*** MARVEL CINEMATIC UNIVERSE *** [Staff message on OP]

3,685,999 Views | 28465 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by rhutton125
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

TCTTS said:

A number of these movies shoot in London, even some of the ones that take place in the states. They're referring more to the studios there (interior sets) as opposed to the actual streets/country side of London.
don't be so certain.

they are calling it the "Fantastic Four"

If it was meant to be in the US, they would be calling it the "Fantastic For".


In England they would be called the Smashing Bunch
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

TCTTS said:

A number of these movies shoot in London, even some of the ones that take place in the states. They're referring more to the studios there (interior sets) as opposed to the actual streets/country side of London.
don't be so certain.

they are calling it the "Fantastic Four"

If it was meant to be in the US, they would be calling it the "Fantastic For".
Sea Speed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
C@LAg said:

TCTTS said:

A number of these movies shoot in London, even some of the ones that take place in the states. They're referring more to the studios there (interior sets) as opposed to the actual streets/country side of London.
don't be so certain.

they are calling it the "Fantastic Four"

If it was meant to be in the US, they would be calling it the "Fantastic For".


Best joke I've seen on here in a while. Kudos
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
you know it's a good dad joke, when it makes me mad. I'm so mad at how much I'm giggling at that.
MASAXET
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

The thing that gets me is LBJ on the cover of the TIME magazine The Thing is reading in that image, which has to be intentional. It's a very real, very specific issue, set in our reality, just after Kennedy had been shot. So it's going to be super weird if this is an alternate reality, but one that's damn near identical to ours, where Kennedy was also shot and LBJ becomes President. At that point it's just, like, what's the point of the multiverse if we're not going to have fun with it and do things that are way different than our own reality?
Do you think the TCTTS in this alternate reality believes the limo driver shot JFK?
taxpreparer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

I appreciate the correct info, but I would still consider all that just as dumb. If we have to do this whole multiverse thing, I feel like all the various different realities should at least be way different from one another. Not just slight variations here and there.


How about Nixon defeating Kennedy in 1960, LBJ defeating Nixon in 1964 with Mondale as his Vp, and serving two terms. Nixon/Mondale never happens. All of causes major changes to the Vietnam war.
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

redline248 said:

Was the FF cartoon photo shared by Marvel, originally?

Either way, I don't know if we should get too caught up in that image. I mean, there is a damn robot serving tea or something. Those didn't exist in the 60s

edit: We also can't be quite done with the multiverse stuff if they plan more Captain Marvel/Monica Rambeau movies. Rambeau is in a multiverse dimension

The FF cartoon photo was officially created/shared by Marvel. IMO, its a very intentional image with multiple "Easter eggs"...


Watched this video a while back and it's really good, and he touches on how they could be from our 60s yet not really be known to this universe (around 9:40 if you're curious).

I agree that it seems odd to release an image like this one that has a few very specific references to a certain time on Earth-616 then have it not be set in our universe. But I guess we'll see.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nice.

Personally, I love the '60s approach, but yeah, my preference would be for them to be from "our"/Earth-616's '60s, be some covert group who isn't known to the public, who then gets swept up into some alternate dimension or deep space or whatever, then spit it out/comes back to our present day. I realize that would tread where Captain America/Captain Marvel have already been, but I think it could still be a lot of fun if done right and in an inventive way.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MASAXET said:

TCTTS said:

The thing that gets me is LBJ on the cover of the TIME magazine The Thing is reading in that image, which has to be intentional. It's a very real, very specific issue, set in our reality, just after Kennedy had been shot. So it's going to be super weird if this is an alternate reality, but one that's damn near identical to ours, where Kennedy was also shot and LBJ becomes President. At that point it's just, like, what's the point of the multiverse if we're not going to have fun with it and do things that are way different than our own reality?
Do you think the TCTTS in this alternate reality believes the limo driver shot JFK?

fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah, I think there's a few ways you can approach it (top secret/government cover up kinda things) that can make it work in the current continuity. I think it's a great opportunity to have some really cool retro tech that's gonna be a lot of fun on screen.
MASAXET
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

MASAXET said:

TCTTS said:

The thing that gets me is LBJ on the cover of the TIME magazine The Thing is reading in that image, which has to be intentional. It's a very real, very specific issue, set in our reality, just after Kennedy had been shot. So it's going to be super weird if this is an alternate reality, but one that's damn near identical to ours, where Kennedy was also shot and LBJ becomes President. At that point it's just, like, what's the point of the multiverse if we're not going to have fun with it and do things that are way different than our own reality?
Do you think the TCTTS in this alternate reality believes the limo driver shot JFK?


AgfromHOU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I dunno, but the one in our universe didn't understand Cruella was making coats of Dalmatian fur
MBAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not going to get up in arms over decisions on what direction to take because frankly I don't think it matters. All that matters is how well they execute the story.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgfromHOU said:

I dunno, but the one in our universe didn't understand Cruella was making coats of Dalmatian fur

Because I'm a grown ass man who hadn't seen the animated movie in 40 YEARS, I didn't REMEMBER.

Once reminded, I perfectly understood.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mean I hadn't seen Silence of the Lambs till I was in my late teens but I sure as hell knew Hannibal Lecter ate people.
MASAXET
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

AgfromHOU said:

I dunno, but the one in our universe didn't understand Cruella was making coats of Dalmatian fur

Because I'm a grown ass man who hadn't seen the animated movie in 40 YEARS, I didn't REMEMBER.

Once reminded, I perfectly understood.
You just have to own this one, TCTTS. It's a great memory here.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MASAXET said:

TCTTS said:

AgfromHOU said:

I dunno, but the one in our universe didn't understand Cruella was making coats of Dalmatian fur

Because I'm a grown ass man who hadn't seen the animated movie in 40 YEARS, I didn't REMEMBER.

Once reminded, I perfectly understood.
You just have to own this one, TCTTS. It's a great memory here.
Agreed. It's not quite to the level of "Fatso with Travel Scrabble" or "He's putting a WHAT in her Stocking" threads, but it's definitely one to remember.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

AgfromHOU said:

I dunno, but the one in our universe didn't understand Cruella was making coats of Dalmatian fur

Because I'm a grown ass man who hadn't seen the animated movie in 40 YEARS, I didn't REMEMBER.

Once reminded, I perfectly understood.
How dare you. You will never get out of this.

maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:


TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know if the below tweet is 100% accurate, but it does jive with other reports I keep seeing. If so, it really does finally feel like all of this stuff is going to start being more directly connected again, with all roads leading to Avengers 5 & 6...

Daredevil: Born Again -> Spider-Man 4 -> Avengers 5
(with Spider-Man and Doctor Strange rumored to "lead" the next two Avengers movies)

Captain America: New World Order -> Thunderbolts -> Avengers 5
(with Armor Wars potentially being in this general mix as well)

Deadpool & Wolverine -> Avengers 5
(rumored to setup the basic multiversal story conceit for Avengers 5)

The Fantastic Four -> Avengers 5
(rumored to setup Doctor Doom toward the end of the movie for Avengers 5 or 6 or both)

... along with Blade, the third Doctor Strange movie, the Shang-Chi sequel, and whatever else all obviously contributing to the overall narrative as well...

Quinn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting- is Daredevil doing the Devil's Reign storyline that happened in the comics a couple years ago?
Bruce Almighty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quinn said:

Interesting- is Daredevil doing the Devil's Reign storyline that happened in the comics a couple years ago?


From what I've read, they're calling it Born Again, but not really using the story, which is a shame. It's my favorite story in all of Marvel.
rhutton125
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They did Born Again in S3 (I think)
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG



YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Glad to see Punisher back.
Definitely Not A Cop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not seeing Murdock's purity ring? Maybe the born-again Christian plot happens later in the season?
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Punisher won't be as foul mouthed as he used to be
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fig96
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is...interesting? She's been great in some things she's been in (i.e. Ozark) but I wouldn't think of her as an actress who has a ton of range.

Not a character I'm very familiar with so curious to see where this is all going.
Post removed:
by user
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does Silver Surfer even need acting range?
Post removed:
by user
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
watch a clip of inventing Anna, then watch a clip of Ozarks. She's incredible.
(note that inventing Anna is a made up accent by the person that the show is about and Julia Garner does a phenomenal job given that only one other person talks like that)
First Page Last Page
Page 759 of 814
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.