I think the real problem is the media ecosystem we find ourselves in is BROKEN.
Its not just enough to make a TV show or movie. You have to go out and promote it ad naseum on any platform you can, and that requires talking about it a lot, and trying to come up with interesting things to say about the project that continue to break through and make news. In the 90s, actors would do magazine articles that basically just pump up the excitement ("fans are going to love what we have done", "people won't believe the stunts", etc.), then go on late night to promote the movie, show a clip, and tell funny stories about production or about something unrelated to endear themselves to the audience.
NOW, you have to go on podcasts, do QAs, go to conventions, on and on. And these actors get asked questions and put on the spot and they say dumb things. Then those dumb things become a lens through which people see the content and its hard to go back from that, because the things some people love, other people hate, etc.
I have found the approach that works for me is that I watch a trailer, if the story seems interesting, or if I like the filmmakers or actors involved, I will give anything a chance. Ignore the talk around the movie, because its ALL trying to get people to pay attention to the actually show or movie. I try to judge the content on its own without all the noise because the noise is always dumb.
An example of this, that still annoys me but that isn't political, is when the focus is on the actors transformation. What their diet was. How they stayed in character, etc. That stuff is all dumb too. Its just not political so it doesn't set people off as much. But its coming from the same issue of having to talk about a project too much and trying to come up with stuff to talk about that breaks through and stays in the headlines.
And the answer Mackie gives just proves how he himself hasn't been paying attention to the themes of the film series he is now the star of. So....maybe that should be the conversation? Not the politics of his answer.