Stumbled across this while in a YouTube rabbit hole. Really like this version as his raspy voice gives the song a whole different feel than Marty Raybon's.
I seem to remember that Heart started off as a Zep cover band. They played Zep covers at just about every show I saw from 1977 until 2005. They play a really good version of "Rock 'n' Roll."
I also like Yoakam's version but there are memories tied to the Fine Young Centibels version. That is also true with a couple of the other covers in my post/
I don't know if I can be convinced there has ever been a better cover than this.
It is jaw droppingly good. I'm a Tool fan but not a Tool nutjob. My favorite band ever is Rush but I think the greatest band ever was LZ (90% of their catalog is gold) and prior to this I thought most LZ covers were hot garbage. There have been a few decent ones but not something I would listen to again and again. This is 11+ minutes of greatness.
No Quarter was a LZ masterpiece too - it was the centerpiece of live shows from 1973 onward. You wanna hear greatness listen to the Celebration Day 2007 Live version by LZ.
To even have the audacity to tackle this is ballsy. Get it wrong and it's a flop of embarrassing proportions and you took up. 11+ minutes of an album for it.
Covers tend to fall into one of 3 different types: 1. Tributes to the original that sound much like the original. 2. A cover that just sounds like the band you might like doing that song. 3. A different rendition based on tempo, genre, style, instruments, etc. A complete departure that redefines the song.
1 and 2 generally add very little other than serving as an homage to the original. They both can be very good but in the end they are adding little. 3 sometimes works very well and can be very welcome (Alien Ant Farm doing Smooth Criminal, Disturbed doing Sound of Silence, Social Distortion doing a punk cover of Ring of Fire).
This cover is all three of those things in different parts - which is possible partly because it is so long.
It starts out as very much a LZ homage in tempo, tone, etc. but the excellent musicianship comes through. In the second section it morphs into more of a Tool sound as it continues to build in intensity. The third section is a cacophony of sound as it is a taken to a new frenetic level and a powerful ending. It is just meticulously planned out and delivers beginning to end.
Covers tend to fall into one of 3 different types: 1. Tributes to the original that sound much like the original. 2. A cover that just sounds like the band you might like doing that song. 3. A different rendition based on tempo, genre, style, instruments, etc. A complete departure that redefines the song.
That's exactly right. There's not really a point to #1 and #2 other than to make money. I love finding #3 gems. When Napster was a thing, I would line up covers of the same song and listen to different takes. Is there an easy way to do that these days?