***Official Houston Astros 2025-26 Offseason Thread***

785,822 Views | 8670 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by Moe Jzyslak
superaggie73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:



Padres didn't give up much, though I guess they have to pay Castellanos.


That has to be a troll account. No way Washington takes a package that small for Abrams. And no way Philly would give up Painter just to get rid of Castellanos.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower said:



Padres didn't give up much, though I guess they have to pay Castellanos.

The Padres were a possibly landing spot for Walker or Isaac to play first.
tylhair
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Clearly fake. Andrew Painter is a RHP anyway.
linkdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

That's quite the assembly of pitching
Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pretty salty
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EastCoastAgNc said:


Its going to be interesting because the players aren't going to like that but I could see the owners taking issue as well. The main issue I see is the small market teams wanting more revenue sharing for that floor and big market teams balking at having to further fund those teams at their own organization's detriment. Those types of caps only work where a huge chunk of revenue is shared and MLB doesn't work that way. They can try to take over more of the tv contract revenue but MLB is and always will be seven more by local ticket revenue.

My guess is they will just have stiffer penalties for exceeding the tax thresholds and make it harder for small market teams who don't spend to pocket shared revenue. In exchange they may let players hit free agency or start arbitration earlier.

On a side note, I'd like to see them get rid of punishing teams for signing free agents. Yes reward teams for losing players but penalizing teams for trying to compete is counter intuitive. It's had the opposite intended effect as only big market teams are willing to absorb the lost draft picks while being a major deterrent for middle market teams.
Hub `93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Meanwhile, on the South Side...

White Sox GM May Not Know Who He Traded for This Offseason
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc said:




And outlaw deferments, or at least make them count to each season. Even better, cost them today at future values to make it especially painful to the salary cap.
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hub `93 said:

Meanwhile, on the South Side...

White Sox GM May Not Know Who He Traded for This Offseason


Put that in the "things could always be worse" category
EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Well this is awkward
agproducer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Passan writing on state of baseball: https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/47620464/mlb-2026-kyle-tucker-los-angeles-dodgers-free-agency-labor-cba-offseason


Quote:

Texas won the World Series as a No. 5 seed against No. 6 seed Arizona in 2023, the last time the Dodgers lost in the postseason. They responded over the next two-plus years by signing Ohtani, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Tucker, two-time Cy Young winner Blake Snell, right-hander Tyler Glasnow, utilityman Tommy Edman, reliever Tanner Scott, three-time reliever of the year Edwin Daz and Japanese sensation Roki Sasaki for a combined $1.8 billion. The guarantee to those nine players is more than the Rays, Marlins, Pirates and A's have each spent in the entirety of the 21st century.

EastCoastAgNc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agproducer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting insight on hamate bone injuries.

AggiEE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward


Is Walker aware about the baseball side of things? He hasn't earned an everyday role

Old man Walker can rest one or two days per week
ktownag08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward


Hopefully he's putting in the work to back up his ambition. If so, he's welcome to stay. If he's going to suck, "Well, Bye!"
tjack16
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If he can replicate his success from Arizona, there would be zero question he'd be an every day player.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward

This is kind of what I was worried about. Paredes and Walker are not going to accept a bench role.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If he could replicate his 2025 road game at home he wouldn't have any issues with PT either.

If he just gets his home splits half way to his road ones he would be fine.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Farmer1906 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward

This is kind of what I was worried about. Paredes and Walker are not going to accept a bench role.


Of course they aren't. Why would they?

This is a disaster waiting to happen. Walker can only play one position and Paredes does not really have one right now unless someone leaves. Dana needs to either move one or get lucky with an injury where Paredes gets a defensive position to open up that he can move into.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I am less worried about home/road/park splits. Sure, some guys hit better in some places because they see it well or it just flies there. But the concerning issue for Walker is his inability to hit the fastball, especially the higher velo. Pitchers were less afraid to challenge him in zone.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
agproducer said:

Interesting insight on hamate bone injuries.




And from what I understand, the hamate bone really serves very little purpose. It's sort of the skeleton's version of our appendix.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Marvin said:

EastCoastAgNc said:




And outlaw deferments, or at least make them count to each season. Even better, cost them today at future values to make it especially painful to the salary cap.


It would never happen but could you imagine if they banned deferments retroactively and in order to meet the salary cap teams would have to make actual hard decisions to trade guys and get under the cap?

Like the Dodgers would have to make the decision whether or not to trade Ohtani, Tucker, Freeman, Betts, etc?
MTX13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward

This is kind of what I was worried about. Paredes and Walker are not going to accept a bench role.

Sorry if this has already been discussed, but as a worst case scenario, is this breakdown terrible?

1B - Walker/Paredes
2B - Altuve
SS - Pena/Correa
3B - Correa/Paredes
LF - Alvarez
CF - Meyers
RF - Smith
DH - Paredes/Walker/Correa (basically whoever is not playing one of the infield positions)

I know it probably isn't ideal, but even with a loaded infield, all of those guys can at least get consistent ABs. And they can rotate through positions throughout the year to manage work load.
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggiEE said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward


Is Walker aware about the baseball side of things? He hasn't earned an everyday role

Old man Walker can rest one or two days per week


Came out too hot in my response. Deleted it. Tired of the arguing over Paredes and Walker and if keeping both of them works.

I just think the way you view it ends poorly. You're being the fan, not the manager.

We shall see how the season goes if they're both on the team. I've been wrong before and surely will be wrong again.
Beat40
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MTX13 said:

Farmer1906 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward

This is kind of what I was worried about. Paredes and Walker are not going to accept a bench role.

Sorry if this has already been discussed, but as a worst case scenario, is this breakdown terrible?

1B - Walker/Paredes
2B - Altuve
SS - Pena/Correa
3B - Correa/Paredes
LF - Alvarez
CF - Meyers
RF - Smith
DH - Paredes/Walker/Correa (basically whoever is not playing one of the infield positions)

I know it probably isn't ideal, but even with a loaded infield, all of those guys can at least get consistent ABs. And they can rotate through positions throughout the year to manage work load.


It's about ABs and games. I don't see how you can get Walker, Paredes, Altuve, Pena, Correa, and Alvarez 150 games if they all stay healthy the entire year. Paredes was an All-Star and we have people on this board essentially wanting to use him as a glorified utility guy and have him and Walker play like 75%-80% of the games this season.

The only way keeping Walker and Paredes works in my mind is Walker becomes a back-up player. That's it. And well, we saw the comments by Walker, so we'll see how the clubhouse culture is this season if they're both on the team.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beat40 said:

MTX13 said:

Farmer1906 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward

This is kind of what I was worried about. Paredes and Walker are not going to accept a bench role.

Sorry if this has already been discussed, but as a worst case scenario, is this breakdown terrible?

1B - Walker/Paredes
2B - Altuve
SS - Pena/Correa
3B - Correa/Paredes
LF - Alvarez
CF - Meyers
RF - Smith
DH - Paredes/Walker/Correa (basically whoever is not playing one of the infield positions)

I know it probably isn't ideal, but even with a loaded infield, all of those guys can at least get consistent ABs. And they can rotate through positions throughout the year to manage work load.


It's about ABs and games. I don't see how you can get Walker, Paredes, Altuve, Pena, Correa, and Alvarez 150 games if they all stay healthy the entire year. Paredes was an All-Star and we have people on this board essentially wanting to use him as a glorified utility guy and have him and Walker play like 75%-80% of the games this season.

The only way keeping Walker and Paredes works in my mind is Walker becomes a back-up player. That's it. And well, we saw the comments by Walker, so we'll see how the clubhouse culture is this season if they're both on the team.


You guys might light me up for asking this, but do we really want Altuve to play 150 games at this point? It's a big "if" considering last year, but what if Walker does show better results? Who out of that group would you rather sit? It would have to be Altuve or Correa.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Beat40 said:

MTX13 said:

Farmer1906 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward

This is kind of what I was worried about. Paredes and Walker are not going to accept a bench role.

Sorry if this has already been discussed, but as a worst case scenario, is this breakdown terrible?

1B - Walker/Paredes
2B - Altuve
SS - Pena/Correa
3B - Correa/Paredes
LF - Alvarez
CF - Meyers
RF - Smith
DH - Paredes/Walker/Correa (basically whoever is not playing one of the infield positions)

I know it probably isn't ideal, but even with a loaded infield, all of those guys can at least get consistent ABs. And they can rotate through positions throughout the year to manage work load.


It's about ABs and games. I don't see how you can get Walker, Paredes, Altuve, Pena, Correa, and Alvarez 150 games if they all stay healthy the entire year. Paredes was an All-Star and we have people on this board essentially wanting to use him as a glorified utility guy and have him and Walker play like 75%-80% of the games this season.

The only way keeping Walker and Paredes works in my mind is Walker becomes a back-up player. That's it. And well, we saw the comments by Walker, so we'll see how the clubhouse culture is this season if they're both on the team.


There is another way. Trade Carlos and put Paredes back at 3B.

I know that's not happening.

The solution is a trade. Someone goes. Paredes. Walker. Or yes trade CC. Or in a crazy impossible world trade Pena, put CC at SS and Paredes gets 3B.

The likelihood of those last two things are -37% and -49%.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Marvin said:

Beat40 said:

MTX13 said:

Farmer1906 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward

This is kind of what I was worried about. Paredes and Walker are not going to accept a bench role.

Sorry if this has already been discussed, but as a worst case scenario, is this breakdown terrible?

1B - Walker/Paredes
2B - Altuve
SS - Pena/Correa
3B - Correa/Paredes
LF - Alvarez
CF - Meyers
RF - Smith
DH - Paredes/Walker/Correa (basically whoever is not playing one of the infield positions)

I know it probably isn't ideal, but even with a loaded infield, all of those guys can at least get consistent ABs. And they can rotate through positions throughout the year to manage work load.


It's about ABs and games. I don't see how you can get Walker, Paredes, Altuve, Pena, Correa, and Alvarez 150 games if they all stay healthy the entire year. Paredes was an All-Star and we have people on this board essentially wanting to use him as a glorified utility guy and have him and Walker play like 75%-80% of the games this season.

The only way keeping Walker and Paredes works in my mind is Walker becomes a back-up player. That's it. And well, we saw the comments by Walker, so we'll see how the clubhouse culture is this season if they're both on the team.


You guys might light me up for asking this, but do we really want Altuve to play 150 games at this point? It's a big "if" considering last year, but what if Walker does show better results? Who out of that group would you rather sit? It would have to be Altuve or Correa.


Well I guess it's 5:00 somewhere. IYKWIM.

Marvin. Brother.
MaxPower
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe. I'm a proponent of trading him but let's not kid ourselves, we have two old guys (CW and Altuve) and an injury prone 3B (God love him). Throw in Rendon Alvarez and Paredes is going to get plenty of PT.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MTX13 said:

Farmer1906 said:

EastCoastAgNc said:


Well this is awkward

This is kind of what I was worried about. Paredes and Walker are not going to accept a bench role.

Sorry if this has already been discussed, but as a worst case scenario, is this breakdown terrible?

1B - Walker/Paredes
2B - Altuve
SS - Pena/Correa
3B - Correa/Paredes
LF - Alvarez
CF - Meyers
RF - Smith
DH - Paredes/Walker/Correa (basically whoever is not playing one of the infield positions)

I know it probably isn't ideal, but even with a loaded infield, all of those guys can at least get consistent ABs. And they can rotate through positions throughout the year to manage work load.

On paper, we can make that work. But in actuality, I think it's a problem.

1. Correa does not want to play SS anymore.
2. The org wants to keep Yordan healthy and at DH as much as possible.
3. This shrinks Paredes and Walker's reps at 3B(Paredes only) and DH. Which means they split a lot of 1B time.

Walker gets 3 starts a month at DH
Paredes gets 2 starts at 3B and 2 starts at DH a month.
They split 1B at 12 starts a month.

That gives them around 15-16 games per month (call it 27 games per month over 6 months). That's less than 100 games a year for each.

Ag_07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can't imagine Paredes playing any 3B unless it's to spell CC for a game or two here and there. Big concern being does he have the range and mobility after the hammy injury.

That same thing can be said about CC playing SS.

To me the logjam is not in the infield. I's at DH. Too many players that can't play defense regularly so now we have a backlog at DH.

I also wouldn't be too concerned about Walker being a locker room problem. Yeah he wants to play full time but by all accounts he's a veteran presence in clubhouse and high quality teammate.
Mr. Awesome Time
How long do you want to ignore this user?
9 days until this team's first spring training game is too long.
First Page Last Page
Page 196 of 248
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.