The Feds' strategy appears more precisely calculated than some pundits are willing to acknowledge IMO.
TL;DR The Feds don't appear to be too scared of the UAP journalists and thinks the general public is stupid and/or uninterested.
Hence, the ongoing cover-up since at least 1947, if not earlier. Many of the answers to the questions are in plain site..it's choosing to ask those folks with the correct answers that is the problem currently. The fact that this issue is even being openly discussed is pretty amazing. Apparently, we have some help in this situation.Agristotle said:
I hope you are right, but I worked in that world, I've seen the mentality up close. I'm not optimistic. Those guys don't like to be put in positions where they have more questions than answers.
But again, I hope you're right, it would be an amazing time to be to be alive.
(#UFOTwitter #UFO #UFOs #UFOSightings #UAPTwitter #UAPs #UAP) pic.twitter.com/DjGQFBcNKx
— 💭 think tank (@528vibes) June 1, 2022
Full vid:https://t.co/XeT1q68Xsw
— Andreas (@andadsson) March 12, 2024
Rep. Eric Burlison, minutes ago, when asked by the host if he trusted DoD/AARO's latest report: "I don't. They weren't transparent with us in a SCIF." https://t.co/YEKzqd9SEI
— Richard Geldreich (@richgel999) March 12, 2024
“Then I realized who I was talking to and these were two very senior senators, neither of whom are prominent at all publicly in the commentary on the issue. But what they took their time to say to me was how they know they can smell bull**it when they see it. And they were making… pic.twitter.com/XCSnjrK4gq
— Andreas (@andadsson) March 13, 2024
Congressional staffers have, "direct, firsthand witness evidence of a retrieval program, and a reverse engineering program inside the United States." ~Coulthart@rosscoulthart: "I was walking down a street in Washington and I was looking around at the people around me and… https://t.co/dB4fp1QNEQ
— Joe Murgia (@TheUfoJoe) March 13, 2024
6 days ago, Dr Garry Nolan: "My sources inside of AARO tell me that there was a lot of pressure to rush this report out with preconceived conclusions..... And, the ODNI was also unpleased at this point, opposed it coming out..." https://t.co/6gqc22ZTZY pic.twitter.com/WJjFEAwicM
— Neil Goodman (@Neil__Goodman) March 16, 2024
BREAKING NEWS:
— D. Dean Johnson (@ddeanjohnson) March 18, 2024
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PAYDIRT:
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF WORLDWIDE UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA REPORTING PROCEDURES (MAY 19, 2023)
By Douglas Dean Johnson
On May 19, 2023, the Joint Staff (J3, Operations; J36 Homeland Defense Division) of the Joint Chiefs… pic.twitter.com/xceBxsqRrT
Quote:
BREAKING NEWS:
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT PAYDIRT:
JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF WORLDWIDE UNIDENTIFIED ANOMALOUS PHENOMENA REPORTING PROCEDURES (MAY 19, 2023)
By Douglas Dean Johnson
On May 19, 2023, the Joint Staff (J3, Operations; J36 Homeland Defense Division) of the Joint Chiefs of Staff disseminated to all unified military commands worldwide a set of uniform procedures to be followed for gathering data and reporting on contemporary military encounters with Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), using a detailed standard reporting template.
I have now obtained a copy of that Pentagon message. I believe that its detailed contents are being made public here for the first time (if the GENADMIN message has previously been published, that publication has not come to my attention).
The message was designated as "GENADMIN Joint Staff J3 Washington DC 191452ZMAY23 Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Reporting and Material Disposition." It was disseminated as "Controlled Unclassified Information," or "CUI."
Journalist
@BrandiVincent_
referred in passing to the existence of this message in a DefenseScoop article dated August 30, 2023 ("Hicks takes direct oversight of Pentagon's UAP office; new reporting website to be launched"). I promptly asked Pentagon press officer Susan Gough to release a copy to me, but Gough replied, "I cannot provide a copy of the message to you, as it contains information that's not publicly releasable."
On August 31, 2023, I filed a FOIA request for the GENADMIN message. The Department of Defense Freedom of Information Division has now released the 9-page document to me (response letter dated March 15, 2024, received by me on March 18), with only minimal redactions. After redacting my personal information, I am now making the complete FOIA release available at the link below. (The image merely shows the first page of the document; click on the link to download the complete PDF.)
INITIAL OBSERVATIONS
Among the noteworthy aspects I see in the May 2023 Joint Staff communication:
-- An introductory paragraph states: "The U.S. government has observed UAP in or near the territory and/or operating areas of the United States, of its allies, and of its adversaries, and observing, identifying, and potentially mitigating UAP has become a growing priority for US policymakers, lawmakers, and warfighters. The potentially ubiquitous presence of UAP defines the national security implications of those anomalies, which range from operational hazards and threats to technological and intelligence surprise to adversaries' strategic miscalculations. It is imperative that DoD provide UAP incident, incursion, and engagement...reporting, data, and material for the Department's detection and mitigation of potential threats; exploitation of advanced technologies; and informing policymaker and warfighter decisions."
--Reports on UAP incidents are to be transmitted upwards with 96 hours, but any "UAP engagement reports" within 12 hours. A "UAP engagement is a kinetic or non-kinetic response to a UAP, intended to deny, disrupt, or destroy the phenomenon and/or its object(s)."
-- The ultimate nexus of collection and analysis of these reports is the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO).
-- The reporting procedures in the Joint Staff message apply only to detections or encounters "that demonstrate behaviors not readily understood by sensors or observers...[that] include but are not limited to phenomena that demonstrate apparent capabilities or material that exceed known performance envelopes." The UAP reporting procedures described in this directive do NOT apply to "incidents, incursions, and engagements by identifiable, non-anomalous phenomena (e.g., sUAS and other capabilities or materials that do not exceed known or predicted performance envelopes);" such incidents will instead "continue to be reported through established processes and mechanisms."
-- The reporting matrix seeks 11 categories of information-- among these, any UAP-displayed "anomalous characteristics/behaviors (e.g., no apparent control surfaces, extreme acceleration/direction change, detection by certain sensors but not others)," and any "UAP effects on equipment (e.g., mechanical, electrical controls and weapons systems and whether persistent or transitory").
-- AARO will coordinate the handling of any UAP "objects and material of incidents, intrusions, and engagements," but "recovery and transfer of identifiable, non-anomalous items of foreign origin...continue to be managed by the DoD FMP [Foreign Material Program]."
-- The military commands are to "enable deployment of special sensors within the AoR [area of responsibility] for the detection, observation, and identification in sensitive areas, and during testing or deployment of special capabilities."
ADDITIONAL CONTEXT
On its website, AARO calls the military reporting system defined in the May 2023 GENADMIN "Current Operational UAP Reporting." In a briefing for selected journalists on March 6, 2024, AARO Acting Director Tim Phillips said that AARO is receiving "approximately...anywhere between 90 and a 100-110 a month" through such channels.
Phillips also told the journalists, "We're trying to work out the command and control, the mechanisms on how other government entities can report UAP incidents to us. We've received a number of reports from Department of Homeland Security and their aircraft reporting to us that we follow up on."
As for civilian pilots, the AARO website states, "AARO receives UAP-related Pilot Reports (PIREPs) from the Federal Aviation Administration."
The UAP reporting system for contemporary military-associated UAP events, as set forth in the May 2023 Joint Staff message, is separate and distinct from the AARO "secure reporting" system for receiving reports "from current or former U.S. Government employees, service members, or contractor personnel with direct knowledge of U.S. Government programs or activities related to UAP dating back to 1945," which is accessible through a portal on the AARO website.
AARO does not yet employ any system for receiving UAP observation reports from the general public.
#UFOx #UFOtwitter #UAP #NHI @BeyndStrangness 🙏
— wow (@wow36932525) March 19, 2024
Col. Karl Nell on David Grusch.
source clip:
David Grush's Boss Admits UFO Reverse Engineering Programs DO Exist
https://t.co/s6E3Ggabbh pic.twitter.com/LnucPk7UK7
I've read bits and pieces of plasma physicist Dr. John Brandenburg's books where he lays out his theory that Mars went through a nuclear event in its past. In this short clip, he discusses the genesis of the main idea of why he believes this is the case - related to the… pic.twitter.com/pLPiWFkTAA
— TheJuan1️⃣ (@planethunter56) March 22, 2024
TCTTS said:
With the lull in news we might as well ad "Was Mars nuked?" to the conversation...I've read bits and pieces of plasma physicist Dr. John Brandenburg's books where he lays out his theory that Mars went through a nuclear event in its past. In this short clip, he discusses the genesis of the main idea of why he believes this is the case - related to the… pic.twitter.com/pLPiWFkTAA
— TheJuan1️⃣ (@planethunter56) March 22, 2024



Probably not going to happen. If it looks interesting watch it, if not...Teddy Perkins said:
It'd be so much more helpful if you provided a summary of these 2 hour + videos you post.
This is why the difference between extraterrestrial (ETH) and non-human intelligence (NHI) is material and not a matter of opinion or preference.
— Lester Nare (@lesternare) March 25, 2024
The range of possible theories for the origin of UAP (96+) exists across 3 main categories: Physical, Psychosocial, and Metaphysical.… pic.twitter.com/aOq2jtcaNi
Yes, that's an excellent demonstration of why the terminology used is so crucial to understanding what is being claimed or refuted. Words mean things.TCTTS said:
Pretty interesting/informative (way more info in the Tweet itself)...This is why the difference between extraterrestrial (ETH) and non-human intelligence (NHI) is material and not a matter of opinion or preference.
— Lester Nare (@lesternare) March 25, 2024
The range of possible theories for the origin of UAP (96+) exists across 3 main categories: Physical, Psychosocial, and Metaphysical.… pic.twitter.com/aOq2jtcaNi
A close to 3 million YT subscriber account (Peter Santenello) interviews retired US Army officer "Theo", who's grandfather was one of the original Operation Paperclip scientists.
— TheJuan1️⃣ (@planethunter56) March 25, 2024
Location of interview: Huntsville, Alabama (yes, the lore). Topic of this clip: Dr. Wernher von… pic.twitter.com/TSxwxTESTf