txags92 said:
MaxPower said:
iBrad said:
I would assume the Sanchez trade would be contingent upon trading for one of Boston's LH outfielders, at which point, ABs for Sanchez become very limited. Do you keep him just as insurance for Cam? I think with Cam, Cole, and Dezenzo, we can find a serviceable bat to go along with Meyers and Boston OFer.
If we have to include Abreu in the Boston trade then Sanchez for a solid RP makes sense.
If they have a solid BP guy equivalent to Abreu they are willing to put in a trade, why would they be trading for Abreu. Count me as solidly against trading Abreu. We have nobody in our BP with a solid multi year track record of being consistently reliable beside Hader. Seems like a great way to maybe improve our offense only to lose a bunch of games in the late innings.
I'm not sure what Dana will do, but I think it would be a mistake to stand pat. This team is not a serious contender as constructed. I get that few teams will be, and logic says the Astros cannot maintain the same level of talent from past title seasons, but I would rather try something big than endure another slide towards or below 500. Anything can happen, but the Astros need more balance to cover the superstar drain.
There will be plenty of "I told you so" opportunities no matter what. I tend to favor action, so I hope Dana gets it done.