Governor Abbott press conference today (Sunday 3/22) at 3pm with links

28,653 Views | 166 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by DTP02
jamey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fightingfarmer09 said:

Love how he is suggesting local officials can implement their own standards.


Hot potato, catch!
Prexys Moon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Finally. Some freaking common sense. What may be necessary for big cities may not be necessary for rural areas.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He is keeping the door open for state level mandate for shelter in place though on a moments notice and emphasizing the importance of the existing limitations to prevent the need of that
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tboag said:

This is like watching a freshman in high school give his first speech. This is awful.


He probably has had very very little sleep. I imagine he's exhausted. That said, I don't think he's doing poorly at all. But he does sound fatigued. Any of us would be.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The longer we put it off, the more we pay later. Hope I'm wrong.
Tramp96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm guessing the guy standing behind his right shoulder just unfolded his new suit out of the Amazon package today.
twk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proposition Joe said:

Saying local authorities can enact shelter-in-place, but not going to do it state-wide.

I don't like sweeping restrictions, but I also don't like putting it in the hands of the local mayors to make these type of decisions. The further down you go, the further down these officials make decisions for re-election.
This is a huge state. Conditions are radically different in various parts of the state. That's why a one size fits all policy is not appropriate.
Fat Bib Fortuna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have to admit I'm a little depressed this wasn't a press conference to announce we were seceding from the Union like in Daniel Da Cruz's book "The Ayes of Texas"

Yukon Cornelius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CassiusClay said:

Yukon Cornelius said:

CassiusClay said:

My GUESS given what I've heard:
1. Non-Essential Businesses Closed
2. Statewide Stay at home


Really?

Only 360 positive covid out of 8,700 tested. Less than 5% have it that are tested and they are only testing those who they think have it.

If he closes down Texas for those numbers it will be a travesty.
667 cases right not - Dallas hitting their exponential curve.
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/coronavirus/


Those include presumed positive not confirmed
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PJYoung said:

The longer we put it off, the more we pay later. Hope I'm wrong.

Like seemingly every other decision in this crisis, we'll make stricter decisions in 3-4 days when "oh look this is still bad".
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tramp96 said:

I'm guessing the guy standing behind his right shoulder just unfolded his new suit out of the Amazon package today.


Nah, he's had that suit for decades and his belly has grown
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
twk said:

Proposition Joe said:

Saying local authorities can enact shelter-in-place, but not going to do it state-wide.

I don't like sweeping restrictions, but I also don't like putting it in the hands of the local mayors to make these type of decisions. The further down you go, the further down these officials make decisions for re-election.
This is a huge state. Conditions are radically different in various parts of the state. That's why a one size fits all policy is not appropriate.

I agree. Shutting down some rural county doesn't make sense like it might Dallas or Tarrant county.

That doesn't change that I don't feel great about officials on the local level really seeing the big picture and knowing when to shut things down (and risk not being re-elected).
dragmagpuff
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How many people have been tested in the counties with 0 cases?
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jamey said:

fightingfarmer09 said:

Love how he is suggesting local officials can implement their own standards.


Hot potato, catch!


Not accurate.

The front lines for this are at the county and city level. Resources and infection rates vary widely.

A one-size-fits-all approach has never made sense unless the situation is dire in a majority of the state.
Independence H-D
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All disasters in the state of Texas are considered"local" with the County Judge being the decision maker on response.
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The most valuable player is the button on the doc's coat.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proposition Joe said:

PJYoung said:

The longer we put it off, the more we pay later. Hope I'm wrong.

Like seemingly every other decision in this crisis, we'll make stricter decisions in 3-4 days when "oh look this is still bad".

Exactly.

There is an exposure lag of 4-5 days, then symptoms bad enough to go in for help/get tested of close to 7 days and then our Aggie doctor was saying in DFW they have a 4-6 day turnaround on test results.

So that lag has us living in a false reality today, looking at numbers today that are really from 1 to 2 weeks ago of community spread.
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yukon Cornelius said:

CassiusClay said:

Yukon Cornelius said:

CassiusClay said:

My GUESS given what I've heard:
1. Non-Essential Businesses Closed
2. Statewide Stay at home


Really?

Only 360 positive covid out of 8,700 tested. Less than 5% have it that are tested and they are only testing those who they think have it.

If he closes down Texas for those numbers it will be a travesty.
667 cases right not - Dallas hitting their exponential curve.
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/coronavirus/


Those include presumed positive not confirmed


But presumed positives generally turn out to be positive. It's a leading indicator.
aggie_sprt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MuckRaker96 said:

I have to admit I'm a little depressed this wasn't a press conference to announce we were seceding from the Union like in Daniel Da Cruz's book "The Ayes of Texas"


That's a blast from the past.

As for the numbers, he offered a good explanation for the difference in official numbers and numbers being reported on sites like John Hopkins.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now asking medical guy when the peak will be, and like everyone else the answer is "we don't know".
dermdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Independence H-D said:

All disasters in the state of Texas are considered"local" with the County Judge being the decision maker on response.
As how it should be. Dallas and Houston are nothing like Dalhart.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
* Will schools resume? Will depend on spread. Impossible to tell right now. At least 6-7 weeks of observation. "Possibility" of them opening.
mazzag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bell County will fine groups of more than 10 $1000. We have 10 confirmed cases. I think local governments can handle this.
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dermdoc said:

AGHouston11 said:

Lowering nursing requirements


We need all hands on deck. A lot of health work being done does not require a lot of expertise.

I like what he is saying as we can open up more hospital beds with his executive orders. Very common sense.


Oh I understand the reason. Slippery slope as always. A lot of health care work doesn't require a lot of expertise. Regulations are for the encounters that you do.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CassiusClay said:

Yukon Cornelius said:

CassiusClay said:

My GUESS given what I've heard:
1. Non-Essential Businesses Closed
2. Statewide Stay at home


Really?

Only 360 positive covid out of 8,700 tested. Less than 5% have it that are tested and they are only testing those who they think have it.

If he closes down Texas for those numbers it will be a travesty.
667 cases right not - Dallas hitting their exponential curve.
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/coronavirus/

And they just mentioned on this press conference that the Texas peak is probably weeks or even months away.

I believe it will be the last week of April or first week of May but nobody really knows. It all depends how effective our current measures are.
fta09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CassiusClay said:

Bighunter43 said:

CassiusClay said:

My GUESS given what I've heard:
1. Non-Essential Businesses Closed
2. Statewide Stay at home


He's taking the long way around the barn to get to it if that's coming.
Yup - Direct info from a C-Suite executive working directly with Texas Department of Commerce thinking it would be today.
If I've learned anything from the collapse of the oil industry, as well as the fallout from this virus and seeing all of the airlines, cruise lines, movie cinemas, etc. come out of the wood work begging for bailouts, it is that most c-suite executives don't know *****
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
* Will shelter-in-place occur? If people stay at home like they are supposed to right now, then no. If they don't stay at home like they are supposed to, it likely will.
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:

The longer we put it off, the more we pay later. Hope I'm wrong.


Major metro areas like SA, Houston, and DFW probably shouldn't put it off any longer. They're at the biggest disadvantages fundamentally.

Other areas can afford to wait and see how the pseudo-lockdown is working.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proposition Joe said:

* Will shelter-in-place occur? If people stay at home like they are supposed to right now, then no. If they don't stay at home like they are supposed to, it likely will.


Aka yes. I'm betting before end of this week
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

Proposition Joe said:

* Will shelter-in-place occur? If people stay at home like they are supposed to right now, then no. If they don't stay at home like they are supposed to, it likely will.


Aka yes. I'm betting before end of this week

Yes I imagine it follows the same "day-late, dollar-short" approach we've had.

More afraid of being the governor that enacted the restriction when maybe we didn't need it than the governor that did it like everyone else did it "when the numbers [that are 3-4 days behind] show we needed to".
AGHouston11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course he's tired. He's been working. A lot of people have been at home on the couch deciding what brand of chip bag we want to open up
Barnyard96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
seemed like a legit presser.

Testing Status
More nurses
more beds
addressing PPE shortages
Fines for violating executive orders
Cant lock down this state. Its too damn big and not necessary across the total geography.




HouAggie2007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Considering the number of idiots I know still going out its a while
thelaw4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DTP02 said:

PJYoung said:

The longer we put it off, the more we pay later. Hope I'm wrong.


Major metro areas like SA, Houston, and DFW probably shouldn't put it off any longer. They're at the biggest disadvantages fundamentally.

Other areas can afford to wait and see how the pseudo-lockdown is working.
I would bet the cities were waiting on what the Gov did first, now that they know he's kicked it to them- i could see the major cities moving to shelter in place on Monday
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.