1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Teslag said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Tea Party said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

---

What are these "constant" lies?

---

right in his website. First issue is about corrupt politicians and their billionaire mega donors buying power - completely ignoring his own backing by the George Soros billionaire PAC. Maybe not a lie, but a clear misrepresentation of this specific issue.

---

This itself is a bit of a misrepresentation. PACs operate independently of candidates. He's pledged not to take any money from corporate PACs for his Senate run. And as of the latest, 98% of his campaign funds are from donations less than $100. Seems pretty in-line with his statements/stance to me.

---

How much is from "act blue" which is nothing but a democrat money laundering scheme?

---

I don't know. Your characterization of it as money laundering scheme is interesting, though. How do you feel about the GOP equivalent, WinRed?

---

Do you ever have anything but "look what your side does"?

---

In 2024, winred distributed $1.8 billion dollars to Republican candidates.

I'm genuinely curious why he considers actblue to be a "Democrat money laundering scheme" given there's an exact counterpart on the other side. If he were to denounce that as well, then he'd be consistent. Perhaps there's a reason why act blue is nefarious and winred isn't that he can share.

I don't think actblue is bad. I don't think winred is bad.

What do you think?

---

And this is why people's here ignore you and think you're a clueless dem sycophant.

Act blue is "taking donations" in the names of people who don't know they donated. They're just bundling large donations and spreading the across multiple fake donors to stay under campaign finance law limits. That's illegal and lmoney laundering.

---

*Citation needed

---

It was all over the news several months ago and all over F16. Again, you're clueless.

https://www.carolinajournal.com/exposed-investigation-indicates-actblue-potentially-laundered-fraudulent-political-donations/

Quote:

---

The results of these investigations suggest that the ActBlue fundraising platform is being used to launder fraudulent political donations using the names and addresses of ordinary citizens," Horn said

---

---

Thanks for posting something to back up your claim. The "journalist" behind this story is a convicted January 6th rioter.

https://www.carolinajournal.com/independent-north-carolina-journalist-sentenced-in-j6-case/

I suppose with such a smoking gun there have been criminal charges filed at some level by now, right?

---

Ah the classic, I don't agree with the message so I'm going to attack the messenger tactic.

---

But it's totally ok to assume over 400 federal judges have gone rogue in immigration cases because they disagree with the legality of the actions of an out of control federal agency.

---

Seeing how many of them Trump wins on appeal, yes it's okay to assume that.

---

I don't think most people realize that law schools vomit out a vastly disproporionate amount of die hard leftists and even social justice warrior types. Even the more 'normal' attorneys I know skew pretty solidly left.

Similar phenomenon with journalism obviously.

---

Gosh what is it about the highly educated that makes them so resistant to the obvious logic of maga.

Let's be honest here, a lot of "highly educated" liberals majored in the humanities and non-math liberal arts.

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Teslag said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Tea Party said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

---

What are these "constant" lies?

---

right in his website. First issue is about corrupt politicians and their billionaire mega donors buying power - completely ignoring his own backing by the George Soros billionaire PAC. Maybe not a lie, but a clear misrepresentation of this specific issue.

---

This itself is a bit of a misrepresentation. PACs operate independently of candidates. He's pledged not to take any money from corporate PACs for his Senate run. And as of the latest, 98% of his campaign funds are from donations less than $100. Seems pretty in-line with his statements/stance to me.

---

How much is from "act blue" which is nothing but a democrat money laundering scheme?

---

I don't know. Your characterization of it as money laundering scheme is interesting, though. How do you feel about the GOP equivalent, WinRed?

---

Do you ever have anything but "look what your side does"?

---

In 2024, winred distributed $1.8 billion dollars to Republican candidates.

I'm genuinely curious why he considers actblue to be a "Democrat money laundering scheme" given there's an exact counterpart on the other side. If he were to denounce that as well, then he'd be consistent. Perhaps there's a reason why act blue is nefarious and winred isn't that he can share.

I don't think actblue is bad. I don't think winred is bad.

What do you think?

---

And this is why people's here ignore you and think you're a clueless dem sycophant.

Act blue is "taking donations" in the names of people who don't know they donated. They're just bundling large donations and spreading the across multiple fake donors to stay under campaign finance law limits. That's illegal and lmoney laundering.

---

*Citation needed

---

It was all over the news several months ago and all over F16. Again, you're clueless.

https://www.carolinajournal.com/exposed-investigation-indicates-actblue-potentially-laundered-fraudulent-political-donations/

Quote:

---

The results of these investigations suggest that the ActBlue fundraising platform is being used to launder fraudulent political donations using the names and addresses of ordinary citizens," Horn said

---

---

Thanks for posting something to back up your claim. The "journalist" behind this story is a convicted January 6th rioter.

https://www.carolinajournal.com/independent-north-carolina-journalist-sentenced-in-j6-case/

I suppose with such a smoking gun there have been criminal charges filed at some level by now, right?

---

Ah the classic, I don't agree with the message so I'm going to attack the messenger tactic.

---

But it's totally ok to assume over 400 federal judges have gone rogue in immigration cases because they disagree with the legality of the actions of an out of control federal agency.

---

Seeing how many of them Trump wins on appeal, yes it's okay to assume that.

---

I don't think most people realize that law schools vomit out a vastly disproporionate amount of die hard leftists and even social justice warrior types. Even the more 'normal' attorneys I know skew pretty solidly left.

Similar phenomenon with journalism obviously.

---

Gosh what is it about the highly educated that makes them so resistant to the obvious logic of maga.

---

LOL yeah, that's probably it. You have to be 'highly educated' to believe blacks and browns are too hapless to get ID's like everyone else and that men can be legitimate women. In fact, super educated blue haired girls with septum piercings and multiple liberal arts degrees are the absolute wisest among us if we're being honest. They are virtually 100% in ideological lockstep with you and a few others on here, and therefore should completely determine where this country goes.

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Teslag said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Tea Party said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

agracer said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Ragoo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

---

What are these "constant" lies?

---

right in his website. First issue is about corrupt politicians and their billionaire mega donors buying power - completely ignoring his own backing by the George Soros billionaire PAC. Maybe not a lie, but a clear misrepresentation of this specific issue.

---

This itself is a bit of a misrepresentation. PACs operate independently of candidates. He's pledged not to take any money from corporate PACs for his Senate run. And as of the latest, 98% of his campaign funds are from donations less than $100. Seems pretty in-line with his statements/stance to me.

---

How much is from "act blue" which is nothing but a democrat money laundering scheme?

---

I don't know. Your characterization of it as money laundering scheme is interesting, though. How do you feel about the GOP equivalent, WinRed?

---

Do you ever have anything but "look what your side does"?

---

In 2024, winred distributed $1.8 billion dollars to Republican candidates.

I'm genuinely curious why he considers actblue to be a "Democrat money laundering scheme" given there's an exact counterpart on the other side. If he were to denounce that as well, then he'd be consistent. Perhaps there's a reason why act blue is nefarious and winred isn't that he can share.

I don't think actblue is bad. I don't think winred is bad.

What do you think?

---

And this is why people's here ignore you and think you're a clueless dem sycophant.

Act blue is "taking donations" in the names of people who don't know they donated. They're just bundling large donations and spreading the across multiple fake donors to stay under campaign finance law limits. That's illegal and lmoney laundering.

---

*Citation needed

---

It was all over the news several months ago and all over F16. Again, you're clueless.

https://www.carolinajournal.com/exposed-investigation-indicates-actblue-potentially-laundered-fraudulent-political-donations/

Quote:

---

The results of these investigations suggest that the ActBlue fundraising platform is being used to launder fraudulent political donations using the names and addresses of ordinary citizens," Horn said

---

---

Thanks for posting something to back up your claim. The "journalist" behind this story is a convicted January 6th rioter.

https://www.carolinajournal.com/independent-north-carolina-journalist-sentenced-in-j6-case/

I suppose with such a smoking gun there have been criminal charges filed at some level by now, right?

---

Ah the classic, I don't agree with the message so I'm going to attack the messenger tactic.

---

But it's totally ok to assume over 400 federal judges have gone rogue in immigration cases because they disagree with the legality of the actions of an out of control federal agency.

---

Seeing how many of them Trump wins on appeal, yes it's okay to assume that.

---

I don't think most people realize that law schools vomit out a vastly disproporionate amount of die hard leftists and even social justice warrior types. Even the more 'normal' attorneys I know skew pretty solidly left.

Similar phenomenon with journalism obviously.

---

Gosh what is it about the highly educated that makes them so resistant to the obvious logic of maga.

---

LOL yeah, that's probably it. You have to be 'highly educated' to believe blacks and browns are too hapless to get ID's like everyone else and that men can be legitimate women. In fact, super educated blue haired girls with septum piercings and multiple liberal arts degrees are the absolute wisest among us if we're being honest. They are virtually 100% in ideological lockstep with you and a few others on here, and therefore should completely determine where this country goes.

---

You don't have to be very smart to regurgitate the same straw man arguments, that's for sure

Teslag said:

---

Let's be honest here, a lot of "highly educated" liberals majored in the humanities and non-math liberal arts.

---

I guess western culture isn't that valuable after all?

Not according to those majors.

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

Nailed it

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

---

What are these "constant" lies?

---

You'd have to listen to him in long form discussion. I listened to him on Rogan a few months ago...I can't just rattle off all of the specific lies, but it's less about technical fouls, and more about dishonestly framing things, and operating off of false narratives to begin with. Like I said, he is very brilliant and cunning and will absolutely appeal to the low info soccer moms, and many others who don't know about the evils and ill effects of socialism (which he pretends not to be). He is great at painting the other side (people like me and my brown wife) as inherently racist/bigoted/ignorant/heartless/fascist in a very civil manner - as opposed to the Rashida Talib and AOC types, while projecting that he loves them and is not giving up on them lol.

I have to give him props, it is a highly effective strategy and he is super intelligent, calculated, and devoted. WIll pay off for him.

Obviously you are naturally going to think everything he does and says is great. You're little "gotcha" attempts like "Jesus was obviously against helping strangers" tells me all I need to know. He would make the same response to me, but in a much more polished and intelligent manner.

---

I WANT HIM TO BE A LIAR I JUST CAN'T FIND ANYTHING HE'S LYING ABOUT

schmendeler said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Let's be honest here, a lot of "highly educated" liberals majored in the humanities and non-math liberal arts.

---

I guess western culture isn't that valuable after all?

---

I wasn't aware western culture was defined by bull **** college courses

Is Talarico the new Temu Beto O'Rourke?

Nah Beto was straight and a fake Mexican. Talarico is gay and a fake Christian.

gunan01 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

M.C. Swag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Talarico is awful. A complete snake. People are too easily fooled by his "aw shucks-y" howdy doody face and demeanor. He has a bright future, unfortunately.

---

lol based on what? Was he caught on a hot mic bragging about assaulting a woman? Was he found civilly liable for misappropriating charity funds? Or you just don't like his opinions so you think that makes him a snake?

---

He is constantly lying and using twisted Christian doctrine to support things like erasing our borders...and paint anyone who believes in borders and an actual legal immigration process as bigoted and "unchristian". If you start to pick up on his lies, you can see that his pious act is just an act. He's brilliant and cunning though, and has a very bright future...I genuinely think he may be the face of the democrat party within the next 10 years.

---

What are these "constant" lies?

---

You'd have to listen to him in long form discussion. I listened to him on Rogan a few months ago...I can't just rattle off all of the specific lies, but it's less about technical fouls, and more about dishonestly framing things, and operating off of false narratives to begin with. Like I said, he is very brilliant and cunning and will absolutely appeal to the low info soccer moms, and many others who don't know about the evils and ill effects of socialism (which he pretends not to be). He is great at painting the other side (people like me and my brown wife) as inherently racist/bigoted/ignorant/heartless/fascist in a very civil manner - as opposed to the Rashida Talib and AOC types, while projecting that he loves them and is not giving up on them lol.

I have to give him props, it is a highly effective strategy and he is super intelligent, calculated, and devoted. WIll pay off for him.

Obviously you are naturally going to think everything he does and says is great. You're little "gotcha" attempts like "Jesus was obviously against helping strangers" tells me all I need to know. He would make the same response to me, but in a much more polished and intelligent manner.

---

I WANT HIM TO BE A LIAR I JUST CAN'T FIND ANYTHING HE'S LYING ABOUT

---

Like every democrat in power or seeking power, by necessity, they must operate off of false premises and narratives to begin with. They have nothing, so they have top frame the other side as heartless or just ignorant...he does this in about as nice a way as one can...like he feels sorry for us, we just don't know any better. He genuinely espouses that Jesus and the apostles would find it immoral to reference anything from the bible in schools or public spaces. That it's basically inhumane to have the ten commandments in school. It's the most absurd notion. You can make that argument, even though there is no such thing as "separation of church and state", but to act like there is biblical basis for it? INSANE. Completely deceptive...no way he is that stupid, but he knows his followers are.

Fake Christians, or those who warp or pervert Christianity for political purposes should scare the begeezus out of people. But he looks like a frail little "aw shucks" Opie, so people gobble up everything he says.

Even though he's a snake, I've got to give him props. His shtick is highly effective. He will kill it with the low info soccer moms and politically gullible Christians (he already is), and just crazy liberals in general who will proclaim "at last! a good Christian I can stomach!".

if Soros is funding a supposed Christian, beware.

Teslag said:

---

Nah Beto was straight and a fake Mexican. Talarico is gay and a fake Christian.

---

Your fixation with the man's sexuality is odd.

double aught said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Nah Beto was straight and a fake Mexican. Talarico is gay and a fake Christian.

---

Your fixation with the man's sexuality is odd.

---

Thou doth protest too much.

On that note, what's the deal with Trump's penchant for telling stories where large men come up to him crying and thanking him and even trying to kiss him?

double aught said:

---

Teslag said:

---

Nah Beto was straight and a fake Mexican. Talarico is gay and a fake Christian.

---

Your fixation with the man's sexuality is odd.

---

I'm not fixated. I'm ridiculing him for being more beta than Beto. And I didn't think that was possible.

cajunaggie08 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

cajunaggie08 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Sapper Redux said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Teslag said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Teslag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Teslag said:

---

And I don't care what we do with these illegals. Round them up, beat the **** out of them, and toss them back across either border. Shoot anyone that gets in ICE's way. Don't care. GTFO.

---

You should really watch the throwback CNN piece from the Obama era where they did a ride-along with ICE to pimp how togh Obama was on Illegal Immigration. On camera, ICE literally apprehends and temporarily detains a legal citizen who they has confused with another man they were after. CNN goaltends for them like their life depends on it.

Absolutely no one could ever convince me that they would not paint the exact same situation under a massively different light if it happened under Trump. I mean, they obviously wouldn't do the "pro ICE" piece to begin with.

---

I saw it. These people don't care about illegals any further than they throw one. It's purely about orange man bad. I'll say it right now, Obama kicked ass on illegals. Major props to him for it. I'm objective. I'm consistent. Illegals are trash. Treat them like the garbage they are. Obama did it. Trump is doing it. Props to both.

---

That is true, have to remind ourselves that with the left, it is ALL about THEIR FEELS. And what they can project outwardly, to fellow members of the tribe. It's like they are trying to fill some type of hollow void by signaling how "noble" and "caring" they are.

That is why they are so much less charitable with their own money or time than conservatives. It's all fake and for show...and maybe to give them temprary warmn fuzzies. Also why they are statistically much less happy and satisfied with their lives and more likely to be afflicted with at least one mental illness.

---

This is hilarious. Everything about the Trump movement is about emotion.

A lot of anger, directed at political opponents.

Even more fear, directed at immigrants, trans people, minorites

Nostalgia, for a time that never really existed

Also weirdly, lust. All the women in the Trump sphere have big fake tits, ****ed up faces, dyed hair

Jealousy, mostly at the highly educated, who don't fall for the Trump BS

Adoration, for billionaires, whom they all want to be

---

The more yall paint him to be some hyper-villain hybrid of Satan and Adolf Hitler, the more fervently people back him. How do some of you not understand this? I hated Trump in 2016, I wrote in an Aggie-vetern buddy of mine. I thought Trump would be too liberal, but mostly that he didn;t really care about this country, or improving it. Then I saw how the left completely lost their sh** the moment their girl lost. Like the next freakin day. And I knew we must have done something right if they were crying and holding "scream at the sky" rallies.

And it got me thinking, how could he be THAT bad. I just didn;t like his personality, but he's no monster. Then I quickly realized that he was just simply who he always was, and that the left was out of their mind, drunk with hatred and fear. He wan't very conservative imo, but Iliked some of the things he did, especially his SCOTUS nominees.

I don't have to like someone personally to back them. I want what's best for my country and my family. There is almost zero % chance Trump and I would get along if you forced us to hang out. I honestly can't stand most billionaires, unless, like Elon Musk, they actually use their position for good and help the needy (just his deployment of Starlink in suffering or war torn countries is amazing alone). But Trump has actually sacrificed. His net worth has taken a ding...his entire empire was his brand, and that will never be the same. He has had multiple coup attempts, was spied on, took a shot to the ear that should have blown his head off had he not turned his head...and half of the world thinks hes demon spawn and wants him dead.

THAT is why I back him. Because the alternative is a psychotic freak show...the world's largets hate group.

I still can't wait for president JD Vance though. Getting sick of some of Trump's antics. He is so self-sabotaging. Such a New York meathead at times.

Stop trying to paint us as racists. It's laughable. It's like you don't know a single republican.

---

I know republicans. It's that they don't know themselves. I knew he was going to be a disaster as soon as he claimed that judge was biased against him because he was Mexican in ancestry. I knew he was going to tear us apart. He's proven it out over and over again.

"But Trump has actually sacrificed. His net worth has taken a ding...his entire empire was his brand, and that will never be the same."

Another example of how i know you're in an information silo.

Trump's net worth has jumped significantly since he became president. He's worth approximately $3 billion more than he was before he became president. He's made $1.4 billion just since taking office last year.

---

How are you completely unable to do any self reflection? At what point do you think you realize it's liberals and their policies we loathe? And also not realize you and your side as equally divisive?

---

I understand. You're wrong. Either willfully or just out of ignorance. I've been on this site for a long time. I was once conservative. I learned, and grew. The left isn't perfect, but their ideas are better for more people.

---

Hahaha I'm calling BS...you've been lefty for decades on here. You did not support Bush and would always go to bat for Obama during his first and second term. Only now you do seem more staunchly left, that is for sure. Almost every leftist, aside from the Tulsi's/Fetterman's/Maher's of the world, do. Yall don't even realize how far you've drifted because you're all drunk with hatred and fear.

One of the most accurate memes in existence:


Another fav:

---

Lol. What moral standards have Republicans abided by, particularly since Trump?

---

Protecting woman from crazy mentally ill men. Protecting minors from irreversible endocrine damage and castration/breast removal. We are generally much less deviant, more peaceful and law abiding. Higher moral standards. Definitely far less likely to loop kids into all of the crazy degenerate stuff like lewd drag queen shows or sexxed up parades. Not super gungho about killing babies en masse, which is good imo. I could go on and on and on.

We are also MUCH more charitable with our own time and money.

Our leaders also don't sit and pout when the surviving mother of a 12 yr old girl who was raped and murdered by illegal gangbangers is recognized...or when a kid with terminal brain cancer who wants to be a cop is recognized.

We are much less likely to block streets or ransack cities or fight or shoot law enforcement officers when we don't get our way. Just much more peaceful and kind and law abiding in general...MUCH more...even though we own a vastly disproportionate amount of firearms.

I know it's a lot, but it really isn't...I kept it short. Any questions?

---

So charitable that Trump just pledged that the US government would give $10 Billion to the Board of Peace that he is also chair of. That was so kind of him.

---

There's good Trump and bad Trump. I am talking about conservatives vs liberals. The people. We are morally superior in general. So much so that the left has to falsely frame everything as "racism" or "fascism"...basic things like wanting a border and not wanting dems to flood the country with 10 million third world immigrants from all over the globe. You know, stuff the hispanics in the RGV voted in favor of...after generations of voting blue loyally.

Me and my brown first generation wife are considered "racist" or "fascist" by a large % of the left. It's dumb. Joe Biden said if you had trouble picking between him and Trump "then you ain't black". Extremely racist notion....from the same man who "didn't want his kids to grow up in a racial jungle" and was always an absolute hawk on illegal immigration. You all were fine with him. lol

---

So $10 Billion in money laundering and robbing the national coffers in plain sight is tolerable because "liberals bad." Enjoy the blood bath in November.

---

Why wait until November when we already have trans freaks that have been emboldened for years now shooting up schools and other facilities regularly? Not to mention the furries.

This has all been encouraged. I'm still searching for one person that fancies themselves on the left to admit they really ****ed up our culture from covid to trannies to Hitler language and multiple assasinations on Donald Trump's life but I'm like Vincent Vega still doing circles staring around a room.

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

cajunaggie08 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

cajunaggie08 said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Sapper Redux said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

Teslag said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Teslag said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Teslag said:

---

And I don't care what we do with these illegals. Round them up, beat the **** out of them, and toss them back across either border. Shoot anyone that gets in ICE's way. Don't care. GTFO.

---

You should really watch the throwback CNN piece from the Obama era where they did a ride-along with ICE to pimp how togh Obama was on Illegal Immigration. On camera, ICE literally apprehends and temporarily detains a legal citizen who they has confused with another man they were after. CNN goaltends for them like their life depends on it.

Absolutely no one could ever convince me that they would not paint the exact same situation under a massively different light if it happened under Trump. I mean, they obviously wouldn't do the "pro ICE" piece to begin with.

---

I saw it. These people don't care about illegals any further than they throw one. It's purely about orange man bad. I'll say it right now, Obama kicked ass on illegals. Major props to him for it. I'm objective. I'm consistent. Illegals are trash. Treat them like the garbage they are. Obama did it. Trump is doing it. Props to both.

---

That is true, have to remind ourselves that with the left, it is ALL about THEIR FEELS. And what they can project outwardly, to fellow members of the tribe. It's like they are trying to fill some type of hollow void by signaling how "noble" and "caring" they are.

That is why they are so much less charitable with their own money or time than conservatives. It's all fake and for show...and maybe to give them temprary warmn fuzzies. Also why they are statistically much less happy and satisfied with their lives and more likely to be afflicted with at least one mental illness.

---

This is hilarious. Everything about the Trump movement is about emotion.

A lot of anger, directed at political opponents.

Even more fear, directed at immigrants, trans people, minorites

Nostalgia, for a time that never really existed

Also weirdly, lust. All the women in the Trump sphere have big fake tits, ****ed up faces, dyed hair

Jealousy, mostly at the highly educated, who don't fall for the Trump BS

Adoration, for billionaires, whom they all want to be

---

The more yall paint him to be some hyper-villain hybrid of Satan and Adolf Hitler, the more fervently people back him. How do some of you not understand this? I hated Trump in 2016, I wrote in an Aggie-vetern buddy of mine. I thought Trump would be too liberal, but mostly that he didn;t really care about this country, or improving it. Then I saw how the left completely lost their sh** the moment their girl lost. Like the next freakin day. And I knew we must have done something right if they were crying and holding "scream at the sky" rallies.

And it got me thinking, how could he be THAT bad. I just didn;t like his personality, but he's no monster. Then I quickly realized that he was just simply who he always was, and that the left was out of their mind, drunk with hatred and fear. He wan't very conservative imo, but Iliked some of the things he did, especially his SCOTUS nominees.

I don't have to like someone personally to back them. I want what's best for my country and my family. There is almost zero % chance Trump and I would get along if you forced us to hang out. I honestly can't stand most billionaires, unless, like Elon Musk, they actually use their position for good and help the needy (just his deployment of Starlink in suffering or war torn countries is amazing alone). But Trump has actually sacrificed. His net worth has taken a ding...his entire empire was his brand, and that will never be the same. He has had multiple coup attempts, was spied on, took a shot to the ear that should have blown his head off had he not turned his head...and half of the world thinks hes demon spawn and wants him dead.

THAT is why I back him. Because the alternative is a psychotic freak show...the world's largets hate group.

I still can't wait for president JD Vance though. Getting sick of some of Trump's antics. He is so self-sabotaging. Such a New York meathead at times.

Stop trying to paint us as racists. It's laughable. It's like you don't know a single republican.

---

I know republicans. It's that they don't know themselves. I knew he was going to be a disaster as soon as he claimed that judge was biased against him because he was Mexican in ancestry. I knew he was going to tear us apart. He's proven it out over and over again.

"But Trump has actually sacrificed. His net worth has taken a ding...his entire empire was his brand, and that will never be the same."

Another example of how i know you're in an information silo.

Trump's net worth has jumped significantly since he became president. He's worth approximately $3 billion more than he was before he became president. He's made $1.4 billion just since taking office last year.

---

How are you completely unable to do any self reflection? At what point do you think you realize it's liberals and their policies we loathe? And also not realize you and your side as equally divisive?

---

I understand. You're wrong. Either willfully or just out of ignorance. I've been on this site for a long time. I was once conservative. I learned, and grew. The left isn't perfect, but their ideas are better for more people.

---

Hahaha I'm calling BS...you've been lefty for decades on here. You did not support Bush and would always go to bat for Obama during his first and second term. Only now you do seem more staunchly left, that is for sure. Almost every leftist, aside from the Tulsi's/Fetterman's/Maher's of the world, do. Yall don't even realize how far you've drifted because you're all drunk with hatred and fear.

One of the most accurate memes in existence:


Another fav:

---

Lol. What moral standards have Republicans abided by, particularly since Trump?

---

Protecting woman from crazy mentally ill men. Protecting minors from irreversible endocrine damage and castration/breast removal. We are generally much less deviant, more peaceful and law abiding. Higher moral standards. Definitely far less likely to loop kids into all of the crazy degenerate stuff like lewd drag queen shows or sexxed up parades. Not super gungho about killing babies en masse, which is good imo. I could go on and on and on.

We are also MUCH more charitable with our own time and money.

Our leaders also don't sit and pout when the surviving mother of a 12 yr old girl who was raped and murdered by illegal gangbangers is recognized...or when a kid with terminal brain cancer who wants to be a cop is recognized.

We are much less likely to block streets or ransack cities or fight or shoot law enforcement officers when we don't get our way. Just much more peaceful and kind and law abiding in general...MUCH more...even though we own a vastly disproportionate amount of firearms.

I know it's a lot, but it really isn't...I kept it short. Any questions?

---

So charitable that Trump just pledged that the US government would give $10 Billion to the Board of Peace that he is also chair of. That was so kind of him.

---

There's good Trump and bad Trump. I am talking about conservatives vs liberals. The people. We are morally superior in general. So much so that the left has to falsely frame everything as "racism" or "fascism"...basic things like wanting a border and not wanting dems to flood the country with 10 million third world immigrants from all over the globe. You know, stuff the hispanics in the RGV voted in favor of...after generations of voting blue loyally.

Me and my brown first generation wife are considered "racist" or "fascist" by a large % of the left. It's dumb. Joe Biden said if you had trouble picking between him and Trump "then you ain't black". Extremely racist notion....from the same man who "didn't want his kids to grow up in a racial jungle" and was always an absolute hawk on illegal immigration. You all were fine with him. lol

---

So $10 Billion in money laundering and robbing the national coffers in plain sight is tolerable because "liberals bad." Enjoy the blood bath in November.

---

Why wait until November when we already have trans freaks that have been emboldened for years now shooting up schools and other facilities regularly? Not to mention the furries.

This has all been encouraged. I'm still searching for one person that fancies themselves on the left to admit they really ****ed up our culture from covid to trannies to Hitler language and multiple assasinations on Donald Trump's life but I'm like Vincent Vega still doing circles staring around a room.

---

But the Orange Man from NYC sometimes says mean things about his critics, so we need to chop breasts off 13-14 y/o girls, do away with the border and let the world invade us, let young mentally ill men invade womens' locker rooms and showers, implement socialism/communism, and be super soft on crime and criminals and let them hurt/rape/kill more innocent citizens! Voter ID is suppression because black and brown people are too poor and incompetent to get one! You are a super duper hitler fascist if you disagree with any of that!

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

CharleyKerfeld said:

---

55

---

You know I'm right, so all you've got is mockery and micro aggressive attacks. Tens of millions of people's brains are basically broken by Trump at this point. Completely cracked. Well the portrayal of Trump at least. Trump is who he's always been.

---

I've voted Republican since 1992. Not sure why you think I'm your enemy. That doesn't mean I can't also think Trump is a ****ing idiot.

DOJ removed, withheld Epstein files related to accusations about Trump https://t.co/u6nIqkO4k7

— Jonathan Lemire (@JonLemire) February 24, 2026

Nothing to hide

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

DOJ removed, withheld Epstein files related to accusations about Trump https://t.co/u6nIqkO4k7

— Jonathan Lemire (@JonLemire) February 24, 2026

Nothing to hide

---

npr DEFINITELY got him this time. FINALLY.

---

What a weird response

I'm sure it was just an oversight. After all, the department of justice wouldn't be operating in a way that would intentionally shield the president from accountability for crimes. They work for the American people, not one man. (Picture unrelated)

schmendeler said:

---

I'm sure it was just an oversight. After all, the department of justice wouldn't be operating in a way that would intentionally shield the president from accountability for crimes. They work for the American people, not one man. (Picture unrelated)

---

Could you imagine MAGA's response if Obama or Biden put a 30 foot poster of their face on the DOJ building? Totally not dystopian at all. This is different though...because it triggers the libs, or something like that.

schmendeler said:

---

I'm sure it was just an oversight. After all, the department of justice wouldn't be operating in a way that would intentionally shield the president from accountability for crimes. They work for the American people, not one man. (Picture unrelated)

---

DOJ is acting like his right hand man. Probably going to say Trump's not fit to stand trial next. Unbelievable.

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

Ervin Burrell said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

I'm sure it was just an oversight. After all, the department of justice wouldn't be operating in a way that would intentionally shield the president from accountability for crimes. They work for the American people, not one man. (Picture unrelated)

---

Could you imagine MAGA's response if Obama or Biden put a 30 foot poster of their face on the DOJ building? Totally not dystopian at all. This is different though...because it triggers the libs, or something like that.

---

Can you imagine limp wristed liberals' response if Trump labeled half of the country (his opposition) as "domestic terrorists" and acted like a king and ordered a decree that all of those who refuse an experimental vaccine for the sniffles be fired and that their families suffer greatly? Just a tad worse than "banners". You'll accuse me of whataboutism and completely dodge, because "whataboutism" is the most effective way to expose someones flagrant hypocrisy and dishonesty.

---

He did...

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

1981 Monte Carlo said:

---

schmendeler said:

---

DOJ removed, withheld Epstein files related to accusations about Trump https://t.co/u6nIqkO4k7

— Jonathan Lemire (@JonLemire) February 24, 2026

Nothing to hide

---

npr DEFINITELY got him this time. FINALLY.

---

What a weird response

---

Quote:

---

claimed that around 1983, when she was around 13 years old, Epstein introduced her to Trump "who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed ***** which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out."

---

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Just like reports that he fought off secret service agents and took over "The Beast" on Jan 6. Almost as believable as "this is MAGA country!"

---

I don't think that's funny at all. Another weird response.