But look at JT's Ryder Cup record and you want a proven partner team that can compete in the big moments at the Ryder Cup in Jordan and JT. It's a no brainer to pick JT over Glover for the Ryder Cup.
Glover is the hottest golfer, and with the new putter....seems to make every must make putt.Hubert J. Farnsworth said:
I know there is strategy to the Ryder Cup, but sometimes I think we way overthink this stuff. It's golf. Take your hot hands and go whip the Euros.
CyclingAg82 said:Glover is the hottest golfer, and with the new putter....seems to make every must make putt.Hubert J. Farnsworth said:
I know there is strategy to the Ryder Cup, but sometimes I think we way overthink this stuff. It's golf. Take your hot hands and go whip the Euros.
We need great putters in the Ryder Cup. Especially over there. JMO, but Glover should be on the team along with Koepka.
mattyd383 said:
F Brooks. Anyone but him in a team event.
CyclingAg82 said:Glover is the hottest golfer, and with the new putter....seems to make every must make putt.Hubert J. Farnsworth said:
I know there is strategy to the Ryder Cup, but sometimes I think we way overthink this stuff. It's golf. Take your hot hands and go whip the Euros.
We need great putters in the Ryder Cup. Especially over there. JMO, but Glover should be on the team along with Koepka.
Bunk Moreland said:
I did not realize Brandel posted on Texags.
Hubert J. Farnsworth said:Bunk Moreland said:
I did not realize Brandel posted on Texags.
Speaking of Brandel. The guy is on a crusade against anyone and anything associated with LIV.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.si.com/golf/.amp/news/brandel-chamblee-says-brooks-koepka-shouldnt-be-on-u-s-ryder-cup-team
Koepka is a great golfer and a terrible teammate.Hubert J. Farnsworth said:mattyd383 said:
F Brooks. Anyone but him in a team event.
Nobody has ever had a problem with him on the Ryder Cup team before. Dudes a great player. Of course we want him on the team.
I never said the Watson and Koepka rift was Ryder Cup related.98Ag99Grad said:
Tom Watson? Koepka wasn't even on that team. His first was Hazeltine. He's been a member of 2 winning teams which is more than many from this era can say.
Bunk Moreland said:
The only valid reason to not consider koepka is he and his wife just had their first kid. So if he isn't mentally all in then maybe. If he is, and wants to be on the team he's a must take.