just a fyi...apparently Gov announced by Executive Order
You're only a true badass if you wear one made of paper thin bandanna and then stand in a group of 20k people, less than 6" apart, yelling. Now THAT is tough and no doubt flattens that ole curve for the rest of us.ElephantRider said:
Im sure we will still have plenty of badasses that are too cool to wear them.
I think they were kidding. Masks were the solution all along.Squadron7 said:
The WHO was against them before they were for them before they were against them.
Because wearing a mask is "proven" to stop the spread...wait.JP_Losman said:
Why is Beijing having an outbreak right now?
They have been religiously using masks all year.
Or we could just return to school...cone said:
you want school to return in 6 weeks?
this is what it's going to take
cone said:
you aren't going to open schools in the middle of a regional pandemic peak
you can argue why you should until your blue in the face but it's not going to happen
Hey, politicians are wimps. I get it. I WOULD open schools. No masks. Let the Karens wait on hold. Its been much more "proven" that the young do not transmit the virus nor are effected by it severely than it's ever been "proven" masks actually stop the spread.cone said:
you aren't going to open schools in the middle of a regional pandemic peak
you can argue why you should until your blue in the face but it's not going to happen
Bingo!SirLurksALot said:cone said:
you aren't going to open schools in the middle of a regional pandemic peak
you can argue why you should until your blue in the face but it's not going to happen
Mask requirements or not, we're not going to be able to get back to normal until people stop pretending that covid is some kind of apocalyptic threat.
LOL, Compare Beijing's "outbreak" to ours.JP_Losman said:
Why is Beijing having an outbreak right now?
They have been religiously using masks all year.
why are paying attention to Daltrey and Townshend?Squadron7 said:
The WHO was against them before they were for them before they were against them.
B/c it doesn't fit his narrative!JP_Losman said:
You kidding me? they were in full lockdown in Beijing last week.
LOCKDOWN
How is that a nothing burger
Sq 17 said:why are paying attention to Daltrey and Townshend?Squadron7 said:
The WHO was against them before they were for them before they were against them.
HotardAg07 said:
Places like Hong Kong and Japan have nearly universal mask adoption and despite way more population density than us and not having a lockdown they were able to avoid an outbreak.
It's the lowest cost lever we have to pull that makes a difference. Wear the mask.
The reason I used Japan and Hong Kong as examples is that their population density is so high and it would apparently be a hot bed for spreading infectious diseases. Australia and New Zealand aren't nearly as densely populated and LA doesn't have nearly the same mask adoption rate. It is over 97% in Hong Kong in Japan.SirLurksALot said:HotardAg07 said:
Places like Hong Kong and Japan have nearly universal mask adoption and despite way more population density than us and not having a lockdown they were able to avoid an outbreak.
It's the lowest cost lever we have to pull that makes a difference. Wear the mask.
Beijing and LA have had mask requirements and widespread adoption yet they are currently experiencing outbreaks. Australia and New Zealand have also done a good job at containment yet don't have mask orders.
It hasn't been proven that masks are the reason Japan and SK have done well. Maybe the fact all 4 countries are islands (SK is practically an island for immigration purposes) and are easily able to control who enters their countries has something to do with their ability to contain the disease.
HotardAg07 said:The reason I used Japan and Hong Kong as examples is that their population density is so high and it would apparently be a hot bed for spreading infectious diseases. Australia and New Zealand aren't nearly as densely populated and LA doesn't have nearly the same mask adoption rate. It is over 97% in Hong Kong in Japan.SirLurksALot said:HotardAg07 said:
Places like Hong Kong and Japan have nearly universal mask adoption and despite way more population density than us and not having a lockdown they were able to avoid an outbreak.
It's the lowest cost lever we have to pull that makes a difference. Wear the mask.
Beijing and LA have had mask requirements and widespread adoption yet they are currently experiencing outbreaks. Australia and New Zealand have also done a good job at containment yet don't have mask orders.
It hasn't been proven that masks are the reason Japan and SK have done well. Maybe the fact all 4 countries are islands (SK is practically an island for immigration purposes) and are easily able to control who enters their countries has something to do with their ability to contain the disease.
Look, it probably doesn't mean the virus will vanish if everybody started wearing cloth masks, but it might help 10-15%. If that helps us go from a situation with Rt>1 to <1 (with other mitigating factors) it is worth it. If it doesn't help, then what have we lost? Nothing.
A mask mandate will do nothing without enforcement, and that statement is one of the most incorrect statements I've seen on this site. I live in SoCal, and virtually no one is out and about with masks, even with a mandate from the Governor as it is not being enforced. I suspect it will be the same out there in TX, but I guess we'll see.SirLurksALot said:HotardAg07 said:The reason I used Japan and Hong Kong as examples is that their population density is so high and it would apparently be a hot bed for spreading infectious diseases. Australia and New Zealand aren't nearly as densely populated and LA doesn't have nearly the same mask adoption rate. It is over 97% in Hong Kong in Japan.SirLurksALot said:HotardAg07 said:
Places like Hong Kong and Japan have nearly universal mask adoption and despite way more population density than us and not having a lockdown they were able to avoid an outbreak.
It's the lowest cost lever we have to pull that makes a difference. Wear the mask.
Beijing and LA have had mask requirements and widespread adoption yet they are currently experiencing outbreaks. Australia and New Zealand have also done a good job at containment yet don't have mask orders.
It hasn't been proven that masks are the reason Japan and SK have done well. Maybe the fact all 4 countries are islands (SK is practically an island for immigration purposes) and are easily able to control who enters their countries has something to do with their ability to contain the disease.
Look, it probably doesn't mean the virus will vanish if everybody started wearing cloth masks, but it might help 10-15%. If that helps us go from a situation with Rt>1 to <1 (with other mitigating factors) it is worth it. If it doesn't help, then what have we lost? Nothing.
If It's not working in LA then it's not going to work anywhere else in America. Out of all the places in this country LA is going to be one of the areas with the highest amount of compliance.
cone said:
you want school to return in 6 weeks?
this is what it's going to take