he's not getting fired. Anyone that says that should be ignoredGoAgs92 said:
This was a very successful season, firing buzz makes no sense.
Beard has too much bob knight in him, plus you have to pay Adams to come too
The H2H is one factor.Johnny Boyziel 2 said:Leander - Ag said:
Beard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> buzz
Beard is 1-3 against Buzz at ole miss. I'll say it again, we have some of the most delusional fans in all of college sports.
Correct!!JJxvi said:This is the problem. You're lauding a school that is at best 2 out of 6 success rate. The coaches they hired are Pat Knight, Billy Gillispie, Tubby Smith, Chris Beard, Mark Adams, and Grant McCasland. They went a decade without making the NCAA Tournament.Agryan00 said:
Texas Tech has been through how many coaches since Knight? How much success have they had? Maybe we should be hiring the people at Tech who keep making good decisions on coaches without lining up the Brinks truck. The A&M AD office and their lack of due diligence is the obvious problem.
bobinator said:
Everyone knows it would cost us like $15M to fire Buzz even if we actually wanted to right?
bobinator said:
It's not even living in reality to think we'd fire him even if it didn't cost us anything unless he's REALLY pissed off everyone in the athletic department.
The results just don't warrant it.
These "just making the round of 32 isn't good enough" or "Buzz has proven he's mediocre" people mostly just don't like college basketball. They're not watching or attending the regular season games. They don't care if we go 17-14 and sneak into the tournament as an 11 seed or 25-6 and go in as a 2 seed. You can tell by reading their posts that they don't see any differences in our last three seasons. Being a four seed and losing in the second round is the same as being a nine seed and losing in the second round. Same season.
And I'm not talking about the people who don't like Buzz's offensive style or just think the game has changed and he's not adapting fast enough or whatever. There's plenty of logical things to criticize about Buzz and not exactly be super confident about the future of the program. I'm just talking about these like 4-5 fringe internet tough guys saying anyone who enjoyed this season is a complacent loser or whatever.
94chem said:Sorry you don't count baseball.zooguy96 said:
The decision makers are dumbasses. Look what every other effing school has done in the major 2 sports in the past 10 years:
Tech - made CBB final
Sip - made CFB playoff twice
Baylol - won CBB NC
Purple Baylol - made CFB NC game
A&M - squat.
dcg4403 said:bobinator said:
Everyone knows it would cost us like $15M to fire Buzz even if we actually wanted to right?
The dream could only be plausible if the Maryland rumor is true.....which it isnt. Maryland isn't buying out Buzz contract.
This post should be pinned at the top of every thread. It's a masterpiece.bobinator said:
It's not even living in reality to think we'd fire him even if it didn't cost us anything unless he's REALLY pissed off everyone in the athletic department.
The results just don't warrant it.
These "just making the round of 32 isn't good enough" or "Buzz has proven he's mediocre" people mostly just don't like college basketball. They're not watching or attending the regular season games. They don't care if we go 17-14 and sneak into the tournament as an 11 seed or 25-6 and go in as a 2 seed. You can tell by reading their posts that they don't see any differences in our last three seasons. Being a four seed and losing in the second round is the same as being a nine seed and losing in the second round. Same season.
And I'm not talking about the people who don't like Buzz's offensive style or just think the game has changed and he's not adapting fast enough or whatever. There's plenty of logical things to criticize about Buzz and not exactly be super confident about the future of the program. I'm just talking about these like 4-5 fringe internet tough guys saying anyone who enjoyed this season is a complacent loser or whatever.
bobinator said:
It's not even living in reality to think we'd fire him even if it didn't cost us anything unless he's REALLY pissed off everyone in the athletic department.
The results just don't warrant it.
These "just making the round of 32 isn't good enough" or "Buzz has proven he's mediocre" people mostly just don't like college basketball. They're not watching or attending the regular season games. They don't care if we go 17-14 and sneak into the tournament as an 11 seed or 25-6 and go in as a 2 seed. You can tell by reading their posts that they don't see any differences in our last three seasons. Being a four seed and losing in the second round is the same as being a nine seed and losing in the second round. Same season.
And I'm not talking about the people who don't like Buzz's offensive style or just think the game has changed and he's not adapting fast enough or whatever. There's plenty of logical things to criticize about Buzz and not exactly be super confident about the future of the program. I'm just talking about these like 4-5 fringe internet tough guys saying anyone who enjoyed this season is a complacent loser or whatever.
