Now the crazy stat. They are the same age. Soto is on year eight and will hit the 1000-game mark this season. Rice has played 77 big league games.
So what you are saying is that not all things are created equal?iBrad said:
Now the crazy stat. They are the same age. Soto is on year eight and will hit the 1000-game mark this season. Rice has played 77 big league games.
Did you know that Soto was only 21 when he played for the Nationals in the 2019 World Series?iBrad said:
Now the crazy stat. They are the same age. Soto is on year eight and will hit the 1000-game mark this season. Rice has played 77 big league games.
He has always been a streaky hitter that feeds off the emotions of the team around him. He had plenty of times here where he went off for a month or two and those stretches usually covered up the month at the beginning of the season where he didn't hit anything. He is happy and having fun in the new environment and seems to be back to the patient approach with a good eye for the zone that he made his reputation on. Not getting the automatic strike call on first pitch that is 6" outside that is usually reserved for Houston batters probably helps tremendously with his approach to hitting. Remains to be seen if he maintains it for the whole season or if the newness wears off and the grind sets in.Ag_07 said:
Spot on
Someone posted something yesterday about how Bregs read and embraced some self help book and it reinvigorated his love of the game. He said he's gone back to embracing the grind and he's gone back to enjoying just hitting line drive after line drive.
Why it took a change of scenery is the big question but seems like he's back to cage rat Bregs.
yes, that's the issue. They both had superstar months of AprilQuo Vadis? said:
I know Tucker and Bregman are good ball players and I was expecting them to play decent, but they're on a pace for a combined 72 HR and 275 RBI….thats a little more than I was thinking
Mathguy64 said:
We traded potential all star level play this year at 2 positions for good to very good play this year, long term financial stability and potential player growth.
We aren't the dodgers, Yankees, cubs, Mets or Red Sox. We don't have the kind of financial freedom they do to sign whoever for whatever they want.
It was the right decision long term given the way baseball is run, the CBA and the way agents game the system.
EastCoastAgNc said:Mathguy64 said:
We traded potential all star level play this year at 2 positions for good to very good play this year, long term financial stability and potential player growth.
We aren't the dodgers, Yankees, cubs, Mets or Red Sox. We don't have the kind of financial freedom they do to sign whoever for whatever they want.
It was the right decision long term given the way baseball is run, the CBA and the way agents game the system.
Hot take, but we made a major mistake not trading Framber
Mathguy64 said:EastCoastAgNc said:Mathguy64 said:
We traded potential all star level play this year at 2 positions for good to very good play this year, long term financial stability and potential player growth.
We aren't the dodgers, Yankees, cubs, Mets or Red Sox. We don't have the kind of financial freedom they do to sign whoever for whatever they want.
It was the right decision long term given the way baseball is run, the CBA and the way agents game the system.
Hot take, but we made a major mistake not trading Framber
And who is the extra starter? Right now we are short one arm. We would have been short 1 to start the season and right now down 2.
Friday edition of Foul Territory!
— Foul Territory (@FoulTerritoryTV) May 2, 2025
• FT Senior Insider @Ken_Rosenthal
• Astros SP Hunter Brown
• Dodgers Director of Team Travel Scott Akasaki
Watch LIVE on YouTube and X from 1-3 ET! pic.twitter.com/Kiv1YGEk34
4/55? That's a commitment to his age 32, 33, 34, and 35 seasons & another lost draft pick for a guy who's never had a season with a sub 4 ERA.EastCoastAgNc said:Mathguy64 said:EastCoastAgNc said:Mathguy64 said:
We traded potential all star level play this year at 2 positions for good to very good play this year, long term financial stability and potential player growth.
We aren't the dodgers, Yankees, cubs, Mets or Red Sox. We don't have the kind of financial freedom they do to sign whoever for whatever they want.
It was the right decision long term given the way baseball is run, the CBA and the way agents game the system.
Hot take, but we made a major mistake not trading Framber
And who is the extra starter? Right now we are short one arm. We would have been short 1 to start the season and right now down 2.
For the money saved on framber, we could have signed someone for cheap to be a fifth starter until the reinforcements came in. Look at how little Pivetta is making with the padres.
The Original Houston 1836 said:
Bregman obviously has had extreme success at Fenway. Now he's playing half of his games there. His sample size is up to 35 games there and he's got a 1.119 OPS and hitting .346. Ironically he's hitting better on the road (.342 average, 1.009 OPS) than at home (.302 / .935) so far this year, but clearly he's somewhere that he genuinely wants to be. . . . .
I'm way more surprised by Tucker's fast start than AB's.
tjack16 said:
I think we won the Tucker trade for the future. I still would've liked to have matched what the Red Sox offered Bregman though.
Booma94 said:
I plan to hold out judgement on the Tucker trade until Tucker does something in October. If he mashes in the playoffs and carries the Cubs to a title I'll be very surprised.
The first set of numbers I gave was for his entire career at Fenway, not just 2025.Faustus said:The Original Houston 1836 said:
Bregman obviously has had extreme success at Fenway. Now he's playing half of his games there. His sample size is up to 35 games there and he's got a 1.119 OPS and hitting .346. Ironically he's hitting better on the road (.342 average, 1.009 OPS) than at home (.302 / .935) so far this year, but clearly he's somewhere that he genuinely wants to be. . . . .
I'm way more surprised by Tucker's fast start than AB's.
Given the home and road numbers it seems like his average and OPS should be in the .326 and .979 range rather than .346 and 1.119.
I admit I cheated and checked baseball reference when I noticed your numbers were higher than either the road/home #s provided.
a whole lot of paybackMr. Awesome Time said:
FYI, looks like Lance is scheduled to start next Saturday with the Reds in town. We owe them some payback.
The Original Houston 1836 said:The first set of numbers I gave was for his entire career at Fenway, not just 2025.Faustus said:The Original Houston 1836 said:
Bregman obviously has had extreme success at Fenway. Now he's playing half of his games there. His sample size is up to 35 games there and he's got a 1.119 OPS and hitting .346. Ironically he's hitting better on the road (.342 average, 1.009 OPS) than at home (.302 / .935) so far this year, but clearly he's somewhere that he genuinely wants to be. . . . .
I'm way more surprised by Tucker's fast start than AB's.
Given the home and road numbers it seems like his average and OPS should be in the .326 and .979 range rather than .346 and 1.119.
I admit I cheated and checked baseball reference when I noticed your numbers were higher than either the road/home #s provided.
Anyone but LA. I know they're the favorites, but I won't be surprised if they don't win the NL this year. Too many good teams in that league.Faustus said:Booma94 said:
I plan to hold out judgement on the Tucker trade until Tucker does something in October. If he mashes in the playoffs and carries the Cubs to a title I'll be very surprised.
If any team other than the Dodgers advance out of the NL it will be a surprise. Agreed on him mashing in the playoffs though.