1st Round - Texas A&M Aggies vs Troy Trojans

24,486 Views | 290 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by greg.w.h
mcag83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very exciting.
Like anyone can even know that.
1stGenAg01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hand Of God said:

Totally uninspired play. Low energy on the court and bench. Team looked scared to lose. Like they were surprised a 15-seed would even try to compete with them. Just trying to hang on instead of attacking. Very stupid to foul like that up 4 at the end of the game. That's on Blair. Then the over and back. Woof. Very glad we survived but that kind of play won't take us much further. Barely avoided an embarrassing defeat. Credit to Troy for battling. They took it to us and we were stunned.


Glad we won, but I feel for Troy. They got hosed by poor officiating multiple times in critical moments of the game. And why in the world Blair is advising them to foul with a 4-pt lead is beyond comprehension. Seems like the only way you can lose is by stopping play and letting them score without the clock running.
Anchorhold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
When did they add the no over-and-bsck rule for the ladies? I thought there used to be no penalty for that because of the short shot clock.
fitzwatema
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sports-Ag said:

I feel like in recent years, Ags have struggled with lower seeds in the first or second rounds.
I agree that in recent years it seems the Aggies have not played the lower seeds well. I was hoping this team would be different. They will get run out of the gym by Iowa State if the Aggies play like they played tonight.
aggiedrjdub
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the committee is justified in not giving us a 1 seed now lol!!
Gig'em Aggies! c/o '98 W H O O P!
Divining Rod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
you whiners about announcers....jeez. they were fine and fair. in fact i was surprised they were even questioning some of those horrible calls- those two calls cost Troy the game, and they were not even CLOSE to being "questionable"- they were absolutely horrific.
Chuck Gay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
16 days between games for us. That is nuts.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texagsubscriber said:

aginlakeway said:

azhector72 said:

Yea, we got 4 good calls there at the end

Bummer, hate winning that way

Congrats to Troy to playing their hearts out.

Not making sweet 16 playing like that, no heart


What makes you think we played with no heart?


His observation of the game. Why are most of your replies with a question mark?

They are not. Not even close to most.
maver1ck
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Divining Rod said:

you whiners about announcers....jeez. they were fine and fair. in fact i was surprised they were even questioning some of those horrible calls- those two calls cost Troy the game, and they were not even CLOSE to being "questionable"- they were absolutely horrific.

This has to be a joke.

With or without the bad calls, the announcers were openly rooting for Troy the entire second half. Beth Mowins makes we want to shove a sharp object through my ear
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So, I'm told by a ref buddy that was the correct call and not over and back because we never established possession in the front court. What is the rule?
Vepp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Found the rule:

Art. 4. A player shall not be the first to touch the ball in their backcourt (with any part of their body, voluntarily or involuntarily) when the ball came from the frontcourt while that player's team was in team control and that player or their teammate was the last to touch the ball before it went into the backcourt.


We were the last to touch the ball. Should have been an easy ruling.
Vepp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It was in Section 12 of the NCAA 2020-21 womens rulebook.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You missed the key bolded words. We never established control in the front court.

Vepp said:

Found the rule:

Art. 4. A player shall not be the first to touch the ball in their backcourt (with any part of their body, voluntarily or involuntarily) when the ball came from the frontcourt while that player's team was in team control and that player or their teammate was the last to touch the ball before it went into the backcourt.


We were the last to touch the ball. Should have been an easy ruling.
WorkTogetherAgs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Where is the location of our game against Iowa St.?
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Vepp said:

Found the rule:

Art. 4. A player shall not be the first to touch the ball in their backcourt (with any part of their body, voluntarily or involuntarily) when the ball came from the frontcourt while that player's team was in team control and that player or their teammate was the last to touch the ball before it went into the backcourt.


We were the last to touch the ball. Should have been an easy ruling.
There was no control. So not over and back.
Vepp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also, in regards to 'control'.

"Section 8. ControlPlayer, Team Art. 1. A player shall be in control when: a. Holding a live ball; or b. Dribbling a live ball while inbounds."

We dribbled it last in the front court.
Vepp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fell free to check my work.

http://www.ncaapublications.com/p-4588-2019-20-and-2020-21-ncaa-womens-basketball-rules-and-interpretations-electronic-versions-updated-sept-1-2020.aspx
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems correct. Just like when you throw it in from the front court to back court. Possession not established before possessing it in the back court.
txsags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When did we dribble it in the front court?
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Vepp said:

Also, in regards to 'control'.

"Section 8. ControlPlayer, Team Art. 1. A player shall be in control when: a. Holding a live ball; or b. Dribbling a live ball while inbounds."

We dribbled it last in the front court.


She touched it. She did not hold or dribble it.
Vepp
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gap said:

Seems correct. Just like when you throw it in from the front court to back court. Possession not established before possessing it in the back court.
Right. Once the ball is dribbled in the frontcourt we gained 'control' and are no longer allowed to enter the backcourt.

Edit: I'll rewatch and check.

Yeah, I guess the first touch wasn't a dribble. Now I have to get into the definition of a dribble..
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txsags said:

When did we dribble it in the front court?

We didn't it. She hit it but didn't dribble/control it.

Still ... not 100% that Troy makes the tying basket.

rausr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Vepp said:

Found the rule:

Art. 4. A player shall not be the first to touch the ball in their backcourt (with any part of their body, voluntarily or involuntarily) when the ball came from the frontcourt while that player's team was in team control and that player or their teammate was the last to touch the ball before it went into the backcourt.


We were the last to touch the ball. Should have been an easy ruling.
There was no control. So not over and back.


Thank you Gap and aginlakeway - that was my thinking as well. Appreciate your clearing that up for us.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Such a tight call and we are lucky the ref saw it the way he did.

I see touch and then first controlled dribble in the backcourt. So close.

Ignoring the comment, here is the video.


aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gap said:

Such a tight call and we are lucky the ref saw it the way he did.

I see touch and then first controlled dribble in the backcourt. So close.

Ignoring the comment, here is the video.



She never controlled it in front court. The first dribble lands in back court.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The backcourt violation requires 3 things: team control (i.e. your team is dribbling or passing a live ball), your player is the last to touch it in the front court, your player is the first to touch it in the back court. Except maybe for throw ins (I haven't kept up with womens rules, and there may be an exception for a throw in and/or jump ball), if an airborne player touches the ball, the front/backcourt status is where the player was when she left the court.

For a dribbler going from back to front, all three points (both feet and the ball) must be IN the front court before going into the backcourt would be a violation. And finally, the division line is in the backcourt, not the front court, so touching the line while in the backcourt and then staying further into the backcourt is not a violation like so many think.

OK, thanks to lakeway, I've seen the play. No violation. Here's why:

There is no team control during the throw in. Despite the fact that the Aggies are in their front court, the inbounds pass was not immediately controlled by the player it was passed to. The first dribble was actually in the backcourt -- NOT the front court. However, I can see the question being asked, but I would not rule that (based on the video, and I'm assuming the official on the spot agrees with me) control or a dribble. Just a muffed pass that happened to have "looked" like a dribble. Thus, see my point above about the three points -- the feet may have been in the front court but the ball was in the backcourt, so the status of the player and ball upon FIRST dribble (and control) was backcourt.

The person who made the allegation of the missed call doesn't know the rules. At the very least, they should have made the assertion that the initial bounce was a dribble and thus team control. Since they didn't, I can only assume they don't know the rule but think they do.

I hate to say it, but Aggies have been bad about this sort of thing -- alleging we've been screwed when they just didn't know what the call was or what the rule was (or in some cases, how the rule was enforced/philosophy). In most cases, fans don't care. If they don't win, the officials suck.
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We had possession and control when we triggered the in bounds pass. The rules excerpt doesn't clarify if control needs to be established on court.
bball73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I can't help but notice that Vic as a 6 seed is up 20+ on a 11 seed toward the end of the 1st half. Once, just once, we could maybe do this.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bball73 said:

I can't help but notice that Vic as a 6 seed is up 20+ on a 11 seed toward the end of the 1st half. Once, just once, we could maybe do this.

OK. But didn't we beat Texas this year?
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
birdman said:

We had possession and control when we triggered the in bounds pass. The rules excerpt doesn't clarify if control needs to be established on court.
Incorrect. If you watch much basketball at all you would be familiar with the inbound pass from front court to back court. There is not a question about the part you are questioning. It happens every game.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
birdman said:

We had possession and control when we triggered the in bounds pass. The rules excerpt doesn't clarify if control needs to be established on court.

You can inbounds into the back court.
Gap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Gap said:

Such a tight call and we are lucky the ref saw it the way he did.

I see touch and then first controlled dribble in the backcourt. So close.

Ignoring the comment, here is the video.



She never controlled it in front court. The first dribble lands in back court.
Exactly and we were lucky because she didn't have much choice where she put it down on the dribble and the direction she was heading.
Martin Cash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
birdman said:

We had possession and control when we triggered the in bounds pass. The rules excerpt doesn't clarify if control needs to be established on court.
Art. 4. A player shall not be the first to touch the ball in their backcourt (with any part of their body, voluntarily or involuntarily) when the ball came from the frontcourt while that player's team was in team control and that player or their teammate was the last to touch the ball before it went into the backcourt.

Yeah, it does.
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
birdman said:

We had possession and control when we triggered the in bounds pass. The rules excerpt doesn't clarify if control needs to be established on court.

There's no control -- player or team -- during a throw in. Not legally speaking. Obviously, she's holding a ball and according to how one would define control in a dictionary found online or in a library, she's controlling it. But that's not how basketball rules work. The rule says what I said above. The reason is that if there were a foul before the throw in was made, they wouldn't want it to be considered a "team control" foul with no free-throws. Yes, they could write exceptions, but in this case, you'd have many exceptions.
birdman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yall need to practice your reading skills.

I know you can pass into back court.

Let me dumb it down for you. Folks are citing "Aggies never had control with initial dribble in front court, therefore the secondary touches in back court were not a violation".

I'm asking a simple question. Are the Aggies considered in control when they throw it in?

The rules might have a carve out that says "contrary to previous rule, the bounds pass can go into backcourt".
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.