because parents and children aren't organized, aren't assured sources of political funding, and generally only get to exert political power every other year
you're emasculated
you're emasculated
The_Fox said:nai06 said:The_Fox said:AggieYankee1 said:cone said:
I'll disagree slightly
this crash course in home schooling is making me question the overall value
if that factors into expendability, well that's part of the cost
How about we as a community come together and remind ourselves of how priceless teachers really are to our community and then agree not to make them walk to plank... deal?
The quality of their education is measureD against the quality of the environment they are in - and right now they are in an environment that is spreading a deadly novel virus that can kill somebody with high blood pressure diabetes over the age of 50 and a cancer survivor And that describes a hell of a lot of teachers doesn't it?
ALL LIVES MATTER!!! RIGHT???
Then they can quit and the school can hire a younger teacher.
The problem is there aren't a whole lot of young teachers (or really any demographic) to hire right now. The subset of people wanting to teach for the amount of pay and the stuff you have to put up with is pretty small.
Then pay teachers that want to teach in person more money. There has to be a solution. I pay $34k for my 2 kids to attend elementary school. A few families with similar aged kids could pay a teacher over $100k to teach and would happily do so. My youngest has to be at school this year. She did not learn via distance learning.
systematic racismKeegan99 said:
And it won't be the children of the upper middle class and upper class that suffer. Those parents will pay for private teachers and tutors to get the results they need.
CowtownEng said:
If public schools continue to respond to this situation in such a poor and inept way, I believe we will see more and more neighbors banding together to create pods/cohorts which are led by privately funded teachers.
nai06 said:The_Fox said:nai06 said:The_Fox said:AggieYankee1 said:cone said:
I'll disagree slightly
this crash course in home schooling is making me question the overall value
if that factors into expendability, well that's part of the cost
How about we as a community come together and remind ourselves of how priceless teachers really are to our community and then agree not to make them walk to plank... deal?
The quality of their education is measureD against the quality of the environment they are in - and right now they are in an environment that is spreading a deadly novel virus that can kill somebody with high blood pressure diabetes over the age of 50 and a cancer survivor And that describes a hell of a lot of teachers doesn't it?
ALL LIVES MATTER!!! RIGHT???
Then they can quit and the school can hire a younger teacher.
The problem is there aren't a whole lot of young teachers (or really any demographic) to hire right now. The subset of people wanting to teach for the amount of pay and the stuff you have to put up with is pretty small.
Then pay teachers that want to teach in person more money. There has to be a solution. I pay $34k for my 2 kids to attend elementary school. A few families with similar aged kids could pay a teacher over $100k to teach and would happily do so. My youngest has to be at school this year. She did not learn via distance learning.
LOL. Nothing get out the pitchforks and torches like suggesting to pay teachers more. Don't you know that teachers are just overpaid babysitter?
Bennettag06 said:
I am new to TexAgs. Can you tell me what F16 is?
NASAg03 said:
Funny how schools finds all these excuses to shut down, when "non-essential" businesses like restaurants find a way to stay open with a way more diverse clientele.
You don't need cafeteria for most kids, and janitors can work after hours.
Teachers can plan from from home or lecture virtually. 25 yo aids cab help in person, or the people working daycare.
NASAg03 said:
Funny how schools finds all these excuses to shut down, when "non-essential" businesses like restaurants find a way to stay open with a way more diverse clientele.
You don't need cafeteria for most kids, and janitors can work after hours.
Teachers can plan from from home or lecture virtually. 25 yo aids cab help in person, or the people working daycare.
If it turns out that online education == classroom education, teaching K-12 as we currently know it may become obsolete.Leather Tuscadero said:
Is it not also just as comical to think we can sit them in front of a computer at young ages and they will also learn?
The Politics "forum'.Patriarch said:Bennettag06 said:
I am new to TexAgs. Can you tell me what F16 is?
Where are these support staff folks going to work where they are safer than at school? They aren't going to be able to work from home. Millions of essential workers, often low paid, have been working every day throughout the pandemic, taking the same risk, or greater, than what these folks would be taking. How is it that grocery stores and Walmart can operate throughout the pandemic but schools cannot?BBRex said:
I'm not a teacher, but I work at a school district. We started in June bringing back workers to central office and the campuses. And we started having upticks in COVID-19 cases. After three weeks at 50%, the district shut it back down. Other districts said they were seeing similar problems.
You have to remember that even schools have to have janitors, cafeteria workers, bus drivers and other support staff. The people are vital, but often make low hourly wages. Without them, the rest of the school doesn't run, and many of them are making so little that they can quit and find a similar paying job somewhere else.
Restaurants and other places like HOSPITALS have dynamics that schools don't have. Gyms, massage parlors, and tattoo shops have dynamics schools don't have.katlong said:
Yes, it definitely feels like a lose-lose. Both "comical" things can be true at the same time. I think the more helpful thing to do is stand by your desire to have kids in school, but stop overly simplifying the hesitations teachers currently have or equating schools to restaurants or other places of work. Schools have lots of unique dynamics that most people don't understand. That doesn't mean you don't get an opinion. It just means we should be careful to not oversimplify.




i want to echo this because it keeps coming back to this. Why is it different? The case is not being convincingly made that its different.twk said:Where are these support staff folks going to work where they are safer than at school? They aren't going to be able to work from home. Millions of essential workers, often low paid, have been working every day throughout the pandemic, taking the same risk, or greater, than what these folks would be taking. How is it that grocery stores and Walmart can operate throughout the pandemic but schools cannot?BBRex said:
I'm not a teacher, but I work at a school district. We started in June bringing back workers to central office and the campuses. And we started having upticks in COVID-19 cases. After three weeks at 50%, the district shut it back down. Other districts said they were seeing similar problems.
You have to remember that even schools have to have janitors, cafeteria workers, bus drivers and other support staff. The people are vital, but often make low hourly wages. Without them, the rest of the school doesn't run, and many of them are making so little that they can quit and find a similar paying job somewhere else.
Working from home doesn't work for teaching as a whole. Businesses will cut loose employees if they aren't getting work done, but that isn't happening in education. KIds learned next to nothing once in person classes stopped. That lack of production will not be allowed to continue, and there is no way to remedy it without returning most kids to the classroom.BBRex said:
You're free to try. I'm guessing you aren't working from home? Because that's what teachers are asking to do. I'm sure other businesses are finding aspects of wfh inconvenient, too.