We have two spots as "n/a".

I assume that's what they are for.

Just emailed you. I'm in if you have any open spots

Spots still open?

Any more spots left?

We are at 10 players after navasotaAg18.

You two would make 12 players. Send me an email to get an invite.

I'm in if there's a spot open

I'll take a spot as well if there's anything left.

you can email me at dan07texags @ gmail

I would, but I can't find where you posted your email.

quote:

---

Team list :

Wrec86 Ag - Anchorage Moosen
texasaggie2015 - Uvalde Unicorns
shano0603 - Magnolia Schlobnobbers - (FYI - this team name is too long for Yahoo - 20 character max)
FTACof2011 - unknown name


send me an email at - RMARS47 at aol.com - and I'll invite you into the league

---

Email sent

Got everyone an invite that reached out.


We are at 13 teams, which is probably as one short of as big as we want to go.

I believe we have one spot left as of now

Think we're full boys.

14 teams.

How much money are you thinking for a buy in?

Enough to cover a BAD ASS traveling trophy.

I would've joined but Shano took magnolia

quote:

---

I would've joined but Shano took magnolia

---

We can be a team

I'd be down for a buy in, but nothing too big considering I'm a current student...

Also, do we have IR or DL spots?

Yes, 2 DL spots, 2 "n/a" spots.


I figure the buy in will be $10, and for the first year, most of the money can cover a big traveling trophy (need to find one) and the winner gets the leftover.

From then on, we will split the winnings 3 ways (50-30-20... Or something like it) and the winner pays for shipping on the trophy (if needed)

Sounds good, thanks!

- draft is currently scheduled for Saturday at 2pm (45 second pick clock)


- I need some input on whether we should be able to update rosters "daily" or "weekly".

Daily - I would probably put a limit of 3-5 transactions per week- I don't want teams to be able to switch out their starting pitchers every day for the players that will start the next day and just rack up wins/ strikeouts.

Weekly - you would set your lineup (due by Monday's first game, I believe) once every week, and it would be locked until the following Monday. You would still be able to pick up free agents, etc during the week, it just wouldn't be effective until the following Monday. One negative here is that there would be some mid-week injuries that you would not be able to get out of your starting lineup.


I think my current vote is for daily rosters with a transaction limit and I can monitor for abuse.

Here is a list of the 14 teams

Anchorage Moosen - Wrec86 ag
Texarkana Tortugas - texasaggie2015
Cincy Flying Pigs - FTACof2011
Milwaukee Beers - shano0603
Las Vegas Broncos - Broncos
Pawnee Swansons - Donald Glover
Cypress Woodpeckers - Frok
Detroit Crime - texasaggie2015's friend
South Padre Pelicans - Moxie
Preston Shorebirds - coreleoneag99
Aggieland Maroon Sox - navasotaag18
Seabrook Shrimpers - nuke Laloosh
Dan's team - Dan07
Tyler's team - aggie1906

Also need opinions here on the "dynasty" aspect of the league

quote:

---

Option 1 - you can keep anyone as long as you want. no restrictions.
Option 2 - you can keep 25 players after each year, however, each year you keep a player, he counts as one extra players.

Example -
You keep Mike Trout after year 1 - he counts as one player
Keep him again after year 2 - he counts as 2 players
Keep him again after year 3 - he counts as 3 players.

Short term, it won't mean that much, but by year 4 or 5, there will be a good mix of kept players and non-kept players. We can change the 25 number if needed, or we can treat it like a salary cap, where it goes up year after year. This would let us adjust as the years go by.

---

quote:

---

- draft is currently scheduled for Saturday at 2pm (45 second pick clock)


- I need some input on whether we should be able to update rosters "daily" or "weekly".

Daily - I would probably put a limit of 3-5 transactions per week- I don't want teams to be able to switch out their starting pitchers every day for the players that will start the next day and just rack up wins/ strikeouts.

Weekly - you would set your lineup (due by Monday's first game, I believe) once every week, and it would be locked until the following Monday. You would still be able to pick up free agents, etc during the week, it just wouldn't be effective until the following Monday. One negative here is that there would be some mid-week injuries that you would not be able to get out of your starting lineup.


I think my current vote is for daily rosters with a transaction limit and I can monitor for abuse.

---

I agree with the daily roster adjustments, but limit it to a few per week for injuries or other changes.

quote:

---

Also need opinions here on the "dynasty" aspect of the league

quote:

---

Option 1 - you can keep anyone as long as you want. no restrictions.
Option 2 - you can keep 25 players after each year, however, each year you keep a player, he counts as one extra players.

Example -
You keep Mike Trout after year 1 - he counts as one player
Keep him again after year 2 - he counts as 2 players
Keep him again after year 3 - he counts as 3 players.

Short term, it won't mean that much, but by year 4 or 5, there will be a good mix of kept players and non-kept players. We can change the 25 number if needed, or we can treat it like a salary cap, where it goes up year after year. This would let us adjust as the years go by.

---

---

I like Option 1 best, but I would be fine with a salary cap per se as well. Also, $10 buy-in

I'd vote option 2 on keepers, weekly lineups (or daily with a transaction limit in the alternative), and $20 buy in.

quote:

---

- draft is currently scheduled for Saturday at 2pm (45 second pick clock)


- I need some input on whether we should be able to update rosters "daily" or "weekly".

Daily - I would probably put a limit of 3-5 transactions per week- I don't want teams to be able to switch out their starting pitchers every day for the players that will start the next day and just rack up wins/ strikeouts.

Weekly - you would set your lineup (due by Monday's first game, I believe) once every week, and it would be locked until the following Monday. You would still be able to pick up free agents, etc during the week, it just wouldn't be effective until the following Monday. One negative here is that there would be some mid-week injuries that you would not be able to get out of your starting lineup.


I think my current vote is for daily rosters with a transaction limit and I can monitor for abuse.

---

The "problem" in my last league was no restrictions. I won by constantly making moves & having more pitchers pitch.

I would be up for weekly or only very few transactions per week.

quote:

---

Also need opinions here on the "dynasty" aspect of the league

quote:

---

Option 1 - you can keep anyone as long as you want. no restrictions.
Option 2 - you can keep 25 players after each year, however, each year you keep a player, he counts as one extra players.

Example -
You keep Mike Trout after year 1 - he counts as one player
Keep him again after year 2 - he counts as 2 players
Keep him again after year 3 - he counts as 3 players.

Short term, it won't mean that much, but by year 4 or 5, there will be a good mix of kept players and non-kept players. We can change the 25 number if needed, or we can treat it like a salary cap, where it goes up year after year. This would let us adjust as the years go by.

---

---

Is there some type of happy medium between 1 and 2? If not then I vote 1.

Either way it should be fine.

I think we should be able to keep a maximum number of players at the end of the year, like 18-20 or something, so we could have a legit draft every year to fill out our rosters. Also, I'd rather do weekly, but would be fine with daily too. If we do daily, I'd prefer that we limit transactions during the week. Also, it could be cool if we could allow draft pick trading for future years, so maybe if somebody isn't doing too well, they can trade players for next years draft picks.

Option 1
Daily lineups with weekly restriction of 2 or 3
20 bucks is fine

Also if possible can we add a few seconds to the 45 between picks. With 14 teams later rounds might require some searching.

quote:

---

I think we should be able to keep a maximum number of players at the end of the year, like 18-20 or something, so we could have a legit draft every year to fill out our rosters. Also, I'd rather do weekly, but would be fine with daily too. If we do daily, I'd prefer that we limit transactions during the week. Also, it could be cool if we could allow draft pick trading for future years, so maybe if somebody isn't doing too well, they can trade players for next years draft picks.

---

Agreed

quote:

---

I think we should be able to keep a maximum number of players at the end of the year, like 18-20 or something, so we could have a legit draft every year to fill out our rosters.

---

I'd be ok with this if it was coupled with either (a) a limitation on the number of years a player can be kept (say 3 or 4 or 5), or (b) the proposal above where each player counts for an additional roster spot for each year they've been kept (so then you have to decide whether someone like, say, Mike Trout is worth taking up 25 or 30% of your roster spots).

I'd also be in favor of a salary cap with dollar amounts for each player -- maybe using auction values for year 1, and then each player increases 10% / year or something.

Ya if we were allowed to keep, lets say 20 players, then I think it would be ok for a guy being kept for two years to increase to two or so so that you could only keep 18 other guys from your team into the next year.

That would help the quality of players in the drafts too.

Maybe the number of years you can keep a player could be based on the round that you draft him in? So if we have 25 rounds for example rounds 1-5 could be x years, 6-10 could be y, etc. I'm very new at these types of leagues so I don't know if it would work but just a thought

How about nobody drafted in the first round of first 2 rounds can be kept? That restocks the draft every year and keeps some parity, but still allows you to plan long term.