fact there's no way of knowing the exact frame the ball is kicked, the attacking player is almost always running and while his feet are well behind, they're using the shoulder to judge.

It ridiculous. If you can't tell from a still image, it's not offside.

I've concluded they need to just use the feet.

It's the simplest thing and does away with needing to create any line from some point to the ground as the feet are on the ground already generally.

I don't care if the offensive player is leaning of course he is, he is running that way, defenders should have to consider that instead they get an added advantage by moving the other way. Remove that and you make them have to play more honest.

If the players feet are not past the last players feet it is onsides. Simple.
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Whew......not a great game. But broke through on a free kick in the 90'+6th minute.

Son blast headed in point blank 3 yards from goal line by Sanchez.

1-0 Spurs

Ref let clock go to more than +11' when it was set for +8'


DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great start of the new year. Gooners lose in extra time. Spurs win in extra time.
littlebitofhifi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was surprised he'd only set it for 8 to being with. I didn't time it but seemed like the medical emergency alone took longer than that.

Weird game but will take the +3
DeangeloVickers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also, as much as I feel we were robbed against Southhampton.....we got away with Lloris....sure looked like a PEN to me
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

With Arse losing 2-1 on a 90+3' goal by MC the table is

53 ManCity 21 games
42 Chelsea 20 games
41 Liverpool 19 games
35 Arsenal 20 games
33 Tottenham 18 games
31 West Ham 19 games and playing CP currently
31 ManU 18 games



Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Ref let clock go to more than +11' when it was set for +8'



8' is the minimum, but I hear ya.
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aye Davanita said:

Quote:

Ref let clock go to more than +11' when it was set for +8'



8' is the minimum, but I hear ya.

Sure I know but it's usually not more than +1 or so of the posted added time. Not like there were long stoppages in added time except the goal celebration and that did not exceed 1 minute.

Just seemed excessive. Had they posted +10 I would not have objected.
Rudyjax
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zombie Jon Snow said:

Aye Davanita said:

Quote:

Ref let clock go to more than +11' when it was set for +8'



8' is the minimum, but I hear ya.

Sure I know but it's usually not more than +1 or so of the posted added time. Not like there were long stoppages in added time except the goal celebration and that did not exceed 1 minute.

Just seemed excessive. Had they posted +10 I would not have objected.


My guess is the center. thought it was a lot more than the 4th did.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.